Tangled is a new Git collaboration platform built on the decentralized atproto protocol. It aims to offer a more streamlined and user-friendly experience than traditional forge platforms like GitHub or GitLab, while also embracing the benefits of decentralization like data ownership, community control, and resistance to censorship. Tangled integrates directly with existing Git tooling, allowing users to clone, push, and pull as usual, but replaces the centralized web interface with a federated approach. This means various instances of Tangled can interoperate, allowing users to collaborate across servers while still retaining control over their data and code. The project is currently in early access, focusing on core features like repositories, issues, and pull requests.
The blog post details how to set up Kleene, a lightweight container management system, on FreeBSD. It emphasizes Kleene's simplicity and ease of use compared to larger, more complex alternatives like Kubernetes. The guide walks through installing Kleene, configuring a network bridge for container communication, and deploying a sample Nginx container. It also covers building custom container images with img and highlights Kleene's ability to manage persistent storage volumes, showcasing its suitability for self-hosting applications on FreeBSD servers. The post concludes by pointing to Kleene's potential as a practical container solution for users seeking a less resource-intensive option than Docker or Kubernetes.
HN commenters generally express interest in Kleene and its potential, particularly for FreeBSD users seeking lighter-weight alternatives to Docker. Some highlight its jail-based approach as a security advantage. Several commenters discuss the complexities of container management and the trade-offs between different tools, with some suggesting that a simpler approach might be preferable for certain use cases. One commenter notes the difficulty in finding clear, up-to-date documentation for FreeBSD containerization, praising the linked article for addressing this gap. There's also a brief thread discussing the benefits of ZFS for container storage. Overall, the comments paint Kleene as a promising tool worth investigating, especially for those already working within the FreeBSD ecosystem.
Distr is an open-source platform designed to simplify the distribution and management of containerized applications within on-premises environments. It provides a streamlined way to package, deploy, and update applications across a cluster of machines, abstracting away the complexities of Kubernetes. Distr aims to offer a user-friendly experience, allowing developers to focus on building and shipping their applications without needing deep Kubernetes expertise. It achieves this through a declarative configuration approach and built-in features for rolling updates, versioning, and rollback capabilities.
Hacker News users generally expressed interest in Distr, praising its focus on simplicity and GitOps approach for on-premise deployments. Several commenters compared it favorably to more complex tools like ArgoCD, highlighting its potential for smaller-scale deployments where a lighter-weight solution is desired. Some raised questions about specific features like secrets management and rollback capabilities, along with its ability to handle more complex deployment scenarios. Others expressed skepticism about the need for a new tool in this space, questioning its differentiation from existing solutions and expressing concerns about potential vendor lock-in, despite it being open-source. There was also discussion around the limited documentation and the project's early stage of development.
Summary of Comments ( 9 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234544
Hacker News users discussed Tangled's potential, particularly its use of the atproto protocol. Some expressed interest in self-hosting options and the possibility of integrating with existing git providers. Concerns were raised about the reliance on Bluesky's infrastructure and the potential vendor lock-in. There was also discussion about the decentralized nature of atproto and how Tangled fits into that ecosystem. A few commenters questioned the need for another git collaboration platform, citing existing solutions like GitHub and GitLab. Overall, the comments showed a cautious optimism about Tangled, with users curious to see how the platform develops and addresses these concerns.
The Hacker News post titled "Show HN: Tangled – Git collaboration platform built on atproto" has generated a moderate amount of discussion. Many commenters express interest in the platform's potential and its use of the atproto federation protocol. There's a recurring theme of curiosity about how Tangled differentiates itself from existing Git collaboration platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
Several commenters focus on the decentralized nature of atproto and its implications for Tangled. Some see this as a significant advantage, envisioning a future where developers have more control over their code and are less reliant on centralized platforms. They also discuss the potential for greater resistance to censorship and vendor lock-in. Others express skepticism about the feasibility of a decentralized Git platform, raising concerns about discoverability, moderation, and the potential for fragmentation.
A compelling thread discusses the challenges of building a successful decentralized platform, highlighting the network effects that benefit centralized platforms. Commenters debate whether the benefits of decentralization are enough to overcome the convenience and established user base of existing solutions.
Another point of discussion revolves around the specific features of Tangled and how they compare to existing platforms. Commenters inquire about features like code review, issue tracking, and CI/CD integration. Some express a desire for more detailed information on Tangled's functionality.
Several users also raise questions about the atproto protocol itself, its maturity, and its security implications. There is a general sense of cautious optimism about the project, with many acknowledging the potential benefits of a decentralized Git platform while also recognizing the challenges involved.
Finally, some comments express concern about the potential for abuse and the difficulty of moderating a decentralized platform. This leads to a discussion about the trade-offs between decentralization and content moderation. Overall, the comments reflect a mixture of excitement, curiosity, and healthy skepticism about the potential of Tangled and the atproto protocol.