hackslash dot org

Build a Container Image from Scratch

Posted: 2025-03-18 05:57:56

This blog post details how to build a container image from scratch without using Docker or other containerization tools. It explains the core components of a container image: a root filesystem with necessary binaries and libraries, metadata in a configuration file (config.json), and a manifest file linking the configuration to the layers comprising the root filesystem. The post walks through creating a minimal root filesystem using tar, creating the necessary configuration and manifest JSON files, and finally assembling them into a valid OCI image using the oci-image-tool utility. This process demonstrates the underlying structure and mechanics of container images, providing a deeper understanding of how they function.

This blog post, "Build a Container Image from Scratch," provides a comprehensive walkthrough of constructing a container image without relying on tools like Docker. The author meticulously details the process, emphasizing the underlying mechanisms and the core components involved. The tutorial begins with a foundational explanation of container images, highlighting their role as self-contained packages encompassing all necessary dependencies for running an application. This includes not only the application's code itself but also system libraries, tools, and configuration files. The core of the image construction revolves around creating a root filesystem. This is accomplished by employing a temporary directory where the essential directory structure mimicking a Linux filesystem is established. Crucial directories such as /bin, /lib, /dev, and others are populated with the requisite files.

The post then meticulously guides the reader through the process of copying a statically compiled "hello world" program, written in C, into the temporary root filesystem. The emphasis on static compilation stems from the desire for a self-contained image, eliminating dependencies on external shared libraries within the container environment. The specific commands used to copy the binary and required libraries, such as libc, are explicitly provided. The author underscores the importance of including only the strictly necessary files within the image to minimize its size and enhance efficiency.

After setting up the root filesystem, the post delves into the specifics of creating the container image itself. This involves employing the tar command to package the contents of the temporary directory into a tar archive. This archive, importantly, utilizes the -cf options to create an uncompressed archive, maintaining the original file structure and permissions. Subsequently, the generated tar archive is further processed using the gzip command to achieve compression, resulting in the final container image. The author stresses that this image is now ready to be run using low-level container runtimes like runc.

The post proceeds to explain how to execute this newly created container image. This involves utilizing runc and specifying configuration details in a config.json file. The configuration file defines essential parameters such as the container's process, memory limits, and root filesystem location. The structure and content of this configuration file are thoroughly described, emphasizing the importance of accurate configuration for successful container execution. The post concludes by demonstrating how to run the container using runc run, successfully executing the "hello world" program within the isolated container environment. The entire process highlights the intricate details of container image construction, providing a deeper understanding of the technology beyond the abstractions provided by higher-level tools like Docker. This hands-on approach clarifies the fundamental principles underlying containerization.

Summary of Comments ( 43 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43396172

HN users largely praised the article for its clear and concise explanation of container image internals. Several commenters appreciated the author's approach of building up the image layer by layer, providing a deeper understanding than simply using Dockerfiles. Some pointed out the educational value in understanding these lower-level mechanics, even for those who typically rely on higher-level tools. A few users suggested alternative or supplementary resources, like the book "Container Security," and discussed the nuances of using tar for creating layers. One commenter noted the importance of security considerations when dealing with untrusted images, emphasizing the need for careful inspection and validation.

The Hacker News post "Build a Container Image from Scratch" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43396172) has generated a moderate discussion with several insightful comments related to the process of building container images and some of the nuances involved.

One commenter points out the critical distinction between a container image and a running container, emphasizing that the article focuses on building the former. They highlight that a container image is essentially a template, while a running container is an instance of that template. This comment helps clarify a fundamental concept for those new to containerization.

Another commenter praises the article for its clear explanation of the image building process, specifically appreciating the step-by-step approach and the explanation of the importance of a statically linked binary for the entrypoint. They find it a valuable resource for understanding the underlying mechanisms involved.

Several commenters discuss the practicality and security implications of building container images from scratch. While acknowledging the educational value of understanding the fundamentals, they caution against using this approach for production environments. They argue that leveraging established base images and build tools offers better security, maintainability, and optimization. Building from scratch significantly increases the risk of inadvertently introducing vulnerabilities and requires considerable effort to replicate the functionality provided by standard base images.

The discussion also touches on the complexity of building images for different architectures, particularly when statically linking libraries. One comment emphasizes the challenges of cross-compiling and managing dependencies for multiple architectures, advocating for solutions like Docker's buildx for multi-arch builds to handle these complexities more efficiently.

Finally, some comments delve into more technical aspects of containerization, such as the role of the kernel and the use of tools like strace for debugging containerized applications. These comments provide deeper insights for those seeking a more advanced understanding of container internals.

Overall, the comments section provides valuable perspectives on building container images from scratch, ranging from clarifying fundamental concepts to discussing practical considerations and more advanced technical details. While acknowledging the educational benefits, the general consensus leans towards utilizing established base images and tools for production deployments due to security and maintainability advantages.

Show HN: XPipe, a shell connection hub for SSH, Docker, K8s, VMs, and more

permalink

Posted: 2025-03-12 03:16:28

XPipe is a command-line tool designed to simplify and streamline connections to various remote environments like SSH servers, Docker containers, Kubernetes clusters, and virtual machines. It acts as a central hub, allowing users to define and manage connections with descriptive names and easily switch between them using simple commands. XPipe aims to improve workflow efficiency by reducing the need for complex commands and remembering connection details, offering features like automatic port forwarding, SSH agent forwarding, and seamless integration with existing SSH configurations. This effectively provides a unified interface for interacting with diverse environments, boosting productivity for developers and system administrators.

XPipe, introduced in the Hacker News post "Show HN: XPipe, a shell connection hub for SSH, Docker, Kubernetes, VMs, and more," presents itself as a unified, streamlined solution for managing and accessing various remote environments commonly used by developers and system administrators. Instead of juggling multiple tools and configurations for different connection types, XPipe aims to provide a single, consistent interface and workflow.

The tool acts as a central connection hub, abstracting the underlying complexities of connecting to SSH servers, Docker containers, Kubernetes pods, virtual machines, and even database instances. It simplifies the process of establishing these connections by offering a simplified configuration process and eliminating the need to remember numerous commands and parameters. Users can define and save their connection details within XPipe, assigning them user-friendly names and organizing them logically.

Once connections are configured, XPipe allows users to quickly and easily switch between them, essentially providing a seamless portal to their various environments. Instead of manually entering SSH commands or navigating complex container orchestration systems, users can simply select their desired target from within XPipe and initiate a connection. This is particularly useful for individuals working across multiple projects or managing a diverse infrastructure.

XPipe's functionality extends beyond simply establishing connections. It also integrates features like port forwarding, allowing users to securely access services running within their remote environments. Furthermore, it supports interactive shell sessions within the connected environments, enabling users to execute commands and perform administrative tasks remotely. This provides a unified experience for managing a wide range of systems and services.

The tool is designed to be lightweight and easy to install, promoting rapid integration into existing workflows. The goal is to reduce the cognitive overhead associated with managing multiple connections, boosting developer productivity and simplifying system administration. By centralizing and streamlining the connection process, XPipe seeks to eliminate the friction often encountered when working with diverse development and deployment environments. It is presented as a more efficient and organized alternative to managing connections through disparate tools and configurations.

Summary of Comments ( 47 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43339629

Hacker News users generally expressed interest in XPipe, praising its potential for streamlining complex workflows involving various connection types. Several commenters appreciated the consolidated approach to managing different access methods, finding value in a single tool for SSH, Docker, Kubernetes, and VMs. Some questioned its advantages over existing solutions like sshuttle, while others raised concerns about security implications, particularly around storing credentials. The discussion also touched upon the project's open-source nature and potential integration with tools like Tailscale. A few users requested clarification on specific features, such as container access and the handling of jump hosts.

The Hacker News post for XPipe has several comments discussing its utility and comparing it to similar tools.

One commenter expresses skepticism about the value proposition of XPipe, questioning whether it simplifies anything or just adds another layer of abstraction. They argue that SSH already works well for most use cases and that tools like kubectl and docker are designed for their specific environments. They suggest that XPipe might be more useful if it focused on solving a particular problem rather than trying to be a general-purpose connection hub.

Another commenter raises concerns about security, particularly regarding the handling of credentials and potential attack vectors. They acknowledge the convenience of centralized connection management but emphasize the importance of robust security measures to mitigate risks.

Several commenters compare XPipe to other tools like ProxyJump in SSH, mosh, and Eternal Terminal. They discuss the relative merits of each tool, noting that ProxyJump offers similar functionality for SSH connections while mosh focuses on reliable connections over unreliable networks. Eternal Terminal is mentioned as a way to persist terminal sessions, a feature XPipe also seems to provide. These comparisons provide context for XPipe's features and help potential users understand its position in the existing ecosystem.

Some commenters appreciate XPipe's user-friendly interface and the ability to visualize connections. They suggest that the visual representation could be helpful for understanding complex network topologies and managing multiple connections. They see potential in the tool, especially for users who frequently work with different environments and need a centralized way to manage connections.

The developer of XPipe actively participates in the discussion, responding to questions and addressing concerns. They explain the rationale behind the tool, highlighting features like automatic reconnection and session persistence. They also clarify the security model, emphasizing that credentials are stored locally and encrypted. This engagement with the community provides valuable insight into the development process and helps address user concerns.

Finally, a few commenters express interest in using XPipe for specific use cases, such as managing connections to embedded devices or simplifying access to remote development environments. This demonstrates the potential for XPipe to address real-world challenges faced by developers and system administrators.

Warewulf is a stateless and diskless container OS provisioning system

permalink

Posted: 2025-03-06 18:45:47

Warewulf is a stateless and diskless operating system provisioning system designed specifically for high-performance computing (HPC) clusters. It utilizes containers and a central configuration to rapidly deploy and manage a uniform compute environment across a large number of nodes. By leveraging a shared network filesystem, Warewulf eliminates the need for local operating system installations on individual compute nodes, simplifying system administration, software updates, and ensuring consistency across the cluster. This approach enhances security and scalability while minimizing maintenance overhead for complex HPC deployments.

Warewulf, as described on its GitHub page, presents itself as a powerful and highly scalable system specifically designed for provisioning and managing clusters of compute nodes, particularly those employed in high-performance computing (HPC) environments. It distinguishes itself by adopting a stateless and diskless architecture. This means that individual compute nodes within the cluster do not retain persistent storage locally. Instead, they rely on a central server for their operating system, applications, and configuration, fetching these resources over the network during the boot process.

This central provisioning server acts as the single source of truth for the entire cluster's configuration, simplifying system administration and ensuring consistency across all nodes. Warewulf utilizes container technology to package and deliver the operating system environment to the compute nodes, further enhancing portability and isolation. This containerized approach allows for rapid deployment of updates and changes, as the server only needs to update the central container images which are then pulled by the nodes on their next boot.

Warewulf's architecture brings several key benefits. The stateless nature ensures that any node failure does not lead to data loss, as no data is stored persistently on the individual nodes. This also simplifies node replacement and scaling, as new nodes can be easily added to the cluster by simply configuring them to boot from the central server. Furthermore, the use of containers promotes greater security and isolation, reducing the risk of malware propagation and simplifying dependency management.

The system supports a variety of network booting protocols, including PXE, allowing for flexibility in deployment scenarios. Warewulf provides a comprehensive command-line interface (CLI) for managing all aspects of the cluster, from node configuration and image management to network setup and provisioning. This CLI offers granular control over the cluster's state, allowing administrators to tailor the environment to specific needs.

In essence, Warewulf offers a robust and scalable solution for managing complex compute clusters, particularly those requiring a high degree of flexibility and control. Its stateless and diskless nature, combined with container technology, allows for simplified administration, enhanced security, and rapid deployment in demanding HPC environments. This makes Warewulf a valuable tool for researchers, scientists, and engineers working with large-scale computations and simulations.

Summary of Comments ( 16 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43283669

Hacker News users discuss Warewulf's niche appeal for high-performance computing (HPC) environments. They acknowledge its power and flexibility for managing large clusters, particularly its ability to quickly provision and re-provision nodes without persistent storage. Some users share their positive experiences using Warewulf, highlighting its robustness and efficiency. Others question its complexity compared to alternatives like xCAT and Bright Cluster Manager, and discuss the learning curve involved. The conversation also touches on Warewulf's suitability for smaller deployments and the challenges of managing containerized workloads within an HPC context. Some commenters mention alternatives like k3s and how Warewulf compares.

The Hacker News post discussing Warewulf, a stateless and diskless container OS provisioning system, has generated several comments exploring its features, comparing it to other systems, and discussing its potential use cases.

One commenter highlights Warewulf's ability to build container images on the fly, emphasizing that this eliminates the need to pre-build images, potentially streamlining the provisioning process and allowing for more dynamic configurations. They also appreciate the inclusion of tools like wwctl container build, which simplifies image creation. This commenter further points out that Warewulf facilitates using different container images for different compute nodes, enabling more specialized setups.

Another commenter draws a comparison between Warewulf and kexec, noting that Warewulf offers a more comprehensive solution for provisioning and managing diskless nodes. While kexec focuses on booting a kernel directly over the network, Warewulf handles the entire provisioning process, including container image management and configuration. This broader approach makes Warewulf more suitable for complex environments with dynamic needs.

The discussion also touches on the security implications of Warewulf. A commenter raises the concern that if the network providing the container images is compromised, all nodes could be affected. This underscores the importance of securing the infrastructure surrounding Warewulf deployments, especially in sensitive environments.

The flexibility of Warewulf's approach is another point of discussion. A commenter mentions its usefulness in scenarios where the file system on the compute node might be unreliable or even non-existent. This resilience makes it a potentially attractive solution for environments where hardware reliability is a major concern.

Finally, some commenters delve into the architectural aspects of Warewulf. They discuss the system's use of technologies like iPXE and its approach to configuring network interfaces. These technical details provide a deeper understanding of how Warewulf operates and its implications for deployment and configuration.

Overall, the comments paint a picture of Warewulf as a powerful and flexible provisioning system with potential benefits for managing diskless and stateless nodes. However, the discussions also highlight the importance of considering security and infrastructure implications when deploying such a system.

Nvidia GPU on bare metal NixOS Kubernetes cluster explained

permalink

Posted: 2025-03-02 20:26:21

This blog post details setting up a bare-metal Kubernetes cluster on NixOS with Nvidia GPU support, focusing on simplicity and declarative configuration. It leverages NixOS's package management for consistent deployments across nodes and uses the toolkit's modularity to manage complex dependencies like CUDA drivers and container toolkits. The author emphasizes using separate NixOS modules for different cluster components—Kubernetes, GPU drivers, and container runtimes—allowing for easier maintenance and upgrades. The post guides readers through configuring the systemd unit for the Nvidia container toolkit, setting up the necessary kernel modules, and ensuring proper access for Kubernetes to the GPUs. Finally, it demonstrates deploying a GPU-enabled pod as a verification step.

This blog post by Fang Pen Lin details the process of setting up a Kubernetes cluster on bare metal NixOS machines, with a specific focus on enabling GPU support provided by Nvidia cards. The author emphasizes a declarative and reproducible approach using NixOS's configuration language and the nixpkgs package repository.

The core challenge lies in coordinating the necessary drivers, libraries, and daemons across both the host NixOS system and the containerized workloads within Kubernetes. The post meticulously outlines the steps involved, beginning with configuring the NixOS hosts. This includes installing the Nvidia driver, the CUDA toolkit, and related dependencies directly into the system's profile, ensuring they're available at boot. Critically, this avoids conflicts that might arise from installing these components within the Kubernetes cluster itself.

A key component of this setup is the use of the Nvidia Container Toolkit. This toolkit facilitates the sharing of the host's GPU resources with containers, enabling Kubernetes pods to leverage the GPU for accelerated computing tasks. The blog post explains the installation and configuration of this toolkit on the NixOS hosts, highlighting the importance of proper device access and permissions.

For orchestrating container deployments, the author opts for deploying a Kubernetes cluster using kubectl and a standard YAML manifest. This approach uses pre-built container images designed for CUDA development, ensuring compatibility and ease of deployment. To ensure the containers have access to the necessary GPU resources, the manifest includes specific configurations, including requesting GPU resources and mounting the necessary device paths. This setup allows users to define the required GPU resources directly in their pod specifications, ensuring proper allocation and usage.

The author then elaborates on using a privileged DaemonSet to deploy the Nvidia device plugin. This plugin is crucial for communicating available GPU resources to the Kubernetes scheduler, enabling intelligent scheduling of GPU-dependent workloads. The post details the configuration of this DaemonSet, including security considerations related to running a privileged pod. It explains that this approach allows the Kubernetes scheduler to be aware of the GPUs present on each node and schedule pods requesting GPU resources accordingly.

Finally, the blog post emphasizes the declarative and reproducible nature of the NixOS configuration. By defining the entire system configuration, including the Kubernetes cluster and GPU setup, in Nix code, the author ensures consistent deployments across different machines and facilitates easy reproducibility. This allows for easier maintenance, updates, and troubleshooting, as the entire system configuration can be easily replicated. The author highlights the benefits of this approach for managing complex infrastructure and minimizing configuration drift.

Summary of Comments ( 6 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234666

Hacker News users discussed various aspects of running Nvidia GPUs on a bare-metal NixOS Kubernetes cluster. Some questioned the necessity of NixOS for this setup, suggesting that its complexity might outweigh its benefits, especially for smaller clusters. Others countered that NixOS provides crucial advantages for reproducible deployments and managing driver dependencies, particularly valuable in research and multi-node GPU environments. Commenters also explored alternatives like using Ansible for provisioning and debated the performance impact of virtualization. A few users shared their personal experiences, highlighting both successes and challenges with similar setups, including issues with specific GPU models and kernel versions. Several commenters expressed interest in the author's approach to network configuration and storage management, but the author didn't elaborate on these aspects in the original post.

The Hacker News post titled "Nvidia GPU on bare metal NixOS Kubernetes cluster explained" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234666) has a moderate number of comments, generating a discussion around the complexities and nuances of using NixOS with Kubernetes and GPUs.

Several commenters focus on the challenges and trade-offs of this specific setup. One commenter highlights the complexity of managing drivers, particularly the Nvidia driver, within NixOS and Kubernetes, questioning the overall maintainability and whether the benefits outweigh the added complexity. This sentiment is echoed by another commenter who mentions the difficulty of keeping drivers updated and synchronized across the cluster, suggesting that the approach might be more trouble than it's worth for smaller setups.

Another discussion thread centers around the choice of NixOS itself. One user questions the wisdom of using NixOS for Kubernetes, arguing that its immutability can conflict with Kubernetes' dynamic nature and that other, more established solutions might be more suitable. This sparks a counter-argument where a proponent of NixOS explains that its declarative configuration and reproducibility can be valuable assets for managing complex infrastructure, especially when dealing with things like GPU drivers and kernel modules. They emphasize that while there's a learning curve, the long-term benefits in terms of reliability and maintainability can be substantial.

The topic of hardware support and specific GPU models also arises. One commenter inquires about compatibility with consumer-grade GPUs, expressing interest in utilizing gaming GPUs for tasks like machine learning. Another comment thread delves into the specifics of PCI passthrough and the complexities of ensuring proper resource allocation and isolation within a Kubernetes environment.

Finally, there are some comments appreciating the author's effort in documenting their process. They acknowledge the value of sharing such specialized knowledge and the insights it provides into managing complex infrastructure setups involving NixOS, Kubernetes, and GPUs. One commenter specifically expresses gratitude for the detailed explanation of the networking setup, which they found particularly helpful.

In summary, the comments section reflects a mixture of skepticism and appreciation. While some users question the practicality and complexity of the approach, others recognize the potential benefits and value the author's contribution to sharing their experience and knowledge in navigating this complex technological landscape. The discussion highlights the ongoing challenges and trade-offs involved in integrating technologies like NixOS, Kubernetes, and GPUs for high-performance computing and machine learning workloads.

3,200% CPU Utilization

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-28 17:01:43

The author experienced extraordinarily high CPU utilization (3200%) on their Linux system, far exceeding the expected maximum for their 8-core processor. After extensive troubleshooting, including analyzing process lists, checking for kernel issues, and verifying hardware performance, the culprit was identified as a bug in the docker stats command itself. The command was incorrectly multiplying the CPU utilization by the number of CPUs, leading to the inflated and misleading percentage. Once the issue was pinpointed, the author switched to a more reliable monitoring tool, htop, which accurately reported normal CPU usage. This highlighted the importance of verifying monitoring tool accuracy when encountering unusual system behavior.

This blog post details a fascinating journey of troubleshooting perplexing CPU utilization on a Linux server. The author, Joseph Mate, begins by describing the initial observation of an astonishing 3200% CPU usage, a figure far exceeding the expected capacity of the server's 8-core processor. This anomalous reading prompted an investigation into the underlying cause.

The initial suspicion fell upon a potential runaway process consuming excessive resources. However, standard tools like top and htop failed to identify any single culprit responsible for such a dramatic spike in CPU usage. Each process appeared to be consuming a reasonable amount of resources individually.

Further investigation using more granular performance monitoring tools like perf began to reveal a more nuanced picture. perf pointed towards a high volume of system calls related to timekeeping functions, specifically gettimeofday and clock_gettime. This suggested that an excessive number of these calls were being made, potentially contributing to the inflated CPU utilization figures.

The author then meticulously analyzed the codebase of the running application, a Rust-based program. Despite the absence of any obvious loops or excessive calls to time functions within the application's logic, the investigation persisted. Suspicion then shifted towards potential interactions with external libraries or dependencies.

Through rigorous profiling and tracing, the root cause was finally unearthed. It was discovered that the application's logging library, specifically the tracing crate, was inadvertently configured to capture timestamps with nanosecond precision for every single log event. This extremely high-resolution timekeeping, while seemingly innocuous, resulted in a substantial overhead due to the sheer volume of logging operations performed by the application. Each call to capture a timestamp with nanosecond precision involved multiple system calls to the underlying timekeeping functions, ultimately accounting for the observed surge in CPU utilization.

By modifying the logging configuration to use less granular timestamps (millisecond precision), the author observed a dramatic reduction in CPU load, bringing the utilization back down to expected levels. The post concludes by highlighting the importance of careful consideration of logging configurations, especially concerning the precision of timestamps, as seemingly minor details can have a profound impact on overall system performance, particularly in high-throughput applications. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the potential performance pitfalls associated with overly aggressive logging practices.

Summary of Comments ( 117 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43207831

Hacker News users discussed the plausibility and implications of 3200% CPU utilization, referencing the original author's use of Web Workers and the browser's ability to utilize multiple threads. Some questioned if this was a true representation of CPU usage or simply a misinterpretation of metrics, suggesting that the number reflects total CPU time consumed across all cores rather than a percentage exceeding 100%. Others pointed out that using performance.now() instead of Date.now() for benchmarks is crucial for accuracy, especially with Web Workers, and speculated on the specific workload and hardware involved. The unusual percentage sparked conversation about the potential for misleading performance measurements and the nuances of interpreting CPU utilization in multi-threaded environments like browsers. Several commenters highlighted the difference between wall-clock time and CPU time, emphasizing that the former is often the more relevant metric for user experience.

The Hacker News post "3,200% CPU Utilization" generated a fair number of comments discussing the linked blog post about achieving extremely high CPU utilization with a custom-built prime number generator. The discussion revolves primarily around the nuances of CPU utilization reporting, the efficiency of the prime-finding algorithm, and the relevance of the benchmark itself.

Several commenters pointed out that exceeding 100% CPU utilization is expected on multi-core systems. One commenter explained that on a 32-core system, 3200% utilization represents all cores running at 100%, which isn't unusual or inherently problematic. This clarifies that the title, while attention-grabbing, might be misinterpreted by those unfamiliar with this aspect of system monitoring.

A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the efficiency of the prime-finding algorithm used in the benchmark. Some commenters questioned whether the algorithm is genuinely optimized, suggesting potential improvements and alternative approaches. One comment proposed using a segmented Sieve of Eratosthenes for improved performance, arguing that the demonstrated approach might not be the most efficient way to generate primes. This sparked a back-and-forth about the practical benefits of different sieving methods and the optimal approach for maximizing CPU usage.

Several commenters questioned the value and relevance of the benchmark itself. Some argued that achieving high CPU utilization is not inherently useful and doesn't necessarily reflect real-world performance gains. They pointed out that without a comparative benchmark against existing prime-finding algorithms, the 3200% figure is essentially meaningless in terms of performance evaluation. This led to a discussion about the purpose of such benchmarks and whether they accurately represent practical application scenarios.

The practicality of using Go for CPU-bound tasks also emerged as a discussion point. Commenters debated the suitability of Go's garbage collection and runtime characteristics for performance-critical computations. One user questioned the choice of Go, given its known performance limitations compared to languages like C or C++ for such computationally intensive tasks.

Finally, some commenters offered suggestions for further optimizing the code and the benchmark itself. These include utilizing SIMD instructions, optimizing memory access patterns, and comparing the performance against established libraries like primesieve. This feedback highlights the collaborative nature of Hacker News, where users contribute ideas and expertise to refine and improve projects.

Netboot Windows 11 with iSCSI and iPXE

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-28 11:47:52

This blog post details how to set up a network bootable Windows 11 installation using iSCSI for storage and iPXE for booting. The author outlines the process of preparing a Windows 11 image for iSCSI, configuring an iSCSI target (using TrueNAS in this example), and setting up an iPXE boot environment. The guide covers partitioning the iSCSI disk, injecting necessary drivers, and configuring the boot process to load the Windows 11 installer from the network. This allows for a centralized installation and management of Windows 11 deployments, eliminating the need for physical installation media for each machine.

This blog post details the process of setting up a network boot environment for Windows 11 using iSCSI for storage and iPXE for booting. The author's goal is to create a system where the operating system resides entirely on a network share, allowing for centralized management and deployment of Windows 11 installations.

The process begins with configuring an iSCSI target, which will act as the hard drive for the networked Windows 11 installation. The author uses TrueNAS SCALE as the iSCSI server, highlighting its user-friendly interface for creating and managing iSCSI targets. The specific steps involved in configuring the target are outlined, including setting the target name, creating an extent (which represents the virtual disk space), and finally creating the target itself.

Next, the blog post addresses the preparation of the Windows 11 installation files. This involves downloading the Windows 11 ISO image and using a tool like oscdimg to create a bootable ISO. This ISO is then mounted, and its contents are copied to a directory on the iSCSI target that has been mounted on the server. This effectively places the Windows 11 installation files on the network share.

With the storage prepared, the focus shifts to configuring the network boot environment using iPXE. The author leverages the flexibility of iPXE scripting to automate the boot process. The provided iPXE script first retrieves the Windows 11 boot files (bootmgfw.efi) from the iSCSI target via HTTP. This crucial step enables the system to initiate the Windows 11 installation process from the network. The script then proceeds to load the Windows 11 installer environment using the retrieved boot file. This sets the stage for the actual Windows 11 installation.

The blog post then walks through the Windows 11 installation process within this network boot environment. It emphasizes the importance of selecting the correct storage driver during the installation process. Because the "hard drive" is the iSCSI target, a specific driver needs to be loaded to allow the installer to recognize and interact with it. The author recommends using the StarWind iSCSI Initiator driver for this purpose. The remaining steps of the Windows 11 installation are standard, including partitioning the iSCSI target, selecting the installation location, and completing the setup process.

Finally, after the installation completes, the post briefly discusses the process of configuring the network boot environment for ongoing use. This entails ensuring the iPXE script is readily available for client machines to access during boot, allowing them to load the installed Windows 11 instance from the iSCSI target each time they start up. The author suggests serving the iPXE script via a DHCP server or TFTP server for easy network access. This creates a truly diskless Windows 11 environment, booting and operating entirely from the network.

Summary of Comments ( 23 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43204604

Hacker News users discuss the practicality and potential benefits of netbooting Windows 11 using iSCSI and iPXE. Some question the real-world use cases, highlighting the complexity and potential performance bottlenecks compared to traditional installations or virtual machines. Others express interest in specific applications, such as creating standardized, easily deployable workstations, or troubleshooting systems with corrupted local storage. Concerns about licensing and Microsoft's stance on this approach are also raised. Several users share alternative solutions and experiences with similar setups involving PXE booting and other network boot methods. The discussion also touches upon the performance implications of iSCSI and the potential advantages of NVMe over iSCSI for netbooting.

The Hacker News post titled "Netboot Windows 11 with iSCSI and iPXE" has generated several comments discussing various aspects of network booting Windows and the author's approach.

Several commenters focused on the complexities and challenges associated with network booting Windows, particularly regarding licensing and driver management. One commenter highlighted the difficulty in getting all the necessary drivers loaded correctly during the boot process, often requiring specific drivers for the network card and storage controller to be injected early on. This commenter also pointed out that dealing with different hardware configurations can further complicate matters. The licensing aspect was also brought up, with concerns about whether Microsoft permits this kind of setup and how to activate Windows in such an environment.

The discussion also touched on the practicality and use cases of netbooting Windows. Some questioned the real-world benefits compared to other deployment methods like traditional imaging or virtual machines, particularly for home use. They pointed out that maintaining the iSCSI target and the network infrastructure adds complexity that might outweigh the advantages for individual users. However, others suggested potential scenarios where netbooting could be beneficial, such as in enterprise environments for standardized deployments, testing, or disaster recovery situations.

A few commenters shared alternative approaches and technologies for netbooting or achieving similar results. One commenter mentioned using WDS (Windows Deployment Services) as a more integrated solution within the Windows ecosystem. Another commenter discussed the advantages of using a hypervisor for greater flexibility and control over the environment.

There's also a thread discussing the performance implications of iSCSI, particularly for booting an operating system. One commenter questioned the speed and responsiveness of booting from an iSCSI target, while another suggested that modern networks and hardware can mitigate potential performance bottlenecks. Someone with experience using iSCSI for booting other operating systems like Linux chimed in, noting that performance can be acceptable but depends heavily on the network infrastructure.

Finally, some comments offered additional tips and resources related to iPXE, network booting, and Windows deployment in general. One user suggested a resource for building custom iPXE boot images. Another highlighted the potential security considerations of network booting, emphasizing the importance of securing the boot process and protecting against unauthorized access.

Fly To Podman: a script that will help you to migrate from Docker

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-21 08:52:13

fly-to-podman is a Bash script designed to simplify the migration from Docker to Podman. It automatically translates and executes Docker commands as their Podman equivalents, handling differences in syntax and functionality. The script aims to provide a seamless transition for users accustomed to Docker, allowing them to continue using familiar commands while leveraging Podman's daemonless architecture and rootless execution capabilities. This tool acts as a bridge, enabling users to progressively adapt to Podman without needing to immediately rewrite their existing workflows or scripts.

Summary of Comments ( 57 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43125487

HN users generally express interest in the script and its potential usefulness for those migrating from Docker to Podman. Some commenters highlight specific benefits like the ease of migration for simple Docker Compose setups and the ability to learn Podman commands. Others discuss the broader context of containerization tools, mentioning alternatives like Buildah and pointing out potential issues such as the script's dependency on docker-compose itself, which may defeat the purpose of a full migration for some users. The necessity of a dedicated migration script is also questioned, with suggestions that direct usage of podman-compose or Compose v2 might be sufficient. Some users express enthusiasm for Podman's rootless feature, and others contribute to the technical discussion by suggesting improvements to the script's error handling and handling of secrets.

The Hacker News post "Fly To Podman: a script that will help you to migrate from Docker" discussing the GitHub project of the same name generated several comments. Many of the commenters expressed skepticism about the necessity and utility of such a script, given that Docker and Podman are already largely compatible.

One commenter argued that if someone is already using Docker Compose, switching to Podman Compose requires minimal changes, mostly adjusting the syntax for volume mounts. They suggested that the complexity of containerization often lies within the orchestration tools like Kubernetes, which remain unaffected by the Docker/Podman choice. Therefore, a dedicated migration script might be overkill.

Another commenter pointed out that Podman's primary advantage lies in its daemonless architecture and rootless execution capabilities, enhancing security. They implied that users seeking these benefits would likely be comfortable enough with containerization to manually adapt their existing Docker setups without a script.

Echoing this sentiment, another user emphasized that migrating images between Docker and Podman is typically as simple as using podman load < docker save ... or docker load < podman save ..., questioning the added value of the script.

One commenter highlighted a potential issue with the script's handling of volume mounts, specifically concerning UID/GID mapping. They cautioned that relying on a script to handle such intricacies might mask underlying complexities and lead to unexpected behavior.

Some commenters did acknowledge potential niche use cases for the script, such as automating the migration of many containers or simplifying the transition for less experienced users. However, the general consensus leaned towards the script being unnecessary for most users already familiar with Docker and Podman.

A few comments delved into broader discussions about the benefits of Podman over Docker and the overall containerization landscape, but the core conversation remained centered on the practicality of the migration script. Notably, the author of the script did not participate in the discussion to address the raised concerns or elaborate on the intended use cases.

Debugging Hetzner: Uncovering failures with powerstat, sensors, and dmidecode

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-19 12:40:58

The blog post details troubleshooting a Hetzner server experiencing random reboots. The author initially suspected power issues, utilizing powerstat to monitor power consumption and sensors to check temperature readings, but these revealed no anomalies. Ultimately, dmidecode identified a faulty RAM module, which, after replacement, resolved the instability. The post highlights the importance of systematic hardware diagnostics when dealing with seemingly inexplicable server issues, emphasizing the usefulness of these specific tools for identifying the root cause.

The blog post "Debugging Hetzner: Uncovering failures with powerstat, sensors, and dmidecode" details a systematic approach to troubleshooting hardware issues on Hetzner dedicated servers, specifically focusing on identifying the root cause of seemingly random reboots. The author emphasizes the importance of proactive monitoring and diagnosis, especially given the limited support options available with Hetzner's Rescue System.

The post begins by highlighting the limitations of relying solely on Hetzner's provided information, such as IPMI logs, which might not always pinpoint the exact hardware culprit. It then introduces a trio of tools – powerstat, sensors, and dmidecode – and explains how they can be utilized for deeper investigation.

powerstat is presented as a crucial tool for monitoring power consumption and identifying potential power delivery problems. The author explains that erratic power readings, fluctuations outside of expected ranges, or complete drops can indicate faulty power supplies, cabling, or even issues within the server's power distribution components. The post suggests comparing powerstat readings under different load conditions to establish a baseline and identify deviations.

Next, the article focuses on sensors, a utility that reads hardware sensor data. This includes readings from temperature sensors, fan speeds, and voltage regulators. By monitoring these values, one can detect overheating components, failing fans, or voltage instability. The author advises checking these readings both at idle and under load, as some problems might only manifest under stress. The post also cautions that interpreting sensor readings can require familiarity with the specific hardware being used and recommends cross-referencing readings with the server's specifications.

Finally, the post discusses dmidecode, a tool that retrieves Desktop Management Interface (DMI) information from the system's BIOS. This information can provide valuable details about the server's hardware components, such as the model, manufacturer, and serial numbers. The author explains how this information can be useful for identifying specific hardware revisions that might be known to have issues, and for contacting Hetzner support with precise information when requesting replacement parts or further investigation.

The blog post concludes by reiterating the importance of proactive monitoring and utilizing these tools to gather evidence before contacting Hetzner support. By presenting a clear methodology and explaining the utility of each tool, the author empowers users to diagnose hardware problems more effectively, leading to quicker resolution times and minimizing downtime on their Hetzner dedicated servers. The post also underscores the importance of understanding server hardware and using available tools to bridge the gap between limited support and complex hardware issues.

Summary of Comments ( 36 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43101430

The Hacker News comments generally praise the author's detailed approach to debugging hardware issues, particularly appreciating the use of readily available tools like ipmitool and dmidecode. Several commenters share similar experiences with Hetzner, mentioning frequent hardware failures, especially with older hardware. Some discuss the complexities of diagnosing such issues, highlighting the challenges of distinguishing between software and hardware problems. One commenter suggests Hetzner's older hardware might be the root cause of the instability, while another offers advice on using dedicated IPMI hardware for better remote management. The thread also touches on the pros and cons of Hetzner's pricing compared to its reliability, with some feeling the price doesn't justify the frequency of issues. A few commenters question the author's conclusion about PSU failure, suggesting other potential culprits like RAM or motherboard issues.

The Hacker News post "Debugging Hetzner: Uncovering failures with powerstat, sensors, and dmidecode" has generated several comments discussing the author's experience debugging hardware issues with a Hetzner server.

Several commenters shared their own experiences and perspectives on Hetzner's hardware and support. One commenter mentioned their generally positive experience with Hetzner's hardware reliability, contrasting it with the author's described issues. Another user questioned the efficacy of using powerstat for diagnosing power issues, suggesting alternative tools or methods. They also pointed out the potential for IPMI access being more helpful in such situations.

A significant part of the discussion revolves around Hetzner's practice of using refurbished hardware. Some commenters speculated that the author's problems stemmed from this practice, while others defended Hetzner, arguing that refurbished hardware can be a cost-effective and environmentally friendly option. One commenter shared a personal anecdote of receiving a server with a failed RAID controller, highlighting the potential risks of refurbished hardware. Another commenter suggested that while Hetzner does use refurbished hardware, the quality and reliability can vary, and that their dedicated server offerings are often a good value despite this.

One commenter expressed surprise at the author's decision to troubleshoot the hardware themselves, suggesting that contacting Hetzner support would have been a more efficient approach. This prompted further discussion about the trade-offs between self-troubleshooting and relying on support, with some users expressing a preference for maintaining control over their own hardware.

There was also a brief discussion about the specific tools mentioned in the article. One commenter questioned the usefulness of dmidecode in this particular scenario, while another mentioned the importance of having out-of-band management access like IPMI for debugging hardware remotely.

Overall, the comments section presents a mixed bag of perspectives on Hetzner's hardware and support. While some users expressed concerns about the reliability of refurbished hardware, others defended Hetzner's practices and shared positive experiences. The discussion also touched upon broader topics such as the value of self-troubleshooting versus relying on support, and the importance of having appropriate tools for remote hardware debugging.

Kleene as a Container Management Platform for FreeBSD

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-15 11:23:46

The blog post details how to set up Kleene, a lightweight container management system, on FreeBSD. It emphasizes Kleene's simplicity and ease of use compared to larger, more complex alternatives like Kubernetes. The guide walks through installing Kleene, configuring a network bridge for container communication, and deploying a sample Nginx container. It also covers building custom container images with img and highlights Kleene's ability to manage persistent storage volumes, showcasing its suitability for self-hosting applications on FreeBSD servers. The post concludes by pointing to Kleene's potential as a practical container solution for users seeking a less resource-intensive option than Docker or Kubernetes.

The blog post "Kleene as a Container Management Platform for FreeBSD" by Gyptazy explores using Kleene, a relatively new container management tool, as a viable alternative to more established solutions like Docker and Kubernetes on FreeBSD systems. The author posits that while Docker enjoys widespread popularity and Kubernetes excels in orchestrating complex container deployments, Kleene offers a simplified, lightweight approach particularly well-suited for FreeBSD, capitalizing on its inherent strengths like ZFS and Jails.

The post begins by highlighting the desire for a more streamlined container management experience on FreeBSD, suggesting that the complexities of Docker and Kubernetes can be overkill for certain use cases. It introduces Kleene as a potential solution, emphasizing its ease of use and minimal resource footprint. A comprehensive, step-by-step guide then follows, meticulously detailing the installation process of Kleene on a FreeBSD system. This includes acquiring the necessary dependencies, cloning the Kleene repository, and configuring the system for optimal performance. Specific commands and configuration snippets are provided to facilitate a smooth installation experience, even for users less familiar with FreeBSD.

The core functionality of Kleene is then explored, focusing on its ability to build, manage, and run containers leveraging FreeBSD's native Jails. The author demonstrates how to define container images using simple configuration files, specifying the base operating system, required packages, and other customizations. The process of building these images and subsequently running them as containers within Jails is thoroughly explained, including instructions on how to manage resources like network connectivity and storage volumes. The integration with ZFS, FreeBSD's advanced file system, is highlighted as a key advantage, enabling efficient storage management and snapshotting capabilities for containers.

The post concludes by summarizing the benefits of using Kleene on FreeBSD, reiterating its simplicity, lightweight nature, and seamless integration with the underlying operating system. It suggests that Kleene represents a compelling option for users seeking a less resource-intensive and easier-to-manage containerization solution on FreeBSD, particularly for scenarios where the full power of Kubernetes isn't required. The author implies that Kleene, while still relatively young, holds considerable promise and encourages further exploration and adoption within the FreeBSD community.

Summary of Comments ( 8 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43057721

HN commenters generally express interest in Kleene and its potential, particularly for FreeBSD users seeking lighter-weight alternatives to Docker. Some highlight its jail-based approach as a security advantage. Several commenters discuss the complexities of container management and the trade-offs between different tools, with some suggesting that a simpler approach might be preferable for certain use cases. One commenter notes the difficulty in finding clear, up-to-date documentation for FreeBSD containerization, praising the linked article for addressing this gap. There's also a brief thread discussing the benefits of ZFS for container storage. Overall, the comments paint Kleene as a promising tool worth investigating, especially for those already working within the FreeBSD ecosystem.

The Hacker News post titled "Kleene as a Container Management Platform for FreeBSD" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43057721) has a modest number of comments, sparking a discussion around FreeBSD, jails, and containerization approaches.

One commenter expresses excitement about seeing more activity around FreeBSD and jails, highlighting its robust security model compared to other containerization technologies. They mention how FreeBSD's capabilities are often overlooked and appreciate the blog post for bringing attention to it.

Another commenter delves into the specifics of FreeBSD jails and how they differ from Docker containers, emphasizing the security advantages of jails being more isolated. They explain that jails leverage the operating system's built-in security features, providing a more robust isolation compared to containers sharing the kernel. This comment also touches on the operational simplicity of jails and their suitability for specific use cases.

A separate comment thread discusses the trade-offs between using jails and other containerization techniques like Docker, particularly focusing on the portability aspect. Docker's image-based approach offers greater portability across different operating systems and environments, while jails are more tightly coupled with FreeBSD. This discussion explores the benefits of each approach and the situations where one might be preferable over the other.

One user expresses a general preference for FreeBSD jails, pointing out the deep integration with the operating system and the ease of management using existing FreeBSD tools. They emphasize the stability and maturity of the jail system, highlighting it as a reliable solution for containerization.

The comments also briefly touch on the niche nature of FreeBSD in the containerization landscape. While Docker enjoys wider adoption, commenters acknowledge the specific benefits of FreeBSD jails, such as their security and performance, making them a compelling alternative for certain use cases.

Overall, the comments section demonstrates a positive reception towards Kleene and the use of FreeBSD jails for container management. The discussion highlights the advantages and disadvantages compared to other solutions, showcasing the security and operational simplicity of jails while acknowledging the portability advantages offered by technologies like Docker.

Linux kernel cgroups writeback high CPU troubleshooting

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-14 08:30:27

The blog post details troubleshooting high CPU usage attributed to the writeback process in a Linux kernel. After initial investigations pointed towards cgroups and specifically the cpu.cfs_period_us parameter, the author traced the issue to a tight loop within the cgroup writeback mechanism. This loop was triggered by a large number of cgroups combined with a specific workload pattern. Ultimately, increasing the dirty_expire_centisecs kernel parameter, which controls how long dirty data stays in memory before being written to disk, provided the solution by significantly reducing the writeback activity and lowering CPU usage.

The blog post "Debugging our new Linux kernel" details a performance investigation centered around high CPU utilization stemming from the writeback process within Linux control groups (cgroups). The author, facing sluggish system performance after a kernel upgrade, noticed that a significant portion of CPU cycles were being consumed by writeback threads associated with specific cgroups. This suggested a problem related to how the kernel was managing data flushing to disk within these isolated resource groups.

The initial suspicion fell upon the storage layer, prompting checks for disk I/O bottlenecks. However, analysis of disk metrics revealed normal operation, indicating the issue resided elsewhere. This redirected the focus towards the kernel's memory management and its interaction with cgroups.

The investigation proceeded by leveraging kernel tracing tools like ftrace and perf. These utilities allowed the author to inspect the kernel's execution path and pinpoint the functions involved in the excessive writeback activity. The tracing data highlighted frequent calls related to memory reclamation and page cache flushing within the affected cgroups.

Through careful examination of the trace output, the author observed a pattern of repeated scanning of inactive file pages. This led to the hypothesis that the kernel was unnecessarily triggering writeback operations for pages that hadn't been modified or accessed recently. The excessive scanning and subsequent flushing contributed to the observed high CPU load.

Further scrutiny pointed towards a recent change in the kernel's memory management subsystem, specifically a modification to the kswapd daemon's behavior within cgroups. This change, intended to improve memory management efficiency, appeared to have inadvertently introduced a regression causing excessive scanning and flushing of inactive pages within specific cgroups.

The author concluded that the high CPU usage by writeback was a direct consequence of this unintended side-effect of the kernel upgrade. While a definitive fix within the kernel itself wasn't immediately available, the post concludes with the author implementing a temporary workaround by adjusting the dirty_ratio and dirty_background_ratio cgroup parameters. This modification effectively controlled the aggressiveness of the kernel's writeback mechanism within the affected cgroups, alleviating the high CPU utilization and restoring acceptable system performance. The author acknowledges this is a temporary solution and looks forward to a proper kernel patch addressing the root cause.

Summary of Comments ( 15 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43046174

Commenters on Hacker News largely discuss practical troubleshooting steps and potential causes of the high CPU usage related to cgroups writeback described in the linked blog post. Several suggest using tools like perf to profile the kernel and pinpoint the exact function causing the issue. Some discuss potential problems with the storage layer, like slow I/O or a misconfigured RAID, while others consider the possibility of a kernel bug or an interaction with specific hardware or drivers. One commenter shares a similar experience with NFS and high CPU usage related to writeback, suggesting a potential commonality in networked filesystems. Several users emphasize the importance of systematic debugging and isolation of the problem, starting with simpler checks before diving into complex kernel analysis.

The Hacker News post titled "Linux kernel cgroups writeback high CPU troubleshooting" sparked a discussion with several insightful comments.

One commenter shared a similar experience, highlighting how an increased vm.dirty_ratio setting led to performance improvements in a database workload. They also emphasized the importance of setting vm.dirty_background_ratio appropriately to avoid performance hiccups due to sudden writeback flushes.

Another commenter delved into the technical details of writeback, explaining how the Linux kernel manages dirty pages and the role of pdflush (now replaced by flush-x:y kernel threads). They noted how an incorrectly configured vm.dirty_ratio can lead to excessive CPU usage by these threads, precisely the issue faced by the original author. This commenter also suggested checking the bdi (backing device information) statistics to pinpoint the specific device causing the writeback bottleneck.

A third commenter provided a practical tip: using iostat -x 1 to monitor disk activity during periods of high CPU usage attributed to writeback. This command helps identify whether the disk itself is the bottleneck or if the issue lies within the kernel's writeback mechanisms.

Another commenter pointed out the importance of considering the underlying storage hardware when tuning vm.dirty_ratio. They advised caution when dealing with SSDs, as aggressive writeback settings could negatively impact their lifespan. This advice underscored the need for a holistic approach to performance tuning, considering both software and hardware limitations.

Furthermore, a user shared their personal anecdote of encountering similar issues with NFS shares. They suggested investigating NFS-specific settings and configurations as potential culprits for high CPU usage related to writeback when working with network file systems.

Several other comments provided additional context and resources. One user linked to a kernel documentation page explaining the dirty_ratio and dirty_background_ratio parameters, offering further reading for those interested in understanding the intricacies of the Linux kernel's memory management. Another commenter mentioned the potential impact of memory pressure on writeback activity, suggesting checking memory usage metrics alongside disk I/O statistics.

Overall, the comments on the Hacker News post offered a valuable collection of practical advice, technical explanations, and real-world experiences, providing a comprehensive perspective on troubleshooting high CPU usage related to writeback in the Linux kernel.

The practical (Unix) problems with .cache and its friends

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-05 07:26:51

The blog post argues against using generic, top-level directories like .cache, .local, and .config for application caching and configuration in Unix-like systems. These directories quickly become cluttered, making it difficult to manage disk space, identify relevant files, and troubleshoot application issues. The author advocates for application developers to use XDG Base Directory Specification compliant paths within $HOME/.cache, $HOME/.local/share, and $HOME/.config, respectively, creating distinct subdirectories for each application. This structured approach improves organization, simplifies cleanup by application or user, and prevents naming conflicts. The lack of enforcement mechanisms for this specification and inconsistent adoption by applications are acknowledged as obstacles.

Chris Siebenmann's blog post, "The practical (Unix) problems with .cache and its friends," delves into the multifaceted issues surrounding the use of dot directories, specifically those intended for caching, in user home directories on Unix-like systems. While the XDG Base Directory Specification aimed to standardize the location of such directories (like .cache, .config, and .local), thereby improving organization and predictability, the practical implementation has revealed several shortcomings that impact system administrators and users alike.

Siebenmann primarily focuses on the challenges these directories present for system backups and administration. The decentralized nature of these dot directories means that significant amounts of data, often transient and rapidly changing cache information, are scattered across numerous user home directories. This poses a problem for backup strategies. Including these directories in backups leads to inflated backup sizes, consuming valuable storage space and increasing backup times. Excluding them entirely, however, risks losing user-specific application configurations and potentially disrupting workflows upon restoration. This leaves administrators in a difficult position, forcing them to choose between bloated backups and potentially incomplete restorations.

Furthermore, the blog post highlights the difficulty in managing disk space consumption related to these dot directories. Caching directories, by their very design, can grow rapidly and unpredictably. While disk quotas can be employed to limit overall user disk usage, they don't offer granular control over specific directory sizes within the home directory. This makes it challenging to prevent runaway cache directories from consuming excessive disk space and potentially impacting system stability. Users may be unaware of the burgeoning size of these hidden directories, further complicating the issue.

Another point of concern raised is the lack of clear guidelines for managing the lifecycle of cached data. The XDG specification doesn't dictate how or when applications should purge outdated or unnecessary cache files. This leads to situations where stale or irrelevant data persists indefinitely, consuming disk space without providing any benefit. The absence of a standardized mechanism for cache eviction leaves users and administrators with the burden of manually cleaning up these directories, a process that can be tedious, error-prone, and often overlooked.

Finally, the blog post touches upon the inconsistent implementation and adoption of the XDG specification across different applications. While many modern applications adhere to the standard, legacy applications and those developed without awareness of the specification may continue to create their own idiosyncratic dot directories, further exacerbating the organizational and management challenges. This inconsistency undermines the very purpose of the standardization effort, perpetuating the problems the specification was intended to solve. In conclusion, while the XDG Base Directory Specification represents a step towards better organization of user data, its practical implementation introduces complexities related to backups, disk space management, and cache lifecycle control, presenting ongoing challenges for Unix system administrators.

Summary of Comments ( 41 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42945109

HN commenters largely agree that standardized cache directories are a good idea in principle but messy in practice. Several point out inconsistencies in how applications actually use $XDG_CACHE_HOME, leading to wasted space and difficulty managing caches. Some suggest tools like bcache could help, while others advocate for more granular control, like per-application cache directories or explicit opt-in/opt-out mechanisms. The lack of clear guidelines on cache eviction policies and the potential for sensitive data leakage are also highlighted as concerns. A few commenters mention that directories starting with a dot (.) are annoying for interactive shell users.

The Hacker News post "The practical (Unix) problems with .cache and its friends" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42945109) has generated several comments discussing the merits and drawbacks of the XDG Base Directory Specification, particularly concerning the .cache directory.

Several commenters agree with the author of the linked blog post that while the specification is well-intentioned, its implementation has created practical issues. One commenter points out the annoyance of having numerous hidden directories cluttering their home directory, making navigation and management more cumbersome. They argue for a simpler, less fragmented approach to storing application data.

Another commenter echoes this sentiment, suggesting that the proliferation of these directories complicates tasks like backups and disk space analysis. They wish for a more consolidated approach, perhaps allowing applications to store cache data within their own installation directories, provided appropriate permissions are managed. This approach is countered by another user who highlights the security implications, stating that allowing applications write access to their installation directories could create vulnerabilities if those directories are shared by multiple users or if the application itself is compromised.

The discussion also touches upon the inconsistent adoption of the standard across different applications. Some commenters note that many applications still create their own application-specific directories within the home directory, rendering the XDG specification somewhat ineffective. They suggest that stronger enforcement or clearer guidelines are needed for developers to adhere to the standard.

One commenter offers a practical workaround by using symbolic links to relocate the .cache directory to a dedicated partition or directory, allowing them to manage cache data separately. Another user suggests employing a tool like trash-cli to easily purge the contents of these directories when necessary.

Some users express skepticism about the overall benefit of the standard, questioning whether the complexity introduced outweighs the advantages. They argue that the original intent – separating different types of application data – hasn't been fully realized, leading to a situation where users are burdened with managing a multitude of hidden directories without significant practical gain.

A few commenters suggest alternative solutions, such as utilizing a dedicated /var/cache directory for all applications or leveraging more advanced filesystem features for managing temporary data. The idea of having package managers automatically clean up cache directories associated with uninstalled applications is also raised.

In essence, the comments reflect a mixed reaction to the XDG Base Directory Specification and its implementation. While acknowledging the theoretical benefits of separating application data, many commenters express frustration with the practical implications of the standard, particularly the proliferation of hidden directories and inconsistent adoption across applications. Several workarounds and alternative approaches are suggested, highlighting a desire for a simpler, more streamlined approach to managing application data on Unix-like systems.

Show HN: Perforator – cluster-wide profiling tool for large data centers

permalink

Posted: 2025-02-01 08:00:34

Perforator is an open-source, cluster-wide profiling tool developed by Yandex for analyzing performance in large data centers. It uses hardware performance counters to collect low-overhead, detailed performance data across thousands of machines simultaneously, aiming to identify performance bottlenecks and optimize resource utilization. The tool offers a web interface for visualization and analysis, and allows users to drill down into specific nodes and processes for deeper investigation. Perforator supports various profiling modes, including CPU, memory, and I/O, and can be integrated with existing monitoring systems.

Yandex has unveiled Perforator, a novel performance profiling tool designed specifically for the challenges of large-scale data centers. This open-source solution aims to provide comprehensive and granular insights into the performance bottlenecks that can plague complex distributed systems. Unlike traditional profilers that often focus on individual machines, Perforator adopts a cluster-wide approach, enabling administrators and developers to analyze performance across numerous interconnected servers simultaneously. This holistic perspective is crucial for understanding the interplay between different components within a distributed environment and identifying the root causes of performance issues that might be obscured by isolated machine-level analysis.

Perforator utilizes Linux's extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) technology for efficient data collection. eBPF allows for dynamic tracing and performance monitoring within the kernel with minimal overhead, making it well-suited for the demands of high-traffic, production environments. By leveraging eBPF, Perforator can capture detailed performance metrics without significantly impacting the performance of the systems being monitored.

The tool offers a range of features designed to streamline performance analysis. It provides flame graphs, a powerful visualization technique for understanding the hierarchical relationships between function calls and identifying performance hotspots. Furthermore, Perforator incorporates differential flame graphs, allowing for direct comparisons between different performance profiles, enabling developers to pinpoint the impact of code changes or configuration adjustments on overall system performance. The tool also offers call graphs, which provide a visual representation of the flow of execution within the system, further aiding in understanding complex interactions between different services and components.

Perforator is designed to be easily deployable and integrated within existing infrastructure. It aims to minimize the operational burden associated with performance monitoring and analysis, providing valuable insights without requiring extensive configuration or specialized expertise. By offering a comprehensive and efficient solution for cluster-wide profiling, Perforator empowers engineers to optimize the performance of their large-scale data centers and deliver improved service reliability and efficiency. Its focus on distributed systems and its utilization of cutting-edge technologies like eBPF position Perforator as a valuable tool for anyone working with the complexities of modern data center operations.

Summary of Comments ( 9 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42896716

Several commenters on Hacker News expressed interest in Perforator, particularly its ability to profile at scale and its low overhead. Some questioned the choice of Python for the agent, citing potential performance issues, while others appreciated its ease of use and integration with existing Python-based infrastructure. A few commenters compared it favorably to existing tools like BCC and eBPF, highlighting Perforator's distributed nature as a key differentiator. The discussion also touched on the challenges of profiling in production environments, with some sharing their experiences and suggesting potential improvements to Perforator. Overall, the comments indicated a positive reception to the tool, with many eager to try it in their own environments.

The Hacker News post titled "Show HN: Perforator – cluster-wide profiling tool for large data centers" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42896716) has generated a modest number of comments, primarily focusing on comparisons to existing profiling tools and discussing the practical applications and limitations of Perforator.

Several commenters brought up alternative profiling solutions, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in comparison to Perforator. One commenter mentioned Coz, emphasizing its user-friendliness and integration with flame graphs. Another suggested the combination of Linux perf and eBPF as a powerful alternative, especially for kernel-level profiling. The discussion around these alternatives touched upon the trade-offs between ease of use, performance overhead, and the level of detail provided.

The practicality of deploying Perforator in large-scale production environments was also a key topic. One commenter questioned the feasibility of using Perforator continuously, citing concerns about performance impact and the potential for data overload. This prompted a discussion about the importance of sampling and filtering in mitigating these issues. The creator of Perforator (a Yandex employee) responded to some of these queries, clarifying the tool's design choices and addressing concerns about its overhead. They explained that Perforator is intended for targeted profiling of specific issues rather than continuous monitoring, and highlighted the tool's ability to filter data based on various criteria. They also explained how the overhead of continuous profiling was minimized.

A few comments focused on specific features of Perforator, such as its support for different profiling methods (perf, eBPF) and its visualization capabilities. One commenter inquired about the integration with other observability tools, while another expressed interest in the underlying data format and the possibility of analyzing it with external tools.

Overall, the comments section provides valuable insights into the potential use cases and limitations of Perforator. The discussion highlights the complexities of performance profiling in large data centers and the need for tools that balance performance overhead, data richness, and ease of use. The comments do not delve deeply into the technical intricacies of Perforator, but rather focus on its practical implications and its position within the existing ecosystem of profiling tools.

Migrating Away from Bcachefs

permalink

Posted: 2025-01-20 21:29:54

The author migrated away from Bcachefs due to persistent performance issues and instability despite extensive troubleshooting. While initially impressed with Bcachefs's features, they experienced slowdowns, freezes, and data corruption, especially under memory pressure. Attempts to identify and fix the problems through kernel debugging and communication with the developers were unsuccessful, leaving the author with no choice but to switch back to ZFS. Although acknowledging Bcachefs's potential, the author concludes it's not currently production-ready for their workload.

Kent Sesse, the author, details their experience migrating away from the experimental Bcachefs filesystem after encountering several issues that ultimately made it untenable for their production server. Initially drawn to Bcachefs due to its appealing features such as copy-on-write, compression, and checksumming, Sesse hoped it would offer performance improvements and data integrity benefits over their existing ext4 setup.

The migration process itself was described as relatively straightforward, involving creating a Bcachefs filesystem on a new partition and using rsync to copy data from the existing ext4 filesystem. However, problems arose soon after. Performance, contrary to expectations, was noticeably worse than with ext4, particularly in random read/write scenarios. This performance degradation became especially pronounced when the SSD caching layer filled up, leading to significant slowdowns.

The author further experienced disconcerting stability issues. The blog post recounts two instances of silent data corruption, where files became unreadable despite Bcachefs's built-in checksumming feature. This loss of data, although seemingly minor in terms of the files affected, eroded Sesse's trust in the filesystem's integrity. Additionally, the blog post mentions an incident involving a kernel panic directly attributable to Bcachefs. This kernel panic, along with a documented history of Bcachefs-related kernel crashes, contributed further to the decision to migrate away.

The final straw, leading to the immediate decision to switch back, was a catastrophic failure where the Bcachefs filesystem became completely corrupted and unmountable. This incident required Sesse to restore from a backup, highlighting the risks associated with using an experimental filesystem in a production environment.

Ultimately, despite the initial promise and the author's acknowledgment of Bcachefs's potential, the combination of poor performance, data corruption, kernel panics, and the catastrophic failure led to the decision to abandon Bcachefs and revert to a more stable and reliable ext4 filesystem. The author concludes by expressing disappointment but also understanding that Bcachefs is still under development and might not be suitable for production use at its current stage. They maintain some hope for the future of Bcachefs, suggesting they might reconsider it once it reaches a more mature state.

Summary of Comments ( 16 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42773296

HN commenters generally express disappointment with Bcachefs's lack of mainline inclusion in the kernel, viewing it as a significant barrier to adoption and a potential sign of deeper issues. Some suggest the lengthy development process and stalled upstreaming might indicate fundamental flaws or maintainability problems within the filesystem itself. Several commenters express a preference for established filesystems like ZFS and btrfs, despite their own imperfections, due to their maturity and broader community support. Others question the wisdom of investing time in a filesystem unlikely to become a standard, citing concerns about future development and maintenance. While acknowledging Bcachefs's technically intriguing features, the consensus leans toward caution and skepticism about its long-term viability. A few offer more neutral perspectives, suggesting the author's experience might not be universally applicable and hoping for the project's eventual success.

The Hacker News post "Migrating Away from Bcachefs" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42773296) has a moderate number of comments discussing the author's experience with and decision to migrate from the Bcachefs filesystem. Many of the comments revolve around the perceived complexities and lack of mainstream adoption of Bcachefs, as well as alternative filesystems.

Several commenters expressed sympathy for the author's frustrations. One commenter mentioned their own difficulties compiling Bcachefs, highlighting the non-trivial process required to get it running. This sentiment was echoed by others, reinforcing the idea that Bcachefs isn't as user-friendly as more established filesystems. The complexities surrounding its checksumming features and lack of clear documentation were also mentioned as contributing factors to its perceived difficulty.

The discussion also touched upon the trade-offs between features and stability. Some commenters questioned the value of Bcachefs's advanced features, especially considering the potential for data loss or corruption that the author experienced. The inherent risks associated with using a less mature filesystem were weighed against the potential benefits, with some arguing that the stability of established solutions like ZFS or btrfs might be preferable for production environments.

A few commenters offered alternative filesystem suggestions, with ZFS and btrfs being the most frequently mentioned. The relative merits of each were debated, with some emphasizing ZFS's maturity and robustness, while others pointed to btrfs's lighter weight and integration with the Linux kernel. One commenter specifically mentioned XFS as another alternative, praising its stability and established track record.

The author themselves participated in the comments section, responding to questions and clarifying some points raised in the blog post. They acknowledged the experimental nature of Bcachefs and explained their rationale for choosing it initially. They also clarified the specific issues they encountered, which involved checksum mismatches and potential data corruption.

The overall tone of the comments is one of cautious curiosity about Bcachefs. While acknowledging its potential, many commenters expressed reservations about its complexity and lack of maturity. The discussion highlights the challenges faced by newer filesystems in gaining widespread adoption, especially when competing against well-established alternatives. The author's experience serves as a cautionary tale for those considering using Bcachefs in production environments, emphasizing the importance of thoroughly understanding the risks involved.

Show HN: Interactive systemd (a better way to work with systemd units)

permalink

Posted: 2025-01-18 16:22:03

isd is an interactive command-line tool designed to simplify working with systemd units. It provides a TUI (terminal user interface) that allows users to browse, filter, start, stop, restart, enable, disable, and edit unit files, as well as view their logs and status in real-time, all within an intuitive and interactive environment. This aims to offer a more user-friendly alternative to traditional command-line tools for managing systemd, streamlining common tasks and reducing the need to memorize complex commands.

The Hacker News post titled "Show HN: Interactive systemd (a better way to work with systemd units)" introduces a new command-line tool called isd (Interactive Systemd) designed to simplify and streamline the management of systemd units. isd provides an interactive text-based user interface (TUI) built with Python and the curses library, offering a more intuitive and discoverable alternative to traditional command-line tools like systemctl.

The core functionality of isd revolves around presenting a dynamically updating list of systemd units within a terminal window. Users can navigate this list using keyboard controls (arrow keys, PgUp/PgDown) and perform various actions on selected units directly within the interface. These actions include: starting, stopping, restarting, enabling, disabling, masking, and unmasking units. The status of each unit (active, inactive, failed, etc.) is clearly displayed in real-time, providing immediate feedback on executed commands.

isd enhances the user experience by offering several features not readily available with standard systemctl usage. A built-in search functionality allows users to quickly filter the unit list by typing partial or full unit names. The interface also displays detailed information about a selected unit, including its description, loaded configuration file, and current status details. Additionally, isd includes a log viewer that streams the journal logs for a selected unit directly within the TUI, eliminating the need to switch between different terminal windows or commands to monitor unit activity.

The project aims to lower the barrier to entry for systemd management, especially for users less familiar with the command-line interface or the complexities of systemctl. By providing a visual and interactive environment, isd simplifies the process of managing systemd units, making it easier to monitor, control, and troubleshoot services and other system components. The project is open-source and available on GitHub, encouraging community contributions and further development. The post highlights the key benefits of using isd, emphasizing its interactive nature, real-time updates, integrated log viewer, and simplified workflow compared to traditional methods. It positions isd as a valuable tool for both novice and experienced system administrators.

Summary of Comments ( 19 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42749402

Hacker News users generally praised the Interactive systemd (ISD) project for its intuitive and user-friendly approach to managing systemd units. Several commenters highlighted the benefits of its visual representation and the ease with which it allows users to start, stop, and restart services, especially compared to the command-line interface. Some expressed interest in specific features like log viewing and real-time status updates. A few users questioned the necessity of a TUI for systemd management, suggesting existing tools like systemctl are sufficient. Others raised concerns about potential security implications and the project's dependency on Python. Despite some reservations, the overall sentiment towards ISD was positive, with many acknowledging its potential as a valuable tool for both novice and experienced Linux users.

The Hacker News post discussing the "Interactive systemd" project generated a moderate amount of discussion, mostly revolving around existing tools and alternative approaches to systemd management.

Several commenters pointed out existing tools that offered similar functionality, such as systemctl status -l, which provides detailed status information for units. One user mentioned using journalctl -fu <unit> for following logs, suggesting the interactive systemd project might be over-engineered for simple use cases. This sentiment was echoed by another who found existing tools sufficient and preferred their terminal's copy-paste functionality.

The discussion touched upon the perceived complexity of systemd itself. One commenter expressed their dislike for systemd, finding its structure unnecessarily complex and expressing a preference for simpler init systems like OpenRC and runit. Another user argued that while systemd is complex, this project doesn't address the underlying complexity; instead, it simply offers a different interface. They suggested that improving systemd's documentation might be a more effective approach.

Some commenters appreciated the visual representation offered by the interactive systemd tool, particularly for exploring relationships between units. One user praised the tool's potential for educational purposes, allowing users to visualize the systemd structure and understand the dependencies between various services. Another found value in the tool for navigating complex systems and quickly grasping the overall state of different units.

A few commenters focused on specific technical aspects. One inquired about the possibility of integrating the tool with other systemd management tools like Cockpit. Another raised the issue of handling large numbers of units and potential performance implications. The discussion also briefly touched on the use of Python and the psutil library, with one commenter mentioning an alternative Python library for systemd interaction.

Finally, the original poster (OP) engaged with several comments, answering questions about the project's motivation, technical implementation, and future plans. They clarified that the tool is intended to complement existing tools, not replace them, and highlighted its unique features such as the visualization of unit dependencies and interactive exploration. The OP also acknowledged the feedback regarding existing alternatives and expressed interest in exploring integration with other tools.

Right to root access

permalink

Posted: 2025-01-12 22:53:16

The blog post "Right to root access" argues that users should have complete control over the devices they own, including root access. It contends that manufacturers artificially restrict user access for anti-competitive reasons, forcing users into walled gardens and limiting their ability to repair, modify, and truly own their devices. This restriction extends beyond just software to encompass firmware and hardware, hindering innovation and consumer freedom. The author believes this control should be a fundamental digital right, akin to property rights in the physical world, empowering users to fully utilize and customize their technology.

The blog post "Right to Root Access" by Medhir explores the multifaceted concept of digital ownership and control, specifically focusing on the implications of restricting root access on devices. The author argues that limiting a user's ability to fully control their own hardware undermines the very notion of ownership, drawing parallels to physical property rights. They posit that if one truly owns a device, they should have the unfettered ability to modify, repair, and utilize it in any manner they see fit, including accessing and altering the root level of the operating system.

This comprehensive control, often symbolized by "root access," is presented as essential for several key reasons. First, it empowers users to truly personalize their devices, tailoring the software and functionality to precisely match their individual needs and preferences. This level of customization extends beyond superficial changes, enabling deep system modifications and the installation of alternative operating systems.

Secondly, the post highlights the crucial role of root access in maintaining and repairing devices. The author contends that restricting root access hinders troubleshooting efforts and forces users to rely on manufacturers or authorized service providers, potentially incurring unnecessary costs and delays. This dependency, they argue, further diminishes the sense of ownership and control.

Furthermore, the blog post emphasizes the significance of root access for security and privacy. While acknowledging potential risks associated with improper use of root privileges, the author argues that knowledgeable users can leverage root access to enhance security by implementing custom security measures, removing potentially unwanted software, and auditing system behavior more effectively. Restricting this access, conversely, can leave users vulnerable to pre-installed bloatware, undisclosed tracking mechanisms, and other potential security compromises.

The author also addresses the common counterarguments against granting universal root access, such as concerns about user error and potential security vulnerabilities. They acknowledge these risks but argue that they should not outweigh the fundamental right to control one's own property. Instead, they propose that education and responsible disclosure of information are more effective approaches than outright restriction. They suggest that fostering a culture of digital literacy and providing users with the knowledge and tools to safely utilize root access is a more sustainable and empowering solution than limiting their control.

In essence, the blog post champions the idea of digital self-determination, arguing that true ownership entails the right to fully control and modify one's digital devices, including accessing the root level of the system. This right, they argue, is essential for personalization, maintenance, security, and ultimately, for preserving the fundamental principles of ownership in the digital realm.

Summary of Comments ( 258 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42677835

HN users largely agree with the premise that users should have root access to devices they own. Several express frustration with "walled gardens" and the increasing trend of manufacturers restricting user control. Some highlight the security and repairability benefits of root access, citing examples like jailbreaking iPhones to enable security features unavailable in the official iOS. A few more skeptical comments raise concerns about users bricking their devices and the potential for increased malware susceptibility if users lack technical expertise. Others note the conflict between right-to-repair legislation and software licensing agreements. A recurring theme is the desire for modular devices that allow component replacement and OS customization without voiding warranties.

The Hacker News post "Right to root access" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42677835) sparked a discussion with a moderate number of comments, mostly focusing on the practicality and implications of the proposed "right to root access" on personal devices.

Several commenters questioned the feasibility and potential consequences of such a right. One commenter argued that allowing root access would necessitate a significant redesign of operating systems and applications, leading to increased complexity and potentially reduced security. They highlighted the current model where users choose between convenience and security, suggesting that mandated root access might force a compromise on one or the other.

The discussion also touched upon the potential for misuse and the difficulty of balancing user freedom with security concerns. One commenter expressed skepticism about the average user's ability to manage root access responsibly, suggesting it could lead to increased vulnerability to malware and other threats. Another raised concerns about the implications for digital rights management (DRM) and the potential conflict with copyright holders.

Some commenters drew parallels to the "right to repair" movement, arguing that root access is a similar concept applied to software. They emphasized the importance of user control over their own devices and the ability to modify or repair them as needed.

A more technical discussion emerged regarding the distinction between "root access" and "administrator access," with one commenter clarifying that the author likely meant administrator access. This highlighted a potential ambiguity in the original article's terminology.

The potential impact on software development was also discussed. One commenter speculated that granting users root access could lead to a shift in software development practices, potentially leading to more modular and customizable systems.

Finally, some comments expressed support for the general idea of greater user control, but acknowledged the significant challenges in implementing such a right in a practical and secure manner. The overall sentiment seemed to be one of cautious interest, with many acknowledging the theoretical appeal while also recognizing the potential downsides and complexities.

Stories with Tag system administration

Summary of Comments ( 43 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43396172

Summary of Comments ( 47 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43339629

Summary of Comments ( 16 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43283669

Summary of Comments ( 6 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234666

Summary of Comments ( 117 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43207831

Summary of Comments ( 23 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43204604

Summary of Comments ( 57 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43125487

Summary of Comments ( 36 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43101430

Summary of Comments ( 8 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43057721

Summary of Comments ( 15 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43046174

Summary of Comments ( 41 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42945109

Summary of Comments ( 9 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42896716

Summary of Comments ( 16 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42773296

Summary of Comments ( 19 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42749402

Summary of Comments ( 258 ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42677835

Summary of Comments ( 43 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43396172

Summary of Comments ( 47 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43339629

Summary of Comments ( 16 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43283669

Summary of Comments ( 6 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234666

Summary of Comments ( 117 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43207831

Summary of Comments ( 23 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43204604

Summary of Comments ( 57 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43125487

Summary of Comments ( 36 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43101430

Summary of Comments ( 8 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43057721

Summary of Comments ( 15 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43046174

Summary of Comments ( 41 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42945109

Summary of Comments ( 9 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42896716

Summary of Comments ( 16 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42773296

Summary of Comments ( 19 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42749402

Summary of Comments ( 258 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42677835