Roe AI, a YC W24 startup, is seeking a Founding Engineer to build AI-powered tools for reproductive health research and advocacy. The ideal candidate will have strong Python and data science experience, a passion for reproductive rights, and comfort working in a fast-paced, early-stage environment. Responsibilities include developing data pipelines, building statistical models, and creating user-facing tools. This role offers significant equity and the opportunity to make a substantial impact on an important social issue.
Trellis is a YC-backed startup building a platform to simplify and automate legal processes for startups, initially focusing on Delaware incorporations. They aim to make legal tasks like forming a company, issuing stock options, and managing cap tables as easy as possible, reducing the time and cost typically associated with these processes. Trellis is currently hiring engineers and designers to join their team.
Commenters on Hacker News express skepticism about the value proposition of Trellis, questioning whether automating social media for local businesses is truly a significant pain point. Some argue that the cost likely outweighs the benefits for small businesses, especially given existing free or low-cost scheduling tools. Others point out the difficulty in creating engaging, authentic social media content automatically, suggesting that genuine interaction is more effective than automated posts. The limited customization options within Trellis are also criticized. A few commenters offer alternative solutions like Buffer or Hootsuite, implying that Trellis doesn't offer enough differentiation to justify its existence. Finally, several commenters note the potential for abuse and spam if the platform isn't carefully managed.
Summary of Comments ( 0 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42964269
HN commenters discuss Roe AI's unusual name, given the sensitive political context surrounding "Roe v Wade," with some speculating it might hinder recruiting or international expansion. Several users question the startup's premise of building a "personalized AI copilot for everything," doubting its feasibility and expressing concerns about privacy implications. There's skepticism about the value proposition and whether this approach is genuinely innovative. A few commenters also point out the potentially high server costs associated with the "always-on" aspect of the AI copilot. Overall, the sentiment leans towards cautious skepticism about Roe AI's viability.
The Hacker News post titled "Roe AI (YC W24) Is Hiring" linking to a YC job posting for a Founding Engineer at Roe AI generated a modest number of comments, mostly focusing on the company's unusual name and its potential implications.
Several commenters expressed concern that the name "Roe AI" might be misconstrued as relating to the landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade, which dealt with abortion rights in the United States. They pointed out that this association, whether intentional or not, could be problematic, leading to unwanted attention and potentially alienating users or investors. One commenter suggested that the name might be interpreted as being politically charged, which could hinder the company's growth and success. Another suggested the founders might not have fully considered the implications of the name choice, especially given the current political climate.
Another line of discussion revolved around the lack of clarity regarding what Roe AI actually does. While the linked job posting mentions "automating insurance claims" and "building large language models (LLMs) to create a new kind of insurance agent," some commenters felt this was too vague. They expressed a desire for more concrete information about the company's product and target market to better assess the opportunity.
Some commenters offered alternative interpretations of the name, speculating that it might refer to "Return on Equity" (ROE), a common financial metric, or even fish eggs. However, these were mostly presented as humorous possibilities rather than serious analyses.
Overall, the sentiment in the comments was cautious. While there was some interest in the company's potential use of LLMs in the insurance industry, the ambiguity surrounding the name and the company's specific focus left many commenters with reservations.