Helpcare AI, a Y Combinator Fall 2024 company, is hiring a full-stack engineer. This role involves building the core product, an AI-powered platform for customer support automation specifically for e-commerce companies. Responsibilities include designing and implementing APIs, integrating with third-party services, and working with the founding team on product strategy. The ideal candidate is proficient in Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, React, and PostgreSQL, and has experience with AWS, Docker, and Kubernetes. An interest in AI/ML and a passion for building efficient and scalable systems are also highly desired.
Inboxbooster, a Y Combinator-backed company, is hiring a fully remote JVM Bytecode Engineer. This role involves working on their core email deliverability product by developing and maintaining a Java agent that modifies bytecode at runtime. Ideal candidates are proficient in Java, bytecode manipulation libraries like ASM or Javassist, and have experience with performance optimization and debugging. Familiarity with email deliverability concepts is a plus.
Hacker News users discussing the Inboxbooster job posting largely focused on the low salary range ($60k-$80k) offered for a JVM Bytecode Engineer, especially given the specialized and in-demand nature of the skillset. Many commenters found this range significantly below market value, even considering the potential for remote work. Some speculated about the reasoning, suggesting either a misjudgment of the market by the company or a targeting of less experienced engineers. The remote aspect was also discussed, with some suggesting it might be a way to justify the lower salary, while others pointed out that top talent in this area can command high salaries regardless of location. A few commenters expressed skepticism about the YC backing given the seemingly low budget for engineering talent.
Summary of Comments ( 0 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43308332
Several Hacker News commenters express skepticism about the Helpcare AI job posting, questioning the heavy emphasis on "hustle culture" and the extremely broad range of required skills for a full-stack engineer, suggesting the company may be understaffed and expecting one person to fill multiple roles. Some point out the vague and potentially misleading language around compensation ("above market rate") and equity. Others question the actual need for AI in the product as described, suspecting it's more of a marketing buzzword than a core technology. A few users offer practical advice to the company, suggesting they clarify the job description and be more transparent about compensation to attract better candidates. Overall, the sentiment leans towards caution for potential applicants.
The Hacker News post titled "Helpcare AI (YC F24) Fullstack Engineer" (linking to a Google Forms job application) has a modest number of comments, primarily focusing on the application process itself and speculation about the company. No one discusses the content of the linked job application directly, or offers substantive commentary about Helpcare AI's product or mission.
Several commenters express frustration with the application's format, specifically the lack of a dedicated field for providing a resume/CV. They see this as a deviation from standard practice and potentially indicative of a less organized or thoughtful hiring process. The reliance on a Google Form, rather than a more professional application platform, is seen by some as a potential red flag.
There's a brief discussion around the ambiguity of the "Fullstack Engineer" role, with one commenter suggesting it might involve maintaining and iterating on the existing web application, possibly using tools like Next.js. This is purely speculative, however, based on the limited information available.
Some commenters express skepticism about the company's name and implied mission, particularly the use of "AI." They question whether the application of AI is genuine or simply a marketing tactic.
Finally, there's a short exchange about Y Combinator's role, with one commenter observing that YC companies frequently pivot, implying that the current job description might not reflect the company's long-term direction.
Overall, the comments are largely speculative and focused on the surface-level aspects of the application process, rather than the substance of the role or the company itself. There's no in-depth discussion of the company's technology, market, or potential. The sentiment expressed is generally cautious, with several commenters expressing reservations about the application process and the company's perceived lack of clarity.