By day, Dan Lane works at a Co-op in Exeter. By night, he's a globally recognized logo designer known as the "Lord of the Logos," creating iconic designs for bands like The Black Dahlia Murder and Aborted. His portfolio spans over 400 logos, including album artwork and merchandise designs for clients worldwide, a passion he pursues in his free time while maintaining his unassuming day job. He's built this impressive career largely through word-of-mouth and online networking within the metal music scene.
Mexico's government has been actively promoting and adopting open source software for over two decades, driven by cost savings, technological independence, and community engagement. This journey has included developing a national open source distribution ("Guadalinex"), promoting open standards, and fostering a collaborative ecosystem. Despite facing challenges such as bureaucratic inertia, vendor lock-in, and a shortage of skilled personnel, the commitment to open source persists, demonstrating its potential benefits for public administration and citizen services. Key lessons learned include the importance of clear policies, community building, and focusing on practical solutions that address specific needs.
HN commenters generally praised the Mexican government's efforts toward open source adoption, viewing it as a positive step towards transparency, cost savings, and citizen engagement. Some pointed out the importance of clear governance and community building for sustained open-source project success, while others expressed concerns about potential challenges like attracting and retaining skilled developers, ensuring long-term maintenance, and navigating bureaucratic hurdles. Several commenters shared examples of successful and unsuccessful open-source initiatives in other governments, emphasizing the need to learn from past experiences. A few also questioned the focus on creating new open source software rather than leveraging existing solutions. The overall sentiment, however, remained optimistic about the potential benefits of open source in government, particularly in fostering innovation and collaboration.
Tom Howard, known as "tomhow" on Hacker News, announced he's officially a public moderator for the site. He aims to improve communication and transparency around moderation decisions, particularly regarding controversial topics that often lead to misunderstandings. He intends to be more present in comment sections, explaining the reasoning behind actions taken by moderators. This move towards more open moderation is hoped to foster better understanding and trust within the Hacker News community.
The Hacker News comments on the "Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator" post express skepticism and concern about the announcement. Several commenters question the need for a publicly identified moderator and worry about the potential for increased targeting and harassment. Some suggest it goes against the spirit of anonymous moderation, potentially chilling open discussion. Others see it as a positive step towards transparency, hoping it might improve moderation consistency and accountability. There's also debate on whether this signifies a shift towards more centralized control over Hacker News. Overall, the sentiment leans towards cautious negativity, with many commenters expressing doubt about the long-term benefits of this change.
"The Book" (2021) podcast episode from 99% Invisible explores the history and cultural impact of The Real Book, a collection of illegally transcribed jazz lead sheets. Starting in the 1970s, this crowdsourced anthology became ubiquitous among jazz musicians, providing readily available arrangements of standards and lesser-known tunes. While copyright infringement plagued its existence, The Real Book democratized access to a vast musical repertoire, fostering improvisation, education, and the evolution of jazz. The episode examines the legal grey areas, the dedication of those who compiled and distributed the book, and its enduring influence on generations of musicians despite the eventual availability of legal alternatives.
Hacker News users discuss the ubiquity and impact of The Real Book, a collection of illegal jazz lead sheets. Commenters share anecdotes of its use in learning, performing, and teaching jazz, highlighting its role as a shared resource and common language among musicians. Some debate the ethics of its copyright-infringing nature, acknowledging the creators' lost revenue but also the book's contribution to jazz accessibility. The discussion also touches on the evolution of "fake books," the challenges of transcribing complex improvisations, and the book's occasional inaccuracies, with some commenters recommending newer, legal alternatives. Others share specific memories associated with The Real Book and its importance in their musical journeys. The practicality of the book, particularly its portability and spiral binding, is also praised.
Google is shifting internal Android development to a private model, similar to how it develops other products. While Android will remain open source, the day-to-day development process will no longer be publicly visible. Google claims this change will improve efficiency and security. The company insists this won't affect the open-source nature of Android, promising continued AOSP releases and collaboration with external partners. They anticipate no changes to the public bug tracker, release schedules, or the overall openness of the platform itself.
Hacker News users largely expressed skepticism and concern over Google's shift towards internal Android development. Many questioned whether "open source releases" would truly remain open if Google's internal development diverged significantly, leading to a de facto closed-source model similar to iOS. Some worried about potential stagnation of the platform, with fewer external contributions and slower innovation. Others saw it as a natural progression for a maturing platform, focusing on stability and polish over rapid feature additions. A few commenters pointed out the potential benefits, such as improved security and consistency through tighter control. The prevailing sentiment, however, was cautious pessimism about the long-term implications for Android's openness and community involvement.
Starting next week, Google will significantly reduce public access to the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) development process. Key parts of the next Android release's development, including platform changes and internal testing, will occur in private. While the source code will eventually be released publicly as usual, the day-to-day development and decision-making will be hidden from the public eye. This shift aims to improve efficiency and reduce early leaks of information about upcoming Android features. Google emphasizes that AOSP will remain open source, and they intend to enhance opportunities for external contributions through other avenues like quarterly platform releases and pre-release program expansions.
Hacker News commenters express concern over Google's move to develop Android AOSP primarily behind closed doors. Several suggest this signals a shift towards prioritizing Pixel features and potentially neglecting the broader Android ecosystem. Some worry this will stifle innovation and community contributions, leading to a more fragmented and less open Android experience. Others speculate this is a cost-cutting measure or a response to security concerns. A few commenters downplay the impact, believing open-source contributions were already minimal and Google's commitment to open source remains, albeit with a different approach. The discussion also touches upon the potential impact on custom ROM development and the future of AOSP's openness.
Frustrated with LinkedIn's limitations, a developer created OpenSpot, a networking platform prioritizing authentic connections and valuable interactions. OpenSpot aims to be a more user-friendly and less cluttered alternative, focusing on genuine engagement rather than vanity metrics. The platform features "Spots," dedicated spaces for focused discussions on specific topics, encouraging deeper conversations and community building. It also offers personalized recommendations based on user interests and skills, facilitating meaningful connections with like-minded individuals and potential collaborators.
HN commenters were largely unimpressed with OpenSpot, viewing it as a generic networking platform lacking a clear differentiator from LinkedIn. Several pointed out the difficulty of bootstrapping a social network, emphasizing the "chicken and egg" problem of attracting both talent and recruiters. Some questioned the value proposition, suggesting LinkedIn's flaws stem from its entrenched position, not its core concept. Others criticized the simplistic UI and generic design. A few commenters expressed a desire for alternative professional networking platforms but remained skeptical of OpenSpot's ability to gain traction. The prevailing sentiment was that OpenSpot didn't offer anything significantly new or compelling to draw users away from established platforms.
The original poster (OP) has successfully addressed their mental health challenges after a period of homelessness and is now seeking advice on rebuilding their life. They are currently staying in transitional housing, which offers limited support, and are feeling overwhelmed by the prospect of finding stable housing and employment. Specifically, they are struggling with anxiety around the rental application process and the fear of returning to homelessness. While proud of the progress made on their mental health journey, the OP feels uncertain about the next steps and is requesting guidance from the Hacker News community on practical strategies for securing housing and income.
The Hacker News comments offer a mix of practical advice and empathetic support. Several commenters stressed the importance of leveraging government and charitable resources for housing, food, and job assistance, specifically mentioning shelters, food banks, and social workers. Others recommended focusing on securing stable income, even if through temporary or gig work, as a foundation for getting off the streets. Multiple users advised against relying on family if the situation was abusive, prioritizing safety and mental well-being above all. Some suggested exploring vocational training or community college programs to improve job prospects. A few commenters shared personal experiences of overcoming homelessness, offering encouragement and highlighting the importance of perseverance. The overall tone was supportive and helpful, focusing on actionable steps the original poster could take.
Robin Sloan reflects on the evolving nature of online stores, arguing against the prevailing trend of mimicking large marketplaces like Amazon. He champions the idea of smaller, more curated shops that prioritize a unique browsing experience and foster a direct connection with customers. These "shopkeepers" should embrace the web's potential for individual expression and build digital spaces that reflect their own tastes and passions, rather than striving for sterile efficiency. He encourages creators to consider the emotional impact of their shops, emphasizing the joy of discovery and the personal touch that distinguishes a truly memorable online retail experience.
HN commenters largely agreed with the author's premise that "shopkeeping" tasks, like managing infrastructure and deployments, distract from product development. Many shared their own experiences of getting bogged down in these operational details, echoing the frustration of context switching and the feeling of being a "glorified sysadmin." Some suggested various solutions, from embracing serverless platforms and managed services to hiring dedicated DevOps engineers or even outsourcing entirely. A particularly compelling comment thread discussed the "build vs. buy" dilemma, with some arguing that building custom solutions, while initially attractive, often leads to increased shopkeeper duties down the line. Others emphasized the importance of early investment in automation and tooling to minimize future maintenance overhead. A few countered that small teams and early-stage startups might not have the resources for these solutions and that some level of shopkeeping is inevitable.
Recurse Center, a retreat for programmers in NYC, is hiring a full-time Office and Operations Assistant. This role involves managing daily office tasks like stocking supplies, handling mail, and assisting with event setup. The ideal candidate is organized, detail-oriented, and enjoys working in a collaborative environment. They should be comfortable with technology and possess excellent communication skills. Experience with administrative tasks is a plus, but a passion for supporting a learning community is essential. The position offers a competitive salary and benefits package.
HN commenters largely discuss Recurse Center's compensation for the Office and Operations Assistant position, finding the $70-80k salary range too low for NYC, especially given the required experience. Some suggest the range might be a typo or reflect a misunderstanding of the current job market. Others compare it unfavorably to similar roles at other organizations. A few defend the offered salary, citing the potential for learning and career growth at RC, along with benefits and the organization's non-profit status. Several commenters express concern that the low salary will limit applicant diversity. Finally, some question the need for in-office presence given RC's remote-friendly nature and speculate on RC's financial situation.
Seven39 is a new social media app designed to combat endless scrolling and promote more present, real-life interactions. It's only active for a 3-hour window each evening, from 7pm to 10pm local time. This limited availability encourages users to engage more intentionally during that specific timeframe and then disconnect to focus on other activities. The app aims to foster a sense of community and shared experience by having everyone online simultaneously within their respective time zones.
HN users generally reacted with skepticism and confusion towards Seven39. Many questioned the limited 3-hour window, finding it restrictive and impractical for building a genuine community. Some speculated it was a gimmick, while others wondered about its purpose or target demographic. The feasibility of scaling with such a limited timeframe was also a concern. Several commenters pointed out that the inherent scarcity might artificially inflate engagement initially, but ultimately wouldn't be sustainable. There was also a discussion about alternatives like Discord or group chats for achieving similar goals without the time constraints.
Sovereign Lumber advocates for a shift in the lumber industry towards localized, small-scale sawmills using sustainably harvested wood. The author argues that current lumber practices, reliant on large-scale operations and often unsustainable forestry, create economic fragility and environmental damage. By promoting smaller mills closer to the source of timber, communities can regain control over their lumber supply, create local jobs, and ensure more responsible forest management. This decentralized approach offers a path to greater resilience and economic independence, while fostering healthier forests and reducing transportation costs and carbon emissions.
Hacker News commenters generally expressed appreciation for the Sovereign Lumber project and its ethos. Several praised the detailed documentation and transparency, finding it refreshing and inspiring. Some questioned the long-term viability and scalability, particularly around sourcing enough appropriate logs and the potential environmental impact. Others discussed the potential for automation and the trade-offs between traditional craftsmanship and modern manufacturing techniques. The high price point was also a topic of discussion, with some arguing that it reflects the true cost of sustainable, locally sourced lumber, while others felt it limited accessibility. A few commenters shared personal anecdotes about woodworking and the challenges of finding high-quality lumber.
Revolt is a free and open-source alternative to Discord, offering a similar feature set with a focus on user privacy and community control. It features text and voice channels, direct messaging, file sharing, rich text editing, and voice chat, all hosted on its own servers. Revolt aims to provide a transparent and extensible platform, allowing users to self-host or contribute to its development. Its client is available on desktop and web, with mobile apps planned for the future. The project prioritizes community involvement and customization, giving users more control over their communication experience.
Hacker News users discussed Revolt's potential as a Discord alternative, praising its open-source nature and commitment to user privacy. Several commenters expressed interest in self-hosting, viewing it as a significant advantage. Some questioned Revolt's long-term viability and ability to compete with Discord's network effects and feature set, while others pointed to Matrix as a more established alternative. Concerns were also raised about moderation challenges and potential abuse on a decentralized platform. A few users shared their positive experiences using Revolt, highlighting its performance and clean interface, though acknowledging it's still under development. Overall, the comments reflect cautious optimism about Revolt, with many hoping it succeeds but recognizing the hurdles it faces.
The blog post "Trust in Firefox and Mozilla Is Gone – Let's Talk Alternatives" laments the perceived decline of Firefox, citing controversial decisions like the inclusion of sponsored tiles and the perceived prioritizing of corporate interests over user privacy and customization. The author argues that Mozilla has lost its way, straying from its original mission and eroding user trust. Consequently, the post explores alternative browsers like Brave, Vivaldi, and Librewolf, encouraging readers to consider switching and participate in a poll to gauge community sentiment regarding Firefox's future. The author feels Mozilla's actions demonstrate a disregard for their core user base, pushing them towards other options.
HN commenters largely agree with the article's premise that Mozilla has lost the trust of many users. Several cite Mozilla's perceived shift in focus towards revenue generation (e.g., Pocket integration, sponsored tiles) and away from user privacy and customization as primary reasons for the decline. Some suggest that Mozilla's embrace of certain web technologies, viewed as pushing users towards Google services, further erodes trust. A number of commenters recommend alternative browsers like LibreWolf, Falkon, and Ungoogled-Chromium as viable Firefox replacements focused on privacy and customizability. Several also express nostalgia for older versions of Firefox, viewing them as superior to the current iteration. While some users defend Mozilla, attributing negative perceptions to vocal minorities and arguing Firefox still offers a reasonable balance of features and privacy, the overall sentiment reflects a disappointment with the direction Mozilla has taken.
Berlin Swapfest is an electronics flea market held multiple times a year near Alexanderplatz, Berlin. It's a place for hobbyists, tinkerers, and professionals to buy, sell, and swap electronic components, tools, and gadgets, ranging from vintage computers and oscilloscopes to resistors and capacitors. Entrance is free for visitors. Vendors can rent tables to sell their wares, creating a vibrant marketplace for all things electronic.
Hacker News users reacted positively to the Berlin Swapfest announcement. Several expressed interest in attending or wished they could, with some lamenting the lack of similar events in their own locations (particularly in the US). Some users reminisced about past swap meets and the unique atmosphere and finds they offered. One commenter pointed out the potential benefits for hobbyists and repair enthusiasts seeking specific parts, contrasting it with the often limited and expensive options available online. The overall sentiment was one of nostalgia and appreciation for the opportunity to engage with a community of like-minded electronics enthusiasts.
Servo, a modern, high-performance browser engine built in Rust, uses Open Collective to transparently manage its finances. The project welcomes contributions to support its ongoing development, including building a sustainable ecosystem around web components and improving performance, reliability, and interoperability. Donations are used for infrastructure costs, bounties, and travel expenses for contributors. While Mozilla previously spearheaded Servo's development, it's now a community-maintained project under the Linux Foundation, focused on empowering developers with cutting-edge web technology.
HN commenters discuss Servo's move to Open Collective, expressing skepticism about its long-term viability without significant corporate backing. Several users question the project's direction and whether a truly independent, community-driven browser engine is feasible given the resources required for ongoing development and maintenance, particularly regarding security and staying current with web standards. The difficulty of competing with established browsers like Chrome and Firefox is also highlighted. Some commenters express disappointment with the project's perceived lack of progress and question the practicality of its current focus, while others hold out hope for its future and praise its technical achievements. A few users suggest potential alternative directions, such as focusing on niche use-cases or becoming a rendering engine for other applications.
Learning in public, as discussed in Giles Thomas's post, offers numerous benefits revolving around accelerated learning and career advancement. By sharing your learning journey, you solidify your understanding through articulation and receive valuable feedback from others. This process also builds a portfolio showcasing your skills and progress, attracting potential collaborators and employers. The act of teaching, inherent in public learning, further cements knowledge and establishes you as a credible resource within your field. Finally, the connections forged through shared learning experiences expand your network and open doors to new opportunities.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the author's premise about the benefits of learning in public. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes of how publicly documenting their learning journeys, even if imperfectly, led to unexpected connections, valuable feedback, and career opportunities. Some highlighted the importance of focusing on the process over the outcome, emphasizing that consistent effort and genuine curiosity are more impactful than polished perfection. A few cautioned against overthinking or being overly concerned with external validation, suggesting that the primary focus should remain on personal growth. One user pointed out the potential negative aspect of focusing solely on maximizing output for external gains and advocated for intrinsic motivation as a more sustainable driver. The discussion also briefly touched upon the discoverability of older "deep dive" posts, suggesting their enduring value even years later.
This "Ask HN" thread from February 2025 invites Hacker News users to share their current projects. People are working on a diverse range of things, from AI-powered tools and SaaS products to hardware projects, open-source libraries, and personal learning endeavors. Projects mentioned include AI companions, developer tools, educational platforms, productivity apps, and creative projects like music and game development. Many contributors are focused on solving specific problems they've encountered, while others are exploring new technologies or building something just for fun. The thread offers a snapshot of the independent and entrepreneurial spirit of the HN community and the kinds of projects that capture their interest at the beginning of 2025.
The Hacker News comments on the "Ask HN: What are you working on? (February 2025)" thread showcase a diverse range of projects. Several commenters are focused on AI-related ventures, including personalized education tools, AI-powered code generation, and creative applications of large language models. Others are working on more traditional software projects like developer tools, mobile apps, and SaaS platforms. A recurring theme is the integration of AI into existing workflows and products. Some commenters discuss hardware projects, particularly in the areas of sustainable energy and personal fabrication. A few express skepticism about the overhyping of certain technologies, while others share personal projects driven by passion rather than commercial intent. The overall sentiment is one of active development and exploration across various technological domains.
The small town of Seneca, Kansas, was ripped apart by a cryptocurrency scam orchestrated by local banker Ashley McFarland. McFarland convinced numerous residents, many elderly and financially vulnerable, to invest in her purportedly lucrative cryptocurrency mining operation, promising astronomical returns. Instead, she siphoned off millions, funding a lavish lifestyle and covering previous losses. As the scheme unraveled, trust eroded within the community, friendships fractured, and families faced financial ruin. The scam exposed the allure of get-rich-quick schemes in struggling rural areas and the devastating consequences of misplaced trust, leaving Seneca grappling with its aftermath.
HN commenters largely discuss the social dynamics of the scam described in the NYT article, with some focusing on the technical aspects. Several express sympathy for the victims, highlighting the deceptive nature of the scam and the difficulty of recognizing it. Some commenters debate the role of greed and the allure of "easy money" in making people vulnerable. Others analyze the technical mechanics of the scam, pointing out the usage of shell corporations and the movement of funds through different accounts to obfuscate the trail. A few commenters criticize the NYT article for its length and writing style, suggesting it could have been more concise. There's also discussion about the broader implications for cryptocurrency regulation and the need for better investor education. Finally, some skepticism is expressed towards the victims' claims of innocence, with some commenters speculating about their potential complicity.
The Matrix Foundation, facing a severe funding shortfall, announced it needs to secure $100,000 by the end of March 2025 to avoid shutting down crucial Matrix bridges. These bridges connect Matrix with other communication platforms like IRC, XMPP, and Slack, significantly expanding its reach and interoperability. Without this funding, the Foundation will be forced to decommission the bridges, impacting users and fragmenting the Matrix ecosystem. They are calling on the community and commercial partners to contribute and help secure the future of these vital connections.
HN commenters largely express skepticism and disappointment at Matrix's current state. Many question the viability of the project given its ongoing funding issues and inability to gain wider adoption. Several commenters criticize the foundation's management and decision-making, particularly regarding the bridge infrastructure. Some suggest alternative approaches like focusing on decentralized bridges or seeking government funding, while others believe the project may be nearing its end. The difficulty of bridging between different messaging protocols and the lack of a clear path towards sustainability are recurring themes. A few users express hope for the project's future but acknowledge significant challenges remain.
Common Lisp saw continued, albeit slow and steady, progress in 2023-2024. Key developments include improved tooling, notably with the rise of the CLPM build system and continued refinement of Roswell. Libraries like FFI, CFFI, and Bordeaux Threads saw improvements, along with advancements in web development frameworks like CLOG and Woo. The community remains active, albeit small, with ongoing efforts in areas like documentation and learning resources. While no groundbreaking shifts occurred, the ecosystem continues to mature, providing a stable and powerful platform for its dedicated user base.
Several commenters on Hacker News appreciated the overview of Common Lisp's recent developments and the author's personal experience. Some highlighted the value of CL's stability and the ongoing work improving its ecosystem, particularly around areas like web development. Others discussed the language's strengths, such as its powerful macro system and interactive development environment, while acknowledging its steeper learning curve compared to more mainstream options. The continued interest and slow but steady progress of Common Lisp were seen as positive signs. One commenter expressed excitement about upcoming web framework improvements, while others shared their own positive experiences with using CL for specific projects.
Open source maintainers are increasingly burdened by escalating demands and dwindling resources. The "2025 State of Open Source" report reveals maintainers face growing user bases expecting faster response times and more features, while simultaneously struggling with burnout, lack of funding, and insufficient institutional support. This pressure is forcing many maintainers to consider stepping back or abandoning their projects altogether, posing a significant threat to the sustainability of the open source ecosystem. The report highlights the need for better funding models, improved communication tools, and greater recognition of the crucial role maintainers play in powering much of the modern internet.
HN commenters generally agree with the article's premise that open-source maintainers are underappreciated and overworked. Several share personal anecdotes of burnout and the difficulty of balancing maintenance with other commitments. Some suggest potential solutions, including better funding models, improved tooling for managing contributions, and fostering more empathetic communities. The most compelling comments highlight the inherent conflict between the "free" nature of open source and the very real costs associated with maintaining it – time, effort, and emotional labor. One commenter poignantly describes the feeling of being "on call" indefinitely, responsible for a project used by thousands without adequate support or compensation. Another suggests that the problem lies in a disconnect between users who treat open-source software as a product and maintainers who often view it as a passion project, leading to mismatched expectations and resentment.
A Diablo IV speedrunner's world record was debunked by hackers who modified the game to replicate the supposedly impossible circumstances of the run. They discovered the runner, who claimed to have benefited from extremely rare item drops and enemy spawns, actually used a cheat to manipulate the game's random number generator, making the fortunate events occur on demand. This manipulation, confirmed by analyzing network traffic, allowed the runner to artificially inflate their luck and achieve an otherwise statistically improbable clear time. The discovery highlighted the difficulty of verifying speedruns in online games and the lengths some players will go to fabricate records.
Hacker News commenters largely praised the technical deep-dive in uncovering the fraudulent Diablo speedrun. Several expressed admiration for the hackers' dedication and the sophisticated tools they built to analyze the game's network traffic and memory. Some questioned the runner's explanation of "lag" and found the evidence presented compelling. A few commenters debated the ethics of reverse-engineering games for this purpose, while others discussed the broader implications for speedrunning verification and the pressure to achieve seemingly impossible records. The general sentiment was one of fascination with the detective work involved and disappointment in the runner's actions.
Faced with the unsustainable maintenance burden of his popular open-source Java linear algebra library, ND4J, the author founded Timefold.ai. The library's widespread use in commercial settings, coupled with the limited resources available for its upkeep through traditional open-source avenues like donations and sponsorships, led to this decision. Timefold offers commercial support and enterprise features built upon ND4J, generating revenue that directly funds the continued development and maintenance of the open-source project. This model allows the library to thrive and remain freely available, while simultaneously providing a sustainable business model based on its value.
Hacker News users generally praised the Timefold founder's ingenuity and resourcefulness in creating a business around his open-source project. Several commenters discussed the challenges of monetizing open-source software, with some suggesting alternative models like donations or dual licensing. A few expressed skepticism about the long-term viability of relying on commercializing closed-source extensions, particularly given the rapid advancements in open-source LLMs. Some users also debated the ethics of restricting certain features to paying customers, while others emphasized the importance of sustainable funding for open-source projects. The founder's transparency and clear explanation of his motivations were widely appreciated.
OSMCal is a comprehensive, crowdsourced calendar of OpenStreetMap-related events worldwide. It aggregates conferences, workshops, mapathons, social gatherings, and other activities relevant to the OSM community, allowing users to browse events by location, date, and keywords. The calendar aims to facilitate connection and collaboration within the OSM ecosystem by providing a central resource for discovering and promoting these events. Users can submit their own events for inclusion, ensuring the calendar stays up-to-date and reflects the vibrant activity of the OpenStreetMap community.
Hacker News users discussed the usefulness of the OpenStreetMap Calendar (OSMCal) for discovering local mapping events. Several commenters expressed appreciation for the resource, finding it valuable for connecting with the OSM community and learning about contributing. Some highlighted the importance of in-person events for fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing within the OSM ecosystem. Others wished for improved filtering or search capabilities to refine event discovery, particularly by region or specific interests. The calendar's role in promoting OSM and coordinating community efforts was generally seen as positive. A few users also mentioned alternative or supplementary resources, such as weeklyOSM and the OSM forum, for staying informed about OpenStreetMap activities.
BookTalk.club streamlines book club management within Slack. It offers a platform to propose, vote on, and schedule books, automatically creating Slack channels and reminders for discussions. The service integrates with Goodreads for book information and aims to simplify the organizational overhead of running a book club, allowing members to focus on reading and discussion.
HN commenters generally expressed interest in the project, with several praising the clean UI and niche focus. Some suggested improvements like Goodreads integration, alternative communication platforms beyond Slack, and features for managing discussions and votes. A few users questioned the long-term viability of Slack as a platform for book clubs, citing potential inactivity and cost issues for larger groups. Others shared their own struggles with running book clubs and expressed hope that this tool could solve some of those challenges. The overall sentiment was positive, with many encouraging the creator to continue developing the project.
Freedesktop.org and Alpine Linux, two significant organizations in the open-source Linux ecosystem, are urgently seeking new web hosting after their current provider, Bytemark, announced its impending closure. This leaves these organizations, which host crucial project infrastructure like Git repositories, mailing lists, and download servers, with a tight deadline to migrate their services. The loss of Bytemark, a long-time supporter of open-source projects, highlights the precarious nature of relying on smaller hosting providers and the challenge of finding replacements willing to offer similar levels of service and support to often resource-constrained open-source projects.
HN commenters discuss the irony of major open-source projects relying on donated infrastructure and facing precarity. Several express concern about the fragility of the open-source ecosystem, highlighting the dependence on individual goodwill and the lack of sustainable funding models. Some suggest exploring federated hosting solutions or community-owned infrastructure to mitigate future risks. Others propose that affected projects should leverage their significant user base to crowdfund resources or find corporate sponsors. A few commenters downplay the issue, suggesting migration to a new host is a relatively simple task. The overall sentiment reflects a mixture of worry about the future of essential open-source projects and a desire for more robust, community-driven solutions.
DM is a lightweight, unofficial Discord client designed to run on older Windows operating systems like Windows 95, 98, ME, and newer versions. Built using the Delphi programming language, it leverages Discord's web API to provide basic chat functionality, including sending and receiving messages, joining and leaving servers, and displaying user lists. While not offering the full feature set of the official Discord client, DM prioritizes minimal resource usage and compatibility with older hardware.
Hacker News users discuss the Discord client for older Windows systems, primarily focusing on its novelty and technical ingenuity. Several express admiration for the developer's skill in making Discord, a complex modern application, function on such outdated operating systems. Some question the practical use cases, while others highlight the potential value for preserving access to communities on older hardware or for specific niche applications like retro gaming setups. There's also discussion around the technical challenges involved, including handling dependencies and the limitations of older APIs. Some users express concern about security implications, given the lack of updates for these older OSes. Finally, the unconventional choice of Pascal/Delphi for the project sparks some interest and debate about the suitability of the language.
Jonathan Crary's "Superbloom" argues that the relentless pursuit of seamless technological connection, exemplified by platforms like Zoom and social media, has paradoxically fragmented our experience of reality. Crary posits that these technologies, promising increased interaction, instead foster alienation by reducing human experience to quantifiable data points and encouraging a constant state of distraction. This constant connectivity degrades our capacity for focused attention, critical thinking, and genuine engagement with the world, ultimately hindering the development of individual subjectivity and shared social realities. The book urges a critical reassessment of our relationship with these technologies and advocates for reclaiming our agency in shaping a more meaningful and less atomized future.
HN commenters largely disagree with the premise of the review and the book it covers ("Superbloom"). Several argue the reviewer misrepresents or misunderstands the book's arguments, especially regarding technology's role in societal fragmentation. Some suggest the reviewer's nostalgia for pre-internet community blinds them to the downsides of those times, like geographic limitations and social conformity. Others point out that "technologies of connection" are tools, and blaming them for societal issues is like blaming hammers for violence. A few commenters mention the irony of discussing connection and disconnection on a platform designed for connection, highlighting the complexity of the issue. The most compelling comments offer alternative perspectives on how technology impacts community, emphasizing individual agency and the potential for both positive and negative consequences depending on usage.
The original Pebble smartwatch ecosystem is being revived through a community-driven effort called Rebble. Existing Pebble watches will continue to function with existing apps and features, thanks to recovered server infrastructure and ongoing community development. Going forward, Rebble aims to enhance the Pebble experience with improvements like bug fixes, new watchfaces, and expanded app compatibility with modern phone operating systems. They are also exploring the possibility of manufacturing new hardware in the future.
Hacker News users reacted to the "Pebble back" announcement with a mix of excitement and skepticism. Many expressed nostalgia for their old Pebbles and hoped for a true revival of the platform, including app support and existing watch functionality. Several commenters questioned the open-source nature of the project, given the reliance on a closed-source phone app and potential server dependencies. Concerns were raised about battery life compared to modern smartwatches, and some users expressed interest in alternative open-source smartwatch projects like AsteroidOS and Bangle.js. Others debated the feasibility of reviving the app ecosystem and questioned the long-term viability of the project given the limited resources of the Rebble team. Finally, some users simply expressed joy at the prospect of using their Pebbles again.
Summary of Comments ( 60 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43594396
Hacker News commenters were generally unimpressed with the "Lord of the Logos" article. Several found the title misleading, as the designer's work, while prolific, wasn't particularly noteworthy or high-profile. Some criticized the writing style as hyperbolic and clickbaity, arguing the story wasn't deserving of such grand pronouncements. Others pointed out the irony of a Co-op employee designing logos for competing supermarkets. A few questioned the legality and ethics of designing logos for other companies while employed, especially given the potential for intellectual property conflicts. There was also a brief discussion about the prevalence of generic-looking logos.
The Hacker News post about the Exeter Co-op worker who designs logos has a modest number of comments, mostly focusing on the juxtaposition of his ordinary day job and creative outlet. Several commenters express appreciation for his artistic talent and the unique designs he creates.
One commenter highlights the "Lord of the Logos" moniker, finding it amusing and fitting. They also draw a parallel to Clark Kent/Superman, emphasizing the hidden talent beneath an unassuming exterior. This comparison resonates with other commenters, who enjoy the romantic notion of a secret identity.
Another thread discusses the logos themselves, with some commenters praising their retro aesthetic and clever use of negative space. They point out the effectiveness of simple, yet memorable designs, and how they stand out in a world of overly complex logos.
A few comments touch on the nature of creative work and the importance of having an outlet for self-expression, regardless of one's profession. They commend the designer for pursuing his passion alongside his day job.
Some commenters express curiosity about the designer's process and how he balances his two roles. They wonder if he plans to transition to logo design full-time or continue his current arrangement.
Overall, the comments reflect a positive reception to the article and a general admiration for the designer's artistic abilities and dedication to his craft. There isn't much in the way of controversy or debate, with most commenters simply sharing their appreciation for the story and the designs.