The blog post "Narrative and the Structure of Art" explores how narrative structure, typically associated with storytelling, also underpins various art forms like music, visual art, and even abstract works. It argues that art relies on creating and resolving tension, mirroring the rising action, climax, and resolution found in traditional narratives. This structure provides a framework for engaging the audience emotionally and intellectually, guiding them through a journey of anticipation and satisfaction. While the narrative might not be a literal story, it manifests as a progression of elements, whether melodic phrases in music, brushstrokes in a painting, or shifting forms in a sculpture, ultimately creating a cohesive and meaningful experience for the observer.
Jan Miksovsky's blog post presents a humorous screenplay introducing the fictional programming language "Slowly." The screenplay satirizes common programming language tropes, including obscure syntax, fervent community debates, and the promise of effortless productivity. It follows the journey of a programmer attempting to learn Slowly, highlighting its counterintuitive features and the resulting frustration. The narrative emphasizes the language's glacial pace and convoluted approach to simple tasks, ultimately culminating in the programmer's realization that "Slowly" is ironically named and incredibly inefficient. The post is a playful commentary on the often-complex and occasionally absurd nature of learning new programming languages.
Hacker News users generally reacted positively to the screenplay format for introducing a programming language. Several commenters praised the engaging and creative approach, finding it a refreshing change from traditional tutorials. Some suggested it could be particularly effective for beginners, making the learning process less intimidating. A few pointed out the potential for broader applications of this format to other technical subjects. There was some discussion on the specifics of the chosen language (Janet) and its suitability for introductory purposes, with some advocating for more mainstream options. The practicality of using a screenplay for a full language tutorial was also questioned, with some suggesting it might be better suited as a brief introduction or for illustrating specific concepts. A common thread was the appreciation for the author's innovative attempt to make learning programming more accessible.
The original poster wonders if people can be categorized as primarily "story-based" or "fact-based" thinkers. They observe that some individuals seem to prioritize narratives and emotional resonance, readily accepting information that fits a compelling story, even if evidence is lacking. Conversely, others appear to prioritize factual accuracy and logical consistency, potentially dismissing emotionally resonant stories if they lack evidential support. The author questions whether this distinction is valid, if people fall on a spectrum, or if other factors are at play, and asks if this dichotomy influences communication styles and understanding.
The Hacker News comments discuss the idea of "story-based" vs. "fact-based" people, with many expressing skepticism about such a rigid dichotomy. Several commenters suggest the distinction isn't about accepting facts, but rather how people prioritize and interpret them. Some argue everyone uses narratives to understand the world, with the key difference being the quality of evidence people demand to support their narratives. Others point out the influence of cognitive biases, motivated reasoning, and the difficulty of separating facts from interpretation. The role of emotion and empathy in decision-making is also highlighted, with some arguing "story-based" thinking might simply reflect a greater emphasis on emotional connection. A few commenters mention Myers-Briggs personality types as a potential framework for understanding these differences, though this is met with some skepticism. Overall, the consensus seems to be that the proposed dichotomy is overly simplistic and potentially misleading.
Summary of Comments ( 0 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43170408
HN users generally found the linked article thought-provoking, though somewhat meandering and lacking in concrete examples. Several commenters appreciated the exploration of narrative structure in different art forms beyond traditional storytelling. One compelling comment highlighted the idea of "nested narratives" and how this concept applies to music, visual art, and even architecture. Another interesting point raised was the distinction between narrative and "narrativity," with the suggestion that even abstract art can possess a sense of unfolding or progression that resembles a narrative. Some users also debated the role of intent versus interpretation in determining the "narrative" of a piece, and whether the artist's intended narrative is ultimately more important than the meaning a viewer derives. A few commenters expressed skepticism about the overall premise, finding the concept of narrative in abstract art to be a stretch.
The Hacker News post titled "Narrative and the Structure of Art," linking to a Medium article of the same name, has generated a modest discussion with several insightful comments. While not a voluminous thread, the comments present some interesting perspectives on the relationship between narrative, art, and meaning-making.
One commenter points out the challenge of appreciating abstract art, acknowledging that while they can admire the skill and effort involved, they often struggle to connect with it emotionally or intellectually without a narrative framework. This commenter expresses a desire to learn how to better appreciate abstract art and understand the artist's intentions, even in the absence of a clear story.
Another commenter builds on this by suggesting that abstract art can evoke emotions and create its own kind of narrative, even if it's not explicit. They propose that abstract forms and colors can trigger associations and memories in the viewer, leading to a personal and subjective experience. This idea suggests that the "narrative" in abstract art might be emergent and co-created by the artist and the viewer.
A third commenter focuses on the crucial role of intent in art. They argue that without understanding the artist's intent, it's difficult to truly grasp the meaning of a piece, regardless of whether it's abstract or representational. They also caution against overly relying on the artist's stated intentions, as the actual impact of the art might differ from what the artist consciously intended. This comment highlights the complex interplay between artist, artwork, and audience in the creation of meaning.
Further discussion delves into the nature of artistic expression and the different ways artists convey meaning. One commenter draws a parallel between music and abstract visual art, suggesting that both can communicate emotions and ideas without relying on explicit narrative. They argue that the structure and form of the artwork itself can be a form of communication, independent of any representational content.
Finally, one comment shifts the focus to the commercial aspects of art, arguing that the art world often prioritizes novelty and marketability over genuine artistic merit. This commenter implies that the pursuit of narrative, particularly in abstract art, might sometimes be driven by market forces rather than purely artistic considerations.
These comments, taken together, offer a nuanced perspective on the interplay of narrative and art. They explore the challenges of appreciating art without a clear story, the potential for abstract art to evoke its own kind of narrative, the importance of artistic intent, and the influence of the art market on artistic creation. While not an extensive discussion, the comments provide valuable food for thought on these complex topics.