Evidence suggests many Pokémon Playtest cards, initially believed to be from the game's early development, were actually printed much later, possibly in 2024. This is based on the presence of a "three-dot" copyright symbol on the cards, which signifies compliance with Japanese copyright law updated in 2024. While this doesn't definitively rule out earlier creation, it strongly indicates a later printing date than previously assumed, suggesting these "Playtest" cards may represent a different stage of development or purpose than initially thought.
Jens Quistgaard, a renowned Danish designer, created a series of iconic peppermills characterized by their unique combination of form and function. These mills, produced primarily from the 1960s to the 1980s, feature a distinctive shape, typically made of teak and featuring a ceramic grinding mechanism. Quistgaard prioritized simplicity and craftsmanship, resulting in mills that are both aesthetically pleasing and practical. While variations exist in size, wood type, and base design, they all share a common design language that makes them instantly recognizable as Quistgaard creations. The peppermills are highly collectible today, appreciated for their enduring design and Quistgaard's legacy.
Hacker News users discuss Quistgaard's pepper mills with a mix of appreciation and pragmatism. Several praise the iconic design and craftsmanship, noting their durability and the satisfying grinding mechanism. Others question the practicality, citing issues with refilling, the coarseness of the grind, and the tendency for peppercorns to get stuck. Some commenters share personal anecdotes of owning or inheriting these mills, highlighting their longevity. A few delve into the history of Dansk Designs and Quistgaard's broader work. Overall, the comments reflect a respect for the design while acknowledging its functional limitations. There's also some discussion about the high prices these mills command, with some arguing they are more collectible than practical.
Summary of Comments ( 174 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42880704
Hacker News users discuss the implications of Pokémon playtest cards potentially being printed in 2024. Some express skepticism, pointing out that a "24" print code doesn't definitively mean the year 2024 and could represent something else entirely. Others find the idea plausible given the long lead times in the printing industry, especially with specialized processes like those used for Pokémon cards. The conversation also touches on the possibility of these being counterfeits, the complexities of the Pokémon TCG market, and how leaks can affect the perceived value and collectability of cards. A few users mention the inherent difficulties in verifying the authenticity of such leaks, while others simply express amusement at the idea of time-traveling Pokémon cards.
The Hacker News post titled "Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in 2024" (linking to an EliteForum discussion) has a moderate number of comments discussing the implications of the apparent leak of Pokémon playtest cards. The discussion centers around the potential ramifications for the Pokémon Trading Card Game (TCG) and the printing process involved.
Several commenters delve into the technical aspects of card printing and how the revealed 2024 date might be interpreted. One commenter questions the significance of a 2024 print date, suggesting it doesn't necessarily mean the cards will be released in that year, as playtesting can occur long before a set's official launch. They point out that Wizards of the Coast, known for Magic: The Gathering, often playtests cards years in advance. This comment sparks further discussion about the logistics of card production, including the possibility that the 2024 date could refer to internal test prints rather than the final production run.
Another thread of discussion revolves around the potential impact of these leaks on the Pokémon TCG meta. Commenters speculate on the potential power level of the leaked cards and whether their premature reveal could disrupt the planned release schedule or force changes in upcoming sets. Some express concern that the leaks could lead to speculation and artificial inflation of prices for certain cards, while others dismiss the leaks as insignificant, arguing that playtest cards rarely resemble the final product.
A few commenters express skepticism about the authenticity of the leaked cards, although this remains a minority view. The majority of commenters seem to accept the legitimacy of the leak and focus on analyzing its implications.
Finally, several commenters discuss the legal ramifications for the leaker and the potential response from The Pokémon Company. Some speculate on the possibility of legal action against the individual who leaked the cards, while others discuss the potential damage to the company's intellectual property and brand.
Overall, the comments on Hacker News reveal a mix of curiosity, concern, and skepticism surrounding the leaked Pokémon playtest cards. The discussion provides insight into the complexities of TCG production, the potential impact of leaks on the game's meta, and the legal and ethical considerations surrounding such incidents.