This blog post by David Weisberg traces the evolution of Computer-Aided Design (CAD). Beginning with early sketchpad systems in the 1960s like Sutherland's Sketchpad, it highlights the development of foundational geometric modeling techniques and the emergence of companies like Dassault Systèmes (CATIA) and SDRC (IDEAS). The post then follows CAD's progression through the rise of parametric and solid modeling in the 1980s and 90s, facilitated by companies like Autodesk (AutoCAD) and PTC (Pro/ENGINEER). Finally, it touches on more recent advancements like direct modeling, cloud-based CAD, and the increasing accessibility of CAD software, culminating in modern tools like Shapr3D.
Jens Quistgaard, a renowned Danish designer, created a series of iconic peppermills characterized by their unique combination of form and function. These mills, produced primarily from the 1960s to the 1980s, feature a distinctive shape, typically made of teak and featuring a ceramic grinding mechanism. Quistgaard prioritized simplicity and craftsmanship, resulting in mills that are both aesthetically pleasing and practical. While variations exist in size, wood type, and base design, they all share a common design language that makes them instantly recognizable as Quistgaard creations. The peppermills are highly collectible today, appreciated for their enduring design and Quistgaard's legacy.
Hacker News users discuss Quistgaard's pepper mills with a mix of appreciation and pragmatism. Several praise the iconic design and craftsmanship, noting their durability and the satisfying grinding mechanism. Others question the practicality, citing issues with refilling, the coarseness of the grind, and the tendency for peppercorns to get stuck. Some commenters share personal anecdotes of owning or inheriting these mills, highlighting their longevity. A few delve into the history of Dansk Designs and Quistgaard's broader work. Overall, the comments reflect a respect for the design while acknowledging its functional limitations. There's also some discussion about the high prices these mills command, with some arguing they are more collectible than practical.
Summary of Comments ( 37 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43167865
Hacker News users discussed the surprising longevity of some early CAD systems, with one commenter pointing out that CATIA, dating back to the late 1970s, is still heavily used in aerospace and automotive design. Others shared anecdotal experiences and historical details, including the evolution of CAD software interfaces (from text-based to graphical), the influence of different hardware platforms, and the challenges of data exchange between systems. Several commenters also mentioned open-source CAD alternatives like FreeCAD and OpenSCAD, noting their growing capabilities but acknowledging their limitations compared to established commercial products. The overall sentiment reflects an appreciation for the progress of CAD technology while recognizing the enduring relevance of some older systems.
The Hacker News post titled "History of CAD – David Weisberg" linking to a Shapr3D blog post has generated a moderate number of comments, most of which delve into personal experiences and perspectives on the evolution of CAD software.
Several commenters reminisce about their early experiences with CAD systems. One commenter recalls using early versions of AutoCAD in the 1980s, highlighting the transition from command-line interfaces to GUI-based systems and the impact it had on productivity. They specifically mention the challenge of remembering complex commands and the significant learning curve involved in mastering these early CAD tools. Another commenter shares a similar sentiment, describing their experience with CADAM, emphasizing the difficulty of using these systems compared to modern software.
Another thread within the comments discusses the importance of Ivan Sutherland's Sketchpad, considered a pioneering work in computer graphics and a precursor to CAD. Commenters emphasize the significance of Sketchpad's object-oriented approach and its influence on subsequent CAD systems.
A few comments focus on specific aspects of CAD software. One commenter discusses the transition from 2D to 3D CAD and the paradigm shift it represented. Another commenter notes the limitations of current parametric modeling systems and expresses a desire for more powerful and flexible tools.
The discussion also touches on the evolution of hardware used for CAD. One commenter mentions the use of specialized graphics workstations in the past and the gradual shift towards more general-purpose hardware as computing power increased.
Some comments offer alternative perspectives on the history of CAD. One commenter argues that the focus on commercial CAD software overlooks the contributions of open-source and academic projects. Another commenter mentions the role of manufacturing processes in shaping the development of CAD.
Overall, the comments provide valuable insights into the historical development of CAD software, offering personal anecdotes, technical discussions, and diverse perspectives on the subject. They showcase the evolution of CAD from its early beginnings to its current state, highlighting the challenges and advancements that have shaped the field.