Elaine Pagels' new book, "Heretic," reviewed in The New Yorker, revisits the enduring fascination with Jesus, even amidst declining Christian belief. Pagels argues that Jesus's radical message of love, forgiveness, and inclusivity, initially appealing to the marginalized, continues to resonate today, divorced from traditional church structures and doctrines. This enduring power stems from the human need for meaning and connection, offering a model for ethical living and social justice that transcends specific religious dogma. The review highlights how Pagels contrasts Jesus's teachings with the evolving, often exclusionary, interpretations imposed by the early Church, particularly Paul, suggesting the original message has been obscured and even betrayed over time.
The New Yorker profiles game designer Jason Rohrer, exploring his intensely personal approach to game creation. Rohrer's games, often minimalist and emotionally resonant, act as a form of self-exploration, delving into his anxieties about death, legacy, and human connection. The article highlights his unique design philosophy, which prioritizes profound experiences over traditional gameplay mechanics, exemplified by projects like "One Hour One Life" and "Sandspiel." It portrays Rohrer as a restless innovator constantly seeking new ways to express complex emotions through interactive media, pushing the boundaries of what games can be.
HN commenters generally found the article interesting and appreciated the designer's vulnerability in exploring his mental health through game development. Some discussed the potential of games for self-discovery and therapeutic applications, while others drew parallels to other introspective games and creators. A few questioned the efficacy of this approach, expressing skepticism about the ultimate value of turning personal struggles into a game. The most compelling comments focused on the blurring lines between game design, art, and therapy, debating the extent to which such deeply personal games can resonate with a wider audience and whether the process itself is inherently therapeutic for the creator. Several commenters also appreciated the article's nuanced portrayal of mental health struggles, moving beyond simple narratives of recovery.
This 1993 New Yorker article profiles Abe Green, a man who spent over four decades as a fixture at the Beverly Hills Hotel pool. Green, a self-made millionaire, established a daily ritual of holding court poolside, becoming a peculiar part of the hotel's landscape. The piece explores Green's evolving relationship with the hotel, from his early days as a welcomed guest to his later years marked by increasing eccentricity and strained relations with management. It paints a portrait of a man seeking community and purpose in a glamorous yet ultimately transient environment, capturing a specific era of Hollywood history and the changing dynamics of the legendary hotel.
Hacker News users discuss the intriguing life of Abe Green, the subject of the New Yorker article. Several commenters express fascination with Green's dedication to a singular, seemingly mundane routine, spending decades poolside. Some question his motivations and mental state, pondering whether it represents a life well-lived or a form of obsessive escapism. Others romanticize his existence, viewing it as a unique pursuit of personal happiness, unburdened by societal expectations. A few commenters note the piece's portrayal of a bygone era of Hollywood glamour and the changing face of Los Angeles. There's also a short thread discussing the hotel itself and its history.
John McPhee's "The Pinball Philosophy" explores the world of competitive pinball through the lens of Roger Sharpe, a top-ranked player in 1970s New York City. The piece delves into the intense focus, strategy, and almost mystical approach Sharpe takes to the game, highlighting the nuanced skills involved beyond mere luck. It contrasts his zen-like calm and calculated nudges with the frenetic energy of pinball parlors, ultimately portraying pinball not as a mindless pastime, but as a demanding game of skill requiring precision, anticipation, and a deep understanding of the machine's mechanics. Sharpe's pursuit of mastery reveals a unique subculture where dedicated players strive for perfect games and fleeting moments of control in a world of chaos and flashing lights.
HN users largely enjoyed McPhee's writing style, praising its evocative descriptions and engaging narrative. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes about pinball, reflecting on its enduring appeal and the unique focus it demands. Some discussed the cultural and historical context of pinball, including its past association with gambling and its resurgence as a hobby. A few users expressed interest in the technical aspects of pinball machine design and operation. The overall sentiment was positive, with many commenters appreciating the rediscovery of this older article. A couple noted the philosophical connections McPhee makes, linking pinball to broader life lessons about skill, chance, and persistence.
In March 1965, Selma, Alabama became the focal point of the fight for voting rights. After a local activist was killed during a peaceful protest, Martin Luther King Jr. led a march from Selma to Montgomery to demand federal intervention. Facing violent resistance from state troopers, the initial march, "Bloody Sunday," was brutally suppressed. A second attempt was aborted, and finally, after federal protection was granted, thousands completed the five-day march to the state capital. The events in Selma galvanized national support for voting rights and directly contributed to the passage of the Voting Rights Act later that year.
HN commenters discuss the historical context of the Selma march, highlighting the bravery of the protestors facing violent opposition. Some note the article's detailed depiction of the political maneuvering and negotiations surrounding the events. Others lament the slow pace of societal change, drawing parallels to ongoing struggles for civil rights. Several commenters share personal anecdotes or related historical information, enriching the discussion with firsthand accounts and further context. A few commenters also point out the importance of remembering and learning from such historical events.
Summary of Comments ( 3 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43467847
Hacker News users discuss the complex legacy of Christianity, largely agreeing with the review's premise that its influence is still felt today. Some highlighted the enduring power of religious narratives, even for non-believers. Others pointed out the irony of dismissing Christianity while simultaneously being shaped by its values. Several comments explored the cyclical nature of history, with one user suggesting that humans are inherently drawn to belief systems, even if those systems change over time. A few questioned the reviewer's framing of early Christianity, suggesting it was more diverse than portrayed. There's also a thread examining the role of power structures in shaping religious narratives and their impact on societies throughout history.
The Hacker News post titled "We're Still Not Done with Jesus," linking to a New Yorker review of Elaine Pagels' book "Heretic," has generated a modest number of comments, primarily focusing on the historical impact of Christianity and its relationship with other belief systems.
Several commenters discuss the complex relationship between early Christianity and Gnosticism. One commenter highlights the historical suppression of Gnostic texts and the ongoing scholarly efforts to understand their significance. Another notes the diversity of beliefs within early Christianity, emphasizing that Gnosticism wasn't a monolithic entity but rather a collection of different perspectives. A different user adds context by mentioning the Nag Hammadi library's discovery and its impact on understanding early Christian thought, contrasting the canonical gospels with Gnostic texts.
The idea of "heresy" itself is discussed. One commenter points out the inherent subjectivity in labeling something as heretical, emphasizing that it depends on who holds the power to define orthodoxy. Another expands on this, observing how evolving interpretations of scripture have led to significant shifts in what's considered acceptable belief within Christianity throughout history.
There's some discussion about the broader implications of religious belief and the role of institutions. One commenter questions the overall utility of organized religion, pointing to historical conflicts and suggesting a focus on individual spirituality instead. Another suggests that the appeal of Christianity lies in its message of hope and the promise of an afterlife, especially during times of hardship.
A few comments focus on the specific book and author. One commenter expresses interest in Pagels' work, praising her ability to make complex theological topics accessible to a wider audience. Another mentions reading the book being reviewed and offers a brief personal reflection on its themes.
Finally, a couple of comments offer tangential observations. One user briefly mentions the influence of paganism on Christian practices, while another makes a more humorous remark about the persistent relevance of religious topics, even in a technologically advanced society.
While the discussion doesn't reach any definitive conclusions, it provides a range of perspectives on the historical and contemporary significance of Christianity, Gnosticism, and the concept of heresy. The comments are generally thoughtful and contribute to a nuanced understanding of the topic, even without delving into highly specific theological debates.