Nobel laureate Mario Vargas Llosa, a towering figure of 20th and 21st-century literature, has died. The Peruvian writer, known for his prolific and politically charged novels, essays, and plays, explored themes of power, corruption, and individual freedom against the backdrop of Latin American society. His works, including "The Time of the Hero," "Conversation in the Cathedral," and "The Feast of the Goat," garnered international acclaim for their complex characters, intricate plots, and unflinching portrayal of societal ills. Vargas Llosa's influence extended beyond literature, as he actively participated in Peruvian politics, even running for president in 1990. His death marks the end of a remarkable literary career that spanned decades and left an indelible mark on the world.
In 1964, Argentinian writer Jorge Luis Borges met Marvin Minsky, a pioneer of artificial intelligence, at a symposium. Borges, initially skeptical and even dismissive of the field, viewing machines as incapable of true creativity, engaged in a lively debate with Minsky. This encounter exposed a clash between Borges's humanistic, literary perspective, rooted in symbolism and metaphor, and Minsky's scientific, computational approach. While Borges saw literature as inherently human, Minsky believed machines could eventually replicate and even surpass human intellectual abilities, including writing. The meeting highlighted fundamental differences in how they viewed the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and creativity.
HN commenters generally enjoyed the anecdote about Borges' encounter with McCulloch, finding it charming and insightful. Several appreciated the connection drawn between Borges' fictional worlds and the burgeoning field of AI, particularly the discussion of symbolic representation and the limitations of formal systems. Some highlighted Borges' skepticism towards reducing consciousness to mere computation, echoing his literary themes. A few commenters provided additional context about McCulloch's work and personality, while others offered further reading suggestions on related topics like cybernetics and the history of AI. One commenter noted the irony of Borges, known for his love of libraries, being introduced to the future of information processing.
Summary of Comments ( 64 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43677917
HN commenters react to Vargas Llosa's death with a mix of appreciation and criticism. Some praise his literary contributions, particularly "The War of the End of the World," and his defense of liberal values. Others criticize his political stances, viewing him as too conservative, and some bring up controversial personal life choices. A few commenters note the irony of his death shortly after an erroneous obituary was published. Several discuss his Nobel Prize and his prolific writing career, with some recommending entry points for those unfamiliar with his work. A recurring theme is the contrast between his impressive literary talent and his sometimes questionable political and personal decisions.
The Hacker News post titled "Mario Vargas Llosa has died" links to a New York Times article which appears to be an appraisal of his work rather than an obituary. This has led to significant confusion and discussion in the comments section.
Many of the initial comments express surprise and even disbelief, given the framing of the Hacker News title. Several users point out that the NYT article doesn't mention his death and speculate about a potential error in the headline. Some even suggest checking other sources to confirm the news, highlighting a healthy skepticism towards information presented online.
Once the misunderstanding about the headline is cleared up, the discussion shifts towards Vargas Llosa's literary legacy and political views. Some commenters express admiration for his writing, particularly "The Feast of the Goat" and "Conversation in the Cathedral," while acknowledging his controversial political stances. The discussion delves into his shift from left-leaning views to more conservative ones, with some commenters attributing this change to his experiences with Peruvian politics and the rise of authoritarian regimes.
A few commenters criticize what they perceive as a hagiographic tone in the NYT piece, arguing that it glosses over some of the more problematic aspects of Vargas Llosa's life and career. They mention his public feud with Gabriel García Márquez, his support for controversial political figures, and his sometimes contentious views on cultural and social issues.
There's also a thread discussing the challenges of writing about living authors, particularly those with complex and evolving legacies. One commenter suggests that attempting an overarching appraisal while the subject is still alive can be premature and potentially lead to skewed perspectives.
Overall, the comments section reveals a mixed reaction to Vargas Llosa. While there's widespread recognition of his literary talent, his political views and personal life remain subjects of debate and contention. The confusion caused by the initial headline further underscores the importance of accurate reporting and the potential for misinformation to spread rapidly online.