The Haiku-OS.org post "Learning to Program with Haiku" provides a comprehensive starting point for aspiring Haiku developers. It highlights the simplicity and power of the Haiku API for creating GUI applications, using the native C++ framework and readily available examples. The guide emphasizes practical learning through modifying existing code and exploring the extensive documentation and example projects provided within the Haiku source code. It also points to resources like the Be Book (covering the BeOS API, which Haiku largely inherits), mailing lists, and the IRC channel for community support. The post ultimately encourages exploration and experimentation as the most effective way to learn Haiku development, positioning it as an accessible and rewarding platform for both beginners and experienced programmers.
NTATV is a project aiming to port Windows NT 4, along with later versions like Windows XP and Windows Server 2003, to the first-generation Apple TV. This involves creating custom drivers and leveraging the existing PowerPC architecture of the device. The goal is to achieve a functional Windows installation on the Apple TV, providing a unique and retro computing experience. The project is still under development, but progress is being documented, including details on hardware compatibility and the challenges encountered.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and legality of running Windows NT on the original Apple TV, expressing skepticism about its usefulness given the hardware limitations. Some questioned the legality of distributing modified Apple firmware and using copyrighted Windows components. Others were curious about the technical challenges involved, particularly regarding driver support and performance. There was some interest in the project as a nostalgic exploration of older operating systems, but overall the comments were more focused on the project's limitations and potential legal issues than its potential benefits. A few users speculated about alternative approaches, such as using a virtual machine, which might offer a more efficient way to achieve similar results.
This blog post explores the architecture and evolution of Darwin, Apple's open-source operating system foundation, and its XNU kernel. It explains how Darwin, built upon the Mach microkernel, incorporates components from BSD and Apple's own I/O Kit. The post details the hybrid kernel approach of XNU, combining the message-passing benefits of a microkernel with the performance advantages of a monolithic kernel. It discusses key XNU subsystems like the process manager, memory manager, file system, and networking stack, highlighting the interplay between Mach and BSD layers. The post also traces Darwin's history, from its NeXTSTEP origins through its evolution into macOS, iOS, watchOS, and tvOS, emphasizing the platform's adaptability and performance.
Hacker News users generally praised the article for its clarity and depth in explaining a complex topic. Several commenters with kernel development experience validated the information presented, noting its accuracy and helpfulness for understanding the evolution of XNU. Some discussion arose around specific architectural choices made by Apple, including the Mach microkernel and its interaction with the BSD environment. One commenter highlighted the performance benefits of the hybrid kernel approach, while others expressed interest in the challenges of maintaining such a system. A few users also pointed out areas where the article could be expanded, such as delving further into I/O Kit details and exploring the security implications of the XNU architecture.
The Linux Kernel Defence Map provides a comprehensive overview of security hardening mechanisms available within the Linux kernel. It categorizes these techniques into areas like memory management, access control, and exploit mitigation, visually mapping them to specific kernel subsystems and features. The map serves as a resource for understanding how various kernel configurations and security modules contribute to a robust and secure system, aiding in both defensive hardening and vulnerability research by illustrating the relationships between different protection layers. It aims to offer a practical guide for navigating the complex landscape of Linux kernel security.
Hacker News users generally praised the Linux Kernel Defence Map for its comprehensiveness and visual clarity. Several commenters pointed out its value for both learning and as a quick reference for experienced kernel developers. Some suggested improvements, including adding more details on specific mitigations, expanding coverage to areas like user namespaces and eBPF, and potentially creating an interactive version. A few users discussed the project's scope, questioning the inclusion of certain features and debating the effectiveness of some mitigations. There was also a short discussion comparing the map to other security resources.
InitWare is a portable init system inspired by systemd, designed to function across multiple operating systems, including Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. It aims to provide a familiar systemd-like experience and API on these platforms while remaining lightweight and configurable. The project utilizes a combination of C and POSIX sh for portability and reimplements core systemd functionalities like service management, device management, and login management. InitWare seeks to offer a viable alternative to traditional init systems on BSDs and a more streamlined and potentially faster option compared to full systemd on Linux.
Hacker News users discussed InitWare, a portable systemd fork, with a mix of skepticism and curiosity. Some questioned the value proposition, given the maturity and ubiquity of systemd, wondering if the project addressed a real need or was a solution in search of a problem. Others expressed concerns about maintaining compatibility across different operating systems and the potential for fragmentation. However, some commenters were intrigued by the possibility of a more lightweight and portable init system, particularly for embedded systems or specialized use cases where systemd might be overkill. Several users also inquired about specific technical details, like the handling of cgroups and service management, demonstrating a genuine interest in the project's approach. The overall sentiment leaned towards cautious observation, with many waiting to see if InitWare could carve out a niche or offer tangible benefits over existing solutions.
The blog post details the author's process of switching from Linux (Pop!_OS, specifically) to Windows 11. Driven by the desire for a better gaming experience and smoother integration with their workflow involving tools like Adobe Creative Suite and DaVinci Resolve, they opted for a clean Windows installation. The author outlines the steps they took, including backing up essential Linux files, creating a Windows installer USB drive, and installing Windows. They also touch on post-installation tasks like driver installation and setting up their development environment with WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) to retain access to Linux tools. Ultimately, the post documents a pragmatic approach to switching operating systems, prioritizing software compatibility and performance for the author's specific needs.
Several commenters on Hacker News express skepticism about the blog post's claim of seamlessly switching from Linux to Windows. Some point out that the author's use case (primarily gaming and web browsing) doesn't necessitate Linux's advantages, making the switch less surprising. Others question the long-term viability of relying on Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) for development, citing potential performance issues and compatibility problems. A few commenters share their own experiences switching between operating systems, with some echoing the author's sentiments and others detailing difficulties they encountered. The overall sentiment leans toward cautious curiosity about WSL's capabilities while remaining unconvinced it's a complete replacement for a native Linux environment for serious development work. Several users suggest the author might switch back to Linux in the future as their needs change.
Windows 11's latest Insider build further cements the requirement of a Microsoft account for Home and Pro edition users during initial setup. While previous workarounds allowed local account creation, this update eliminates those loopholes, forcing users to sign in with a Microsoft account before accessing the desktop. Microsoft claims this provides a consistent experience across Windows 11 features and devices. However, this change limits user choice and potentially raises privacy concerns for those preferring local accounts. Pro users setting up Windows 11 on their workplace network will be exempt from this requirement, allowing them to directly join Azure Active Directory or Active Directory.
Hacker News users largely expressed frustration and cynicism towards Microsoft's increased push for mandatory account sign-ins in Windows 11. Several commenters saw this as a continuation of Microsoft's trend of prioritizing advertising revenue and data collection over user experience and privacy. Some discussed workarounds, like using local accounts during initial setup and disabling connected services later, while others lamented the gradual erosion of local account functionality. A few pointed out the irony of Microsoft's stance on user choice given their past criticisms of similar practices by other tech companies. Several commenters suggested that this move further solidified Linux as a preferable alternative for privacy-conscious users.
Starting next week, Google will significantly reduce public access to the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) development process. Key parts of the next Android release's development, including platform changes and internal testing, will occur in private. While the source code will eventually be released publicly as usual, the day-to-day development and decision-making will be hidden from the public eye. This shift aims to improve efficiency and reduce early leaks of information about upcoming Android features. Google emphasizes that AOSP will remain open source, and they intend to enhance opportunities for external contributions through other avenues like quarterly platform releases and pre-release program expansions.
Hacker News commenters express concern over Google's move to develop Android AOSP primarily behind closed doors. Several suggest this signals a shift towards prioritizing Pixel features and potentially neglecting the broader Android ecosystem. Some worry this will stifle innovation and community contributions, leading to a more fragmented and less open Android experience. Others speculate this is a cost-cutting measure or a response to security concerns. A few commenters downplay the impact, believing open-source contributions were already minimal and Google's commitment to open source remains, albeit with a different approach. The discussion also touches upon the potential impact on custom ROM development and the future of AOSP's openness.
Debian's "bookworm" release now offers officially reproducible live images. This means that rebuilding the images from source code will result in bit-for-bit identical outputs, verifying the integrity and build process. This achievement, a first for official Debian live images, was accomplished by addressing various sources of non-determinism within the build system, including timestamps, random numbers, and build paths. This increased transparency and trustworthiness strengthens Debian's security posture.
Hacker News commenters generally expressed approval of Debian's move toward reproducible builds, viewing it as a significant step for security and trust. Some highlighted the practical benefits, like easier verification of image integrity and detection of malicious tampering. Others discussed the technical challenges involved in achieving reproducibility, particularly with factors like timestamps and build environments. A few commenters also touched upon the broader implications for software supply chain security and the potential influence on other distributions. One compelling comment pointed out the difference between "bit-for-bit" reproducibility and the more nuanced "content-addressed" approach Debian is using, clarifying that some variation in non-functional aspects is still acceptable. Another insightful comment mentioned the value of this for embedded systems, where knowing exactly what's running is crucial.
Linux kernel 6.14 delivers significant performance improvements and enhanced Windows compatibility. Key advancements include faster initial setup times, optimized memory management reducing overhead, and improvements to the EXT4 filesystem, boosting I/O performance for everyday tasks. Better support for running Windows games through Proton and Steam Play, stemming from enhanced Direct3 12 support, and improved performance with Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL2) make gaming and cross-platform development smoother. Initial benchmarks show impressive results, particularly for AMD systems. This release signals a notable step forward for Linux in both performance and its ability to seamlessly integrate with Windows environments.
Hacker News commenters generally express skepticism towards ZDNet's claim of a "big leap forward." Several point out that the article lacks specific benchmarks or evidence to support the performance improvement claims, especially regarding gaming. Some suggest the improvements, while present, are likely incremental and specific to certain hardware or workloads, not a universal boost. Others discuss the ongoing development of mainline Windows drivers for Linux, particularly for newer hardware, and the complexities surrounding secure boot. A few commenters mention specific improvements they appreciate, such as the inclusion of the "rusty-rng" random number generator and enhancements for RISC-V architecture. The overall sentiment is one of cautious optimism tempered by a desire for more concrete data.
Collapse OS is a minimal, highly adaptable operating system designed for a post-apocalyptic scenario where global supply chains have broken down. It aims to be runnable on minimal and easily scavenged hardware, using widely available Z80 processors. Its functionality focuses on essential tasks like bootstrapping other, more complex systems, creating and running simple programs, and interfacing with rudimentary hardware like text terminals and floppy drives. The project anticipates a future where readily available modern hardware and software are no longer accessible, and seeks to provide a digital life raft by relying on robust, easily reproduced technologies.
Hacker News users discussing Collapse OS express skepticism about its practicality and usefulness. Many question the likelihood of a societal collapse severe enough to render existing technology useless, while others point out the difficulty of bootstrapping complex technology from salvaged parts in a post-apocalyptic scenario. Some find the project interesting as a thought experiment or a hobby, but doubt its real-world applicability. A few commenters express concerns about the project's potential to attract a "doomer" mentality. The overall sentiment is one of cautious curiosity mixed with significant doubt about the project's premise and viability.
The blog post introduces "quadlet," a tool simplifying the management of Podman containers under systemd. Quadlet generates systemd unit files for Podman containers, handling complexities like dependencies, port forwarding, volume mounting, and resource limits. This allows users to manage containers using familiar systemd commands like systemctl start, stop, and enable. The tool aims to bridge the gap between Podman's containerization capabilities and systemd's robust service management, offering a more integrated and user-friendly experience for running containers on systems that rely on systemd. It simplifies container lifecycle management by generating unit files that encapsulate container configurations, making them easier to manage and maintain within a systemd environment.
Hacker News users discussed Quadlet, a tool for running Podman containers under systemd. Several commenters appreciated the simplicity and elegance of the approach, contrasting it favorably with the complexity of Kubernetes for smaller, self-hosted deployments. Some questioned the need for systemd integration, advocating for Podman's built-in restart mechanisms or tools like podman generate systemd. Concerns were raised regarding potential conflicts with other container management tools like Docker and the possibility of unintended consequences from mixing cgroups. The perceived niche appeal of the tool was also mentioned, with some suggesting that its use cases might be limited. A few commenters pointed out potential alternatives or related projects, like using podman-compose or distroless containers. Overall, the reception was mixed, with some praising its streamlined approach while others questioned its necessity and potential complications.
The seL4 microkernel is a highly secure and reliable operating system foundation, formally verified to guarantee functional correctness and security properties. This verification proves that the implementation adheres to its specification, encompassing properties like data integrity and control-flow integrity. Designed for high-performance and real-time embedded systems, seL4's small size and minimal interface facilitate formal analysis and predictable resource usage. Its strong isolation mechanisms enable the construction of robust systems where different components with varying levels of trust can coexist securely, preventing failures in one component from affecting others. The kernel's open-source nature and liberal licensing promote transparency and wider adoption, fostering further research and development in secure systems.
Hacker News users discussed the seL4 microkernel, focusing on its formal verification and practical applications. Some questioned the real-world impact of the verification, highlighting the potential for vulnerabilities outside the kernel's scope, such as in device drivers or user-space applications. Others praised the project's rigor and considered it a significant achievement in system software. Several comments mentioned the challenges of using microkernels effectively, including the performance overhead of inter-process communication (IPC). Some users also pointed out the limited adoption of microkernels in general, despite their theoretical advantages. There was also interest in seL4's use in specific applications like autonomous vehicles and aerospace.
Fedora 42 Beta is now available for testing, bringing updates across the desktop, server, and cloud. Key features include the GNOME 44 desktop environment with improved quick settings and a redesigned file chooser, the Linux 6.4 kernel, and Golang 1.20. For server users, Fedora 42 defaults to a more minimal install, reducing attack surface and resource usage. The cloud image incorporates these updates and is prepared for deployment on various platforms. Testers are encouraged to download the beta release and provide feedback to help ensure a polished final release.
HN users discuss the changes in Fedora 42 Beta. Several commenters express excitement about the switch to GNOME 44, praising its improved performance and features like quick settings toggles for Bluetooth. Others appreciate the inclusion of newer kernel and Golang versions. Some users discuss the decision to drop support for i686, with mixed reactions. A few commenters also mention their preferred desktop environments, like KDE and Sway, and their experiences with Fedora Kinoite. The transition to a new bootloader, BLS, is also mentioned but doesn't generate extensive discussion.
Scorpi is a new, open-source type-1 hypervisor designed specifically for macOS on Apple silicon. It aims to be a modern, lightweight, and performant alternative to existing solutions. Leveraging the virtualization capabilities of Apple silicon, Scorpi provides a minimal kernel responsible solely for virtualization while offloading other tasks to a dedicated "service VM." This approach prioritizes performance and security by reducing the hypervisor's attack surface. Scorpi also offers a flexible device model for efficient peripheral access and a streamlined user experience. While still in active development, it promises a compelling new option for running virtual machines on macOS.
HN commenters generally expressed excitement about Scorpi, praising its clean design and potential for macOS virtualization. Several highlighted the difficulty of macOS virtualization in the past and saw Scorpi as a promising new approach. Some questioned the performance compared to existing solutions like UTM, and others were curious about specific features like nested virtualization and GPU passthrough. A few commenters with virtualization experience offered technical insights, discussing the challenges of implementing certain features and suggesting potential improvements. The project's open-source nature and reliance on Apple's Hypervisor.framework were also points of interest. Overall, the comments reflected a cautiously optimistic view of Scorpi's potential to simplify and improve macOS virtualization.
The blog post highlights the DEC Professional 380's strengths as a retrocomputing platform, specifically its ability to run the PRO/VENIX operating system. The author successfully installed and showcases PRO/VENIX 2.0 on the 380, demonstrating its impressive speed and functionality compared to the standard P/OS. The post emphasizes the sleek and responsive nature of PRO/VENIX, particularly its windowing system and overall performance improvements, making the 380 feel like a more modern machine. The author concludes that PRO/VENIX significantly enhances the user experience and opens up new possibilities for the DEC Professional 380.
Hacker News users discuss the DEC Professional 380, primarily focusing on its historical significance and the PRO/VENIX operating system. Several commenters reminisce about using the machine, praising its then-advanced features and performance. Some highlight its role in bridging the gap between minicomputers and personal computers. The robustness of the hardware and the positive experience with PRO/VENIX are recurring themes. There's also mention of its connection to the VT100 terminal and how the 380 compared to other systems like the IBM PC and the Apple II. A few commenters express surprise at the system's relative obscurity, given its capabilities.
A hidden recovery partition, dating back to 1994 and designed for Apple's Quadra 630, has been discovered. This partition, previously unknown, contains a mini operating system and tools intended to help users recover their system in case of corruption. Located on a small sliver of the hard drive, it was found by a user who meticulously examined disk images and realized its purpose. This "mini OS" is bootable and provides utilities for repairing directory damage and other system issues, offering a fascinating glimpse into early Apple recovery methods.
Hacker News users discuss the practicality and historical significance of the discovered System 7.5 recovery partition. Several commenters note the small size of the partition (20MB) reflects the much smaller software of the time, with one pointing out a full System 7.5 install was only 50MB. Others delve into the technical aspects, discussing how the partition was hidden and the methods used to access it. Some express skepticism about the "lost" nature of the partition, suggesting it was simply undocumented rather than unknown. The overall sentiment is one of mild interest in this piece of Apple history, with a touch of nostalgia and some technical curiosity about retro computing.
The author recounts their teenage experience developing a rudimentary operating system for the Inmos Transputer. Fascinated by parallel processing, they created a system capable of multitasking and inter-process communication using the Transputer's unique link architecture. The OS, written in Occam, featured a kernel, device drivers, and a command-line interface, demonstrating a surprisingly sophisticated understanding of OS principles for a young programmer. Despite its limitations, like a lack of memory protection and a simple scheduler, the project provided valuable learning experiences in systems programming and showcased the potential of the Transputer's parallel processing capabilities.
Hacker News users discussed the blog post about a teen's experience developing a Transputer OS, largely focusing on the impressive nature of the project for someone so young. Several commenters reminisced about their own early programming experiences, often involving simpler systems like the Z80 or 6502. Some discussed the specific challenges of the Transputer architecture, like the difficulty of debugging and the limitations of the Occam language. A few users questioned the true complexity of the OS, suggesting it might be more accurately described as a kernel. Others shared links to resources for learning more about Transputers and Occam. The overall sentiment was one of admiration for the author's initiative and technical skills at a young age.
This video showcases a young, energetic Steve Ballmer enthusiastically pitching the then-new Microsoft Windows 1.0. He highlights key features like the graphical user interface, multitasking capabilities (running multiple programs simultaneously), and the use of a mouse for easier navigation, contrasting it with the command-line interface prevalent at the time. Ballmer emphasizes the user-friendliness and productivity gains of Windows, demonstrating basic operations like opening and closing windows, switching between applications, and using paint software. He positions Windows as a revolutionary advancement in personal computing, promising a more intuitive and efficient working experience.
Commenters on Hacker News reacted to the Windows 1.0 video with a mix of nostalgia and amusement. Several noted the awkwardness of early software demos, particularly Ballmer's forced enthusiasm and the clunky interface. Some reminisced about their own experiences with early versions of Windows, while others pointed out the historical significance of the moment and how far personal computing has come. A few highlighted the surprisingly high system requirements for the time, and the relative affordability compared to other graphical interfaces like the Macintosh. There was some debate about the actual usefulness of Windows 1.0 and whether it was truly a "killer app." Overall, the comments reflected a sense of appreciation for the historical context of the video and the progress made since then.
The post details the author's successful, albeit challenging, experience installing NetBSD 9.0 on a Sun JavaStation Network Computer (NC). The JavaStation's limited resources and unusual architecture, including its use of a microSPARC IIep processor and a small amount of RAM, presented various hurdles. These included needing to create custom boot floppies and finding compatible network drivers. Despite these difficulties, the author achieved a functional NetBSD installation, showcasing the operating system's portability and the author's persistence. The experience also highlighted the resourcefulness required to repurpose older hardware and the satisfaction of breathing new life into vintage computing platforms.
Commenters on Hacker News largely expressed nostalgia for JavaStations and Sun hardware, reminiscing about their quirks and limitations. Several appreciated the author's dedication to getting NetBSD running on such an unusual and constrained platform. Some discussed the challenges of working with the JavaStation's architecture, including its small amount of RAM and unusual graphics setup. Others shared their own experiences using JavaStations and similar thin clients, with some mentioning their use in educational settings. A few commenters also delved into technical details, discussing the specifics of NetBSD's compatibility and the process of getting X11 functioning.
The Register reports that Google collects and transmits Android user data, including hardware identifiers and location, to its servers even before a user opens any apps or completes device setup. This pre-setup data collection involves several Google services and occurs during the initial boot process, transmitting information like IMEI, hardware serial number, SIM serial number, and nearby Wi-Fi access point details. While Google claims this data is crucial for essential services like fraud prevention and software updates, the article raises privacy concerns, particularly because users are not informed of this data collection nor given the opportunity to opt out. This behavior raises questions about the balance between user privacy and Google's data collection practices.
HN commenters discuss the implications of Google's data collection on Android even before app usage. Some highlight the irony of Google's privacy claims contrasted with their extensive tracking. Several express resignation, suggesting this behavior is expected from Google and other large tech companies. One commenter mentions a study showing Google collecting data even when location services are disabled, and another points to the difficulty of truly opting out of this tracking without significant technical knowledge. The discussion also touches upon the limitations of using alternative Android ROMs or de-Googled phones, acknowledging their usability compromises. There's a general sense of pessimism about the ability of users to control their data in the Android ecosystem.
The 2008 blog post argues that Windows wasn't truly "free" for businesses, despite the common perception. While the OS itself came bundled with PCs, the associated costs of management, maintenance, software licensing (especially for Microsoft Office and server products), antivirus, and dealing with malware significantly outweighed the initial cost of the OS. The author contends that these hidden expenses made Windows a more expensive option compared to perceived free alternatives like Linux, particularly for smaller businesses. Ultimately, the "free" Windows license subsidized other revenue streams for Microsoft, making it a profitable, albeit deceptive, business model.
Hacker News users discussed the complexities of Microsoft's "free" Windows licensing model for businesses. Several pointed out that while the OS itself might not have a direct upfront cost, it's bundled with hardware purchases, making it an indirect expense. Others highlighted the ongoing costs associated with Windows, such as Software Assurance for updates and support, along with the costs of managing Active Directory and other related infrastructure. The general consensus was that "free" is a misleading term, and the true cost of Windows for businesses is substantial when considering the total cost of ownership. Some commenters also discussed the historical context of the article (from 2008) and how Microsoft's licensing and business models have evolved since then.
Eliseo Martelli's blog post argues that Apple's software quality has declined, despite its premium hardware. He points to increased bugs, regressions, and a lack of polish in recent macOS and iOS releases as evidence. Martelli contends that this decline stems from factors like rapid feature iteration, prioritizing marketing over engineering rigor, and a potential shift in internal culture. He ultimately calls on Apple to refocus on its historical commitment to quality and user experience.
HN commenters largely agree with the author's premise that Apple's software quality has declined. Several point to specific examples like bugs in macOS Ventura and iOS, regressions in previously stable features, and a perceived lack of polish. Some attribute the decline to Apple's increasing focus on services and new hardware at the expense of refining existing software. Others suggest rapid feature additions and a larger codebase contribute to the problem. A few dissenters argue the issues are overblown or limited to specific areas, while others claim that software quality is cyclical and Apple will eventually address the problems. Some suggest the move to universal silicon has exacerbated the problems, while others point to the increasing complexity of software as a whole. A few comments mention specific frustrations like poor keyboard shortcuts and confusing UI/UX choices.
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 22635.4950 (Beta Channel) brings several fixes and improvements. Key changes include resolving an explorer.exe crash, improving Narrator performance with large amounts of text, fixing an issue affecting the reliability of Start menu badges, and addressing problems with app defaults and searchindexer.exe crashes. This build also removes the previously available live captions settings within Quick Settings, directing users to the full settings page instead. While this build doesn't introduce new features, it focuses on stability and bug fixes for a smoother user experience.
Hacker News users discuss the new features in the Windows 11 Insider Preview Build, mostly focusing on practical improvements rather than revolutionary changes. Several commenters express appreciation for the return of ungrouped taskbar icons, viewing it as a positive step back from a less popular design choice. Some discuss the new screen recording feature in Snipping Tool, noting its basic functionality and comparing it to existing third-party options. Others mention the addition of a native VPN status indicator in the system tray, considering it a welcome, if overdue, feature. A few comments also touch on more technical aspects, such as the performance improvements and changes to Windows Ink. Overall, the sentiment seems to be one of cautious optimism, with users appreciating the iterative improvements but remaining somewhat reserved about the overall direction of Windows 11.
LWN.net's "The early days of Linux (2023)" revisits Linux's origins through the lens of newly rediscovered email archives from 1992. These emails reveal the collaborative, yet sometimes contentious, environment surrounding the project's infancy. They highlight Linus Torvalds's central role, the rapid evolution of the kernel, and early discussions about licensing, portability, and features. The article underscores how open collaboration, despite its challenges, fueled Linux's early growth and laid the groundwork for its future success. The rediscovered archive offers valuable historical insight into the project's formative period and provides a more complete understanding of its development.
HN commenters discuss Linus Torvalds' early approach to Linux development, contrasting it with the more structured, corporate-driven development of today. Several highlight his initial dismissal of formal specifications, preferring a "code first, ask questions later" method guided by user feedback and rapid iteration. This organic approach, some argue, fostered innovation and rapid growth in Linux's early stages, while others note its limitations as the project matured. The discussion also touches on Torvalds' personality, described as both brilliant and abrasive, and how his strong opinions shaped the project's direction. A few comments express nostalgia for the simpler times of early open-source development, contrasting it with the complexities of modern software engineering.
This project aims to port Windows NT 4.0 to the Nintendo GameCube and Wii. It utilizes a custom HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) built upon the already existing Wii and GameCube homebrew scene and leverages existing open-source drivers where possible. While still in its early stages, the project has achieved booting to the NT kernel and displaying the blue screen. Significant challenges remain, including implementing proper drivers for the consoles' unique hardware and optimizing performance. The goal is to eventually create a fully functional NT 4.0 environment on these platforms, showcasing the operating system's adaptability and offering a unique retro-computing experience.
Hacker News users discuss the "entii-for-workcubes" project, expressing fascination with the technical challenge and achievement of porting Windows NT 4 to the GameCube and Wii. Several commenters reminisce about the era of NT 4 and its perceived robustness. Some discuss the limitations of the port, like slow performance and lack of sound, acknowledging the hardware constraints. Others speculate about potential uses, such as retro gaming or running period-specific software. The practicality is questioned, with many recognizing it more as a fun technical exercise than a genuinely useful tool. There's also discussion of the legal implications of using copyrighted BIOS files. The project's clever name, a play on "Nintendo" and "entities," receives positive remarks.
This blog post offers a collection of macOS tips and tricks to enhance productivity and user experience. It covers various aspects of the operating system, from basic shortcuts like quickly hiding all other applications (⌘⌥H) to more advanced techniques involving the terminal and shell scripting. The post highlights features such as using the Preview app for quick image edits, leveraging Quick Look for file previews and actions, customizing the Dock and menu bar, and employing keyboard shortcuts for various tasks. It also emphasizes the power of the Terminal for automating actions and managing system settings, and recommends several useful third-party applications to further improve workflow.
HN users generally praised the macOS tips listed in the article, finding them useful and well-organized. Several commenters highlighted specific tips they appreciated, such as using keyboard shortcuts for moving windows between monitors, the "Say" command for text-to-speech, and the ability to paste rich text into plain text fields with a modified paste command. Some users shared additional tips of their own, including using Automator for repetitive tasks and leveraging specific terminal commands. A few questioned the necessity of some of the listed "tricks," suggesting they are standard macOS features. Overall, the discussion revolved around the practicality of the tips and expanding upon the list with further macOS productivity enhancements.
OpenBSD has contributed significantly to operating system security and development through proactive approaches. These include innovations like memory safety mitigations such as W^X (preventing simultaneous write and execute permissions on memory pages) and pledge() (restricting system calls available to a process), advanced cryptography and randomization techniques, and extensive code auditing practices. The project also champions portable and reusable code, evident in the creation of OpenSSH, OpenNTPD, and other tools, which are now widely used across various platforms. Furthermore, OpenBSD emphasizes careful documentation and user-friendly features like the package management system, highlighting a commitment to both security and usability.
Hacker News users discuss OpenBSD's historical focus on proactive security, praising its influence on other operating systems. Several commenters highlight OpenBSD's pledge ("secure by default") and the depth of its code audits, contrasting it favorably with Linux's reactive approach. Some debate the practicality of OpenBSD for everyday use, citing hardware compatibility challenges and a smaller software ecosystem. Others acknowledge these limitations but emphasize OpenBSD's value as a learning resource and a model for secure coding practices. The maintainability of its codebase and the project's commitment to simplicity are also lauded. A few users mention specific innovations like OpenSSH and CARP, while others appreciate the project's consistent philosophy and long-term vision.
A working version of Unix Version 2, specifically a "beta" release predating the official V2 from November 1972, has been recovered and made available. Discovered on a PDP-11 RK05 disk pack, this "Proto-V2" includes intriguing differences like an earlier version of the file system and unique commands. Warren Toomey, leveraging a SIMH emulator and painstaking analysis, managed to boot and explore this historical artifact, offering a fascinating glimpse into Unix's early evolution. The restored system, along with Toomey's detailed notes, is now accessible to the public, providing valuable insights for those interested in computing history.
Hacker News commenters express excitement about the resurrection of Unix V2 "Beta," viewing it as a valuable historical artifact. Several highlight the simplicity and elegance of early Unix compared to modern operating systems, appreciating the ability to explore its concise codebase. Some discuss the technical details of the restoration process, including the challenges of running old software on modern hardware and the use of emulators like SIMH. Others reminisce about their experiences with early Unix, contrasting the collaborative and open environment of the time with the more commercialized landscape of today. The small size of the OS and the speed at which it boots also impress commenters, emphasizing the efficiency of early Unix development.
The blog post details how to set up Kleene, a lightweight container management system, on FreeBSD. It emphasizes Kleene's simplicity and ease of use compared to larger, more complex alternatives like Kubernetes. The guide walks through installing Kleene, configuring a network bridge for container communication, and deploying a sample Nginx container. It also covers building custom container images with img and highlights Kleene's ability to manage persistent storage volumes, showcasing its suitability for self-hosting applications on FreeBSD servers. The post concludes by pointing to Kleene's potential as a practical container solution for users seeking a less resource-intensive option than Docker or Kubernetes.
HN commenters generally express interest in Kleene and its potential, particularly for FreeBSD users seeking lighter-weight alternatives to Docker. Some highlight its jail-based approach as a security advantage. Several commenters discuss the complexities of container management and the trade-offs between different tools, with some suggesting that a simpler approach might be preferable for certain use cases. One commenter notes the difficulty in finding clear, up-to-date documentation for FreeBSD containerization, praising the linked article for addressing this gap. There's also a brief thread discussing the benefits of ZFS for container storage. Overall, the comments paint Kleene as a promising tool worth investigating, especially for those already working within the FreeBSD ecosystem.
Summary of Comments ( 37 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43640403
Commenters on Hacker News largely expressed nostalgia and fondness for Haiku OS, praising its clean design and the tutorial's approachable nature for beginners. Some recalled their positive experiences with BeOS and appreciated Haiku's continuation of its legacy. Several users highlighted Haiku's suitability for older hardware and embedded systems. A few comments delved into technical aspects, discussing the merits of Haiku's API and its potential as a development platform. One commenter noted the tutorial's focus on GUI programming as a smart move to showcase Haiku's strengths. The overall sentiment was positive, with many expressing interest in revisiting or trying Haiku based on the tutorial.
The Hacker News post "Learning to Program with Haiku" has generated several comments discussing various aspects of Haiku OS and its suitability for learning programming.
Several commenters praised Haiku's simplicity and the nostalgic appeal of its BeOS heritage. One user highlighted its clean API and the ease of getting started with development, comparing it favorably to the complexities of modern Linux distributions. They suggested that Haiku's relative simplicity allows beginners to focus on core programming concepts without being overwhelmed by the intricacies of a large and complex operating system. This sentiment was echoed by another commenter who appreciated Haiku's small size and the availability of source code, making it an ideal environment for learning and experimentation.
The discussion also touched upon Haiku's suitability as a primary operating system. While acknowledging its qualities, some users pointed out the limitations of driver support and software availability compared to more mainstream operating systems. One commenter specifically mentioned the lack of certain applications that might be essential for a typical user. However, another commenter countered this point by highlighting the potential of Haiku as a secondary OS for focused programming tasks, suggesting that its minimalist nature could enhance productivity.
Performance and the active development community were also discussed. One commenter praised Haiku's speed, attributing it to its efficient design. Others commented on the welcoming nature of the Haiku community and its responsiveness to new developers. The possibility of contributing to the operating system itself was presented as an attractive aspect for learning and gaining experience.
Finally, the conversation branched out into related topics such as the benefits of learning C++ and the role of personal projects in programming education. One commenter emphasized the importance of building tangible projects to solidify learning, suggesting that Haiku could provide a suitable platform for such endeavors. Another commenter discussed the value of learning C++ and its relevance in understanding systems programming. This tied back to Haiku as a potential learning environment where understanding C++ could be directly applied to OS development.