The blog post "Narrative and the Structure of Art" explores how narrative structure, typically associated with storytelling, also underpins various art forms like music, visual art, and even abstract works. It argues that art relies on creating and resolving tension, mirroring the rising action, climax, and resolution found in traditional narratives. This structure provides a framework for engaging the audience emotionally and intellectually, guiding them through a journey of anticipation and satisfaction. While the narrative might not be a literal story, it manifests as a progression of elements, whether melodic phrases in music, brushstrokes in a painting, or shifting forms in a sculpture, ultimately creating a cohesive and meaningful experience for the observer.
This Medium post, entitled "Narrative and the Structure of Art," embarks upon a comprehensive exploration of the intricate relationship between narrative structures and artistic expression. The author posits that narrative, far from being a mere component of certain art forms, functions as a fundamental organizing principle across a wide spectrum of artistic endeavors, extending its influence even into seemingly abstract domains like music and visual arts.
The central thesis revolves around the concept of art as a form of communication, a conveyance of meaning from the artist to the audience. This transmission of meaning, the author argues, is inherently structured, resembling the unfolding of a narrative. Even when a narrative isn't explicitly present in the conventional sense of a story with characters and plot, the arrangement of elements within a piece of art – be it the progression of musical notes, the interplay of colors and shapes on a canvas, or the sequence of movements in a dance – creates a temporal or spatial experience that can be interpreted as a kind of narrative progression.
The author meticulously dissects this concept through an examination of various artistic disciplines. In literature, the narrative structure is readily apparent, manifesting in familiar forms like plot arcs and character development. However, the post argues that even seemingly abstract art forms like music leverage narrative principles, albeit in a more abstract manner. The arrangement of musical phrases, the building of tension and release, the thematic development – all contribute to a sense of progression and unfolding that mirrors the dynamic nature of storytelling. Similarly, in visual arts, the composition, the use of perspective, and the interplay of visual elements guide the viewer's eye across the artwork, creating a journey of sorts, a visual narrative that unfolds over time.
Furthermore, the author delves into the cognitive underpinnings of this phenomenon, suggesting that the human brain is inherently wired to perceive and interpret patterns and sequences. This innate tendency to seek structure and meaning predisposes us to experience art through a narrative lens, even when the artist hasn't explicitly crafted a traditional story. This inherent human propensity for narrative construction allows us to derive meaning and emotional resonance from the structured arrangement of elements within any artistic medium.
In essence, the post proposes a paradigm shift in how we understand the structure of art. It advocates for a broader, more inclusive understanding of narrative, not merely as a literary device, but as a fundamental organizing principle permeating all forms of artistic expression, shaping our perception and enriching our engagement with the world of art. This framework suggests that appreciating art, in any form, involves engaging with its inherent narrative structure, whether explicit or implicit, and deciphering the unique story it tells.
Summary of Comments ( 0 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43170408
HN users generally found the linked article thought-provoking, though somewhat meandering and lacking in concrete examples. Several commenters appreciated the exploration of narrative structure in different art forms beyond traditional storytelling. One compelling comment highlighted the idea of "nested narratives" and how this concept applies to music, visual art, and even architecture. Another interesting point raised was the distinction between narrative and "narrativity," with the suggestion that even abstract art can possess a sense of unfolding or progression that resembles a narrative. Some users also debated the role of intent versus interpretation in determining the "narrative" of a piece, and whether the artist's intended narrative is ultimately more important than the meaning a viewer derives. A few commenters expressed skepticism about the overall premise, finding the concept of narrative in abstract art to be a stretch.
The Hacker News post titled "Narrative and the Structure of Art," linking to a Medium article of the same name, has generated a modest discussion with several insightful comments. While not a voluminous thread, the comments present some interesting perspectives on the relationship between narrative, art, and meaning-making.
One commenter points out the challenge of appreciating abstract art, acknowledging that while they can admire the skill and effort involved, they often struggle to connect with it emotionally or intellectually without a narrative framework. This commenter expresses a desire to learn how to better appreciate abstract art and understand the artist's intentions, even in the absence of a clear story.
Another commenter builds on this by suggesting that abstract art can evoke emotions and create its own kind of narrative, even if it's not explicit. They propose that abstract forms and colors can trigger associations and memories in the viewer, leading to a personal and subjective experience. This idea suggests that the "narrative" in abstract art might be emergent and co-created by the artist and the viewer.
A third commenter focuses on the crucial role of intent in art. They argue that without understanding the artist's intent, it's difficult to truly grasp the meaning of a piece, regardless of whether it's abstract or representational. They also caution against overly relying on the artist's stated intentions, as the actual impact of the art might differ from what the artist consciously intended. This comment highlights the complex interplay between artist, artwork, and audience in the creation of meaning.
Further discussion delves into the nature of artistic expression and the different ways artists convey meaning. One commenter draws a parallel between music and abstract visual art, suggesting that both can communicate emotions and ideas without relying on explicit narrative. They argue that the structure and form of the artwork itself can be a form of communication, independent of any representational content.
Finally, one comment shifts the focus to the commercial aspects of art, arguing that the art world often prioritizes novelty and marketability over genuine artistic merit. This commenter implies that the pursuit of narrative, particularly in abstract art, might sometimes be driven by market forces rather than purely artistic considerations.
These comments, taken together, offer a nuanced perspective on the interplay of narrative and art. They explore the challenges of appreciating art without a clear story, the potential for abstract art to evoke its own kind of narrative, the importance of artistic intent, and the influence of the art market on artistic creation. While not an extensive discussion, the comments provide valuable food for thought on these complex topics.