Tapping a wheel of cheese is a traditional method used to assess its quality and maturity, particularly for hard cheeses like Parmesan. The process involves using a small hammer or tool to strike the wheel at various points, listening to the resulting sounds and vibrations. A trained ear can interpret these sounds to determine the presence of cracks, voids, or inconsistencies within the cheese, as well as gauge its texture and overall ripeness. While not a foolproof method, tapping provides valuable insights into the internal structure of the cheese without cutting into it, helping cheesemakers and affineurs ensure quality and select the best wheels.
Traditional technical interviews, relying heavily on coding challenges like LeetCode-style problems, are becoming obsolete due to the rise of AI tools that can easily solve them. This renders these tests less effective at evaluating a candidate's true abilities and problem-solving skills. The author argues that interviews should shift focus towards assessing higher-level thinking, system design, and real-world problem-solving. They suggest incorporating methods like take-home projects, pair programming, and discussions of past experiences to better gauge a candidate's potential and practical skills in a collaborative environment. This new approach recognizes that coding proficiency is only one component of a successful software engineer, and emphasizes the importance of broader skills like collaboration, communication, and practical application of knowledge.
HN commenters largely agree that AI hasn't "killed" the technical interview, but has exposed its pre-existing flaws. Many argue that rote memorization and LeetCode-style challenges were already poor indicators of real-world performance. Some suggest focusing on practical skills, system design, and open-ended problem-solving. Others highlight the potential of AI as a collaborative tool for both interviewers and interviewees, assisting with code generation and problem exploration. Several commenters also express concern about the equity implications of AI-assisted interview prep, potentially exacerbating existing disparities. A recurring theme is the need to adapt interviewing practices to assess the skills truly needed in a post-AI coding world.
Summary of Comments ( 17 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43644970
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and cultural significance of cheese wheel tapping. Some commenters debated the efficacy of tapping for assessing quality, suggesting other methods like drilling and plugging might be more reliable for determining internal defects. Others highlighted the performative aspect, arguing it's primarily for show or tradition, particularly for hard cheeses where tapping yields limited information. The rhythmic and visual appeal of the process was also noted, along with its potential to engage customers. A few users shared anecdotes about witnessing cheese tapping firsthand, and others wondered about regional variations in the practice. There was also brief discussion about the tools used, such as hammers and mallets, and the specific sounds produced.
The Hacker News post "Why Tap a Wheel of Cheese?" with the link to https://www.cheeseprofessor.com/blog/cheese-wheel-tapping has several comments discussing the cheese-tapping process.
Many commenters focused on the practicality and limitations of the tapping method. One commenter expressed skepticism about the reliability of tapping as a sole indicator of quality, especially given the variability in cheese wheels and the subjective nature of interpreting the sounds. They suggested tapping is more likely used in conjunction with other assessment techniques like coring. Another commenter with admitted limited experience echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that tapping is likely just one piece of the puzzle alongside visual inspection and smell. This commenter also highlighted the article's acknowledgment of tapping's limits.
The discussion also touched upon the tools used. One user inquired about the specific hammer used, pointing out the differences compared to a typical meat tenderizer. Another user hypothesized that the small hammer shown in the article's video might be insufficient for larger wheels, prompting speculation about the use of larger mallets and the potential risks of damaging the cheese with excessive force.
Some comments offered additional insights into the cheesemaking process. One commenter, identifying as a cheesemaker, described the use of tapping to detect unwanted gas formation during aging, specifically mentioning the issue of "blowing" in hard cheeses. Another user extrapolated this point, mentioning other defects that tapping might reveal, such as cracks, which could compromise the cheese's aging process or structural integrity.
The conversation expanded beyond the practicalities to include anecdotal experiences. One commenter shared a story about a broken cheese wheel that went unnoticed and ended up costing them significantly, adding a real-world consequence to the importance of cheese assessment.
Finally, a few comments injected a touch of humor. One commenter jokingly suggested using machine learning to analyze the tapping sounds, a nod to the tendency to apply technology to traditional practices. Another commenter quipped about using a more forceful "Hulk smash" approach to cheese inspection.
Overall, the comments section offers a range of perspectives, from skeptical inquiries to expert insights and humorous asides, creating a robust discussion around the seemingly simple act of tapping a cheese wheel.