Stories with Tag bbs

• Flame – BBS and MUD

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-03-31 12:54:46

  Verbose tl;dr

  Flame is a free and accessible telnet-based Bulletin Board System (BBS) and Multi-User Dungeon (MUD) hosted by the University of Canberra Computer Club. It offers a nostalgic online experience with classic BBS features like forums, file transfers, and games, alongside a MUD environment for text-based roleplaying and exploration. Flame aims to provide a friendly and welcoming community for both experienced users familiar with these older systems and newcomers curious to explore the history of online communities. Users can connect via telnet or through a web-based interface, making it easily accessible.

  The University of Canberra Computer Club (UCCC) proudly hosts Flame, a versatile platform that harkens back to the golden age of online text-based communities. Flame concurrently serves as both a Bulletin Board System (BBS) and a Multi-User Dungeon (MUD), offering a diverse range of experiences for users seeking text-based interaction. Accessible through telnet, users can connect directly to flame.ucc.asn.au on port 23, bypassing the need for specialized software. For those preferring a more modern approach, a web client is also available, offering a convenient gateway to the same rich content.

  As a BBS, Flame provides a classic forum for asynchronous communication. Users can engage in threaded discussions across a spectrum of topics within various message boards, share files through a dedicated file transfer system, and exchange personal messages with other members of the community. This functionality replicates the core experience of traditional BBS systems, fostering a sense of community and facilitating the exchange of information and ideas.

  Simultaneously, Flame functions as a MUD, offering a dynamic and interactive virtual world. Users can create and customize characters, embark on text-based adventures, explore intricate virtual environments, and interact with other players in real-time. This MUD component expands upon the static nature of the BBS, introducing a layer of immersive role-playing and collaborative storytelling.

  The post highlights the unique blend of these two distinct yet complementary services, emphasizing Flame's ability to cater to both those seeking asynchronous discussion and those desiring real-time interactive experiences. The enduring legacy of BBS and MUD culture is preserved and celebrated within Flame, offering a nostalgic glimpse into the past while simultaneously providing a vibrant platform for ongoing community engagement. The UCCC, as custodians of Flame, actively encourages new users to join and experience this unique digital realm.

  • bbs
  • MUD
  • Telnet
  • Retro Computing
  • online community
  • Internet History
  • dial-up
  • Text-Based Game
  • Virtual World
  • Multi-User Dungeon
  • Bulletin Board System
  • UCC
  • University of Canterbury (NZ)
  • New Zealand

  Summary of Comments ( 9 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43534480

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discuss Flame, a BBS and MUD software package. Several commenters reminisce about their experiences with BBSes and MUDs, expressing nostalgia for that era of online interaction. Some discuss the technical aspects of Flame, praising its features and flexibility, and comparing it to other contemporary systems. A few users mention trying to get it running on modern hardware, with varying degrees of success. There's a brief discussion about the challenges of preserving old BBS software and data. Overall, the comments reflect a fondness for the history of online communities and an appreciation for Flame's role in it.

  The Hacker News post titled "Flame – BBS and MUD" has generated a moderate amount of discussion with several commenters sharing their experiences and insights related to BBSs and MUDs.

  One commenter reminisces about their early online experiences with bulletin board systems and dial-up modems, recalling the thrill of exploring new online worlds and the limitations of slow connection speeds. They also express a sense of nostalgia for the simpler times of early online communities.

  Another commenter dives deeper into the technical aspects, discussing the challenges of running a BBS with limited hardware resources and the ingenuity required to optimize performance. They mention specific hardware limitations and the clever workarounds employed to overcome them.

  Several comments focus on the unique culture of BBSs and MUDs, contrasting them with modern social media platforms. They highlight the stronger sense of community and the deeper connections fostered in these smaller, more focused online spaces. Some express a longing for the text-based interactions and the emphasis on creativity and imagination that characterized these earlier online environments.

  There's a discussion about the role of BBSs and MUDs in the development of online communities and the internet as a whole. Commenters acknowledge their importance as precursors to modern social platforms and online gaming. They also point to the influence of BBSs and MUDs on the development of internet technologies and culture.

  A few comments mention the challenges of preserving the history and legacy of BBSs and MUDs, with some suggesting resources and initiatives dedicated to archiving and documenting these early online spaces. They emphasize the importance of preserving these digital artifacts for future generations.

  One commenter points out the link provided in the original post actually leads to the Flame University Computer Club homepage rather than a specific page about Flame itself. They helpfully provide a direct link to the Flame documentation.

  Finally, a commenter highlights the unusual combination of BBS and MUD functionality in Flame, suggesting that it represents a unique hybrid of these two distinct online platforms. They find this combination intriguing and express curiosity about the technical implementation and user experience.

• An early social un-network

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-17 09:56:55

  Verbose tl;dr

  The blog post "An early social un-network" details the creation and demise of a hyperlocal, anonymous social network called "Dodgeball" in the early 2000s. Unlike friend-based platforms like Friendster, Dodgeball centered around broadcasting one's location via SMS to nearby users, fostering spontaneous real-world interactions. Its simple design and focus on proximity aimed to connect people in the same physical space, facilitating serendipitous meetings and shared experiences. However, its reliance on SMS proved costly and cumbersome, while its anonymity attracted unwanted attention and hindered the formation of meaningful connections. Despite its innovative approach to social networking, Dodgeball ultimately failed to gain widespread traction and was eventually acquired and shut down.

  This blog post, titled "An early social un-network," delves into the history and philosophy of a unique online community known as "The Place" (theplace.bz), which existed from 1995 to 2000. The author characterizes The Place not as a traditional social network, but rather as an "un-network," emphasizing its distinctive approach to online interaction. Unlike platforms designed to connect individuals based on shared interests or pre-existing relationships, The Place fostered spontaneous and often anonymous encounters. It offered a shared digital canvas where users could collaboratively create pixel art, effectively making the platform a collaborative, constantly evolving artwork in itself.

  The post elaborates on the technical infrastructure of The Place, highlighting its simplicity. The core functionality revolved around a 1000x1000 pixel grid where each user could change the color of a single pixel every few minutes. This constraint, seemingly limiting, actually encouraged intricate collaboration and emergent forms of communication. Users developed complex systems of signaling, coordination, and even storytelling within the confines of this minimalist interface. The author argues that this technical simplicity fostered creativity and a sense of shared ownership over the evolving image.

  Furthermore, the post explores the sociological dynamics that emerged within The Place. The lack of explicit profiles or persistent identities encouraged a focus on the act of creation itself, rather than on individual recognition. This fostered a unique sense of anonymity and collective authorship. While individual contributions were ephemeral, they became part of a larger, constantly shifting tapestry. The Place became a microcosm of emergent social behavior, demonstrating how complex interactions can arise from simple rules and shared spaces. The author contrasts this with modern social media, where the emphasis on individual profiles and curated identities often overshadows genuine connection and collaborative creation.

  The piece concludes by reflecting on the enduring legacy of The Place, despite its relatively short lifespan. The author suggests that its unconventional approach to online interaction offers valuable insights into the potential of digital spaces for fostering creativity, collaboration, and a sense of shared experience, contrasting starkly with the often isolating and performative nature of contemporary social networks. It serves as a reminder that meaningful online interaction doesn't necessarily require complex features or elaborate profiles, but can arise from simple, shared spaces that encourage collective creation.

  • social networks
  • decentralization
  • Internet History
  • early internet
  • Online Communities
  • Usenet
  • bbs
  • bulletin board systems
  • fido
  • fido net
  • alternative social media
  • IndieWeb
  • peer-to-peer
  • distributed systems
  • communication protocols
  • social media protocols

  Summary of Comments ( 5 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43077091

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed the impracticality of the "social un-network" described in the linked article, particularly its reliance on physical proximity and limitations on content sharing. Some found the idea nostalgic and reminiscent of earlier, smaller online communities like Usenet or BBSs. Others expressed concerns about scalability and the potential for abuse and harassment without robust moderation tools. Several commenters questioned the overall utility of such a system, arguing that existing social networks already address the desire for smaller, more focused communities through features like groups or subreddits. The lack of searchability and portability of conversations was also a recurring criticism. While some appreciated the author's intention to foster deeper connections, the general consensus was that the proposed system was too restrictive and ultimately unworkable in its current form.

  The Hacker News post "An early social un-network" discussing the paperstack.com blog post of the same name has generated a moderate amount of discussion with several compelling threads.

  Several commenters discuss the merits and drawbacks of decentralized social networking in general, with some expressing skepticism about its viability and others arguing that it offers a valuable alternative to centralized platforms. One commenter points out the difficulty of discoverability in decentralized systems, highlighting the inherent tension between open access and curation/moderation. Another commenter mentions the "network effect," suggesting that decentralized systems struggle to gain traction because they lack the critical mass of users that centralized platforms enjoy. This user also argues that the very notion of an "un-network" is oxymoronic, implying that connection inherently necessitates some form of network structure.

  Another thread focuses on the specific approach described in the blog post, questioning its practicality and scalability. One commenter argues that the reliance on RSS and email makes the system cumbersome and unlikely to attract a large user base. They suggest that a more modern approach involving a dedicated client or web interface would be necessary for wider adoption.

  Several commenters express nostalgia for earlier, simpler forms of online interaction, referencing platforms like Usenet and mailing lists. They lament the perceived decline in online discourse quality and the rise of centralized platforms dominated by algorithms and advertising. These commenters see the "un-network" concept as a potential return to a more authentic and user-driven online experience.

  There is also some discussion of the technical details of the proposed system, with commenters exploring alternative approaches to decentralized identity and content distribution. One commenter suggests using a blockchain-based system for identity management, while another proposes a peer-to-peer architecture for content storage and retrieval.

  Finally, a few commenters simply express appreciation for the author's exploration of alternative social networking models, even if they are not entirely convinced of their practicality. They see value in challenging the dominance of existing platforms and exploring different approaches to online community building. One commenter summarizes the sentiment by saying that while the specific implementation might not be ideal, the core idea of a more decentralized and user-controlled social space is worth pursuing.