Michael LaBarbera's "The Biology of B-Movie Monsters" analyzes the biological plausibility of classic movie monsters. He applies basic principles of biomechanics, scaling, and physiology to creatures like Godzilla, King Kong, and giant ants, demonstrating how their depicted size and abilities often defy the laws of nature. LaBarbera explores the square-cube law, explaining why enormous creatures would crumble under their own weight and how the energy requirements for movement and bodily functions would be insurmountable. He uses humorous calculations and engaging examples to deconstruct the fantastical elements of these films, highlighting the inherent conflict between Hollywood spectacle and scientific realism.
Frank Herbert's Dune was heavily influenced by T.E. Lawrence's experiences in the Arab Revolt, as depicted in Seven Pillars of Wisdom. Herbert saw parallels between Lawrence's manipulation of Arab tribes against the Ottoman Empire and the potential for ecological and cultural manipulation on a desert planet. The Fremen, like the Bedouin, are desert-dwelling warriors whose culture and survival are intertwined with their harsh environment. Paul Atreides, like Lawrence, becomes a messianic figure, embracing the local customs and leading a rebellion against an oppressive empire. Herbert, however, was wary of the "Lawrence of Arabia" archetype and explored the dangers of unchecked messianic power and the unintended consequences of cultural manipulation, making Paul's journey a cautionary tale rather than a straightforward hero's narrative.
Hacker News commenters discuss the influence of T.E. Lawrence on Frank Herbert's Dune, agreeing that the parallels between Lawrence and Paul Atreides are evident. Some highlight Herbert's explicit mention of Lawrence as an inspiration, while others explore the shared themes of cultural manipulation, messianic figures, and the unintended consequences of intervening in foreign cultures. A few commenters delve into the historical context of Lawrence's exploits, offering additional insights into the complex political landscape of the Middle East and its potential reflection in Dune's world-building. One commenter notes Herbert's cynical view of leadership and revolution, suggesting that both Lawrence and Paul ultimately failed due to the inherent flaws in their approaches. Several users also recommend further reading on Lawrence, including his own writings like Seven Pillars of Wisdom.
Adam Golanski's piece explores a hypothetical "Revenge of the Jedi" directed by David Lynch, imagining how Lynch's surrealist style and thematic obsessions might have transformed the Star Wars saga's conclusion. Golanski analyzes how Lynchian elements like dream logic, grotesque imagery, and explorations of duality could have manifested within the existing narrative framework of Return of the Jedi. He suggests a darker, more psychologically driven film, filled with unsettling visuals and ambiguous morality, contrasting sharply with the relatively straightforward heroism of the original. This imagined Lynchian version delves into the subconscious of characters like Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader, potentially offering a more complex and disturbing resolution to their conflict.
Hacker News users discuss Adam Golaski's piece on David Lynch almost directing Return of the Jedi. Several commenters express fascination with this alternate history, pondering how different the film might have been under Lynch's vision. Some highlight the stark contrast between Lynch's surreal style and Star Wars, leading to speculation about a darker, more psychologically driven narrative. Others point out Lynch's aversion to studio interference, questioning whether he could have navigated the pressures of such a large franchise. A few comments mention the existing pre-production work by Ralph McQuarrie and how Lynch's vision might have incorporated or diverged from it. The overall sentiment leans towards intrigued curiosity about a "what if" scenario, acknowledging the improbability but enjoying the thought experiment.
Summary of Comments ( 21 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43505334
Hacker News users discuss the plausibility and biological implications of B-movie monster tropes. Several commenters analyze the feasibility of giant creatures, citing the square-cube law and its effects on structural integrity, locomotion, and metabolism. Discussions touch on Godzilla's improbable size, the necessary adaptations for giant insects, and the potential for alternative biological mechanisms that might enable such creatures. The impracticality of rapid growth and metamorphosis seen in many monster movies is also pointed out. Some users recommend other resources exploring similar concepts, like Haldane's essay "On Being the Right Size." Several express appreciation for the original article's engaging and informative approach to the subject.
The Hacker News post titled "The Biology of B-Movie Monsters (2003)" links to an article exploring the (often flawed) biological plausibility of classic movie monsters. The discussion on Hacker News generates several interesting comments, revolving around the article's premise and expanding on its themes.
One compelling comment points out that while the article is entertaining, its core argument about the implausibility of movie monsters is somewhat weak. The commenter argues that the very nature of "B-movies" embraces absurdity and doesn't strive for scientific accuracy. They suggest the article might be missing the point by applying serious scientific scrutiny to inherently fantastical creatures. This comment highlights the tension between enjoying fiction and overanalyzing its adherence to real-world rules.
Another commenter expresses appreciation for the article's engaging and humorous approach to scientific concepts. They praise the author's ability to make complex biological ideas accessible and enjoyable for a wider audience. This highlights the article's success in using humor as a tool for science communication.
Building on the article's analysis of giant insects, a commenter discusses the "square-cube law" which explains why scaling up an insect to monstrous size would make it structurally unsound. They provide further detail on how the exoskeleton of a giant insect would crumble under its own weight, reinforcing the article's point about biological constraints.
Some commenters share personal anecdotes and memories related to B-movies and monster movies. One recounts watching a specific film featuring giant ants as a child, demonstrating the lasting impact of these kinds of films on popular culture.
Finally, several comments branch off into discussing other examples of fictional creatures and their biological plausibility (or lack thereof), including Godzilla, King Kong, and various mythical beasts. This demonstrates how the article's core concept can be applied to a wider range of fictional scenarios, sparking further discussion and exploration of the intersection of science and fiction.