Stories with Tag popularity

• The highest-ranking personal blogs of Hacker News

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-03-25 18:48:57

  Verbose tl;dr

  The post analyzes which personal blogs are most frequently linked on Hacker News, revealing a preference for technically-focused, long-form content. It identifies Paul Graham's blog as the most popular by a significant margin, followed by blogs from other prominent figures in the tech and startup world like Steve Yegge, Joel Spolsky, and John Carmack. The analysis uses a dataset of Hacker News submissions and ranks the blogs based on total link counts, highlighting the enduring influence of these authors and their insights within the Hacker News community.

  The blog post, "The Highest-Ranking Personal Blogs of Hacker News," meticulously examines the performance of personal blogs within the Hacker News community, a prominent online forum for discussing technology and entrepreneurship. The author sets out to identify which independently operated blogs have garnered the most traction on the platform, as measured by the number of articles submitted from those blogs that have reached the coveted front page of Hacker News.

  The analysis involved a complex and computationally intensive process of data collection and processing. The author scraped the entirety of Hacker News' history, encompassing every submission ever made to the platform. This vast dataset was then meticulously filtered to isolate submissions originating from personal blogs, distinguishing them from corporate blogs or news sites. The author painstakingly identified and categorized these personal blogs, a task made challenging by the variations in URL structures and the occasional ambiguity between personal and corporate blogs. This categorization was crucial for accurately attributing submitted articles to their respective blogs.

  The core of the analysis revolved around identifying submissions that had achieved front-page status on Hacker News. Reaching the front page signifies a significant level of community engagement and approval, indicating that the article resonated with a substantial portion of the Hacker News readership. By tallying the number of front-page submissions for each personal blog, the author established a ranking system, effectively highlighting the most consistently popular and influential personal blogs within the Hacker News ecosystem.

  The results of this analysis are presented in a comprehensive table, listing the top-performing personal blogs in descending order based on their front-page submission count. The table provides not only the blog names and their corresponding URLs but also includes valuable metadata such as the total number of submissions from each blog and the percentage of those submissions that reached the front page, offering a nuanced perspective on each blog's overall performance and success rate. This detailed presentation of the data allows readers to gain a thorough understanding of the influence and reach of these personal blogs within the Hacker News community. The author also acknowledges the potential for biases in the data and methodology, offering caveats and explanations for certain decisions made during the analysis, further enhancing the transparency and credibility of the findings.

  • Hacker News
  • blogs
  • ranking
  • popularity
  • personal blogs
  • top blogs
  • Blogging
  • technology blogs
  • programming blogs
  • software development blogs

  Summary of Comments ( 12 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43474505

  Verbose tl;dr

  Commenters on Hacker News largely discussed the methodology used in the linked article to determine popular personal blogs. Several users pointed out potential flaws, such as excluding comments and only considering submissions, which could skew the results towards prolific posters rather than genuinely popular blogs. Some questioned the definition of "personal blog" and suggested alternative methods for identifying them. Others noted the absence of certain expected blogs and the inclusion of some that didn't seem to fit the criteria. A few commenters also shared their personal experiences with Hacker News and blog promotion. The overall sentiment was one of cautious interest, with many acknowledging the limitations of the analysis while appreciating the effort.

  The Hacker News thread discussing "The highest-ranking personal blogs of Hacker News" contains several comments exploring the nature of popularity on the platform and reflecting on the listed blogs.

  Several commenters discuss the methodology of the analysis presented in the article. One user questions whether the analysis accounts for the age of the blog, suggesting that older blogs might have an inherent advantage due to accumulated posts over time. Another points out the potential impact of external factors, like Twitter cross-posting, influencing the ranking. The validity of using "average rank" as a metric is also debated, with some suggesting alternative metrics like the number of posts exceeding a certain score threshold might be more insightful.

  A significant portion of the discussion revolves around the specific blogs listed and their perceived quality. Several users express appreciation for certain blogs highlighted in the article, praising their writing style, depth of analysis, and unique perspectives. Some commenters mention specific blogs they enjoy that didn't make the list, leading to discussions about the subjective nature of "quality" and the potential limitations of the ranking system. One commenter highlights the prevalence of technical blogs on the list, speculating about the potential reasons for this trend.

  The conversation also touches upon the broader dynamics of Hacker News itself. One commenter observes the tendency of the platform to favor controversial or emotionally charged content, suggesting this might influence the ranking. Another user reflects on the evolution of Hacker News over time, noting the shift in popular topics and the increasing prevalence of self-promotion.

  A few commenters offer personal anecdotes about their experiences with blogging and the challenges of building an audience on Hacker News. One user shares their strategy for achieving higher rankings, emphasizing the importance of engaging titles and compelling content. Another discusses the difficulties of maintaining a consistent posting schedule and the pressure to produce high-quality content.

  Overall, the comment section offers a diverse range of perspectives on the article and its implications. The discussion explores the complexities of measuring popularity, the subjective nature of quality, and the evolving dynamics of the Hacker News platform itself.

• What happened when REM went mainstream

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-17 18:36:14

  Verbose tl;dr

  R.E.M.'s trajectory from college-radio darlings to mainstream giants is examined through the lens of their 1991 album Out of Time. The article argues that the band's newfound popularity, while commercially successful, diluted their artistic integrity and signaled a broader shift in alternative rock towards commercial palatability. The album's polished production, reliance on softer instrumentation, and incorporation of orchestral elements, exemplified by the hit single "Losing My Religion," marked a departure from their earlier, rawer sound. This sonic shift, while broadening their audience, alienated some long-time fans who perceived it as a betrayal of their alternative roots. Ultimately, the article suggests that Out of Time represents a turning point, not just for R.E.M., but for alternative rock as a whole, illustrating the compromises and contradictions inherent in achieving mainstream success.

  The Yale Review article, "What Happened When R.E.M. Went Mainstream?" by Harmony Tavakoli, meticulously explores the band's trajectory from indie darlings to international superstars, focusing specifically on the period surrounding the release of their 1991 album, Out of Time. Tavakoli argues that R.E.M.'s ascent to the pinnacle of popular music was a complex, multifaceted phenomenon, fraught with internal band tensions and external pressures that ultimately reshaped their artistic identity. She posits that the band's conscious decision to embrace more commercially viable sounds, evidenced by the prominent use of mandolin and orchestral arrangements on Out of Time, was met with both critical acclaim and accusations of selling out from a dedicated fanbase that cherished their earlier, more obscure, and arguably more authentic sound.

  The article delves into the band's internal struggles with the implications of their newfound fame. It details the emotional and psychological toll that constant touring and media scrutiny took on the members, particularly Michael Stipe, whose lyrics on Out of Time reflect a growing desire for privacy and a retreat from the public eye. Tavakoli analyzes how the band navigated the paradoxical situation of achieving widespread recognition while simultaneously grappling with the loss of the intimacy and underground credibility that had initially defined them. She highlights the band's attempts to reconcile their artistic integrity with the demands of a global market, suggesting that their subsequent albums, while commercially successful, represented a departure from the raw, experimental energy of their earlier work.

  Furthermore, the article examines the broader cultural context of the early 1990s, exploring how the rise of alternative rock and MTV's influence on music consumption contributed to R.E.M.'s mainstream breakthrough. Tavakoli suggests that the band's success was, in part, a product of being in the right place at the right time, capitalizing on a shifting cultural landscape that was increasingly receptive to alternative music. She meticulously dissects the production and reception of Out of Time's hit singles, "Losing My Religion" and "Shiny Happy People," analyzing how these songs, with their distinctive musical and visual aesthetics, resonated with a broad audience and solidified R.E.M.'s place in the popular music canon. Ultimately, Tavakoli's analysis paints a nuanced portrait of a band wrestling with the inherent contradictions of artistic ambition and commercial success, and how the pursuit of one often comes at the expense of the other. The article concludes by suggesting that R.E.M.'s story serves as a cautionary tale for artists navigating the treacherous waters of mainstream appeal, highlighting the enduring tension between artistic integrity and commercial viability.

  • REM
  • Music
  • alternative rock
  • mainstream
  • 1980s
  • 1990s
  • band history
  • rock music
  • popularity
  • cultural impact
  • musical evolution
  • Peter Buck
  • Michael Stipe
  • Mike Mills
  • Bill Berry

  Summary of Comments ( 13 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43081929

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN commenters discuss the Yale Review article about R.E.M.'s shift to mainstream success. Some felt the author romanticized the band's early indie days and overlooked the artistic merit of their later work, citing examples like "Automatic for the People" as proof of continued creativity. Others agreed with the premise, lamenting the perceived decline in quality after Bill Berry's departure and the adoption of a more generic sound. Several commenters debated the nature of "selling out," acknowledging the financial pressures and creative burnout bands face after years of touring and recording. A few chimed in with personal anecdotes about seeing R.E.M. live during different eras of their career, offering firsthand perspectives on their evolving sound. The overall sentiment leans towards a nuanced view of the band's trajectory, with many acknowledging the complexities of artistic evolution and commercial success.

  The Hacker News post titled "What happened when REM went mainstream" links to a Yale Review article about the band R.E.M. and their shift in sound and popularity after signing to Warner Bros. The discussion on Hacker News is relatively brief, with only a handful of comments, so an extensive summary of diverse perspectives isn't possible.

  One commenter focuses on the band's early, pre-major label sound, arguing that "Murmur" and other early albums possess a unique sonic quality that is difficult to categorize. They specifically mention the distinct guitar sound, Peter Buck's Rickenbacker, and the overall "jangle-pop" feel. This commenter suggests that the magic of R.E.M.'s early music lay in its undefinable nature.

  Another commenter touches on the changing landscape of the music industry and how artists often face challenges maintaining their original sound while achieving greater commercial success. This comment doesn't specifically analyze R.E.M.'s trajectory but offers a broader reflection on the pressures artists face when "going mainstream."

  A further comment directly addresses the Yale Review article, praising it for its depth and insight. They also lament the current state of music journalism, suggesting this type of in-depth analysis is rare.

  Finally, one commenter offers a personal anecdote about seeing R.E.M. live during their earlier period. They recount being impressed even back then, recognizing the band's potential for broader appeal.

  In short, the Hacker News discussion is small but touches upon themes of artistic integrity, the challenges of commercial success, the unique qualities of R.E.M.'s early work, and the appreciation for in-depth music journalism. The comments don't offer deeply conflicting viewpoints or extended debate, but rather provide individual reflections on the band and the linked article.