Amazon has launched its own large language model (LLM) called Amazon Nova. Nova is designed to be integrated into applications via an SDK or used through a dedicated website. It offers features like text generation, question answering, summarization, and custom chatbots. Amazon emphasizes responsible AI development and highlights Nova’s enterprise-grade security and privacy features. The company aims to empower developers and customers with a powerful and trustworthy AI tool.
Citizen Lab's November 2024 report analyzes censorship on Amazon.com, revealing the removal or suppression of books challenging China's government. Researchers discovered 89 unavailable titles, primarily concerning Xinjiang, Tibet, Taiwan, and the Chinese Communist Party. While some books were explicitly blocked in specific Amazon marketplaces, others were globally unavailable or suppressed in search results. This censorship likely stems from Amazon's dependence on the Chinese market and its adherence to Chinese regulations, highlighting the conflict between commercial interests and freedom of expression. The report concludes that Amazon's actions ultimately facilitate China's transnational repression efforts.
HN commenters discuss potential motivations behind Amazon's book removals, including copyright issues, content violations (like sexually suggestive content involving minors), and genuine errors. Some express skepticism about the Citizen Lab report, questioning its methodology and suggesting it conflates different removal reasons. Others highlight the difficulty of moderating content at scale and the potential for both over- and under-enforcement. Several commenters point out the lack of transparency from Amazon regarding its removal process, making it difficult to determine the true extent and rationale behind the book bans. The recurring theme is the need for greater clarity and accountability from Amazon on its content moderation practices.
Amazon is discontinuing on-device processing for Alexa voice commands. All future requests will be sent to the cloud for processing, regardless of device capabilities. While Amazon claims this will lead to a more unified and improved Alexa experience with faster response times and access to newer features, it effectively removes the local processing option previously available on some devices. This change means increased reliance on a constant internet connection for Alexa functionality and raises potential privacy concerns regarding the handling of voice data.
HN commenters generally lament the demise of on-device processing for Alexa, viewing it as a betrayal of privacy and a step backwards in functionality. Several express concern about increased latency and dependence on internet connectivity, impacting responsiveness and usefulness in areas with poor service. Some speculate this move is driven by cost-cutting at Amazon, prioritizing server-side processing and centralized data collection over user experience. A few question the claimed security benefits, arguing that local processing could enhance privacy and security in certain scenarios. The potential for increased data collection and targeted advertising is also a recurring concern. There's skepticism about Amazon's explanation, with some suggesting it's a veiled attempt to push users towards newer Echo devices or other Amazon services.
Amazon has removed the "Do Not Send" toggle in Alexa's privacy settings that previously prevented voice recordings from being reviewed by human annotators. While users can still delete their voice history and choose not to participate in the "Help improve Alexa" program, automatic deletion is no longer an option, meaning some voice recordings will be retained for an unspecified period for ongoing model development. Amazon claims this change simplifies privacy settings and reflects the primary way customers manage their data (i.e., through activity deletion).
Hacker News users reacted with cynicism and resignation to the news that Amazon silently removed the Alexa voice recording privacy option. Many expressed the belief that Amazon never truly honored the setting in the first place, speculating the data was still collected regardless of user preference. Some commenters suggested that this move further erodes trust in Amazon and reinforces the perception that "big tech" companies prioritize data collection over user privacy. Others recommended alternative smart home solutions that respect privacy or simply avoiding such devices altogether. A few wondered about the technical or legal reasons behind the change, with some speculating it might be related to training large language models.
Amazon has halted its drone delivery operations in College Station, Texas, less than two years after launching the service there. While Amazon claims the pause is temporary and part of a "normal business operations" evolution, the move raises questions about the viability and scalability of the company's drone delivery ambitions. The company states it remains committed to drone delivery and plans to resume service in College Station at some point, but has not provided a timeline. This pause follows a similar shutdown in California earlier this year and comes amidst broader cost-cutting measures at Amazon.
HN commenters discuss the abrupt halt of Amazon's drone delivery program in College Station, expressing skepticism about the viability of drone delivery in general. Some suggest the technology isn't mature enough, citing concerns about noise, safety, and scalability. Others speculate about behind-the-scenes issues like regulatory hurdles, cost-effectiveness problems, or even technical failures. A few commenters point out the limited scope of the program and question whether it was ever intended to be more than a pilot project. The overall sentiment seems to be one of disappointment mixed with a belief that drone delivery still faces significant obstacles.
Amazon announced "Alexa+", a suite of new AI-powered features designed to make Alexa more conversational and proactive. Leveraging generative AI, Alexa can now create stories, generate summaries of lengthy information, and offer more natural and context-aware responses. This includes improved follow-up questions and the ability to adjust responses based on previous interactions. These advancements aim to provide a more intuitive and helpful user experience, making Alexa a more integrated part of daily life.
HN commenters are largely skeptical of Amazon's claims about the new Alexa. Several point out that past "improvements" haven't delivered and that Alexa still struggles with basic tasks and contextual understanding. Some express concerns about privacy implications with the increased data collection required for generative AI. Others see this as a desperate attempt by Amazon to catch up to competitors in the AI space, especially given the recent layoffs at Alexa's development team. A few are slightly more optimistic, suggesting that generative AI could potentially address some of Alexa's existing weaknesses, but overall the sentiment is one of cautious pessimism.
Amazon, having completed its acquisition of MGM Studios, now has full creative control over the James Bond franchise. This includes future 007 films, along with the extensive Bond library. Amazon intends to honor the legacy of the franchise while expanding the reach of the Bond universe through new storytelling across various media, potentially including video games and other immersive experiences. They emphasize a commitment to preserving the theatrical experience for future Bond films.
Hacker News commenters express skepticism about Amazon's ability to manage the James Bond franchise effectively. Several predict an influx of poorly-received spin-offs and sequels, diluting the brand with subpar content for profit maximization. Concerns were raised regarding Amazon's track record with original content, with some arguing their successes are outweighed by numerous mediocre productions. Others highlighted the delicate balance required to modernize Bond while retaining the core elements that define the character, fearing Amazon will prioritize commercial viability over artistic integrity. A few commenters expressed cautious optimism, hoping Amazon might bring fresh perspectives to the franchise, but overall sentiment leans towards apprehension about the future of James Bond under Amazon's control.
Amazon is shutting down its Appstore for Android devices on August 20, 2025. Users will no longer be able to download or update apps from the Appstore after this date, and some services associated with existing apps may also cease functioning. Amazon will refund any remaining Amazon Coins balance. Developers will continue to be paid royalties for existing apps until the shutdown date. While Amazon states they're shifting focus to Fire tablets and Fire TV, the actual Android Appstore listing has been pulled from the Google Play Store, and development of new Android apps for submission is now discouraged.
Hacker News users react to the Amazon Appstore shutdown with a mixture of apathy and mild surprise. Many point out the store's general irrelevance, citing its limited selection and lack of discoverability compared to the Google Play Store. Some speculate about Amazon's motivations, suggesting they're refocusing resources on more profitable ventures or admitting defeat in the mobile app market. A few users express disappointment, having used the store for specific apps unavailable elsewhere or to take advantage of Amazon Coins promotions. The overall sentiment suggests the closure won't significantly impact the Android ecosystem.
A new jailbreak called "WinterBreak" has been released, exploiting a vulnerability present in all currently supported Kindle e-readers. This jailbreak allows users to install custom firmware and software, opening up possibilities like alternative ebook stores, custom fonts, and other enhancements not officially supported by Amazon. The exploit is reliable and relatively easy to execute, requiring only a specially crafted MOBI file to be sideloaded onto the device. This marks a significant development in the Kindle modding community, as previous jailbreaks were often device-specific and quickly patched by Amazon. Users are encouraged to update to the latest Kindle firmware before applying the jailbreak, as WinterBreak supports all current versions.
Hacker News users discuss the implications of a new Kindle jailbreak, primarily focusing on its potential benefits for accessibility and user control. Some express excitement about features like custom fonts, improved PDF handling, and removing Amazon's advertisements. Others caution about potential downsides, such as voiding the warranty and the possibility of bricking the device. A few users share their past experiences with jailbreaking Kindles, mentioning the benefits they've enjoyed, while others question the long-term practicality and the risk versus reward, especially given the relatively low cost of newer Kindles. Several commenters express concern about Amazon's potential response and the future of jailbreaking Kindles.
Bookshop.org, the online platform supporting independent bookstores, has launched its own e-book store and reading app, offering a direct competitor to Amazon's Kindle ecosystem. This allows customers to purchase e-books while still financially supporting their chosen local bookstore. The app provides basic e-reader functionality, including customizable fonts and backgrounds, and purchases are fulfilled by Ingram Content Group, a major book distributor. Bookshop.org aims to provide an ethical alternative for digitally-minded readers who want to support local businesses.
Hacker News commenters generally expressed skepticism about Bookshop.org's e-reader and ebook app. Several questioned its viability against the entrenched Amazon Kindle ecosystem, citing the lack of device integration and limited ebook selection. Some doubted the profitability for independent bookstores, given the small percentage they receive per sale. Others pointed to existing alternatives like Kobo and library ebook programs. A few commenters were more positive, viewing the move as a principled stand against Amazon, but even they acknowledged the uphill battle Bookshop.org faces. There was also discussion of the technical challenges involved in DRM and ebook formats, with some suggesting an open platform would be more appealing. The overall sentiment seemed to be that while the initiative is laudable, its success is far from guaranteed.
Summary of Comments ( 16 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43535558
HN commenters are generally skeptical of Amazon's Nova offering. Several point out that Amazon's history with consumer-facing AI products is lackluster (e.g., Alexa). Others question the value proposition of yet another LLM chatbot, especially given the existing strong competition and Amazon's apparent lack of a unique angle. Some express concern about the closed-source nature of Nova and its potential limitations compared to open-source alternatives. A few commenters speculate about potential enterprise applications and integrations within the AWS ecosystem, but even those comments are tempered with doubts about Amazon's execution. Overall, the sentiment seems to be that Nova faces an uphill battle to gain significant traction.
The Hacker News post about Amazon's announcement of Nova, its competitor to ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok, sparked a variety of comments, primarily focusing on skepticism and comparisons to existing offerings.
Several commenters questioned the genuine innovation of Nova, expressing doubt that it offered anything significantly different from other large language models (LLMs) already available. They pointed to the lack of specific details about Nova's capabilities in the announcement as a reason for their skepticism. Some suggested that Amazon was simply trying to keep up with the trend, entering the market late without a clear competitive edge. The sentiment was that Amazon's announcement was more about marketing and less about a groundbreaking technological advancement.
Comparisons to existing chatbots like ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude were frequent. Commenters speculated whether Nova would be able to match their performance, particularly given the perceived lack of novelty. Some questioned whether Amazon had the necessary expertise in the LLM space to truly compete with established players like Google and OpenAI.
Several commenters discussed the potential integration of Nova with Amazon Web Services (AWS). They saw this as a potential advantage for Amazon, allowing them to offer a comprehensive suite of AI tools to their cloud customers. However, even this integration was met with some skepticism, with some suggesting it was a natural, if not particularly innovative, move.
A few commenters brought up the issue of data privacy, wondering how Amazon would handle user data collected through Nova, given the company's existing data collection practices.
There was also a thread discussing the name "Nova," with some finding it generic and uninspired, and others pointing out the potential for confusion with existing products and services.
Overall, the comments on Hacker News were predominantly cautious and critical of Amazon's Nova announcement. The prevailing sentiment was that Amazon hadn't demonstrated anything particularly new or exciting, and that the company faced a significant uphill battle to compete with established players in the rapidly evolving LLM landscape.