Calcverse is a collection of simple, focused online calculators built by a solo developer as a counterpoint to the current hype around AI agents. The creator emphasizes the value of small, well-executed tools that solve specific problems efficiently. The calculators currently offered on the site cover areas like loan comparisons, unit conversions, and investment calculations, with more planned for the future. The project embraces a minimalist design and aims to provide a practical alternative to overly complex software.
The Marsha P. Johnson Chrome extension combats trans erasure by highlighting instances where "deadnaming" occurs on webpages. It identifies and visually emphasizes when a transgender person's pre-transition name is used instead of their chosen name, aiming to raise awareness and promote respectful language. The extension utilizes a user-maintained database of names and allows for community contributions to ensure its accuracy and comprehensiveness. This tool serves as a simple yet powerful reminder of the importance of using correct names and pronouns, honoring trans identities, and fostering a more inclusive online environment.
Several Hacker News commenters express skepticism about the value and implementation of the Marsha P. Johnson Chrome extension. Some question the effectiveness of simply highlighting names, suggesting it doesn't meaningfully address trans erasure and may even be counterproductive by trivializing the issue. Others criticize the technical execution, pointing to potential performance issues, privacy concerns around data collection, and the potential for misidentification or misgendering due to the complexities of language. There are also concerns about the extension promoting a specific political viewpoint and the potential for misuse or abuse. A few commenters offer alternative suggestions for combating trans erasure, such as donating to relevant organizations or engaging in more direct activism.
Summary of Comments ( 80 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43137248
HN users generally praised the calculator's clean UI/UX and appreciated the developer's focus on a simple, well-executed project rather than chasing the AI hype. Several commenters suggested potential improvements or expansions, including adding more unit conversions, financial calculators, and even integrating with existing tools like Excel or Google Sheets. Some pointed out the existing prevalence of specialized online calculators, questioning the project's long-term viability. Others expressed interest in the technical implementation details, particularly the use of Qwik and Partytown. A few jokingly questioned the project's description as "just" calculators, recognizing the complexity and value in building a robust and user-friendly calculation tool.
The Hacker News post titled "Show HN: While the world builds AI Agents, I'm just building calculators" sparked a small but interesting discussion.
One commenter expressed appreciation for the simplicity and focus of the project, contrasting it with the current hype surrounding AI agents. They saw value in creating tools that serve a specific purpose well, rather than chasing the latest trend. They also pointed out the potential for calculators to become more complex and powerful, hinting at the possibility of the creator eventually incorporating some of the AI technologies they are currently eschewing.
Another commenter focused on the business aspect, inquiring about the project's monetization strategy. This led the original poster (OP) to explain they were considering a freemium model with potential add-ons like custom themes and functions. This exchange offered a glimpse into the practical considerations of developing and sustaining a project like this.
A third comment highlighted the importance of discoverability, suggesting that submitting the calculators to various app stores could significantly increase their reach. This practical advice offered a potential avenue for growth.
The discussion also touched upon the technical aspects of the project. One user asked about the technology used to build the calculators, to which the OP replied that they were using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This clarified the development stack and offered insight into the project's technical foundation.
Finally, there's a short exchange regarding the user interface. One commenter pointed out the lack of an equals sign (=) on the percentage calculator and enquired about its functionality, prompting the OP to explain it and also admit the UI confusion. This small detail highlighted the importance of user feedback in identifying and addressing usability issues.
While the overall number of comments is relatively low, they provide a well-rounded perspective on the project, covering aspects from design and technical implementation to business strategy and discoverability. The comments generally express support for the project's focus on simplicity and utility in a landscape increasingly dominated by complex AI-driven applications.