OpenVertebrate has launched a free, accessible database containing over 13,000 3D scans of vertebrate specimens, including skeletons and soft tissue. Sourced from museums and research institutions worldwide, these scans allow researchers, educators, and the public to explore vertebrate anatomy and evolution in detail. The project aims to democratize access to these resources, enabling new discoveries and educational opportunities without requiring physical access to the specimens themselves. Users can download, 3D print, or view the models online using a dedicated viewer.
A shift towards softer foods in ancient human diets, starting around the time of the Neolithic agricultural revolution, inadvertently changed the way our jaws develop. This resulted in a more common occurrence of overbites, where the upper teeth overlap the lower teeth. This change in jaw structure, in turn, facilitated the pronunciation of labiodental sounds like "f" and "v," which were less common in languages spoken by hunter-gatherer populations with edge-to-edge bites. The study used biomechanical modeling and analyzed phonetic data from a variety of languages, concluding that the overbite facilitates these sounds, offering a selective advantage in populations consuming softer foods.
HN commenters discuss the methodology of the study, questioning the reliance on biomechanical models and expressing skepticism about definitively linking soft food to overbite development over other factors like genetic drift. Several users point out that other primates, like chimpanzees, also exhibit labiodental articulation despite not having undergone the same dietary shift. The oversimplification of the "soft food" category is also addressed, with commenters noting variations in food processing across different ancient cultures. Some doubt the practicality of reconstructing speech sounds based solely on skeletal remains, highlighting the missing piece of soft tissue data. Finally, the connection between overbite and labiodental sounds is challenged, with some arguing that an edge-to-edge bite is sufficient for producing these sounds.
"Anatomy of Oscillation" explores the ubiquitous nature of oscillations in various systems, from physics and engineering to biology and economics. The post argues that these seemingly disparate phenomena share a common underlying structure: a feedback loop where a system's output influences its own input, leading to cyclical behavior. It uses the example of a simple harmonic oscillator (a mass on a spring) to illustrate the core principles of oscillation, including the concepts of equilibrium, displacement, restoring force, and inertia. The author suggests that understanding these basic principles can help us better understand and predict oscillations in more complex systems, ultimately offering a framework for recognizing recurring patterns in seemingly chaotic processes.
Hacker News users discussed the idea of "oscillation" presented in the linked Substack article, primarily focusing on its application in various fields. Some commenters questioned the novelty of the concept, arguing that it simply describes well-known feedback loops. Others found the framing helpful, highlighting its relevance to software development processes, personal productivity, and even biological systems. A few users expressed skepticism about the practical value of the framework, while others offered specific examples of oscillation in their own work, such as product development cycles and the balance between exploration and exploitation in learning. The discussion also touched upon the optimal frequency of oscillations and the importance of recognizing and managing them for improved outcomes.
Summary of Comments ( 12 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43589989
HN commenters generally expressed enthusiasm for the OpenVertebrate project, viewing it as a valuable resource for research, education, and art. Some highlighted the potential for 3D printing and its implications for paleontology and museum studies, allowing access to specimens without handling fragile originals. Others discussed the technical aspects, inquiring about file formats and the scanning process. A few expressed concerns about the long-term sustainability of such projects and the need for consistent funding and metadata standards. Several pointed out the utility for comparative anatomy and evolutionary biology studies. Finally, some users shared links to related projects and resources involving 3D scanning of biological specimens.
The Hacker News post titled "OpenVertebrate Presents a Database of 13,000 3D Scans of Specimens" has generated several comments discussing the significance and potential applications of the database.
Several commenters express enthusiasm for the resource. One highlights the potential for 3D printing, envisioning the possibility of printing and assembling a complete skeleton, while acknowledging potential licensing issues. Another user points out the educational value, particularly for those in remote areas or without access to physical specimens. The ability to manipulate and examine the models in 3D is seen as a significant advantage over traditional 2D images.
Some comments focus on the technical aspects. One user questions the accessibility of the data for those with limited internet access, given the large file sizes. Another inquires about the scanning methodology and file formats used. A commenter with experience in the field points out that the quality of 3D scans can vary significantly and suggests that the database would benefit from including metadata about scan quality. This same commenter expresses excitement about the potential to use the database for geometric morphometrics, a powerful technique for analyzing shape variation.
There's a discussion about potential applications beyond education and research. One commenter suggests uses in art and design, while another envisions applications in paleontology and comparative anatomy. The possibility of using the models for virtual and augmented reality experiences is also mentioned.
Finally, a few comments raise important considerations about the ethical implications of digitizing natural history collections, including issues of cultural heritage and repatriation. One commenter raises the point that many of these specimens were likely collected during periods of colonialism and emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the historical context.
Overall, the comments reflect a positive reception to the OpenVertebrate database, with commenters recognizing its potential to revolutionize fields like education, research, and even art and design. However, the discussion also highlights crucial considerations regarding data accessibility, quality, and the ethical implications of digitizing natural history collections.