The FBI raided the home of Mateo D’Amato, a renowned computer scientist specializing in cryptography and anonymity technologies, and seized several electronic devices. D’Amato has since vanished, becoming incommunicado with colleagues and family. His university profile has been removed, and the institution refuses to comment, further deepening the mystery surrounding his disappearance and the reason for the FBI's interest. D’Amato's research focused on areas with potential national security implications, but no details regarding the investigation have been released.
The average college student today is increasingly disengaged and apathetic, prioritizing social life and career prospects over genuine intellectual curiosity. They view college primarily as a stepping stone to a high-paying job, often choosing majors based on perceived earning potential rather than personal interest. This instrumental approach to education leads to a decline in critical thinking, a superficial understanding of complex topics, and a reluctance to engage in challenging discussions. This trend is further exacerbated by a culture of safetyism and emotional fragility, where students avoid potentially offensive or uncomfortable ideas, hindering intellectual exploration and the development of robust reasoning skills.
Hacker News users generally agreed with the premise of the linked article, which argues that the average college student is less academically prepared and engaged than in the past. Several commenters pointed to administrative bloat and the increasing focus on non-academic amenities as contributing factors to declining academic rigor. Some discussed the rising cost of college relative to its perceived value, and how that impacts student motivation. A few argued that the article overgeneralizes and that high-achieving students still exist, but are overshadowed by the growing number of students who are less focused on academics. The pressure on universities to increase enrollment, regardless of academic preparedness, was also cited as a driving force behind the described decline. Finally, several users questioned the validity of the author's data and methodology, highlighting the difficulty in defining and measuring "average" student performance across different institutions and time periods.
Istanbul University revoked Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu's degree, claiming irregularities in his initial university diploma that he used to enroll. This decision could bar Imamoglu, a prominent rival of President Erdogan and potential presidential candidate, from running for office. The mayor denounced the move as politically motivated and vowed to appeal.
Hacker News commenters largely see the annulment of Istanbul mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu's university degree as a politically motivated move by President Erdoğan to eliminate a strong rival. Several highlight the apparent absurdity of the timing and the specific charge, questioning the legitimacy of the process. Some draw parallels to other authoritarian regimes and express concern about the erosion of democratic norms in Turkey. A few commenters offer alternative interpretations, suggesting the situation might be more nuanced or that İmamoğlu may have genuinely committed an infraction, though these views are in the minority. Overall, the prevailing sentiment is one of skepticism towards the official narrative and concern for the future of Turkish democracy.
The blog post "Please Commit More Blatant Academic Fraud" argues that the current academic system, particularly in humanities, incentivizes meaningless, formulaic writing that adheres to rigid stylistic and theoretical frameworks rather than genuine intellectual exploration. The author encourages students to subvert this system by embracing "blatant academic fraud"—not plagiarism or fabrication, but rather strategically utilizing sophisticated language and fashionable theories to create impressive-sounding yet ultimately hollow work. This act of performative scholarship is presented as a form of protest, exposing the absurdity of a system that values appearance over substance and rewards conformity over original thought. The author believes this "fraud" will force the academy to confront its own superficiality and hopefully lead to meaningful reform.
Hacker News users generally agree with the author's premise that the current academic publishing system is broken and incentivizes bad research practices. Many commenters share anecdotes of questionable research practices they've witnessed, including pressure to produce positive results, manipulating data, and salami slicing publications. Some highlight the perverse incentives created by the "publish or perish" environment, arguing that it pushes researchers towards quantity over quality. Several commenters discuss the potential benefits of open science practices and pre-registration as ways to improve transparency and rigor. There is also a thread discussing the role of reviewers and editors in perpetuating these problems, suggesting they often lack the time or expertise to thoroughly evaluate submissions. A few dissenting voices argue that while problems exist, blatant fraud is rare and the author's tone is overly cynical.
Murat Buffalo reflects on his fulfilling five years at MIT CSAIL, expressing gratitude for the exceptional research environment and collaborations. He highlights the freedom to explore diverse research areas, from theoretical foundations to real-world applications in areas like climate change and healthcare. Buffalo acknowledges the supportive community, emphasizing the valuable mentorship he received and the inspiring colleagues he worked alongside. Though bittersweet to leave, he's excited for the next chapter and carries the positive impact of his MIT experience forward.
Hacker News users discussing Murat Buffalo's blog post about his time at MIT generally express sympathy and understanding of his experiences. Several commenters share similar stories of feeling overwhelmed, isolated, and struggling with mental health in demanding academic environments. Some question the value of relentlessly pursuing prestige, highlighting the importance of finding a balance between ambition and well-being. Others offer practical advice, suggesting that seeking help and focusing on intrinsic motivation rather than external validation can lead to a more fulfilling experience. A few commenters criticize the blog post for being overly negative and potentially discouraging to prospective students, while others defend Buffalo's right to share his personal perspective. The overall sentiment leans towards acknowledging the pressures of elite institutions and advocating for a more supportive and humane approach to education.
PhD enrollment is declining globally, driven by several factors. The demanding nature of doctoral programs, coupled with often-meager stipends and uncertain career prospects outside academia, is deterring potential applicants. Many are opting for higher-paying jobs in industry directly after their master's degrees. Additionally, concerns about work-life balance, mental health, and the increasing pressure to publish are contributing to this trend. While some fields, like engineering and computer science, remain attractive due to industry demand, the overall appeal of doctoral studies is diminishing as alternative career paths become more appealing.
Hacker News users discuss potential reasons for the PhD decline, citing poor academic job prospects, low pay compared to industry, and lengthy, often stressful, programs. Some argue that a PhD is only worthwhile for those truly passionate about research, while others suggest the value of a PhD depends heavily on the field. Several commenters point out that industry increasingly values specialized skills acquired through shorter, more focused programs, and the financial burden of a PhD is a major deterrent. Some suggest the "lustre" hasn't faded for all PhDs, with fields like computer science remaining attractive. Others propose alternative paths like industry-sponsored PhDs or more direct collaborations between academia and industry to increase relevance and improve career outcomes. A few commenters also highlight the potential impact of declining birth rates and the rising cost of higher education in general.
Summary of Comments ( 159 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43527001
Hacker News users discussed the implications of the FBI raid and subsequent disappearance of the computer scientist, expressing concern over the lack of public information and potential chilling effects on academic research. Some speculated about the reasons behind the raid, ranging from national security concerns to more mundane possibilities like grant fraud or data mismanagement. Several commenters questioned the university's swift removal of the scientist's webpage, viewing it as an overreaction and potentially damaging to his reputation. Others pointed out the difficulty of drawing conclusions without knowing the specifics of the investigation, advocating for cautious observation until more information emerges. The overall sentiment leaned towards concern for the scientist's well-being and apprehension about the precedent this sets for academic freedom.
The Hacker News post titled "FBI raids home of prominent computer scientist who has gone incommunicado" (linking to an Ars Technica article about the disappearance of Dr. Yingying (Jennifer) Chen) has generated a significant number of comments discussing various aspects of the situation. Many commenters express concern over the lack of information and the chilling effect this kind of action could have on academic research and international collaboration.
Several commenters focus on the potential implications of the FBI raid and Chen's subsequent disappearance. Some speculate about possible reasons, ranging from intellectual property theft to espionage, while acknowledging the absence of publicly available evidence. Others caution against jumping to conclusions and emphasize the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The secrecy surrounding the case fuels speculation and anxieties.
A recurring theme in the comments is the potential damage to academic freedom and international collaboration. Commenters worry that incidents like this could deter foreign researchers from working in the US or collaborating with American institutions. Some express concerns that the incident could exacerbate existing tensions between the US and China.
Some commenters question the proportionality of the FBI's response, particularly given the lack of publicly disclosed information about the nature of the alleged wrongdoing. They highlight the potential for such raids to disrupt research, damage reputations, and cause significant personal distress even if the individual is ultimately exonerated.
A few commenters offer alternative perspectives, suggesting that the lack of public information might indicate the sensitivity or complexity of the investigation. They argue that it's premature to criticize the FBI's actions without a clearer understanding of the circumstances.
Many comments dissect the Ars Technica article itself, pointing out what they perceive as journalistic shortcomings, such as the reliance on anonymous sources and the lack of concrete details. Some commenters express frustration with the article's focus on speculation rather than verifiable facts.
Finally, several commenters offer practical advice and support, sharing information about legal resources and expressing solidarity with Chen and her family. There's a palpable sense of concern within the community for Chen's well-being and the broader implications of her disappearance. The comments reflect a desire for transparency and a cautious approach to judgment in the absence of confirmed information.