Stories with Tag M3U

• Tunarr: Create and configure live TV channels from media on your servers

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-12 15:26:25

  Verbose tl;dr

  Tunarr transforms your personal media libraries into personalized live TV channels. It fetches media from your servers, structures them into a customizable program guide (EPG), and serves them as live streams accessible via common IPTV players. This allows you to experience your movies, TV shows, and music as traditional broadcast television, complete with channel logos, descriptions, and scheduled programming blocks. Tunarr handles transcoding on the fly for compatibility with various devices and supports popular media server software like Plex, Emby, and Jellyfin.

  Tunarr is a comprehensive, self-hosted software solution designed for individuals who wish to curate and manage their personal live TV channels using their existing media libraries. It acts as a sophisticated intermediary, taking locally stored media files (movies, TV shows, music videos, etc.) and transforming them into continuously broadcasting channels, mimicking the experience of traditional television. This empowers users to create personalized viewing experiences tailored to their specific tastes.

  Tunarr boasts a robust feature set designed for ease of use and customization. Its intuitive web interface allows users to effortlessly create and manage their channels, scheduling content and organizing media into playlists. This scheduling functionality allows for both linear, sequential broadcasting and more randomized playback, enabling users to emulate different viewing paradigms. The software intelligently handles transcoding, ensuring compatibility across a wide range of devices and network conditions. Users can define the quality and format of the streams to optimize for different bandwidth limitations and client capabilities.

  Beyond simple playback, Tunarr incorporates advanced features such as Electronic Program Guide (EPG) generation. This enables compatible client devices, like smart TVs and set-top boxes, to display program information, including titles, descriptions, and schedules, enhancing the traditional TV viewing experience. Furthermore, the software provides the capability to integrate with existing Plex media servers, allowing users to leverage their existing Plex libraries and organizational structures directly within Tunarr.

  Tunarr addresses the increasing desire for personalized content consumption, offering a powerful and flexible way to repurpose existing digital media collections into a format reminiscent of classic television broadcasting. By putting the user in control of programming and scheduling, Tunarr provides a unique and customizable alternative to traditional cable or streaming services. This self-hosted nature emphasizes privacy and control over one's media, a key aspect for users concerned about data security and ownership.

  • Tunarr
  • Live TV
  • streaming
  • media server
  • Plex
  • Jellyfin
  • Emby
  • DVR
  • PVR
  • IPTV
  • M3U
  • self-hosted
  • Open Source
  • Media Center
  • Home Media
  • Video Streaming
  • Channel Creation
  • Channel Management

  Summary of Comments ( 16 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43665201

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed Tunarr's potential, praising its ability to combine local media and internet streams into a cohesive TV-like experience, particularly for cord-cutters. Some highlighted the project's reliance on Docker, simplifying setup and deployment. Concerns were raised about the limited documentation and potential complexity for non-technical users. Several commenters expressed interest in features like DVR functionality and better EPG management. The discussion also touched on alternatives like Plex and Jellyfin, with some suggesting Tunarr could complement or even surpass these platforms for specific use-cases. There was a desire for more information about the project's roadmap and long-term goals.

  The Hacker News post "Tunarr: Create and configure live TV channels from media on your servers" generated a modest amount of discussion, with a focus on comparing Tunarr to existing solutions and questioning its specific use cases.

  Several commenters highlighted the overlap in functionality between Tunarr and Plex, a popular media server software. One commenter pointed out that Plex already allows users to organize media into collections that resemble TV channels, questioning the added value of Tunarr. Others echoed this sentiment, suggesting that Plex, along with its live TV and DVR features, largely covers the same ground. The discussion explored the nuanced differences, with some suggesting Tunarr might be preferable for users wanting a more traditional linear TV experience, particularly with features like channel surfing and EPG.

  The practicality of Tunarr's approach was also debated. One commenter questioned the need for simulating live TV channels when on-demand streaming is readily available. They argued that the traditional channel model is becoming obsolete and that curating playlists for on-demand viewing is a more efficient approach. This sparked a counter-argument, suggesting that the familiar channel format can be comforting and preferred by some users, particularly those accustomed to traditional television.

  Some commenters expressed interest in using Tunarr for specific scenarios, like creating custom channels for children or showcasing personal video collections. The ease of setup and configuration was also discussed, with users inquiring about the technical requirements and the level of effort involved in setting up and maintaining the system.

  A few commenters mentioned alternative solutions like PseudoTV Live, emphasizing the existing options available for creating personalized TV channel experiences. The discussion around these alternatives further highlighted the question of Tunarr's unique selling points and its place within the existing ecosystem of media server software.

  While there was no overwhelming consensus on the value of Tunarr, the comments reflected a diverse range of perspectives. Some viewed it as a potentially useful tool for specific niche applications, while others remained unconvinced, citing the adequacy of existing solutions like Plex. The discussion primarily revolved around comparing Tunarr to existing tools, questioning its practical applications, and exploring the evolving landscape of media consumption.

• DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-12 12:58:13

  Verbose tl;dr

  DeaDBeeF is a modular music player for Linux, *BSD, Android, macOS, and other UNIX-like systems. It prioritizes audio quality and offers a wide array of features including support for numerous lossless and lossy audio formats, gapless playback, ReplayGain, customizable playlists, and a powerful plugin architecture enabling extensibility. Its focus is on lightweight performance and a simple, efficient user interface, making it a robust and customizable audio player for serious music listeners.

  DeaDBeeF, self-proclaimed as the "Ultimate Music Player," presents itself as a powerful and highly customizable audio player specifically designed for the GNU/Linux operating system, with ports available for other Unix-like systems such as *BSD, Android, and macOS. It emphasizes a focus on advanced functionality and caters to users who desire a high degree of control over their music playback experience.

  The project highlights its lightweight and efficient nature, consuming minimal system resources while providing a rich feature set. This includes support for a wide variety of audio formats, exceeding the capabilities of many mainstream players. DeaDBeeF boasts compatibility with lossless formats like FLAC, APE, and WavPack, as well as more common formats like MP3, Ogg Vorbis, and Musepack. Furthermore, it supports playback of tracker modules, game music files, and numerous other specialized formats.

  Customization is a cornerstone of DeaDBeeF's philosophy, offering users extensive control over the player's appearance and behavior. This includes customizable themes, configurable hotkeys, and a flexible plugin system that allows users to extend functionality and tailor the player to their specific needs. The plugin architecture allows for additions like DSP effects, different output methods, and integration with external services.

  The user interface is described as practical and efficient, prioritizing functionality over aesthetics. While visually reminiscent of classic audio players, it provides a comprehensive set of tools for managing and playing music, including playlist management, advanced tagging capabilities, and support for cuesheets. Furthermore, DeaDBeeF offers robust replaygain support, ensuring a consistent volume level across tracks.

  In addition to its core playback features, DeaDBeeF integrates seamlessly with various external devices and services. It supports portable audio players, allowing for easy synchronization and transfer of music files. Furthermore, it offers built-in support for streaming from internet radio stations and podcasts.

  The project emphasizes its commitment to open-source principles, being released under the GPLv2 license. This fosters community involvement and ensures the software remains free and accessible to all. DeaDBeeF is presented as a mature and stable project with a dedicated development team and a long history of active maintenance. It positions itself as a compelling alternative to resource-intensive or feature-limited music players, catering to power users who value customization, efficiency, and extensive format support.

  • DeadBeef
  • Music Player
  • audio player
  • Free Software
  • Open Source
  • Cross-Platform
  • lightweight
  • Customizable
  • Plugin Support
  • MP3
  • FLAC
  • Ogg Vorbis
  • WAV
  • CUE
  • M3U
  • PLS

  Summary of Comments ( 82 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43024961

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discuss DeaDBeeF's minimalist nature, praising its speed and efficiency, particularly on older hardware. Several commenters appreciate its customizability and plugin ecosystem, contrasting it favorably with bloated music players. Some lament the lack of a polished macOS version and the somewhat dated UI, but overall the sentiment is positive, with users highlighting its reliability and focus on core music playback functionality. A few share their long-term usage of the player, reinforcing its reputation as a stable and dependable choice for audiophiles and power users seeking a lightweight alternative. Some mention specific features like playlist management and format support as particularly strong points.

  The Hacker News post titled "DeaDBeeF: The Ultimate Music Player" generated several comments discussing the merits and drawbacks of the DeaDBeeF audio player. Many commenters expressed appreciation for its lightweight nature, minimalist interface, and focus on functionality over visual aesthetics. They praised its customizability, including support for plugins, and its efficient handling of large music libraries. Some specifically highlighted its low resource usage compared to other players, making it suitable for older or less powerful hardware.

  Several users shared their long-term experience with DeaDBeeF, emphasizing its stability and reliability. They viewed it as a robust and practical tool for simply playing music without unnecessary distractions.

  There was discussion comparing DeaDBeeF to other popular music players like Foobar2000, with some users drawing parallels in terms of functionality and customizability. The modularity and plugin system were highlighted as key features allowing users to tailor the player to their specific needs.

  However, not all comments were positive. Some users pointed out what they perceived as a steep learning curve due to the abundance of options and lack of hand-holding. The interface, while appreciated by some for its minimalism, was criticized by others as being dated or clunky. A few commenters also mentioned encountering bugs or stability issues, although these reports were less frequent than the positive comments.

  The discussion also touched upon the cross-platform availability of DeaDBeeF and its support for various audio formats. Some users expressed a desire for improved playlist management features. Overall, the comments reflect a mixed reception, with many long-time users praising DeaDBeeF's functionality and efficiency, while others found it less approachable due to its interface and complexity.