Researchers have reconstructed the face of St. Thomas Aquinas using 3D modeling based on his skull, offering a glimpse of his appearance 750 years after his death. Analysis also suggests he suffered from a chronic ear infection and severe osteoarthritis, possibly contributing to his demise. While the cause of death remains uncertain, these findings provide valuable insight into the health and physical characteristics of the influential theologian and philosopher.
A recent anthropological investigation, utilizing cutting-edge craniofacial reconstruction techniques, has provided unprecedented insight into the visage and demise of the eminent 13th-century philosopher and theologian, Saint Thomas Aquinas. Researchers, meticulously examining the preserved skull of Aquinas, which has been venerated as a relic for centuries, embarked on a painstaking process to recreate the likely appearance of this towering intellectual figure. Through sophisticated methodologies, including advanced imaging and forensic anthropological principles, they extrapolated the facial features that were once enveloped by skin and muscle, effectively offering a glimpse into the countenance of the Doctor Angelicus.
This meticulous reconstruction, based on the bony architecture of the skull, revealed a man with a prominent forehead, suggestive of a powerful intellect, and other distinguishing characteristics that have now been brought to light after more than seven and a half centuries. The resulting image, a product of scientific rigor and historical curiosity, provides a tangible connection to this pivotal figure in Western thought.
Furthermore, the examination of Aquinas's skull yielded compelling evidence related to the circumstances surrounding his death. While historical accounts suggest he perished en route to the Second Council of Lyon in 1274, the precise cause has remained a subject of speculation. The recent anthropological study, however, sheds light on this enigma, indicating potential pathological markers on the cranium. While not definitively conclusive, these findings suggest the possibility of a serious illness, perhaps an infection or a tumor, contributing to his untimely passing. This new information enriches the historical narrative surrounding Aquinas, adding a layer of understanding to the final chapter of his life and offering a more nuanced perspective on the physical challenges he might have faced. Thus, the scientific inquest into the skull of Thomas Aquinas has not only unveiled his likely appearance but has also deepened our comprehension of his final days, adding further depth to the legacy of this influential theologian and philosopher.
Summary of Comments ( 81 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42996671
HN commenters discuss the methodology used to reconstruct Aquinas's face, with some skepticism about its accuracy given the reliance on skull shape alone and the potential for subjective interpretation by the artists. Several commenters point out the irony of reconstructing the face of a theologian who emphasized the immaterial soul over physical appearance. Others question the significance of the project, while some express interest in the historical and forensic aspects. A few commenters debate the cause of death, with one suggesting it might have been a stroke rather than the reported "cerebral stroke" mentioned in some historical accounts. Overall, the comments express a mixture of curiosity, doubt, and philosophical reflection on the nature of identity and the limits of historical reconstruction.
The Hacker News post titled "Thomas Aquinas' skull reveals appearance and cause of death" linking to an article in the National Catholic Register has generated several comments. The discussion primarily revolves around the methods used for the facial reconstruction and the inherent uncertainties involved, as well as some tangential discussions about Aquinas' life and philosophy.
One commenter expressed skepticism about the accuracy of facial reconstructions based on skulls, pointing out the significant role soft tissue plays in shaping a person's appearance. They argued that such reconstructions can only provide a very general idea, rather than a truly accurate representation. This sentiment was echoed by another commenter who questioned the level of confidence one should have in these reconstructions, noting the substantial margin of error.
Another thread of discussion focused on the difficulty of diagnosing cause of death based solely on skeletal remains. One commenter highlighted this challenge, mentioning the limited information that can be gleaned from bones, especially centuries later. This led to a brief discussion about the various possible causes of death that could be consistent with the described skull condition.
Some commenters also touched on Aquinas' philosophical work. One commenter mentioned the vast difference between Aquinas' theological focus and the interests of the typical Hacker News user. Another commenter briefly discussed Aquinas' views on just war theory, leading to a short exchange about its relevance to modern conflicts.
A few commenters expressed general interest in the reconstruction process and the historical context, while others questioned the newsworthiness of the story. One commenter questioned the scientific rigor of the reconstruction, comparing it to phrenology. Another found the article's tone excessively sensationalized.
Finally, a couple of commenters shared links to resources with additional information about facial reconstruction techniques and the life of Thomas Aquinas.