Helvetica is ubiquitous in New York City's signage, especially in the subway system. Originally designed as a neutral, legible typeface, it became the standard for wayfinding and official communications, conveying authority and efficiency. The post explores this pervasiveness, showcasing numerous examples of Helvetica's use across various applications from street signs to building names. Its widespread adoption, though intended to create a unified and clear urban environment, has arguably led to a homogenized visual landscape. The essay ultimately suggests that while functional, Helvetica's dominance potentially diminishes the city's unique visual character.
Milwaukee's General Mitchell International Airport is known for its unique "Recombobulation Area" signs, located just past the security checkpoints. These signs, pointing to restrooms, restaurants, and shops, humorously acknowledge the disorienting experience of going through airport security. While their origin is uncertain, airport director Barry Bateman suggests they were likely installed during a 2008 renovation as a lighthearted way to help travelers regain their composure and find their bearings after the stressful security process. The signs have become a beloved quirk of the airport, a popular photo opportunity, and a symbol of Milwaukee's friendly and approachable atmosphere.
Hacker News users generally found the concept of a "Recombobulation Area" amusing and appreciated its Midwestern charm. Several commenters shared similar experiences in other airports, noting designated areas for gathering oneself after security, sometimes informally referred to as the "re-shoeing area". Some debated the etymology and official vs. colloquial usage of the word "recombobulate," while others questioned the necessity of such a designated space, suggesting it might be more of a marketing gimmick than a practical need. A few questioned the overall efficiency of Milwaukee's airport layout. One commenter mentioned the term is also used at the Port Canaveral cruise terminal.
Summary of Comments ( 78 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43053419
HN commenters largely appreciate the deep dive into Helvetica's use in NYC signage, particularly its historical context and evolution. Some debate the merits of Helvetica versus other sans-serif fonts, with a few suggesting alternatives like Franklin Gothic or Akzidenz-Grotesk would be better choices. Others highlight the importance of considering the overall design, not just the font, pointing out that even Helvetica can be used poorly. A couple of commenters offer additional examples of Helvetica's pervasiveness, referencing its use in government and transportation systems. One compelling observation notes the shift away from Helvetica in newer signage, suggesting a changing aesthetic landscape in the city.
The Hacker News post titled "The hardest working font in Manhattan" (linking to an article on aresluna.org) has generated a moderate number of comments, mostly focusing on the prevalence and practicality of Helvetica in signage and wayfinding.
Several commenters discuss the historical context of Helvetica's adoption by the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), praising its clarity and readability, particularly in challenging environments like subway stations. They highlight its role in improving the passenger experience by making navigation easier and more efficient. One commenter specifically mentions Massimo Vignelli's involvement in choosing Helvetica for the NYCTA, emphasizing its contribution to a unified and consistent visual identity for the transit system. Another points out the difficulties in maintaining this consistency over time, citing variations and deviations from the original Helvetica standard that have appeared over the years.
The discussion also touches upon the broader appeal of Helvetica in other applications, including government and corporate branding. Some commenters express appreciation for its clean and neutral aesthetic, suggesting that its ubiquity stems from its ability to convey information effectively without distracting or imposing a strong personality. However, others express a degree of "Helvetica fatigue," arguing that its overuse has made it somewhat bland and uninspired.
A few comments delve into the technical aspects of typography, discussing the specific characteristics of Helvetica that contribute to its legibility, such as its x-height and consistent stroke weights. One commenter mentions the "Standard Medium" variant used by the NYCTA and how its subtle differences from standard Helvetica impact its appearance.
There's a brief tangent about other typefaces used in New York City signage, with a couple of commenters mentioning the use of Akzidenz-Grotesk by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). This leads to a short comparison of Helvetica and Akzidenz-Grotesk, highlighting their similarities and differences.
Finally, some comments address the challenges of designing effective signage systems, emphasizing the importance of factors like font size, spacing, and contrast in ensuring readability and accessibility. One commenter notes the crucial role of good typography in creating a positive and intuitive user experience in public spaces.