Stories with Tag Film Criticism

• The Biology of B-Movie Monsters (2003)

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-03-28 13:40:41

  Verbose tl;dr

  Michael LaBarbera's "The Biology of B-Movie Monsters" analyzes the biological plausibility of classic movie monsters. He applies basic principles of biomechanics, scaling, and physiology to creatures like Godzilla, King Kong, and giant ants, demonstrating how their depicted size and abilities often defy the laws of nature. LaBarbera explores the square-cube law, explaining why enormous creatures would crumble under their own weight and how the energy requirements for movement and bodily functions would be insurmountable. He uses humorous calculations and engaging examples to deconstruct the fantastical elements of these films, highlighting the inherent conflict between Hollywood spectacle and scientific realism.

  Michael LaBarbera's 2003 essay, "The Biology of B-Movie Monsters," published on the University of Chicago's Fathom platform, delves into the fascinating, albeit often ludicrous, world of cinematic creature features, analyzing the biological plausibility of these silver screen behemoths. LaBarbera, a distinguished professor of organismal biology and anatomy, employs his profound understanding of biomechanics, scaling laws, and evolutionary principles to dissect the often-exaggerated portrayals of monstrous life forms. He meticulously examines a diverse array of cinematic creations, ranging from gargantuan insects and arachnids to colossal apes and reptiles, meticulously assessing their structural integrity, locomotion capabilities, and metabolic demands.

  Central to LaBarbera's analysis is the concept of scaling, specifically the square-cube law, which dictates that as an object's size increases, its volume grows proportionally faster than its surface area. This fundamental principle has profound implications for the structural integrity and physiological function of any organism, particularly those of immense proportions. LaBarbera eloquently explains how the skeletal and muscular systems of a creature magnified to monstrous proportions would be subjected to exponentially greater stresses, rendering them incapable of supporting the creature's immense weight or facilitating movement. He illustrates this with vivid examples, demonstrating how a giant ant, for instance, would crumble under its own weight, its exoskeleton unable to withstand the increased gravitational forces.

  Furthermore, LaBarbera explores the metabolic challenges faced by such colossal organisms. The energy requirements of a giant creature would be astronomical, and he meticulously calculates the caloric intake necessary to sustain these behemoths, often revealing the absurdity of their depicted behaviors. For instance, he dismantles the notion of a giant praying mantis capable of rapid movements and aggressive predation, demonstrating that its metabolic demands would be so exorbitant that it would require an implausible and constant supply of prey to maintain its activity levels.

  Beyond the purely physical limitations, LaBarbera also delves into the evolutionary improbability of such creatures arising in the first place. He argues that the selective pressures that drive evolution would generally favor more efficient and sustainable body plans, rendering the emergence of gargantuan, structurally unsound organisms highly unlikely.

  Through his rigorous scientific analysis and engaging prose, LaBarbera not only exposes the biological fallacies inherent in B-movie monsters but also illuminates fundamental principles of biology, making the essay both an entertaining and educational exploration of the intersection of science and science fiction. He skillfully utilizes the fantastical realm of cinematic monsters as a springboard to discuss real-world biological concepts, demonstrating the power of scientific thinking to dissect even the most outlandish scenarios. Ultimately, "The Biology of B-Movie Monsters" serves as a testament to the importance of scientific literacy and the inherent fascination with the natural world, even when viewed through the lens of cinematic exaggeration.

  • B-Movies
  • Monster Movies
  • Biology
  • Science Fiction
  • Film Analysis
  • Film Criticism
  • Horror
  • Paleontology
  • Zoology
  • evolution
  • Kaiju
  • Creature Features
  • 2003
  • Academic Articles
  • Fathom Archive
  • University of Chicago

  Summary of Comments ( 21 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43505334

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discuss the plausibility and biological implications of B-movie monster tropes. Several commenters analyze the feasibility of giant creatures, citing the square-cube law and its effects on structural integrity, locomotion, and metabolism. Discussions touch on Godzilla's improbable size, the necessary adaptations for giant insects, and the potential for alternative biological mechanisms that might enable such creatures. The impracticality of rapid growth and metamorphosis seen in many monster movies is also pointed out. Some users recommend other resources exploring similar concepts, like Haldane's essay "On Being the Right Size." Several express appreciation for the original article's engaging and informative approach to the subject.

  The Hacker News post titled "The Biology of B-Movie Monsters (2003)" links to an article exploring the (often flawed) biological plausibility of classic movie monsters. The discussion on Hacker News generates several interesting comments, revolving around the article's premise and expanding on its themes.

  One compelling comment points out that while the article is entertaining, its core argument about the implausibility of movie monsters is somewhat weak. The commenter argues that the very nature of "B-movies" embraces absurdity and doesn't strive for scientific accuracy. They suggest the article might be missing the point by applying serious scientific scrutiny to inherently fantastical creatures. This comment highlights the tension between enjoying fiction and overanalyzing its adherence to real-world rules.

  Another commenter expresses appreciation for the article's engaging and humorous approach to scientific concepts. They praise the author's ability to make complex biological ideas accessible and enjoyable for a wider audience. This highlights the article's success in using humor as a tool for science communication.

  Building on the article's analysis of giant insects, a commenter discusses the "square-cube law" which explains why scaling up an insect to monstrous size would make it structurally unsound. They provide further detail on how the exoskeleton of a giant insect would crumble under its own weight, reinforcing the article's point about biological constraints.

  Some commenters share personal anecdotes and memories related to B-movies and monster movies. One recounts watching a specific film featuring giant ants as a child, demonstrating the lasting impact of these kinds of films on popular culture.

  Finally, several comments branch off into discussing other examples of fictional creatures and their biological plausibility (or lack thereof), including Godzilla, King Kong, and various mythical beasts. This demonstrates how the article's core concept can be applied to a wider range of fictional scenarios, sparking further discussion and exploration of the intersection of science and fiction.

• On David Lynch's Revenge of the Jedi (2018)

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-17 23:11:33

  Verbose tl;dr

  Adam Golanski's piece explores a hypothetical "Revenge of the Jedi" directed by David Lynch, imagining how Lynch's surrealist style and thematic obsessions might have transformed the Star Wars saga's conclusion. Golanski analyzes how Lynchian elements like dream logic, grotesque imagery, and explorations of duality could have manifested within the existing narrative framework of Return of the Jedi. He suggests a darker, more psychologically driven film, filled with unsettling visuals and ambiguous morality, contrasting sharply with the relatively straightforward heroism of the original. This imagined Lynchian version delves into the subconscious of characters like Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader, potentially offering a more complex and disturbing resolution to their conflict.

  Adam Golaski's essay, "On David Lynch's Revenge of the Jedi (2018)," published in the Bennington Review, delves into a fascinating counterfactual: what if David Lynch, the surrealist filmmaker behind Eraserhead and Twin Peaks, had directed Return of the Jedi, the concluding chapter of the original Star Wars trilogy? Golaski meticulously constructs a hypothetical Return of the Jedi imbued with Lynchian sensibilities, drawing parallels between Lynch's established oeuvre and the thematic and narrative elements present in Star Wars. He doesn't simply superimpose Lynch's style onto the existing film; rather, he extrapolates how Lynch might have interpreted and reimagined the core narrative beats, characters, and even the very fabric of the Star Wars universe.

  Golaski explores how Lynch's penchant for dreamlike sequences, psychological horror, and grotesque imagery could have manifested in a galaxy far, far away. He envisions a darker, more introspective Jedi narrative, potentially focusing on Luke Skywalker's internal struggles with the dark side and the psychological weight of his lineage. The Emperor, a figure of malevolent authority, could have been rendered even more unsettling through Lynch's distinctive lens, possibly emphasizing the insidious nature of power and corruption. Golaski also contemplates how Lynch's fascination with the duality of human nature, often expressed through doppelgängers and fractured identities, could have played out in the conflict between Luke and Darth Vader.

  The essay further speculates on how Lynch might have utilized practical effects and sound design to create a more visceral and unsettling cinematic experience. The alien landscapes and creatures of Star Wars, already fantastical, could have been imbued with a new level of strangeness and otherworldliness under Lynch's direction. Golaski imagines the potential for distorted soundscapes and eerie ambient noises, amplifying the psychological tension and creating a sense of unease.

  Ultimately, Golaski's piece isn't about advocating for a Lynch-directed Return of the Jedi. Instead, it uses this hypothetical scenario as a framework to analyze the distinct artistic sensibilities of David Lynch and how they might interact with the established mythology of Star Wars. It's an exercise in creative reimagining, exploring the potential for alternative interpretations of a beloved cultural artifact and prompting reflection on the nature of authorship, adaptation, and the enduring power of imagination. The essay serves as a testament to the impact of both Lynch's and George Lucas's distinct directorial styles, highlighting how different artistic visions can dramatically reshape a familiar narrative.

  • David Lynch
  • Star Wars
  • Return of the Jedi
  • Revenge of the Jedi
  • Film Analysis
  • Film Criticism
  • Fan Theories
  • Alternate Versions
  • George Lucas
  • Science Fiction
  • Movie Directors
  • 2018
  • The Bennington Review
  • Adam Golaski

  Summary of Comments ( 116 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43084145

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discuss Adam Golaski's piece on David Lynch almost directing Return of the Jedi. Several commenters express fascination with this alternate history, pondering how different the film might have been under Lynch's vision. Some highlight the stark contrast between Lynch's surreal style and Star Wars, leading to speculation about a darker, more psychologically driven narrative. Others point out Lynch's aversion to studio interference, questioning whether he could have navigated the pressures of such a large franchise. A few comments mention the existing pre-production work by Ralph McQuarrie and how Lynch's vision might have incorporated or diverged from it. The overall sentiment leans towards intrigued curiosity about a "what if" scenario, acknowledging the improbability but enjoying the thought experiment.

  The Hacker News post titled "On David Lynch's Revenge of the Jedi (2018)" links to an article exploring the hypothetical scenario of David Lynch directing Return of the Jedi. The discussion in the comments section is relatively brief, with only a handful of contributions. Therefore, a detailed summary of "compelling" comments is difficult, as the overall engagement is low.

  One commenter expresses skepticism about the premise, suggesting that Lynch's style wouldn't mesh well with the established tone of Star Wars, envisioning a result that would be "weird and unpleasant" rather than successful. They imagine Lynch's version would be "slow, dark, and filled with uncomfortable silences," contrasting sharply with the generally fast-paced and adventurous nature of the original trilogy.

  Another commenter simply states their preference for the existing Return of the Jedi, implying contentment with the film as it is and a lack of interest in a Lynch-directed version.

  A third comment briefly touches on the potential influence of George Lucas, suggesting that even if Lynch had directed, Lucas's overarching creative control would have likely prevented a truly "Lynchian" film. They mention the example of Dune, where Lynch's directorial vision was significantly constrained by studio interference.

  The remaining comments are very short, expressing mild interest or simple agreement with previous points. There's no extended discussion or in-depth analysis of the hypothetical scenario. In summary, the comments are limited and primarily express skepticism or disinterest in the idea of a Lynch-directed Return of the Jedi.

• Chimes at Midnight (2024)

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-09 09:45:57

  Verbose tl;dr

  Orson Welles's "Chimes at Midnight" (1966), finally receiving a 4K restoration in 2024 from Janus Films, is a masterful adaptation of Shakespeare's Falstaff plays, focusing on the complex relationship between the aging knight and Prince Hal. The film portrays Falstaff not just as a comedic figure but also a tragic one, grappling with his own mortality and the prince's inevitable rejection. This restoration, supervised by Orson Welles expert and longtime champion Peter Bogdanovich, represents the fulfillment of Welles’s own wishes for the film's presentation and will allow audiences to experience this often-overlooked masterpiece in its intended form.

  Orson Welles's 1965 cinematic masterpiece, Chimes at Midnight, also known as Falstaff, is experiencing a resurgence in 2024 thanks to a meticulously restored 4K edition undertaken by Janus Films. This restoration, based on the original camera negative, aims to revitalize and present the film as close to Welles's original artistic vision as possible. The article elucidates the intricate challenges faced during the restoration process, particularly regarding the varying quality of existing prints and the complexities of matching the original film's unique visual aesthetic. Welles, notoriously meticulous about his work, struggled with securing funding and distribution for Chimes at Midnight, a project he considered his most personal and arguably his finest achievement. The film, a tapestry woven from Shakespearean texts primarily focusing on the Henry IV plays and incorporating elements from Richard II, Henry V, and The Merry Wives of Windsor, centers on the complex and ultimately tragic figure of Sir John Falstaff and his tumultuous relationship with Prince Hal, the future King Henry V. The article underscores the film's thematic exploration of the corrosive effects of power, the bittersweet nature of aging and mortality, and the poignant betrayal that lies at the heart of Falstaff and Hal's friendship. The restoration aims to showcase Welles's innovative cinematic techniques, including his dynamic use of deep focus, chiaroscuro lighting, and his pioneering montage sequences, particularly the renowned Battle of Shrewsbury scene, which stands as a landmark achievement in cinematic battle depiction. The release of the restored Chimes at Midnight provides modern audiences a renewed opportunity to appreciate the artistry and depth of Welles's work and to experience the film as he intended it to be seen, free from the degradation of time and previous imperfect restorations. This revival emphasizes the film's enduring relevance and solidifies its status as a major work in cinematic history, offering a profound meditation on human nature, loyalty, and the fleeting nature of time.

  • Chimes at Midnight
  • Film
  • movie
  • Orson Welles
  • Shakespeare
  • Falstaff
  • Henry V
  • adaptation
  • Review
  • Film Criticism
  • 2024 Re-release
  • Asterisk Magazine
  • Criterion Collection

  Summary of Comments ( 5 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42989609

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed the seeming paradox of Chimes at Midnight, a small, independent magazine achieving significant cultural impact despite its limited readership. Commenters praised the magazine's high production quality, unique content, and focus on in-depth exploration of niche topics. Some highlighted the power of physical objects and the tactile experience they offer in a digital world. Others drew parallels to the early days of the internet and the close-knit communities that formed around shared interests, suggesting Chimes at Midnight taps into a similar dynamic. The potential for small, focused publications to thrive in the current media landscape was a recurring theme, with several commenters noting the importance of catering to a specific, passionate audience rather than chasing mass appeal. A few expressed skepticism about the long-term viability of the magazine's business model, but the overall sentiment was one of admiration and cautious optimism.

  The Hacker News post titled "Chimes at Midnight (2024)" linking to an Asterisk magazine article has generated several comments discussing the article's content and broader themes.

  Several commenters express appreciation for the article and its exploration of complex sociopolitical issues through the lens of speculative fiction. One commenter praises the author's ability to weave together intricate narratives and thought-provoking concepts, highlighting the article's successful blending of entertainment and intellectual stimulation. They specifically appreciate the nuanced portrayal of power dynamics and the exploration of how technology can be both a tool of oppression and liberation.

  Another commenter focuses on the article's portrayal of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and their potential impact on society. They discuss the challenges and opportunities presented by DAOs, raising questions about governance, accountability, and the potential for unintended consequences. This commenter also draws parallels between the fictional scenarios presented in the article and real-world developments in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space.

  A different thread of conversation emerges around the article's discussion of surveillance and privacy in a technologically advanced future. One commenter expresses concern about the erosion of privacy in the face of increasingly sophisticated surveillance technologies, while another argues that some level of surveillance is necessary for maintaining social order and security. This leads to a brief debate about the balance between individual liberties and collective security.

  One commenter brings up the theme of technological determinism, questioning whether technology inevitably shapes society or if society has the agency to shape the development and use of technology. This sparks a discussion about the role of human values and ethical considerations in technological innovation.

  Finally, a few commenters express their interest in exploring the author's other works and engage in a brief discussion about the genre of solarpunk and its potential to inspire positive visions of the future. They see the article as a valuable contribution to the solarpunk movement.

  Overall, the comments on the Hacker News post demonstrate a thoughtful engagement with the themes and ideas presented in the Asterisk magazine article. The commenters explore the complexities of DAOs, surveillance, technological determinism, and the role of technology in shaping the future. The discussion remains largely respectful and insightful, offering a variety of perspectives on the article's core arguments.