Gary Shteyngart's essay explores his complex relationship with clothing, particularly a meticulously crafted, expensive suit. He details the suit's creation and its impact on his self-perception, weaving this narrative with reflections on aging, social anxiety, and the desire for external validation. While the suit initially provides a sense of confidence and belonging, it ultimately fails to truly address his deeper insecurities. He grapples with the superficiality of material possessions and the fleeting nature of the satisfaction they provide, eventually concluding that true self-acceptance must come from within, not from a perfectly tailored garment.
Robin Hanson describes his experience with various "status circles," groups where he feels varying degrees of status and comfort. He outlines how status within a group influences his behavior, causing him to act differently in circles where he's central and respected compared to those where he's peripheral or unknown. This affects his willingness to speak up, share personal information, and even how much fun he has. Hanson ultimately argues that having many diverse status circles, including some where one holds high status, is key to a rich and fulfilling life. He emphasizes that pursuing only high status in all circles can lead to anxiety and missed opportunities to learn and grow from less prestigious groups.
HN users generally agree with the author's premise of having multiple status circles and seeking different kinds of status within them. Some commenters pointed out the inherent human drive for social comparison and the inevitable hierarchies that form, regardless of intention. Others discussed the trade-offs between broad vs. niche circles, and how the internet has facilitated the pursuit of niche status. A few questioned the negativity associated with "status seeking" and suggested reframing it as a natural desire for belonging and recognition. One compelling comment highlighted the difference between status seeking and status earning, arguing that genuine contribution, rather than manipulation, leads to more fulfilling status. Another interesting observation was the cyclical nature of status, with people often moving between different circles as their priorities and values change.
Summary of Comments ( 53 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42989062
HN commenters largely found Shteyngart's essay on bespoke suits self-indulgent and out of touch. Several criticized the focus on expensive clothing amidst widespread economic hardship, viewing it as tone-deaf and privileged. Some questioned the value proposition of bespoke tailoring, suggesting cheaper off-the-rack options suffice. Others, while acknowledging the potential artistry and personal satisfaction derived from bespoke suits, still found the essay's framing excessive and lacking self-awareness. A few commenters offered a more nuanced perspective, suggesting the essay satirized consumerism and explored themes of identity and self-perception. However, this interpretation was a minority view, with most finding the piece shallow and disconnected from the realities of most people's lives.
The Hacker News post titled "The Man in the Midnight-Blue Six-Ply Italian-Milled Wool Suit" linking to an Atlantic article about Gary Shteyngart's experience with bespoke tailoring has generated a moderate number of comments, mostly focusing on the perceived absurdity of the situation and the author's apparent self-absorption.
Several commenters express skepticism and mild mockery towards the author's quest for the perfect suit, viewing it as an extravagant and ultimately futile exercise in vanity. They question the value proposition of spending such a significant amount of money on clothing, especially when the described benefits seem superficial and driven by insecurity. One commenter sarcastically highlights the supposed transformative power of the suit, implying that the author believes it will magically solve his problems.
Others discuss the nature of bespoke tailoring itself, contrasting the genuine craftsmanship and personalized fit offered by traditional bespoke with the more common "made-to-measure" services often misrepresented as bespoke. They emphasize the significant price difference and the level of skill involved in true bespoke tailoring. This discussion touches upon the idea that the author might be mistaking a high-end made-to-measure suit for a truly bespoke one.
A few commenters offer more empathetic perspectives, acknowledging the potential psychological benefits of investing in well-made clothing and the confidence it can provide. They suggest that while the author's pursuit might seem excessive to some, it's ultimately a personal choice and shouldn't be judged too harshly. However, even these comments maintain a slightly ironic tone, recognizing the inherent humor in the author's obsession.
There's a brief tangent about the changing landscape of men's fashion and the decline of formal attire in contemporary society. This leads to a discussion about the role of clothing in self-expression and the different ways people choose to present themselves to the world.
Overall, the comments on the Hacker News post are a mix of amusement, skepticism, and mild criticism towards the author's extravagant pursuit of sartorial perfection. While some commenters attempt to understand the underlying motivations, the prevailing sentiment is one of gentle mockery and a questioning of the value placed on such material possessions. The discussion also delves into the nuances of bespoke tailoring and the broader context of men's fashion in the 21st century.