Stories with Tag Single Board Computer

• Msxbook OneChipMSX MSX2 Computer

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-15 00:08:14

  Verbose tl;dr

  The MSXbook OneChipMSX is a compact, portable MSX2 computer contained within a book-like form factor. It features a Raspberry Pi RP2040 microcontroller emulating a Z80 processor, offering a faithful MSX2 experience. The system includes a membrane keyboard, a small LCD screen, integrated SD card storage for ROMs and data, and various ports for connecting peripherals like joysticks and external displays. Intended for retro gaming and MSX development, the OneChipMSX aims to provide a convenient and affordable way to enjoy the classic MSX platform.

  The Tindie product listing introduces the Msxbook OneChipMSX, a meticulously crafted, modernized rendition of the classic MSX2 computer system, designed for enthusiasts and retro computing aficionados. This compact and portable device encapsulates the essence of the MSX2 experience within a sleek, book-like form factor. It leverages the power of a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), specifically the Cyclone IV, to faithfully replicate the original MSX2 hardware, ensuring accurate emulation and compatibility with a vast library of MSX software and games.

  The Msxbook OneChipMSX boasts several enhancements over its vintage counterpart. It features a composite video output for connection to modern displays, alongside a dedicated VGA output, offering crisp and clear visuals. Audio is delivered through a 3.5mm headphone jack, providing convenient connectivity to audio equipment. Storage is handled by an SD card slot, allowing users to load ROMs, disk images, and other data with ease, replacing the traditional floppy disk drive and cartridge slots. A PS/2 keyboard connector allows for the use of standard keyboards, simplifying user interaction. Additionally, a joystick port caters to classic gaming experiences.

  The system's FPGA implementation offers a high degree of accuracy and flexibility. It meticulously emulates the original Z80 processor, the Yamaha V9938 video display processor, and the AY-3-8912 Programmable Sound Generator (PSG), ensuring faithful reproduction of the MSX2's audio-visual capabilities. The integrated SD card controller manages data transfer and storage, facilitating a streamlined user experience.

  The Msxbook OneChipMSX is presented as a fully assembled unit, ready for immediate use upon arrival. The product listing highlights its compact and portable design, making it ideal for on-the-go retro gaming and computing. The device represents a modern approach to experiencing the legacy of the MSX2 platform, combining authentic emulation with contemporary conveniences. It’s targeted towards users seeking a reliable and convenient way to relive classic MSX2 experiences, as well as developers and tinkerers interested in exploring the intricacies of the MSX2 architecture.

  • MSX
  • MSX2
  • OneChipMSX
  • retro computer
  • Vintage Computer
  • 8-bit computer
  • Home Computer
  • DIY computer
  • Single Board Computer
  • FPGA
  • Tindie
  • MSXbook

  Summary of Comments ( 21 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43054473

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed the OneChipMSX's appeal stemming from nostalgia for the MSX standard, particularly in Europe and South America. Several commenters reminisced about their experiences with MSX computers in their youth. Some expressed interest in the device but questioned the high price, while others debated the practicality of emulating MSX versus owning dedicated hardware. The open-source nature and FPGA implementation were praised. There was some discussion about potential use cases like introducing younger generations to retro computing or connecting to CRT televisions for an authentic experience. The lack of a built-in keyboard was also noted.

  The Hacker News post titled "Msxbook OneChipMSX MSX2 Computer" linking to a Tindie product page has generated several comments discussing various aspects of the MSX standard and the device itself.

  Several commenters reminisce about their experiences with MSX computers during their childhood, highlighting the system's popularity in specific regions like Europe and Brazil. They discuss the significance of the MSX standard in democratizing computing during the 80s, offering a more affordable alternative compared to other contemporary systems. The conversation also touches upon the MSX's role as an entry point for many into programming, with some users recalling writing their first programs on these machines.

  The compact form factor of the Msxbook draws attention and praise, with commenters appreciating its portability and resemblance to a netbook. The integrated keyboard and the inclusion of a VGA port are seen as positive features, enhancing the device's usability.

  There's a discussion regarding the OneChipMSX project, an open-source initiative aimed at replicating MSX hardware using FPGA. Commenters express interest in the project and its potential for preserving the MSX legacy, allowing future generations to experience these classic computers.

  Some comments delve into the technical specifications of the Msxbook, including its Z80 processor and limited RAM. The discussion explores the performance limitations imposed by these specifications, acknowledging that while the system may not handle more demanding MSX2 titles smoothly, it's still capable of running a wide range of software, especially from the MSX1 era.

  The comments also touch on the availability and pricing of the Msxbook. Commenters discuss the device's niche appeal and the potential challenges in acquiring one, given its limited production run. The general sentiment is one of curiosity and enthusiasm for the project, albeit tempered by pragmatic considerations regarding its price and performance.

  Finally, a few comments mention alternative MSX emulators and FPGA implementations, offering further avenues for exploring the MSX ecosystem. These suggestions cater to those interested in experiencing MSX software without necessarily purchasing the Msxbook itself. This suggests that the post sparked broader interest in the MSX platform beyond just the specific hardware on offer.

• R1 Computer Use

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-06 20:02:03

  Verbose tl;dr

  The "R1 Computer Use" document outlines strict computer usage guidelines for a specific group (likely employees). It prohibits personal use, unauthorized software installation, and accessing inappropriate content. All computer activity is subject to monitoring and logging. Users are responsible for keeping their accounts secure and reporting any suspicious activity. The policy emphasizes the importance of respecting intellectual property and adhering to licensing agreements. Deviation from these rules may result in disciplinary action.

  This GitHub repository, titled "R1 Computer Use," meticulously documents the author's personal philosophy and comprehensive system for utilizing a singular computer, designated as "R1," for all computational tasks. The author posits that focusing on a single, powerful machine, as opposed to distributing workloads across multiple devices, fosters a deeper understanding of the system and promotes a more streamlined and efficient workflow. The document outlines a detailed methodology for achieving this centralized computing paradigm, encompassing hardware selection, operating system configuration, software management, and data organization.

  The author emphasizes the importance of choosing robust and reliable hardware components for the R1 machine, prioritizing performance and longevity to minimize disruptions and maximize the return on investment. This includes careful consideration of the CPU, RAM, storage, and peripheral devices. The chosen operating system, NixOS, is highlighted for its declarative configuration and reproducible builds, which contribute to a stable and maintainable system environment. This declarative approach extends to the management of software packages, ensuring consistency and simplifying the process of updating and maintaining the system's software ecosystem.

  A key aspect of the R1 philosophy is the meticulous organization of data, employing a hierarchical structure with well-defined categories and consistent naming conventions. This rigorous approach to data management facilitates efficient retrieval and manipulation of information, minimizing the time spent searching for files and maximizing the overall productivity of the user. The author advocates for regular backups and version control to safeguard against data loss and enable seamless recovery in case of unforeseen circumstances.

  Furthermore, the document delves into the specific software tools and utilities employed in the R1 workflow, covering a wide range of applications for tasks such as text editing, software development, data analysis, and communication. The author stresses the importance of selecting tools that integrate seamlessly within the overall system and contribute to a cohesive and productive working environment. The document represents a comprehensive and detailed guide to implementing a centralized computing paradigm, emphasizing the benefits of focusing on a single, well-maintained machine for all computational endeavors. This approach, according to the author, leads to a more efficient, streamlined, and ultimately, more satisfying computing experience.

  • R1
  • RISC-V
  • Computer Architecture
  • Single Board Computer
  • SBC
  • Embedded Systems
  • FPGA
  • Hardware Design
  • Open Source Hardware
  • Verilog

  Summary of Comments ( 1 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42965954

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News commenters on the "R1 Computer Use" post largely focused on the impracticality of the system for modern usage. Several pointed out the extremely slow speed and limited storage, making it unsuitable for anything beyond very basic tasks. Some appreciated the historical context and the demonstration of early computing, while others questioned the value of emulating such a limited system. The discussion also touched upon the challenges of preserving old software and hardware, with commenters noting the difficulty in finding working components and the expertise required to maintain these systems. A few expressed interest in the educational aspects, suggesting its potential use for teaching about the history of computing or demonstrating fundamental computer concepts.

  The Hacker News post titled "R1 Computer Use" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42965954) has a modest number of comments, generating a brief discussion around the linked GitHub repository detailing computer use policies at R1 Capital. While not a highly active thread, several comments offer interesting perspectives.

  A recurring theme is the perceived strictness of R1's policies. One commenter likens the rules to those of a high security environment, questioning whether such stringent measures are necessary in a financial firm, albeit one engaged in high-frequency trading. They specifically mention the prohibition of USB drives and restrictions on personal devices as examples of this strictness. This sentiment is echoed by another commenter who expresses surprise at the seemingly extreme limitations, particularly the ban on personal devices and the mandated use of company-issued laptops even for remote work.

  Another commenter focuses on the impracticality of some rules, highlighting the restriction on using personal accounts for work-related communication and cloud storage. They argue that such policies hinder productivity and collaboration, especially in a fast-paced environment where quick access to information and seamless communication are crucial. This commenter also questions the blanket prohibition of external drives, suggesting that it might be excessively restrictive.

  The discussion also touches upon the security implications of R1's policies. While some acknowledge the need for strong security measures in finance, others debate the effectiveness of the specific rules outlined. One commenter suggests that the focus on physical security, such as USB drives, might be misplaced in the current threat landscape where social engineering and phishing attacks are more prevalent. They argue that investing in employee security awareness training would be a more effective approach.

  A few commenters also offer alternative interpretations of the document. One suggests that the rules might be a baseline for employees, with exceptions granted on a case-by-case basis. Another speculates that the strictness could be a reflection of regulatory requirements or specific contractual obligations with clients.

  Finally, one comment shifts the focus to the tone of the document, criticizing its perceived authoritarian nature and suggesting that a more collaborative approach to security policy development would be more beneficial.

  While not a lengthy discussion, the comments on this Hacker News post provide a range of perspectives on the practicality, effectiveness, and implications of R1 Capital's computer use policies. The discussion highlights the tension between security and productivity, and the challenges of implementing effective security measures in a modern work environment.