This article provides a comprehensive overview of Canon's autofocus (AF) motor technologies used in their EF and RF lenses. It details the evolution from the original Arc Form Drive (AFD) to the more advanced UltraSonic Motors (USM) – ring-type, micro-USM, and nano-USM – and the Stepping Motor (STM). Each motor type is described in terms of its operating principles, performance characteristics (speed, noise, accuracy), and typical applications. The article highlights the advantages of USM for speed and quiet operation, particularly the ring-type USM for professional lenses, and the benefits of STM for smooth and silent focusing during video recording. It also covers the power-saving Lead-screw type STM found in some smaller lenses. Essentially, the article serves as a technical reference for understanding the different AF motor technologies employed by Canon and how they relate to lens performance.
The 1930s saw a diverse range of camera formats coexisting, from large format plate cameras favored by professionals to increasingly popular roll-film cameras like folding cameras and box cameras for casual users. Miniature format cameras using 35mm film, though existing, were still gaining traction. The era was characterized by evolving technology, with advancements in lenses, shutters, and film contributing to improved image quality and ease of use for amateur photographers. While sophisticated, high-quality cameras were available, affordability remained a barrier for many, with simpler, more accessible cameras dominating the consumer market.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and social implications of the "Living Image" setup described in the linked article. Some questioned the claimed real-time nature of the system given the technological limitations of the 1930s, suggesting significant latency and low resolution would have hampered true "live" viewing. Others pointed out the substantial resources required, making it an exclusive technology accessible only to the very wealthy. The potential for surveillance and voyeurism was also raised, with comparisons to modern security systems and the panopticon concept. Finally, several commenters expressed fascination with the ingenuity of the system and the glimpse it provided into the technological aspirations of the era.
Summary of Comments ( 53 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43320230
HN users generally found the article informative, especially regarding the different autofocus motor technologies Canon uses. Several commenters shared their own experiences with specific lenses and motor types, highlighting the performance differences between USM, STM, and Nano USM. Some discussed the tradeoffs between speed, noise, and cost associated with each motor type. The practicality of micro-adjustments for autofocus was also debated, with some users finding it essential and others considering it a workaround for poor lens design. Finally, there was some discussion around the article's focus on Canon, with some users wishing for similar breakdowns of autofocus systems from other manufacturers like Nikon and Sony.
The Hacker News post titled "Canon EF and RF Lenses – All Autofocus Motors" links to an article detailing the various autofocus motor technologies Canon has used in its EF and RF lens mounts. The discussion in the comments section is relatively brief, with only a few comments focusing on specific technical details rather than broad opinions about the article itself.
One commenter points out a perceived error in the article, stating that the article incorrectly claims the STM motor is based on a piezo effect. They clarify that STM motors are actually based on a stepping motor, offering a more accurate description of its functionality. This commenter also highlights the quietness of STM motors, a characteristic particularly beneficial for video recording.
Another comment adds to this correction, emphasizing that while some focusing systems do use piezo elements, Canon's STM does not. This comment further explains that Canon's STM employs an ultrasonic motor driving a lead screw to achieve focus, contrasting it with ring-type USM systems which directly move the focusing lens group. This commenter provides more context by discussing ring USM, micro USM, and nano USM, explaining that although they differ in their implementation (direct drive vs. geared), they are all based on ultrasonic vibration principles.
A subsequent comment shifts the focus slightly, mentioning issues with the Canon EOS R's electronic viewfinder (EVF) "blackout" during continuous autofocus. This blackout refers to the momentary loss of the live view image in the EVF when the camera takes a shot. This commenter expresses frustration with the duration of the blackout, claiming it makes tracking moving subjects difficult. While related to autofocus, this comment doesn't directly address the article's content on autofocus motors themselves but rather a practical consequence of the camera system's performance.
Finally, one commenter simply expresses appreciation for the article, finding it "useful" and "interesting." This, however, doesn't provide much detail or insight into specific aspects of the discussion.
In summary, the comment section is small but offers some valuable technical clarifications regarding the article's description of STM motor technology. It also touches upon practical user experience with Canon's mirrorless autofocus system. While the discussion doesn't offer extensive debate or diverse viewpoints, it does provide helpful additions and corrections to the original article's information, especially for those interested in the nuances of Canon's autofocus technology.