We lack memories from infancy and toddlerhood primarily due to the immaturity of the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, brain regions crucial for forming and retrieving long-term memories. While babies can form short-term memories, these regions aren't developed enough to consolidate them into lasting autobiographical narratives. Further, our early understanding of the self and language, both essential for organizing and anchoring memories, is still developing. This "infantile amnesia" is common across cultures and even other mammals, suggesting it's a fundamental aspect of brain development, not simply a matter of repression or forgotten language.
Spaced repetition, a learning technique that schedules reviews at increasing intervals, can theoretically lead to near-perfect, long-term retention. By strategically timing repetitions just before forgetting occurs, the memory trace is strengthened, making recall progressively easier and extending the retention period indefinitely. The article argues against the common misconception of a "forgetting curve" with inevitable decay, proposing instead a model where each successful recall flattens the curve and increases the time until the next necessary review. This allows for efficient long-term learning by minimizing the number of reviews required to maintain information in memory, effectively making "infinite recall" achievable.
Hacker News users discussed the effectiveness and practicality of spaced repetition, referencing personal experiences and variations in implementation. Some commenters highlighted the importance of understanding the underlying cognitive science, advocating for adjusting repetition schedules based on individual needs rather than blindly following algorithms. Others debated the difference between recognition and recall, and the article's conflation of the two. A few pointed out potential downsides of spaced repetition, such as the time commitment required and the possibility of over-optimizing for memorization at the expense of deeper understanding. Several users shared their preferred spaced repetition software and techniques.
Summary of Comments ( 254 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43084355
HN commenters discuss various theories related to infantile amnesia. Some suggest it's due to the underdeveloped hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in infants, crucial for memory formation and retrieval. Others point to the lack of language skills in early childhood, hindering the encoding of memories in a narrative format. The idea that early childhood experiences are too traumatic to remember is also raised, though largely dismissed. A compelling comment thread explores the difference between episodic and semantic memory, arguing that while episodic memories (specific events) are absent, semantic memories (general knowledge) from infancy might persist. Finally, some users share personal anecdotes about surprisingly early memories, questioning the universality of infantile amnesia.
The Hacker News post linked discusses the reasons why we can't remember our early childhoods, sparking a range of comments exploring various theories and personal experiences.
Several commenters discuss the idea of language acquisition being linked to memory formation. One compelling argument suggests that without language, we lack the framework to encode and retrieve memories in the way we do later in life. This is supported by another commenter who mentions that their earliest memories coincide with their first understanding of language. The idea is that language provides the structure and labels needed to organize and store experiences.
Another thread of discussion centers around the development of the hippocampus, a brain region crucial for memory formation. Commenters note that the hippocampus isn't fully developed in infants and toddlers, impacting their ability to form long-term memories. This biological explanation is complemented by observations about the constant neurogenesis happening in young brains, with the suggestion that this rapid creation of new neurons might overwrite existing memory traces.
Some commenters offer anecdotal evidence, sharing their own earliest memories and reflecting on their nature. These personal accounts range from vague sensory impressions to more concrete events, highlighting the variability of early childhood memory.
One intriguing perspective introduces the concept of "infantile amnesia" and the ongoing research surrounding it. The comment acknowledges that there is no single definitive answer, but highlights various contributing factors, including the development of the hippocampus, language acquisition, and the encoding specificity principle – the idea that memories are best retrieved in the context in which they were formed.
A few commenters question the premise of the article, suggesting that perhaps we do retain some form of pre-verbal memories, but they are inaccessible to our conscious minds. This leads to speculation about implicit memories, which influence our behavior and emotional responses without conscious recall.
Finally, some commenters offer alternative theories, including the idea that early childhood memories are repressed due to their emotional intensity or the overwhelming nature of the world from a baby's perspective. However, these suggestions are presented more as speculation rather than established theories.
Overall, the comments section provides a multifaceted discussion of infantile amnesia, exploring neurological, linguistic, and psychological perspectives. While no single definitive answer is reached, the comments offer a range of compelling theories and personal insights that shed light on this intriguing phenomenon.