Stories with Tag command-line tool

• Httptap: View HTTP/HTTPS requests made by any Linux program

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-03 16:28:45

  Verbose tl;dr

  Httptap is a command-line tool for Linux that intercepts and displays HTTP and HTTPS traffic generated by any specified program. It works by injecting a dynamic library into the target process, allowing it to capture requests and responses before they reach the network stack. This provides a convenient way to observe the HTTP communication of applications without requiring proxies or modifying their source code. Httptap presents the captured data in a human-readable format, showing details like headers, body content, and timing information.

  httptap is a command-line utility for Linux systems that allows users to intercept and inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic generated by any specified program. It functions as a specialized proxy server, sitting between the target application and its intended destination server. When a program makes an HTTP or HTTPS request, httptap intercepts it, displays detailed information about the request in the terminal, and then forwards the request to the original destination server. The response from the server is then relayed back to the application, allowing it to function normally while providing the user with full visibility into the network communication.

  The information displayed by httptap includes various crucial details about each request and response. For requests, this includes the HTTP method (GET, POST, PUT, etc.), the full URL, headers, and the request body (if present). For responses, httptap displays the HTTP status code, headers, and the complete response body. This comprehensive view allows developers and users to debug network issues, analyze API interactions, understand how applications communicate with servers, and even modify requests or responses (although this functionality is not explicitly mentioned in the core documentation and might require additional tools or scripting).

  httptap works by leveraging the LD_PRELOAD environment variable in Linux. This allows it to inject a shared library into the target application's process. This library overrides the standard network functions (like connect, send, recv, etc.) used by the program. By intercepting calls to these functions, httptap can capture and display the HTTP/HTTPS traffic before passing it along. This approach means httptap works at the socket level and doesn't require any special configuration within the target application itself. It simply requires running the desired program with the appropriate LD_PRELOAD setting pointing to the httptap library. This method is generally effective for most applications, providing a convenient way to analyze their network behavior without modifying their source code.

  The tool is described as being especially useful for command-line applications, which often lack built-in tools for inspecting HTTP traffic. It offers a more streamlined and less intrusive alternative to using general-purpose proxy tools or browser developer tools, particularly when dealing with programs that don't utilize a browser for network communication. While focusing on clarity and ease of use, httptap aims to provide a straightforward way to gain insights into the HTTP/HTTPS traffic of any Linux program.

  • HTTP
  • HTTPS
  • Network Monitoring
  • Linux
  • Debugging
  • traffic analysis
  • Security
  • Open Source
  • cli
  • command-line tool
  • System Tools
  • networking
  • httptap
  • Packet Capture
  • Proxy

  Summary of Comments ( 66 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42919909

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discuss httptap, focusing on its potential uses and comparing it to existing tools. Some praise its simplicity and ease of use for quickly inspecting HTTP traffic, particularly for debugging. Others suggest alternative tools like mitmproxy, tcpdump, and Wireshark, highlighting their more advanced features, such as SSL decryption and broader protocol support. The conversation also touches on the limitations of httptap, including its current lack of HTTPS decryption and potential performance impact. Several commenters express interest in contributing features, particularly HTTPS support. Overall, the sentiment is positive, with many appreciating httptap as a lightweight and convenient option for simple HTTP inspection.

  The Hacker News post for "Httptap: View HTTP/HTTPS requests made by any Linux program" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42919909) has several comments discussing the utility and functionality of the tool.

  One commenter points out the potential security implications of tools like httptap, highlighting that granting access to /proc effectively grants root access, making it a significant security concern. They suggest exploring alternatives like using system call tracing through eBPF which could provide similar functionality with a smaller security footprint. This raises an important consideration for users concerned about system security.

  Another comment elaborates on the mechanism by which httptap functions. They explain how it uses LD_PRELOAD to intercept libc functions like connect, send, and recv. This clarifies how httptap gains visibility into the network traffic of processes without requiring modifications to the processes themselves. They also acknowledge the security concerns associated with this approach.

  A subsequent comment chain delves deeper into the security discussion, comparing httptap to tools like mitmproxy and discussing the relative risks of each. One commenter explains how mitmproxy operates as a proxy, requiring configuration changes on the client-side, while httptap directly intercepts traffic. This distinction clarifies the different use cases and security considerations for each tool. They further suggest that for debugging specific processes, using a debugger with network inspection capabilities might be a more secure approach.

  Another comment focuses on alternative methods for intercepting and analyzing HTTPS traffic, specifically mentioning the use of SSLKEYLOGFILE. This environment variable allows tools like Wireshark to decrypt TLS traffic, offering another option for analyzing HTTPS requests.

  One commenter mentions using strace with the -e trace=network option for a similar purpose. This suggestion provides a simpler, built-in alternative for basic network traffic inspection.

  Finally, a comment acknowledges the utility of httptap for debugging issues related to TLS certificate validation, offering a specific use case where this tool could be particularly helpful.

  In summary, the comments on the Hacker News post offer a range of perspectives on httptap, including discussions of its functionality, security implications, and alternative solutions. The comments provide valuable context for potential users to understand the benefits and risks associated with the tool.

• Sniffnet – monitor your Internet traffic

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-02 16:14:49

  Verbose tl;dr

  Sniffnet is a cross-platform network traffic monitor designed to be user-friendly and informative. It captures and displays network packets in real-time, providing details such as source and destination IPs, ports, protocols, and data transfer sizes. Sniffnet aims to offer an accessible way to understand network activity, featuring a simple interface, color-coded packet information, and filtering options for easier analysis. Its cross-platform compatibility makes it a versatile tool for monitoring network traffic on various operating systems.

  GyulyVGC's "sniffnet," hosted on GitHub, presents itself as a straightforward command-line utility designed for network traffic monitoring. Its core functionality revolves around capturing and displaying network packets traversing a user's system. This allows users to observe, in real-time, the flow of data entering and exiting their machine, providing insight into which applications are communicating over the network and with which remote hosts.

  The tool distinguishes itself by focusing on simplicity and ease of use. It boasts a user-friendly interface presented directly in the terminal, eliminating the need for complex graphical interfaces or intricate configurations. This minimalist approach aims to make network monitoring accessible to a broader range of users, from seasoned system administrators to those with less technical expertise. The output displayed by sniffnet includes key information about each captured packet, such as the source and destination IP addresses and ports, the protocol being used (e.g., TCP, UDP), and the size of the data payload. This information can be invaluable for troubleshooting network connectivity issues, identifying bandwidth-intensive applications, or simply gaining a better understanding of one's network activity.

  Sniffnet is written in Rust, a programming language known for its performance and memory safety, contributing to the tool's efficiency and robustness. The project's GitHub repository provides clear instructions for installation and usage, along with the source code for transparency and potential community contributions. It leverages the "pcap" library for packet capturing, suggesting compatibility across various operating systems. While the tool's primary focus is real-time monitoring, the project's description hints at potential future enhancements, possibly including more advanced filtering and analysis features. The overall objective of sniffnet, as conveyed by its creator, is to provide a lightweight yet powerful tool for gaining visibility into network traffic, empowering users with the knowledge and control over their own network interactions.

  • Network Monitoring
  • traffic analysis
  • packet sniffing
  • network security
  • internet traffic
  • bandwidth monitoring
  • network diagnostics
  • command-line tool
  • Python
  • sniffnet
  • GitHub

  Summary of Comments ( 49 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42909530

  Verbose tl;dr

  HN users generally praised Sniffnet for its simple interface and ease of use, particularly for quickly identifying the source of unexpected network activity. Some appreciated the passive nature of the tool, contrasting it with more intrusive solutions like Wireshark. Concerns were raised about potential performance issues, especially on busy networks, and the limited functionality compared to more comprehensive network analysis tools. One commenter suggested using tcpdump or tshark with filters for similar results, while others questioned the project's actual utility beyond simple curiosity. Several users expressed interest in the potential for future development, such as adding filtering capabilities and improving performance.

  The Hacker News post "Sniffnet – monitor your Internet traffic" (linking to the GitHub repository for Sniffnet) generated a moderate amount of discussion with a focus on existing tools, the project's scope, and some potential use cases.

  Several commenters immediately pointed out the existing, mature tools that perform similar functions. One commenter mentioned tcpdump and Wireshark, highlighting their robust capabilities and established user base. This sentiment was echoed by others who suggested using tshark for a more command-line focused approach to packet analysis, and also nethogs for bandwidth monitoring. These comments generally framed Sniffnet as potentially reinventing the wheel, implying that users might be better served by existing, feature-rich solutions.

  Some discussion revolved around the scope and target audience of Sniffnet. One user questioned the project's practical usefulness, wondering who would use a TUI (terminal user interface) application of this kind. Another user speculated that its primary appeal might be to less technical users or those who prefer a simplified, visual representation of network traffic within their terminal environment. It was also pointed out that Sniffnet might be useful for quick glances at traffic data without the overhead of launching more complex applications like Wireshark.

  A few comments delved into more specific use cases and potential benefits of Sniffnet. One user highlighted the cross-platform nature of the tool as a potential advantage. Another user suggested its utility in quickly identifying the process responsible for network activity. One comment pointed out a potential niche for embedded systems where a full-blown Wireshark installation might be impractical due to resource constraints.

  Finally, there was a brief thread discussing the merits of TUIs in general, with one commenter expressing a preference for TUIs like Sniffnet for their perceived efficiency and speed compared to graphical applications.

  Overall, the comments reflect a mixture of skepticism regarding the project's novelty and potential user base, tempered by acknowledgements of its potential niche applications, particularly for those seeking a lightweight, cross-platform TUI solution for monitoring network traffic.