Learning in public, as discussed in Giles Thomas's post, offers numerous benefits revolving around accelerated learning and career advancement. By sharing your learning journey, you solidify your understanding through articulation and receive valuable feedback from others. This process also builds a portfolio showcasing your skills and progress, attracting potential collaborators and employers. The act of teaching, inherent in public learning, further cements knowledge and establishes you as a credible resource within your field. Finally, the connections forged through shared learning experiences expand your network and open doors to new opportunities.
"Shades of Blunders" explores the psychology behind chess mistakes, arguing that simply labeling errors as "blunders" is insufficient for improvement. The author, a chess coach, introduces a nuanced categorization of blunders based on the underlying mental processes. These categories include overlooking obvious threats due to inattention ("blind spots"), misjudging positional elements ("positional blindness"), calculation errors stemming from limited depth ("short-sightedness"), and emotionally driven mistakes ("impatience" or "fear"). By understanding the root cause of their errors, chess players can develop more targeted training strategies and avoid repeating the same mistakes. The post emphasizes the importance of honest self-assessment and moving beyond simple move-by-move analysis to understand the why behind suboptimal decisions.
HN users discuss various aspects of blunders in chess. Several highlight the psychological impact, including the tilt and frustration that can follow a mistake, even in casual games. Some commenters delve into the different types of blunders, differentiating between simple oversights and more complex errors in calculation or evaluation. The role of time pressure is also mentioned as a contributing factor. A few users share personal anecdotes of particularly memorable blunders, adding a touch of humor to the discussion. Finally, the value of analyzing blunders for improvement is emphasized by multiple commenters.
Summary of Comments ( 81 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43154666
Hacker News users generally agreed with the author's premise about the benefits of learning in public. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes of how publicly documenting their learning journeys, even if imperfectly, led to unexpected connections, valuable feedback, and career opportunities. Some highlighted the importance of focusing on the process over the outcome, emphasizing that consistent effort and genuine curiosity are more impactful than polished perfection. A few cautioned against overthinking or being overly concerned with external validation, suggesting that the primary focus should remain on personal growth. One user pointed out the potential negative aspect of focusing solely on maximizing output for external gains and advocated for intrinsic motivation as a more sustainable driver. The discussion also briefly touched upon the discoverability of older "deep dive" posts, suggesting their enduring value even years later.
The Hacker News post "The benefits of learning in public" (linking to an article about the same topic) generated a moderate amount of discussion with 14 comments. Several commenters agreed with the premise of learning in public and shared their own positive experiences.
One commenter discussed how publicly documenting their learning journey with Go helped them attract job offers, even before they considered themselves proficient. They highlighted the value of demonstrating a willingness to learn and the process of thinking through problems publicly. This resonates with the article's point about the benefits extending beyond pure knowledge acquisition.
Another commenter echoed this sentiment, mentioning that sharing their learning process for Rust attracted positive attention from potential employers. They emphasized the importance of showing progress and the ability to articulate one's thinking. This reinforces the idea that learning in public signals valuable traits to potential employers.
One commenter cautioned that the benefits of learning in public might be field-dependent. They suggested it could be more advantageous in fast-moving fields where demonstrating continuous learning is highly valued. This adds a nuance to the discussion, acknowledging that the strategy might not be equally effective in all domains.
Another commenter highlighted the motivational aspect of learning in public, explaining that the social pressure encourages consistency. They also mentioned the benefit of receiving feedback and different perspectives. This adds another layer to the benefits, moving beyond career advantages and touching upon the personal drive to learn and improve.
A further commenter pointed out the benefit of building an audience, which can lead to serendipitous opportunities. They mentioned an example of getting a book deal through their public learning efforts. This showcases an unexpected but potentially significant advantage of sharing one's learning journey.
A few comments were shorter and generally supportive of the concept. Some also provided anecdotal evidence of positive outcomes from learning in public, such as improved learning retention and unexpected collaborations. While not as detailed as the other comments, they contribute to a general consensus in favor of the practice.
Overall, the comments on Hacker News largely reinforce the benefits of learning in public highlighted in the linked article, with commenters sharing personal anecdotes and expanding on the advantages, such as attracting job opportunities, enhancing motivation, and fostering unexpected collaborations. They also add some nuance, suggesting that the effectiveness might vary depending on the field.