Stories with Tag Point Cloud

• Raspberry Pi Lidar Scanner

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-04-19 18:53:32

  Verbose tl;dr

  PiLiDAR is a project demonstrating a low-cost, DIY LiDAR scanner built using a Raspberry Pi. It leverages a readily available RPLiDAR A1M8 sensor, Python code, and a simple mechanical setup involving a servo motor to rotate the LiDAR unit, creating 360-degree scans. The project provides complete instructions and software, allowing users to easily build their own LiDAR system for applications like robotics, mapping, and 3D scanning. The provided Python scripts handle data acquisition, processing, and visualization, outputting point cloud data that can be further analyzed or used with other software.

  This GitHub repository, titled "PiLiDAR," details a project focused on creating a 2D LiDAR scanner using a Raspberry Pi. The project leverages the affordability and versatility of the Raspberry Pi platform to construct a cost-effective LiDAR system suitable for various applications. The core of the system revolves around a RPLIDAR A1M8 360-degree laser scanner, known for its compact size and relatively low cost compared to other LiDAR units. The Raspberry Pi acts as the central processing unit, handling data acquisition from the LiDAR sensor, processing that data, and subsequently visualizing it.

  The provided documentation outlines the necessary hardware components beyond the Raspberry Pi and the RPLIDAR, such as a suitable power supply to drive both devices, and the physical mounting mechanisms required to securely affix the LiDAR unit. The software aspect of the project involves utilizing the RPLIDAR's SDK (Software Development Kit), which provides the necessary libraries and functions for communicating with and controlling the LiDAR sensor. Detailed instructions for installing the SDK on the Raspberry Pi's operating system (Raspbian, specifically) are included, ensuring users can correctly configure their system for data acquisition. Furthermore, the repository likely provides code examples and scripts demonstrating how to capture the raw LiDAR data, which typically consists of distance measurements at various angles.

  This captured data can then be further processed and visualized using various methods, potentially including creating 2D point cloud representations of the scanned environment. The visualization process allows users to interpret the LiDAR data and see a representation of the surrounding objects and their distances from the scanner. While the primary focus is on 2D scanning, the project's inherent flexibility implies potential expandability or adaptation for more advanced applications. The open-source nature of the project encourages community contribution and further development, potentially leading to enhancements in data processing, visualization techniques, and even integration with other robotic or automation systems. The project aims to provide an accessible and affordable entry point into the world of LiDAR technology, empowering users to explore its capabilities and develop their own applications based on this foundational framework.

  • Raspberry Pi
  • LiDAR
  • Scanner
  • 3D Scanning
  • Robotics
  • Point Cloud
  • DIY
  • Hardware
  • Python
  • Sensor
  • SLAM
  • autonomous navigation
  • Laser Scanning

  Summary of Comments ( 158 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43738561

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed the PiLiDAR project with a focus on its practicality and potential applications. Several commenters questioned the effective range and resolution of the lidar given the Raspberry Pi's processing power and the motor's speed, expressing skepticism about its usefulness for anything beyond very short-range scanning. Others were more optimistic, suggesting applications like indoor mapping, robotics projects, and 3D scanning of small objects. The cost-effectiveness of the project compared to dedicated lidar units was also a point of discussion, with some suggesting that readily available and more powerful lidar units might offer better value. A few users highlighted the educational value of the project, particularly for learning about lidar technology and interfacing hardware with the Raspberry Pi.

  The Hacker News post titled "Raspberry Pi Lidar Scanner" (linking to a GitHub project called PiLiDAR) has generated several comments, offering a variety of perspectives on the project.

  Several users discuss the practicality and applications of such a setup. One user highlights the potential limitations due to the Raspberry Pi's processing power, suggesting that a more powerful platform might be necessary for real-time, high-resolution scanning, especially with more advanced SLAM algorithms. They also express interest in the project's potential for robotics applications. Another user suggests the possibility of using it for indoor mapping and navigation, emphasizing the affordability of the setup. A different commenter points out the previous existence of similar projects using the Raspberry Pi and lidar, indicating this isn't an entirely novel concept.

  The discussion also touches upon the specific components used in the project. One comment mentions the RPLidar A1M8, a specific lidar model, and notes its limited range and resolution, suggesting alternative lidar units for improved performance depending on the desired application. This comment thread also delves into the cost-effectiveness of using the RPLidar A1 with a Raspberry Pi, considering other processing options. A separate comment chain discusses the intricacies of processing lidar data on resource-constrained devices like the Raspberry Pi, with suggestions for optimizing code and algorithms.

  Some comments focus on the software aspects. One user inquires about the specific SLAM algorithm being used and its suitability for the Raspberry Pi's hardware. Another user expresses interest in the project's potential for creating 3D models of environments. There's also mention of the project's use of Python and its libraries, with some users expressing appreciation for the language choice.

  A few comments touch upon the safety aspects of using lidar, particularly regarding eye safety and the power of the laser used.

  In summary, the comments section explores various facets of the project, including its technical feasibility, potential applications, component choices, software implementation, and safety considerations. The discussion reveals both enthusiasm for the project's potential and a pragmatic awareness of its limitations.

• Apple's Cubify Anything: Scaling Indoor 3D Object Detection

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-03-31 08:25:20

  Verbose tl;dr

  Apple's "Cubify Anything" introduces a new approach to 3D object detection within indoor scenes using monocular RGB images. It leverages a pre-trained 2D object detector to identify objects and then fits a cuboid to each detected object by estimating its 3D pose and dimensions. This method, dubbed "cubification," efficiently generates dense 3D models of indoor environments, suitable for applications like augmented reality and scene understanding. The approach simplifies the 3D detection pipeline by directly predicting cuboids instead of complex meshes or point clouds, enabling real-time performance on mobile devices. Importantly, Cubify Anything is designed to work on diverse indoor scenes without requiring specific training data for each scene.

  Apple researchers have introduced Cubify Anything, a novel approach to 3D object detection within indoor environments. This method deviates significantly from conventional techniques that rely on bounding boxes, instead opting to represent objects as a collection of interconnected cuboids. This cuboid representation offers a more nuanced and accurate depiction of object shape and size, capturing intricate details that traditional bounding boxes often miss.

  The Cubify Anything methodology operates in two distinct stages. The first stage involves generating a set of potential cuboid proposals. These proposals are diverse in size, orientation, and location, effectively blanketing the scene with a multitude of possible object representations. This proposal generation stage is designed to be over-generative, ensuring that even complex object shapes are potentially captured by at least a subset of the proposed cuboids. The generation process leverages depth information derived from RGB-D images, allowing the cuboids to align with the perceived geometry of the scene.

  The second stage refines and filters the initial set of cuboid proposals. This refinement process is powered by a neural network trained to evaluate the likelihood of each cuboid accurately representing a part of a real-world object. The network considers various factors, including the spatial relationships between cuboids, their alignment with the depth data, and visual features extracted from the RGB image. Through this evaluation process, the network identifies a subset of cuboids that optimally reconstructs the objects present in the scene. These selected cuboids are then aggregated to form the final cuboid-based object representations.

  One of the key innovations of Cubify Anything is its scalability. The method demonstrates the ability to detect a wide range of object categories without requiring category-specific training data. This is achieved through a novel training strategy that leverages readily available synthetic data. This synthetic data allows the network to learn general principles of object geometry and composition, making it adaptable to diverse real-world scenarios without the need for extensive manual labeling.

  Furthermore, Cubify Anything has demonstrated remarkable accuracy in capturing the intricate details of complex object shapes. The cuboid representation allows for a more fine-grained understanding of object geometry compared to bounding boxes, resulting in improved performance on challenging 3D object detection tasks. This improved accuracy has potential implications for various applications, including augmented reality, robotics, and scene understanding.

  The researchers have made their code and pre-trained models publicly available, fostering further exploration and development within the computer vision community. This release encourages collaboration and allows researchers to build upon Apple's advancements in 3D object detection, potentially leading to innovative applications and further refinements of the Cubify Anything approach.

  • 3D Object Detection
  • Indoor 3D Scanning
  • computer vision
  • machine learning
  • artificial intelligence
  • iOS
  • Apple
  • LiDAR
  • Depth Sensing
  • Point Cloud
  • Mesh Reconstruction
  • 3D Modeling
  • Cubify Anything
  • Mobile AI
  • On-Device Processing

  Summary of Comments ( 18 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43532551

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed Apple's Cubify research, expressing excitement about its potential applications in AR/VR and robotics. Some questioned the practical use cases given the computational demands, suggesting mobile deployment would be challenging. Several commenters compared it to existing 3D modeling techniques like NeRF, noting Cubify's focus on cuboid representations might offer advantages in certain scenarios, like robot manipulation. There was also interest in the dataset used for training and the possibility of open-sourcing it. Finally, some users expressed skepticism about Apple's history of releasing research code, while others countered that their recent track record had improved.

  The Hacker News post discussing Apple's "Cubify Anything" project has generated several interesting comments. Many users express excitement about the potential applications and advancements in 3D object detection.

  A prevalent theme is the impressive speed and efficiency of the model, particularly its ability to generate cuboids in real-time on an iPhone. Commenters note this as a significant step towards real-world AR applications, envisioning scenarios like robots navigating cluttered environments or assisting visually impaired individuals.

  Several commenters delve into the technical aspects. Some discuss the choice of using cuboids for representation, acknowledging its simplicity while questioning its limitations in capturing complex shapes accurately. Others highlight the innovative use of sparse 3D convolutions and the efficiency gains achieved through this approach.

  The discussion also touches upon the broader implications for the field. Some see this as a validation of the increasing power of mobile devices for complex machine learning tasks. Others anticipate a surge in similar research and development, predicting advancements in areas like robotics, augmented reality, and 3D scene understanding.

  A few commenters express curiosity about the dataset used for training and the model's robustness against different lighting conditions and object types. They also wonder about Apple's plans for releasing the code or making the technology publicly available.

  Some express skepticism, questioning the practical utility of cuboid representations for complex real-world scenarios. They suggest that while impressive, the technology might be limited in its current form.

  Overall, the comments reflect a mix of enthusiasm, curiosity, and cautious optimism about the implications of Apple's "Cubify Anything" project. The discussion highlights the potential for significant advancements in 3D object detection and its applications in various domains.

• 3D Scene Reconstruction in Adverse Weather Conditions via Gaussian Splatting

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-28 23:14:03

  Verbose tl;dr

  This paper introduces a novel method for 3D scene reconstruction from images captured in adverse weather conditions like fog, rain, and snow. The approach leverages Gaussian splatting, a recent technique for representing scenes as collections of small, oriented Gaussian ellipsoids. By adapting the Gaussian splatting framework to incorporate weather effects, specifically by modeling attenuation and scattering, the method is able to reconstruct accurate 3D scenes even from degraded input images. The authors demonstrate superior performance compared to existing methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing robust reconstructions in challenging visibility conditions. This improved robustness is attributed to the inherent smoothness of the Gaussian splatting representation and its ability to effectively handle noisy and incomplete data.

  The paper "3D Scene Reconstruction in Adverse Weather Conditions via Gaussian Splatting" introduces a novel approach to reconstructing 3D scenes from multi-view images captured in challenging weather conditions like fog, rain, and snow. Traditional 3D reconstruction methods often struggle with these conditions due to reduced visibility and the presence of atmospheric effects that distort light transport. This paper addresses these challenges by leveraging the representational power and efficiency of Gaussian Splatting, a recent technique for representing 3D scenes as a collection of small, oriented Gaussian ellipsoids.

  The proposed method begins by estimating camera poses for the input images, a crucial step in multi-view reconstruction. Recognizing that standard pose estimation techniques are susceptible to errors in adverse weather, the authors employ a robust pose estimation strategy that leverages the inherent structure of the Gaussian Splatting representation. Specifically, they utilize a differentiable rendering process within the pose estimation pipeline, enabling the optimization of camera parameters directly against the splatted scene representation. This allows the system to learn camera poses that are consistent with the observed scene structure, even in the presence of weather-induced distortions.

  Once the camera poses are estimated, the method proceeds to optimize the parameters of the Gaussian splats themselves. This optimization process aims to minimize the difference between the rendered images generated from the splatted scene and the actual input images captured in adverse weather. The optimization considers not only the shape, size, and orientation of each Gaussian splat but also its appearance, including color and opacity. Crucially, the method explicitly accounts for the scattering effects of adverse weather conditions during the rendering process. This is achieved by incorporating a physically-based scattering model that simulates the interaction of light with atmospheric particles. By incorporating this model, the optimization process can effectively learn splat parameters that accurately represent the scene's appearance under the given weather conditions.

  The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of its approach through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets captured in various adverse weather scenarios. The results show that the proposed method significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques in terms of reconstruction accuracy and robustness to weather-induced artifacts. The reconstructed 3D scenes exhibit greater detail and fidelity, even in the presence of heavy fog, rain, or snow. Furthermore, the method's efficiency allows for relatively fast reconstruction times, making it suitable for practical applications. The authors conclude that their approach represents a significant step towards robust and accurate 3D scene reconstruction in challenging real-world environments. They suggest future research directions could explore incorporating more sophisticated scattering models and extending the method to handle dynamic weather conditions.

  • 3D Scene Reconstruction
  • Gaussian Splatting
  • Adverse Weather
  • computer vision
  • Point Cloud
  • Neural Rendering
  • deep learning
  • Robotics
  • autonomous driving
  • SLAM
  • LiDAR
  • Radar
  • sensor fusion
  • image processing
  • computer graphics

  Summary of Comments ( 1 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859412

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users discussed the robustness of the Gaussian Splatting method for 3D scene reconstruction presented in the linked paper, particularly its effectiveness in challenging weather like fog and snow. Some commenters questioned the practical applicability due to computational cost and the potential need for specialized hardware. Others highlighted the impressive visual results and the potential for applications in autonomous driving and robotics. The reliance on LiDAR data was also discussed, with some noting its limitations in certain adverse weather conditions, potentially hindering the proposed method's overall robustness. A few commenters pointed out the novelty of the approach and its potential to improve upon existing methods that struggle with poor visibility. There was also brief mention of the challenges of accurately modelling dynamic weather phenomena in these reconstructions.

  The Hacker News post titled "3D Scene Reconstruction in Adverse Weather Conditions via Gaussian Splatting" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859412) has a modest number of comments, generating a brief discussion around the presented research. No single comment stands out as overwhelmingly compelling, but several offer interesting perspectives and extensions of the core ideas.

  One commenter highlights the potential impact of this research on autonomous driving, specifically mentioning Tesla's struggles with vision-based systems in adverse weather. They suggest that this approach could be a valuable step towards more robust perception capabilities for self-driving cars. This comment touches on a practical application of the research and emphasizes its relevance to a current technological challenge.

  Another comment delves into the technical aspects, questioning the computational cost of the proposed method, particularly regarding memory requirements. They express concern about the scalability of the Gaussian splatting technique for large-scale scenes, which is a crucial consideration for real-world deployment.

  Further discussion revolves around the novelty of the approach. One user points out that while dealing with adverse weather is an important contribution, the underlying method of Gaussian splatting itself isn't entirely new. They suggest that the key innovation lies in the adaptation and application of this technique to challenging weather scenarios rather than the fundamental technique itself.

  Finally, there's a brief exchange regarding the limitations of the current work and potential future directions. One commenter speculates about the possibility of incorporating temporal information to further improve the robustness and accuracy of the reconstruction in dynamic weather conditions. This suggestion highlights an avenue for future research and acknowledges that the presented work, while promising, is not a complete solution.

  In summary, the comments on the Hacker News post offer a mix of practical considerations, technical analysis, and forward-looking speculation. They touch upon the potential applications, challenges, and future development of the research on 3D scene reconstruction in adverse weather using Gaussian splatting. While there isn't a single dominant or groundbreaking comment, the collective discussion provides a valuable perspective on the significance and limitations of the presented work.