Sweden is investigating a newly discovered break in a fiber optic cable in its territorial waters of the Baltic Sea, marking the fourth such incident in the region since October. While the damaged cable primarily served domestic internet traffic for the island of Gotland, authorities are treating the incident seriously given the recent spate of unexplained cable cuts, including those affecting international data and power transmission. The Swedish Security Service is leading the investigation and has not yet determined a cause or identified any suspects, though sabotage is a suspected possibility given the geopolitical context and previous incidents. The damage has not significantly disrupted internet access for Gotland residents.
Sweden is considering sending prisoners abroad due to overcrowding in its prisons. This overcrowding is largely attributed to a surge in gang-related crime, which has led to an increased number of convictions and longer sentences. The Swedish government is exploring agreements with other countries to house inmates, specifically focusing on those convicted of crimes committed abroad, and aims to alleviate pressure on its correctional system while potentially reducing costs.
Hacker News commenters discuss the irony of Sweden, known for its progressive social policies, now facing prison overcrowding due to gang violence. Some attribute the rise in crime to integration issues with immigrants, while others point to broader societal factors. Several commenters highlight the seeming contradiction of a country with generous social programs struggling with such a problem. The discussion also touches on the effectiveness of sending inmates abroad, with skepticism about its long-term impact on rehabilitation and reintegration. Some question whether this is a sustainable solution or simply a way to avoid addressing the root causes of the crime wave. A few commenters note the lack of specifics in the article about the plan's logistics and the countries being considered.
Summary of Comments ( 86 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43127425
Hacker News commenters discuss the likelihood of this cable break being another act of sabotage, similar to the Nord Stream pipelines. Several express skepticism of the official explanation of a fishing trawler causing the damage, citing the cable's depth and robust construction. Some speculate about Russian involvement given the geopolitical context, while others suggest the possibility of other state actors or even non-state actors being responsible. The lack of clear evidence and the ongoing investigation are highlighted, with several commenters calling for more transparency and a thorough inquiry before drawing conclusions. A few users also discuss the vulnerability of undersea infrastructure and the potential implications for communication and energy security.
The Hacker News post "Sweden Investigates New Cable Break Under Baltic Sea" has generated several comments discussing the implications of the incident described in the linked New York Times article. A recurring theme is a suspicion of foul play, given the context of recent damage to the Nord Stream pipelines and heightened geopolitical tensions. Several commenters point out the strategic importance of undersea cables for communication and data transfer, making them potential targets for sabotage.
Some commenters speculate about the potential culprits, with Russia being mentioned frequently due to the ongoing war in Ukraine. However, others caution against jumping to conclusions before a thorough investigation is completed. The possibility of accidental damage is also considered, though viewed as less likely by some given the sensitive nature of the infrastructure.
Several commenters express concern about the vulnerability of undersea infrastructure and the potential for widespread disruption if further damage occurs. The discussion also touches on the difficulties involved in repairing these cables and the potential economic and social consequences of prolonged outages.
One commenter highlights the lack of robust international agreements or frameworks to protect these critical communication lines, suggesting this incident could be a catalyst for developing stronger safeguards. Another commenter questions the long-term viability of relying on centralized, physical infrastructure like undersea cables and proposes exploring alternative communication methods that are more resilient to sabotage or natural disasters.
Some of the more compelling comments include a discussion of the legal frameworks surrounding attacks on undersea cables, the potential for escalating geopolitical tensions as a result of such incidents, and the technical challenges involved in securing and repairing deep-sea infrastructure. A comment referencing the increasing reliance on undersea cables for critical infrastructure and the implications of their vulnerability to malicious actors also stands out.
There's also a thread discussing the possibility of using distributed ledger technologies or mesh networks to create more resilient communication systems, illustrating the potential for this incident to spark innovation in the field of communications infrastructure. Finally, a few comments offer more technical insights, speculating about the specific types of cables involved and the methods that might be used for repair.