Appstat is a free, open-source process monitor for Windows presented as a modern alternative to existing tools. It offers a clean and responsive UI, focusing on real-time performance monitoring with detailed metrics like CPU usage, memory consumption, I/O operations, and network activity. Appstat aims to provide a comprehensive view of system resource utilization by individual processes, enabling users to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and troubleshoot issues. It boasts features like customizable columns, sorting, filtering, process tree views, and historical data charting for deeper analysis.
This blog post demonstrates how to build an agent-less system monitoring tool using Elixir and Broadway. It leverages SSH to remotely execute commands on target machines, collecting metrics like CPU usage, memory consumption, and disk space. Broadway manages the concurrent execution of these commands across multiple hosts, providing scalability and fault tolerance. The collected data is then processed and displayed, offering a centralized overview of system performance. The author highlights the benefits of this approach, including simplified deployment (no agent installation required) and the inherent robustness of Elixir and its ecosystem. This method offers a lightweight yet powerful solution for monitoring server infrastructure.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and benefits of the agentless approach to system monitoring described in the linked blog post. Several commenters appreciated the simplicity and reduced overhead of not needing to install agents on monitored machines. Some raised concerns about potential security implications of running commands remotely via SSH and the potential performance bottlenecks of doing so. Others questioned the scalability of this method, particularly for large numbers of monitored systems. The discussion also touched on alternative approaches like using message queues and the potential benefits of Elixir's concurrency features for this type of monitoring system. A compelling comment suggested exploring the use of OSquery for efficient data gathering, which prompted further discussion on its pros and cons. Finally, some commenters expressed interest in the author's open-sourcing of their project.
Motivated by the lack of a suitable smartwatch solution for managing his son's Type 1 diabetes, a father embarked on building a custom smartwatch from scratch. Using off-the-shelf hardware components like a PineTime smartwatch and a Nightscout-compatible continuous glucose monitor (CGM), he developed software to display real-time blood glucose data directly on the watch face. This DIY project aimed to provide a discreet and readily accessible way for his son to monitor his blood sugar levels, addressing concerns like bulky existing solutions and social stigma associated with medical devices. The resulting smartwatch displays glucose levels, trend arrows, and alerts for high or low readings, offering a more user-friendly and age-appropriate interface than traditional diabetes management tools.
Hacker News commenters largely praised the author's dedication and ingenuity in creating a smartwatch for his son with Type 1 diabetes. Several expressed admiration for his willingness to dive into hardware and software development to address a specific need. Some discussed the challenges of closed-loop systems and the potential benefits and risks of DIY medical devices. A few commenters with diabetes shared their personal experiences and offered suggestions for improvement, such as incorporating existing open-source projects or considering different hardware platforms. Others raised concerns about the regulatory hurdles and safety implications of using a homemade device for managing a serious medical condition. There was also some discussion about the potential for commercializing the project.
Summary of Comments ( 4 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43255855
HN users generally praised Appstat as a useful tool. Several pointed out its similarity to existing tools like Sysinternals Process Monitor (Procmon) while highlighting Appstat's simpler interface and easier setup as advantages. Some appreciated its focus on security-relevant events. Others suggested potential improvements, such as adding filtering capabilities, including command line arguments, and enhancing the UI with features like column sorting. A few users mentioned alternative tools they preferred, including Procmon and ETW Explorer. The developer actively responded to comments, addressing questions and acknowledging suggestions for future development.
The Hacker News post for "Show HN: Appstat – Process Monitor for Windows" generated a moderate amount of discussion, with several commenters offering their perspectives and experiences.
A significant portion of the conversation revolves around comparing Appstat to existing process monitoring tools, particularly Process Monitor (Procmon) from Sysinternals. Several users praise Procmon as a powerful and comprehensive tool, questioning whether Appstat offers enough unique features to justify its existence. One commenter points out the steep learning curve associated with Procmon, highlighting the need for simpler alternatives, particularly for less experienced users. They suggest Appstat could potentially fill this niche.
The author of Appstat actively participates in the thread, responding to queries and providing clarification about its features. They emphasize the tool's focus on providing a more user-friendly interface compared to Procmon, acknowledging that Procmon offers greater depth in terms of data collection. They also discuss Appstat's specific use cases, such as troubleshooting application crashes and identifying performance bottlenecks. This direct engagement from the creator allows for a deeper understanding of the tool's purpose and intended audience.
One commenter expresses skepticism about the cross-platform capabilities of Appstat, specifically questioning its performance on Linux. The author responds by acknowledging the current limitations of the Linux version and outlining future development plans. This exchange provides valuable insight into the current state of the project and its roadmap.
Further discussion centers on the potential licensing model for Appstat. One commenter inquires about plans for open-sourcing the project. The author responds by stating that they are currently considering various options, including a potential dual-licensing approach. This suggests the possibility of both a free community edition and a paid commercial version.
The overall sentiment within the comments section appears to be cautiously optimistic. While several users acknowledge the value of existing tools like Procmon, there's also a recognition that there's room for alternative solutions with different design philosophies and target user groups. The author's active participation and responsiveness to feedback contribute positively to the discussion, leaving a favorable impression of the project and its potential.