Donald Shoup, a UCLA urban planning professor, revolutionized parking policy by highlighting its hidden costs and advocating for market-based solutions. His influential book, The High Cost of Free Parking, argues that artificially low or free parking minimums lead to increased traffic congestion, sprawling development, and environmental harm. Shoup champions removing minimum parking requirements and implementing dynamic pricing, where parking prices adjust based on demand, ensuring availability and generating revenue that can be reinvested in the community. This approach aims to create more efficient, livable, and sustainable cities.
TheretoWhere.com lets you visualize ideal housing locations in a city based on your personalized criteria. By inputting preferences like price range, commute time, proximity to amenities (parks, groceries, etc.), and preferred neighborhood vibes, the site generates a heatmap highlighting areas that best match your needs. This allows users to quickly identify promising neighborhoods and explore potential living areas based on their individualized priorities, making the often daunting process of apartment hunting or relocation more efficient and targeted.
HN users generally found the "theretowhere" website concept interesting, but criticized its execution. Several commenters pointed out the limited and US-centric data, making it less useful for those outside major American cities. The reliance on Zillow data was also questioned, with some noting Zillow's known inaccuracies and biases. Others criticized the UI/UX, citing slow load times and a cumbersome interface. Despite the flaws, some saw potential in the idea, suggesting improvements like incorporating more data sources, expanding geographic coverage, and allowing users to adjust weighting for different preferences. A few commenters questioned the overall utility of the heatmap approach, arguing that it oversimplifies a complex decision-making process.
Waymo, Alphabet's self-driving unit, plans to expand its autonomous vehicle testing to over ten new US cities. Focusing on trucking and delivery services, Waymo will leverage its existing experience in Phoenix and San Francisco to gather data and refine its technology in diverse environments. This expansion aims to bolster the development and eventual commercial deployment of their autonomous driving systems for both passenger and freight transport.
HN commenters are generally skeptical of Waymo's expansion plans. Several point out that Waymo's current operational areas are geographically limited and relatively simple to navigate compared to more complex urban environments. Some question the viability of truly driverless technology in the near future, citing the ongoing need for human intervention and the difficulty of handling unpredictable situations. Others express concern about the safety implications of widespread autonomous vehicle deployment, particularly in densely populated areas. There's also discussion of the regulatory hurdles and public acceptance challenges that Waymo and other autonomous vehicle companies face. Finally, some commenters suggest Waymo's announcement is primarily a PR move designed to attract investment and maintain public interest.
Summary of Comments ( 190 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43026920
Hacker News users discussed the inflexibility of Shoup's parking model, particularly its struggles to adapt to changing demand (e.g., increased deliveries, ride-sharing). Some commenters argued that dynamic pricing, while theoretically sound, often faces political resistance and implementation challenges due to public perception and bureaucratic hurdles. Others pointed out that Shoup's focus on eliminating minimum parking requirements, while beneficial, doesn't fully address broader urban planning issues. The thread also touched upon the limitations of modeling and the difficulty of predicting long-term trends in transportation. A few users shared personal anecdotes of cities successfully implementing Shoup's ideas, while others highlighted the complexities and unintended consequences that can arise.
The Hacker News post titled "The Prophet of Parking," linking to a Works in Progress article about Donald Shoup, generated a lively discussion with 29 comments. Several commenters expressed strong agreement with Shoup's ideas about parking and its impact on urban planning.
A recurring theme was the seemingly irrational abundance of free parking, often mandated by city ordinances, and its negative consequences. One commenter highlighted the absurdity of businesses being forced to provide parking, effectively subsidizing car use and contributing to urban sprawl. Another pointed out how these regulations lead to wasted space and higher costs for everyone, even those who don't drive.
The economic distortions caused by free parking were also discussed, with commenters noting how it incentivizes driving and discourages alternative transportation methods. The artificial deflation of the true cost of driving, they argued, leads to increased traffic congestion and environmental problems.
Several commenters shared personal anecdotes and examples of how parking regulations impact their daily lives, from the difficulty of finding parking in busy areas to the frustration of seeing vast expanses of empty parking lots. One commenter mentioned the positive impact of Shoup's ideas on their city, noting improvements in traffic flow and a greater sense of walkability after implementing some of his recommendations.
Some commenters delved into the political aspects of parking reform, acknowledging the challenges of overcoming resistance from businesses and residents accustomed to free parking. One commenter suggested that framing the issue as a matter of efficient resource allocation, rather than a war on cars, might be more effective in garnering support for change.
While most commenters were supportive of Shoup's ideas, there were a few dissenting voices. One commenter questioned the feasibility of implementing market-based parking solutions in all contexts, arguing that some areas might require different approaches. Another commenter expressed skepticism about the potential benefits of dynamic pricing, suggesting it could disproportionately impact lower-income drivers.
Overall, the comments section reflects a general appreciation for Shoup's work and a recognition of the significant impact parking policies have on urban development and transportation. The most compelling comments highlighted the economic inefficiencies of free parking, the environmental consequences of car-centric planning, and the potential benefits of market-based solutions.