The Atari 1200XL, intended as a high-end successor to the Atari 800, was a commercial failure due to a combination of poor design choices and unfortunate timing. Released in 1983, it boasted a sleek, compact design and some minor hardware improvements. However, its redesigned, non-standard keyboard layout, lack of function keys, limited memory expansion options, and higher price point compared to the existing 800 alienated consumers. Its launch coincided with the video game crash of 1983, further hindering its chances of success. The 1200XL was quickly discontinued, paving the way for the more successful XL series, which addressed many of the 1200XL's shortcomings.
The article argues that Nintendo strategically suffocated Atari Games, a prominent arcade and home console developer, by exploiting loopholes and leveraging its market dominance. Nintendo's strict licensing agreements, including cartridge limitations and exclusivity clauses, constrained Atari's output and creativity. Combined with alleged backroom deals that prioritized Nintendo's own games for arcade operators, these practices effectively choked Atari's access to the market, leading to its eventual decline and absorption by Midway. This dominance, the article suggests, stifled innovation and competition in the gaming industry, leaving Nintendo virtually unchallenged for a significant period.
HN commenters discuss the predatory practices of Nintendo's licensing agreements in the 1980s, agreeing with the article's premise. Several pointed out that Nintendo's strategy, while harsh, was a reaction to the chaotic and low-quality software market of the time, effectively saving the video game industry from crashing. Some commenters drew parallels to Apple's tightly controlled App Store, with debates arising about the trade-offs between quality control and developer freedom. A few highlighted the irony of Nintendo later becoming the target of similar anti-competitive accusations. Others focused on specific details like the role of lawyers and the cultural differences between Japanese and American business practices. The lack of a "killer app" at launch for the NES was also mentioned, with the success of the console being attributed to Nintendo's stringent quality control measures.
Compute!'s Gazette, a beloved magazine for Commodore 8-bit computers, has been revived after a 35-year hiatus. The new publication will maintain its focus on retro computing, specifically covering Commodore 64, VIC-20, PET, Plus/4, and 128 systems. Readers can expect articles on programming, hardware modifications, game reviews, and interviews, aiming to capture the spirit and enthusiasm of the original magazine while offering fresh content for both veteran users and newcomers to the Commodore scene. The magazine will be available in both digital and print formats.
Hacker News users reacted to Compute's Gazette's return with a mix of nostalgia and cautious optimism. Several commenters fondly recalled their childhood experiences with the magazine, specifically mentioning the included type-in programs and the excitement of getting it in the mail. Some expressed concerns about the viability of a print magazine in the digital age, and questioned the focus on retro computing. Others wondered about the target audience and the content's relevance to younger generations. Despite these reservations, there was a general sense of goodwill and hope that the revived publication could capture some of the magic of the original. A few users questioned the business model and suggested exploring digital distribution alongside print. The most compelling comments highlighted the unique community fostered by early computing magazines and expressed hope that the new Compute's Gazette could recapture that spirit.
"Space Invaders," released by Taito in 1978, revolutionized the arcade gaming industry. Designed by Tomohiro Nishikado, the game features descending rows of alien invaders that players must shoot down before they reach the bottom of the screen. The game's increasing speed and iconic descending sound effects created a tense and engaging experience. Its innovative gameplay, including player-controlled movement, destructible shields, and the bonus UFO, cemented its place as a foundational title for the shoot 'em up genre and influenced countless games that followed. It also popularized the joystick control scheme and helped establish the golden age of arcade video games.
Hacker News users discuss the ingenuity of the original Space Invaders design, particularly its increasing speed as the aliens are eliminated, a mechanic born from hardware limitations that became a core part of the gameplay. Several commenters recall fond memories of playing the game in arcades and on early home computers like the Atari 2600. Some discuss the various ports and clones, comparing their faithfulness to the original and highlighting differences in sound and gameplay. The technical aspects are also touched upon, including discussions of the hardware limitations of the original arcade machine and how those limitations influenced the game's design. The conversation also drifts into broader nostalgia for the golden age of arcade gaming and the impact Space Invaders had on the industry. A few commenters share personal anecdotes about their experiences with the game and its cultural impact.
DeepSeek's R1-Zero and R1 models demonstrate impressive performance in language modeling, outperforming open-source models of comparable size in several benchmarks. R1-Zero, despite being pre-trained on only 1.5 trillion tokens, achieves similar performance to much larger open-source models trained on 3-4 trillion tokens. The more powerful R1 model, trained with selected data and reinforcement learning from human feedback, further improves upon R1-Zero, especially in reasoning and following instructions. DeepSeek attributes its success to a combination of improved architecture, efficient training, and high-quality data. The results highlight the potential for achieving high performance with smaller, more efficiently trained models.
HN commenters discuss the implications of DeepSeek's impressive results in the ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) challenge with their R1-Zero and R1 models. Several highlight the significance of achieving near-perfect scores on the training set, raising questions about the nature of generalization and the potential limitations of current evaluation metrics. Some express skepticism about the actual novelty of the approach, noting similarities to existing techniques and questioning the impact of architectural choices versus data augmentation. The closed nature of DeepSeek and the lack of publicly available code also draw criticism, with some suspecting potential overfitting or undisclosed tricks. Others emphasize the importance of reproducible research and open collaboration for scientific progress in the field. The potential for such powerful models in practical applications is acknowledged, with some speculating on future developments and the need for better benchmarks.
Summary of Comments ( 37 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43714476
Hacker News users discuss the Atari 1200XL's failure, citing its high price, lack of backwards compatibility with popular peripherals, limited improvements over the existing 800XL, and poor marketing as key factors. Some commenters argue that its redesigned keyboard, though unpopular at the time, was actually superior. Others note the internal politics and mismanagement within Atari during this period as contributing to the console's demise. Several users share personal anecdotes of their experiences with the 1200XL, highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses. The overall sentiment is that the 1200XL was a missed opportunity for Atari, representing a pivotal moment in the company's decline.
The Hacker News post titled "The Atari 1200XL Fiasco" linking to an article on goto10retro.com has generated a moderate number of comments, mostly focusing on the technical shortcomings and market missteps of the Atari 1200XL. Several commenters offer firsthand experience or insights gleaned from the era.
A recurring theme is the 1200XL's incompatibility with existing Atari peripherals and software. One commenter highlights the frustration of the limited expansion ports, making popular additions like extra RAM or floppy drives difficult or impossible to connect. This incompatibility is cited as a major factor in the console's failure, as it alienated existing Atari owners who would have to repurchase their accessories.
Another point of contention brought up by multiple users is the keyboard. While lauded for its improved feel over the Atari 400/800's membrane keyboard, the 1200XL's keyboard layout, particularly the placement of the HELP key, is criticized. One commenter recalls personal experience with the awkward layout, and another mentions the lack of function keys which limited its potential as a home computer.
The 1200XL's higher price compared to the existing Atari models is also mentioned as a contributing factor to its poor sales. Commenters point out that the machine offered little in the way of improved performance to justify the increased cost, especially given the incompatibility issues.
Beyond these major points, several comments offer smaller anecdotes and observations. One user shares a story about an acquaintance who worked at Atari and expressed bewilderment at the 1200XL's design choices. Another commenter mentions the subsequent 600XL and 800XL models as evidence that Atari eventually recognized and corrected the mistakes of the 1200XL. Finally, a few comments touch upon the broader context of the video game crash of 1983, suggesting that even a more competently designed 1200XL might have struggled in the face of the market downturn.
While there isn't a single, overwhelmingly compelling comment, the collective discussion paints a picture of the 1200XL as a product hampered by a combination of technical limitations, design flaws, and poor market timing. The comments offer valuable insights into the factors that contributed to the console's failure.