The essay "Ghosts and Dolls" explores the uncanny nature of dolls, positioning them as liminal objects occupying a space between life and death, animation and inanimacy. Their resemblance to humans, yet inherent stillness, evokes an unsettling feeling, often linked to folklore and spiritual beliefs about trapped souls or conduits to the supernatural. The author connects this eeriness to the concept of "the double," a psychological phenomenon where a copy or representation triggers existential anxieties about identity and mortality. Dolls, therefore, become potent symbols of this unease, acting as mirrors reflecting our own fears of death and decay. This is further exemplified through their use in various cultural practices, from children's play mimicking life cycles to mourning rituals and magical traditions.
The author explores the idea of imbuing AI with simulated emotions, specifically anger, not for the sake of realism but for practical utility. They argue that a strategically angry AI could be more effective at tasks like debugging or system administration, where expressing frustration can highlight critical issues and motivate human intervention. This "anger" wouldn't be genuine emotion but a calculated performance designed to improve communication and problem-solving. The author envisions this manifested through tailored language, assertive recommendations, and even playful grumbling, ultimately making the AI a more engaging and helpful collaborator.
Hacker News users largely disagreed with the premise of an "angry" AI. Several commenters argued that anger is a human emotion rooted in biological imperatives, and applying it to AI is anthropomorphism that misrepresents how AI functions. Others pointed out the potential dangers of an AI designed to express anger, questioning its usefulness and raising concerns about manipulation and unintended consequences. Some suggested that what the author desires isn't anger, but rather an AI that effectively communicates importance and urgency. A few commenters saw potential benefits, like an AI that could advocate for the user, but these were in the minority. Overall, the sentiment leaned toward skepticism and concern about the implications of imbuing AI with human emotions.
Summary of Comments ( 0 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43866670
Hacker News users discussing "Ghosts and Dolls" largely focused on the plausibility of the phenomena described. Some commenters expressed skepticism, suggesting the experiences were due to suggestibility, confirmation bias, and the human tendency to find patterns. Others shared personal anecdotes or cited research seemingly supporting the existence of paranormal activity. A few users pointed out the cultural significance of dolls and how that ties into the uncanny valley effect, contributing to the feeling of unease they evoke. The discussion touched upon the role of imagination and storytelling, with some arguing that the value of such narratives lies not in their veracity, but in their exploration of human psychology and cultural anxieties. A compelling comment thread developed around the idea that these experiences, regardless of their origin, offer insight into the human need to create meaning and find explanations for the unknown.
The Hacker News post "Ghosts and Dolls" linking to an article in The Lamp magazine has generated a modest discussion with seven comments at the time of this summary. While not a large number, several comments offer interesting perspectives.
One commenter expresses appreciation for the article, finding it "beautifully written and deeply affecting," and highlighting the author's skill in weaving together personal experiences with broader cultural observations about death, memory, and the role of objects in processing grief. They also note the effectiveness of the author's use of recurring motifs, like the color blue, throughout the piece.
Another commenter focuses on the specific aspect of children using dolls and stuffed animals to grapple with complex emotions, particularly around loss and death. They connect this to the broader human tendency to imbue inanimate objects with meaning and significance, particularly during times of emotional vulnerability.
A third comment shifts the focus to the concept of animism and its persistence even in modern, secular societies. They suggest the article's exploration of the relationship between people and dolls touches upon this inherent human tendency to perceive a kind of life force in objects, especially those we form strong emotional bonds with.
Another commenter offers a personal anecdote about a childhood experience with a doll, echoing the themes of imbuing objects with meaning and using them as a means of emotional expression. They express how the article resonated with their own memories and feelings.
One comment simply expresses appreciation for being introduced to The Lamp magazine, suggesting they were unaware of it previously.
The remaining two comments are brief, one expressing general enjoyment of the article and the other linking to a Wikipedia page about tulpas, thought-forms believed to be sentient entities created through sustained thought and concentration. This commenter suggests a connection between the concept of tulpas and the themes of the article, implying that the emotional investment in dolls might be seen as a form of tulpa creation, albeit unintentional.
In summary, the discussion revolves around the article's themes of grief, memory, the human tendency to imbue objects with meaning, and the potential connection between these themes and broader concepts like animism and tulpas. While the number of comments is limited, several offer thoughtful reflections and personal connections to the article's subject matter.