WEIRD is a decentralized and encrypted platform for building and hosting websites. It prioritizes user autonomy and data ownership by allowing users to control their content and identity without relying on centralized servers or third-party providers. Websites are built using simple markdown and HTML, and can be accessed via a unique .weird domain. The project emphasizes privacy and security, using end-to-end encryption and distributed storage to protect user data from surveillance and censorship. It aims to be a resilient and accessible alternative to the traditional web.
Matt's Script Archive, established in 1995, is a vast online repository of movie and television scripts, transcripts, and unproduced screenplays. It serves as a free resource for aspiring writers, film enthusiasts, and anyone interested in studying the art of screenwriting. The site features a simple, searchable interface allowing users to browse by title, genre, or writer. While claiming no official affiliations with the studios or writers, the archive offers a significant collection, ranging from classic films to more recent releases and television series.
Hacker News users discuss Matt's Script Archive, a relic of the early web. Several commenters reminisce about using the site in the 90s, highlighting its importance as a resource for learning CGI scripting and early web development. Some note the simplicity and educational value of the scripts, contrasting them with the complexity of modern web development. Others express a sense of nostalgia for the early internet and the community spirit it fostered. A few commenters also discuss the technical details of the scripts, including the languages used and their limitations. The overall sentiment is one of appreciation for the archive as a historical artifact and a testament to the ingenuity of early web developers.
After their startup failed, the founder launched VcSubsidized.com to sell off the remaining inventory. The website's tongue-in-cheek name acknowledges the venture capital funding that allowed for the initial product creation, now being recouped through discounted sales. The products themselves, primarily blankets and pillows made with natural materials like alpaca and cashmere, are presented with straightforward descriptions and high-quality photos. The site's simple design and the founder's transparent explanation of the startup's demise contribute to a sense of authenticity.
HN commenters largely found the VCSubsidized.com site humorous and appreciated the creator's entrepreneurial spirit and marketing savvy. Some questioned the longevity of the domain name's availability given its potentially controversial nature. Others discussed the prevalence of subsidized goods and services in the startup ecosystem, with some pointing out that the practice isn't inherently negative and can benefit consumers. A few commenters shared personal anecdotes of acquiring and reselling goods from failed startups. The overall sentiment was positive, with the project viewed as a clever commentary on startup culture.
NextRead (nextread.info) is a simple web tool designed to help users find their next book. It presents a sortable and filterable table comparing popular book recommendations from various sources like Goodreads, Bill Gates, and Barack Obama. This allows readers to quickly see commonalities across lists, identify highly-recommended titles, and filter by criteria like genre, author, or publication year to refine their search and discover new reads based on trusted sources.
HN users generally praised the simplicity and usefulness of the book comparison tool. Several suggested improvements, such as adding Goodreads integration, allowing users to import their own lists, and including more metadata like page count and publication date. Some questioned the reliance on Amazon, desiring alternative sources. The discussion also touched on the subjectivity of book recommendations and the difficulty of quantifying "similarity" between books. A few users shared their personal book recommendation methods, contrasting them with the tool's approach. The creator responded to many comments, acknowledging the suggestions and explaining some design choices.
SimpleSearch is a website that aggregates a large directory of specialized search engines, presented as a straightforward, uncluttered list. It aims to provide a quick access point for users to find information across various domains, from academic resources and code repositories to specific file types and social media platforms. Rather than relying on a single, general-purpose search engine, SimpleSearch offers a curated collection of tools tailored to different search needs.
HN users generally praised SimpleSearch for its clean design and utility, particularly for its quick access to various specialized search engines. Several commenters suggested additions, including academic search engines like BASE and PubMed, code-specific search like Sourcegraph, and visual search tools like Google Images. Some discussed the benefits of curated lists versus relying on browser search engines, with a few noting the project's similarity to existing search aggregators. The creator responded to several suggestions and expressed interest in incorporating user feedback. A minor point of contention arose regarding the inclusion of Google, but overall the reception was positive, with many appreciating the simplicity and convenience offered by the site.
Summary of Comments ( 9 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43691891
Hacker News users discussed the privacy implications of WEIRD, questioning its reliance on a single server and the potential for data leaks or misuse. Some expressed skepticism about its practicality and long-term viability, particularly regarding scaling and maintenance. Others were interested in the technical details, inquiring about the specific technologies used and the possibility of self-hosting. The novel approach to web browsing was acknowledged, but concerns about censorship resistance and the centralized nature of the platform dominated the conversation. Several commenters compared WEIRD to other decentralized platforms and explored alternative approaches to achieving similar goals. There was also a discussion about the project's name and its potential to hinder wider adoption.
The Hacker News post titled "WEIRD – a way to be on the web" linking to a.weird.one has generated several comments discussing various aspects of the project.
Several commenters express interest in the underlying technology and architecture behind WEIRD. One user asks for clarification on whether it's a peer-to-peer system and how it handles updates, prompting a response from the creator (seemingly the author of the linked article) explaining that it utilizes WebRTC for peer-to-peer communication and a central server for coordination and update propagation, but emphasizing the goal of eventual decentralization. There's further technical discussion regarding the use of CRDTs for conflict-free data replication, and the challenges associated with implementing them efficiently. Someone raises a concern about the potential for a central point of failure despite the peer-to-peer aspects.
Another thread of discussion focuses on the user experience and philosophy behind WEIRD. Some commenters praise the unique approach to web browsing and content creation, appreciating its minimalist design and focus on individual expression. Others express skepticism about its practicality and long-term viability, questioning whether it offers enough functionality to attract a wider audience. The creator clarifies it is intended to be simple and more focused on a different model of web interactions.
The comment section also touches upon the project's open-source nature, with inquiries about licensing and community involvement. The creator confirms it's open source and encourages contributions.
There's a brief discussion regarding the choice of the name "WEIRD," with one commenter suggesting it might not be the most appealing or descriptive moniker. Another thread examines the project's privacy implications, particularly regarding the use of WebRTC.
Overall, the comments reflect a mixture of curiosity, enthusiasm, and skepticism towards WEIRD. The technical details and the project's unconventional approach spark interest, while concerns about scalability, practicality, and the long-term vision remain. The comments offer a valuable insight into the initial reactions and questions surrounding this project.