Stories with Tag Financial Modeling

• Show HN: Calculate Your Revenue

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-02-03 10:47:33

  Verbose tl;dr

  Postmake.io/revenue offers a simple calculator to help businesses quickly estimate their annual recurring revenue (ARR). Users input their number of customers, average revenue per customer (ARPU), and customer churn rate to calculate current ARR, ARR growth potential, and potential revenue loss due to churn. The tool aims to provide a straightforward way to understand these key metrics and their impact on overall revenue, facilitating better financial planning.

  The Hacker News post titled "Show HN: Calculate Your Revenue" introduces a straightforward, web-based calculator designed to assist individuals, particularly those involved in online businesses or subscription services, in quickly determining their potential revenue. This uncomplicated tool presents a minimalist user interface featuring only the essential input fields required for the calculation: the number of customers, the price per customer, and the desired time period for projection (selectable as monthly or annual).

  Upon entering these three values, the calculator instantaneously displays the calculated revenue, eliminating the need for manual computations or the use of more complex spreadsheet software. This streamlined approach focuses on providing a rapid and readily accessible means of revenue estimation, ideal for quick assessments or on-the-fly calculations. The tool is presented as a publicly available web application, accessible directly through a provided URL, allowing any user with an internet connection to utilize its functionality without needing to download or install any software. Its purpose is clearly defined as a simple, convenient, and freely available utility for basic revenue forecasting.

  • revenue
  • calculator
  • finance
  • Business
  • startup
  • SaaS
  • Financial Modeling
  • Pricing
  • Sales
  • forecasting

  Summary of Comments ( 0 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42916934

  Verbose tl;dr

  Hacker News users generally reacted positively to Postmake's revenue calculator. Several commenters praised its simplicity and ease of use, finding it a helpful tool for quick calculations. Some suggested potential improvements, like adding more sophisticated features for calculating recurring revenue or including churn rate. One commenter pointed out the importance of considering customer lifetime value (CLTV) alongside revenue. A few expressed skepticism about the long-term viability of relying on a third-party tool for such calculations, suggesting spreadsheets or custom-built solutions as alternatives. Overall, the comments reflected an appreciation for a simple, accessible tool while also highlighting the need for more robust solutions for complex revenue modeling.

  The Hacker News post "Show HN: Calculate Your Revenue" linking to postmake.io/revenue generated several comments, largely focusing on the simplicity of the tool and its potential usefulness, while also pointing out some limitations and suggesting improvements.

  Several commenters appreciated the clean and straightforward design of the calculator. One user praised its minimalist approach, finding it refreshing compared to more complex tools. Another echoed this sentiment, highlighting the ease with which they could quickly calculate revenue based on different pricing scenarios. The intuitive nature of the tool was a common theme, with users expressing satisfaction in its ability to provide quick answers without requiring extensive input or navigation.

  However, some commenters pointed out areas where the calculator could be improved. One suggestion involved adding the ability to factor in churn rate, a crucial metric for subscription-based businesses. This addition would provide a more realistic revenue projection by accounting for customer loss over time. Another commenter suggested incorporating a feature to calculate lifetime value (LTV), further enhancing the tool's ability to provide valuable business insights.

  The limitations of a simple model were also acknowledged. One user pointed out that while helpful for basic calculations, the tool doesn't account for the complexities of real-world businesses, such as varying conversion rates or fluctuating customer acquisition costs. These factors, they argued, significantly impact revenue and should ideally be considered for a more comprehensive analysis.

  There was also a brief discussion regarding the platform on which the calculator was built. One commenter inquired about the choice of technology, expressing interest in the development process. The creator responded, clarifying the use of Next.js and Vercel, and briefly explained their reasoning for choosing these technologies.

  A few commenters also offered alternative tools or methods for revenue calculation. One mentioned using spreadsheets for more complex scenarios, while another suggested exploring dedicated SaaS metrics platforms for a more in-depth analysis. These suggestions offered a broader perspective on revenue calculation, highlighting the diverse range of available tools.

  Finally, a minor point of discussion revolved around the calculator's presentation. One commenter suggested a small visual improvement, specifically recommending a different font choice. While a relatively minor detail, it exemplifies the level of scrutiny the tool received from the Hacker News community.

• Two Bites of Data Science in K

  permalink

  Posted: 2025-01-26 18:29:18

  Verbose tl;dr

  The blog post explores two practical applications of the K programming language in data science. First, it demonstrates K's conciseness and efficiency for calculating quantiles on large datasets, outperforming Python's NumPy in both speed and code brevity. Second, it showcases K's ability to elegantly express the k-nearest neighbors algorithm, highlighting its expressive power for complex calculations within a limited space. The author argues that despite its steep learning curve, K's unique strengths make it a valuable tool for certain data science tasks where performance and compact code are paramount.

  This blog post, titled "Two Bites of Data Science in K," by Zachary Smith, delves into the application of the K programming language, specifically the kdb+ implementation, to two distinct data science problems. The author emphasizes the conciseness and efficiency of K for these tasks, highlighting its ability to manipulate and analyze large datasets with minimal code.

  The first problem addressed is calculating quantiles within a sliding window across a time series. Smith meticulously outlines the conventional approach to this problem, involving looping and iterative calculations, which can become computationally expensive for extensive datasets. He then contrasts this with a K solution, showcasing how K's array-oriented nature and built-in functions allow for a drastically more compact and performant implementation. The K code leverages a sliding window technique and the iasc (ascending indices) function to efficiently determine quantiles within each window without explicit iteration. The author details the code's logic, emphasizing how K's implicit vector operations eliminate the need for verbose loops and temporary variable assignments.

  The second problem explored is the computation of a moving average. While seemingly straightforward, the author dissects the nuances of efficiently implementing a moving average over a substantial time series. He again begins by describing a conventional iterative approach, highlighting its potential performance bottlenecks. Then, Smith introduces a sophisticated K solution utilizing the sums function to cumulatively sum the data. He demonstrates how this cumulative sum, combined with a cleverly constructed difference operation, can be used to compute moving averages across the entire dataset in a highly vectorized manner. This approach avoids repeated calculations and optimizes for performance, particularly when dealing with millions of data points. The post meticulously explains the underlying logic of the K code, demonstrating its elegance and efficiency in handling this common data science task. Ultimately, the author underscores K's powerful capabilities for data manipulation and analysis, especially its ability to express complex operations concisely and performantly through its array-oriented paradigm. He positions K as a compelling alternative to more conventional tools for certain data science applications.

  • Data Science
  • K Programming Language
  • Kdb+
  • Q Language
  • APL
  • Array Programming
  • Time Series Analysis
  • Financial Modeling
  • High-Performance Computing
  • Data Analysis

  Summary of Comments ( 0 )
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42832482

  Verbose tl;dr

  The Hacker News comments generally praise the elegance and conciseness of K for data manipulation, with several users highlighting its power and expressiveness, especially for exploratory analysis. Some express familiarity with K and APL, noting the steep learning curve but appreciating the resulting efficiency. A few commenters mention the practical limitations of K's proprietary nature and the scarcity of available learning resources compared to more mainstream languages like Python. Others suggest that the article serves as a good introduction to the paradigm shift required to think in array-oriented languages. The licensing costs and limited community support are pointed out as potential drawbacks, while the article's clarity and engaging examples are commended.

  The Hacker News post titled "Two Bites of Data Science in K" spawned a moderate discussion with several commenters weighing in on the use of the K programming language for data science tasks.

  A significant portion of the commentary revolves around the perceived terseness and difficulty of K. One commenter notes the language's steep learning curve, acknowledging its power but questioning its practicality for most data science applications. They suggest that while K might be suitable for specialized domains or experienced programmers, its syntax can be a significant barrier to entry for many. This sentiment is echoed by another commenter who describes K as a "write-only language," implying that code written in K can be extremely difficult to understand or maintain, even for the original author.

  However, some commenters defend K, highlighting its conciseness and efficiency. One points out that K allows for expressing complex operations in very few lines of code, which can be advantageous for certain tasks. They argue that the initial investment in learning the language can pay off in terms of increased productivity and reduced code complexity. Another commenter notes the historical context of K, explaining its origins in APL and its focus on array processing, making it well-suited for data manipulation. This commenter also acknowledges the challenging syntax while simultaneously appreciating its elegance.

  The discussion also touches upon the broader landscape of array-oriented programming languages. Commenters mention alternatives like J and Q, comparing their features and usability to K. One commenter specifically highlights Q as a more accessible option within the same family of languages, offering a slightly less cryptic syntax and better integration with existing tools.

  Finally, a few comments address the specific examples presented in the original blog post. One commenter questions the practical relevance of the chosen examples, arguing that they don't fully showcase the capabilities of K in real-world data science scenarios. Another commenter suggests alternative approaches to solving the same problems using more common languages like Python, implying that the benefits of using K might not be significant enough to justify its complexity.

  In summary, the comments on Hacker News reflect a mixed reception to the use of K for data science. While some acknowledge its power and efficiency, others express concerns about its steep learning curve and difficult syntax. The discussion highlights the trade-offs between conciseness and readability, and ultimately suggests that K might be a niche tool best suited for specific applications and experienced programmers.