France's data protection watchdog, CNIL, fined Apple €8 million and Meta (Facebook's parent company) €60 million for violating EU privacy law. The fines stem from how the companies implemented targeted advertising on iOS and Android respectively. CNIL found that users were not given a simple enough mechanism to opt out of personalized ads; while both companies offered some control, users had to navigate multiple settings. Specifically, Apple defaulted to personalized ads requiring users to actively disable them, while Meta made ad personalization integral to its terms of service, requiring active consent to activate non-personalized ads. The CNIL considered both approaches violations of EU regulations that require clear and straightforward consent for personalized advertising.
"The Ghosts of Gaelic" explores the decline of the Gaelic languages (Irish, Scottish Gaelic, and Manx) by examining the social and political forces that suppressed them. The article highlights the impact of English colonialism, the rise of English as the language of commerce and education, and the devastating effects of the Highland Clearances and the Great Famine. While acknowledging the significant loss of speakers and cultural heritage, it also points to the enduring presence of Gaelic, evident in revived interest, language learning initiatives, and ongoing efforts to preserve and promote these languages within their respective communities. Ultimately, the article frames the story of Gaelic not as one of simple demise, but rather as a complex narrative of resilience and adaptation in the face of historical adversity.
HN users discuss the decline of Gaelic, attributing it to factors beyond just English suppression. Some highlight the internal social dynamics within Gaelic communities, where upward mobility was linked to English adoption. Others mention the role of the printing press in standardizing and solidifying English's dominance, while the lack of a similar effort for Gaelic hindered its survival. The role of religion, specifically Protestant evangelism promoting English literacy, is also pointed out. Finally, some commenters compare the situation to other minority languages, noting similar patterns of decline and emphasizing the complex interplay of social, economic, and political factors. One compelling argument suggests that language preservation requires more than just government funding or language nests, needing robust everyday use and cultural relevance to thrive. Another notes the parallels with how Latin faded as a vernacular language.
This post discusses the potential of "alt-JS" languages like Elm, PureScript, and ReasonML to fundamentally change frontend web development. The author argues that these languages, with their strong typing, immutability, and functional paradigms, offer significant advantages over JavaScript in terms of maintainability, reliability, and developer experience. While acknowledging JavaScript's entrenched position and the challenges of adoption, the post suggests these languages represent a paradigm shift that could reshape the frontend landscape, leading to more robust and scalable applications. It emphasizes the learning curve but suggests the long-term benefits outweigh the initial investment.
HN users discuss the practicality and implications of Derek Brown's proposed "mostly serverless" architecture. Several commenters express skepticism about the cost-effectiveness of serverless for high-traffic applications, citing potential vendor lock-in and unexpected expenses. Others debate the definition of "serverless" and whether Brown's approach truly qualifies. Some find the architectural diagrams unclear or unhelpful. A few appreciate the concept's simplicity and potential for scaling, while acknowledging the potential drawbacks mentioned by others. Overall, the comments reflect a cautious but interested response to the proposed architecture, with many focusing on practical concerns rather than theoretical benefits.
Ian Stewart's "The Celts: A Modern History" refutes the romanticized notion of a unified Celtic past. Stewart argues that "Celtic" is a largely modern construct, shaped by 18th and 19th-century romanticism and nationalism. While acknowledging shared linguistic and cultural elements in ancient communities across Europe, he emphasizes their diversity and distinct identities. The book traces how the concept of "Celticism" evolved and was variously appropriated for political and cultural agendas, demonstrating that contemporary interpretations of Celtic identity are far removed from historical realities. Stewart’s rigorous approach deconstructs the persistent myth of a singular Celtic people, presenting a more nuanced and historically accurate view of the dispersed communities labeled "Celtic."
HN commenters largely discuss the problematic nature of defining "Celts," questioning its validity as a unified cultural or ethnic group. Several highlight the anachronistic application of the term, arguing it's a modern construct retroactively applied to disparate groups. Some point to the book's potential value despite this, acknowledging its exploration of how the idea of "Celticness" has been constructed and used throughout history, particularly in relation to national identity. Others suggest alternative readings on the topic or express skepticism towards the review's framing. A recurring theme is the romanticized and often inaccurate portrayal of Celtic history, especially within nationalistic narratives.
Analysis of ancient genomes from burials in Germany dating to the Iron Age revealed a surprising social structure. High-status graves consistently contained women who were not biologically related to lower-status individuals buried nearby, suggesting that women married into the community from elsewhere. Conversely, men buried in lower-status graves were genetically related to each other, indicating they remained in their birthplace. This pattern suggests a patrilocal society where social standing and inheritance were passed down through the female line, indicating women held a prominent role in community leadership and power.
HN commenters discuss the methodology and conclusions of the study regarding an Iron Age society seemingly centered on women. Several express skepticism about the claim, questioning whether the burial practices necessarily reflect social power structures, suggesting alternative explanations like differential preservation of remains or ritual significance. Some also point out the small sample size and potential biases. Others highlight the importance of challenging traditional historical narratives and the possibility of diverse social structures in the past, while acknowledging the need for further research to confirm these findings. The discussion touches on matrilineality versus matriarchy and the frequent conflation of the two. Some also note the sensationalized title and urge caution in interpreting the results.
Summary of Comments ( 174 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43770337
Hacker News commenters generally agree that the fines levied against Apple and Meta (formerly Facebook) are insignificant relative to their revenue, suggesting the penalties are more symbolic than impactful. Some point out the absurdity of the situation, with Apple being fined for giving users more privacy controls, while Meta is fined for essentially ignoring them. The discussion also questions the effectiveness of GDPR and similar regulations, arguing that they haven't significantly changed data collection practices and mostly serve to generate revenue for governments. Several commenters expressed skepticism about the EU's motives, suggesting the fines are driven by a desire to bolster European tech companies rather than genuinely protecting user privacy. A few commenters note the contrast between the EU's approach and that of the US, where similar regulations are seemingly less enforced.
The Hacker News post "Apple and Meta fined millions for breaching EU law" generated a modest number of comments, primarily focusing on the perceived absurdity of the fines and the EU's regulatory approach.
Several commenters expressed skepticism about the effectiveness and rationale behind the fines. One user questioned the logic of fining companies for allegedly violating user privacy while simultaneously mandating features (like ATT, App Tracking Transparency) that purportedly aim to protect user privacy. They highlighted the seemingly contradictory nature of being penalized for not adhering to a standard while also being forced to implement a mechanism that seemingly leads to that penalty.
Another commenter pointed out the relatively small amount of the fines compared to the companies' vast revenues, suggesting that such penalties are unlikely to deter future behavior. They argued that these fines essentially amount to a "cost of doing business" rather than a genuine deterrent.
The discussion also touched on the complexities of obtaining user consent and the practical challenges of adhering to regulations like GDPR. A commenter sarcastically remarked on the expectation that users should meaningfully engage with complex consent pop-ups, noting the impracticality of expecting users to carefully consider and understand the implications of every consent request.
One comment questioned the actual impact on user privacy, suggesting that the fines might be more about generating revenue for the EU than genuinely protecting users. They also suggested the possibility of regulatory capture, implying that regulators might be influenced by larger tech companies.
Finally, a comment highlighted the seeming disparity in the application of GDPR regulations, observing that smaller companies face stricter enforcement while larger companies often seem to escape significant consequences. They used the analogy of enforcing traffic laws strictly on bicycles while ignoring violations by large trucks.
In essence, the comments reflect a general sentiment of skepticism and cynicism towards the EU's approach to regulating tech giants, questioning the effectiveness and motivations behind the fines, and highlighting the practical difficulties and perceived inconsistencies in their application.