This 1975 essay by Gerald Weinberg explores the delicate balance between honesty and kindness when delivering potentially painful truths. Weinberg argues that truth-telling isn't simply about stating facts, but also considering the impact of those facts on the recipient. He introduces the concept of "egoless programming" and extends it to general communication, emphasizing the importance of separating one's ego from the message. The essay provides a framework for delivering criticism constructively, focusing on observable behaviors rather than character judgments, and offering suggestions for improvement instead of mere complaints. Ultimately, Weinberg suggests that truly helpful truth-telling requires empathy, careful phrasing, and a genuine desire to help the other person grow.
John McPhee's "The Pinball Philosophy" explores the world of competitive pinball through the lens of Roger Sharpe, a top-ranked player in 1970s New York City. The piece delves into the intense focus, strategy, and almost mystical approach Sharpe takes to the game, highlighting the nuanced skills involved beyond mere luck. It contrasts his zen-like calm and calculated nudges with the frenetic energy of pinball parlors, ultimately portraying pinball not as a mindless pastime, but as a demanding game of skill requiring precision, anticipation, and a deep understanding of the machine's mechanics. Sharpe's pursuit of mastery reveals a unique subculture where dedicated players strive for perfect games and fleeting moments of control in a world of chaos and flashing lights.
HN users largely enjoyed McPhee's writing style, praising its evocative descriptions and engaging narrative. Several commenters shared personal anecdotes about pinball, reflecting on its enduring appeal and the unique focus it demands. Some discussed the cultural and historical context of pinball, including its past association with gambling and its resurgence as a hobby. A few users expressed interest in the technical aspects of pinball machine design and operation. The overall sentiment was positive, with many commenters appreciating the rediscovery of this older article. A couple noted the philosophical connections McPhee makes, linking pinball to broader life lessons about skill, chance, and persistence.
In the chaotic final days of the Vietnam War, South Vietnamese Air Force Major Buang-Ly loaded his wife, five children, and his mother onto a two-seat Cessna O-1 Bird Dog. Knowing Saigon was about to fall to the North Vietnamese, he desperately searched for the USS Midway. Locating the carrier, he dropped a note pleading for a clear deck and then skillfully landed the overloaded plane, a feat practically unheard of for such a small aircraft on a moving carrier. His daring act saved his family, and though the plane was pushed overboard to make room for other escaping helicopters, Ly's bravery became a symbol of resilience and desperation amidst the war's end.
HN commenters largely focused on the incredible feat of landing a Cessna O-1 on the USS Midway's deck, highlighting the pilot's skill and bravery given the plane's lack of tailhook and the small landing area. Some questioned the historical accuracy of the number of people onboard, citing conflicting accounts. Others discussed the chaos of the fall of Saigon and the desperation of refugees fleeing the communist regime, with some expressing sympathy for the pilot's plight while others debated the US's role in the Vietnam War and its aftermath. A few commenters shared personal anecdotes related to the evacuation or their own experiences with the O-1 aircraft, adding a personal dimension to the historical discussion. The logistics of getting the family off the carrier and the fate of the plane were also points of interest.
Summary of Comments ( 27 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43335679
HN commenters largely discuss the difficulty of delivering hard truths, particularly in professional settings. Some highlight the importance of framing, suggesting that focusing on shared goals and the benefits of honesty can make criticism more palatable. Others emphasize empathy and tact, recommending a focus on observable behaviors rather than character judgments. Several commenters note the importance of building trust beforehand, as criticism from a trusted source is more readily accepted. The power dynamics inherent in delivering criticism are also explored, with some arguing that managers have a responsibility to create a safe space for feedback. Finally, several users note the timeless nature of the advice in the original article, observing that these challenges remain relevant today.
The Hacker News post titled "How do we tell truths that might hurt? (1975)" links to an essay by Gerald M. Weinberg exploring the complexities of delivering difficult or uncomfortable truths. The discussion in the comments section is fairly robust, with several commenters engaging with the core ideas presented in Weinberg's essay.
Several commenters appreciate the essay's nuanced approach to truth-telling, acknowledging that it's not simply about blunt honesty but about considering the context, the recipient's capacity to process the information, and the potential consequences. One commenter highlights the importance of understanding the listener's "frame of reference" and tailoring the message accordingly, echoing Weinberg's emphasis on empathy and understanding. This commenter uses the analogy of a doctor delivering a difficult diagnosis; a skilled doctor will deliver the truth in a way that is both honest and supportive, considering the patient's emotional state.
Another commenter focuses on the concept of "egoless programming" mentioned in the essay, extending it beyond the realm of software development to general communication. They argue that detaching one's ego from the message allows for more effective communication, as it reduces defensiveness and promotes a more open exchange of ideas. This aligns with Weinberg's argument that focusing on the problem, rather than assigning blame, is crucial for productive conversations.
The idea of "truths that might hurt" is also discussed in relation to power dynamics. One commenter points out that the power differential between the speaker and the listener significantly impacts how a message is received. They note that criticism from a superior can be particularly damaging, even if well-intentioned, highlighting the need for those in positions of power to be especially mindful of their communication style.
Furthermore, some commenters discuss the importance of feedback and its role in personal and professional growth. They acknowledge that receiving constructive criticism, even if painful, is essential for improvement. One comment emphasizes the value of creating a safe environment where individuals feel comfortable both giving and receiving feedback without fear of reprisal, suggesting that this fosters a culture of continuous improvement.
Finally, a few commenters offer specific examples of situations where they have struggled with delivering difficult truths, demonstrating the practical challenges of applying Weinberg's principles in real-life scenarios. These examples range from interpersonal relationships to professional settings, further illustrating the universality of the essay's themes.
In summary, the comments on the Hacker News post generally reflect a positive reception to Weinberg's essay. The discussion expands on the essay's core ideas, exploring the complexities of truth-telling in various contexts, including power dynamics, interpersonal relationships, and professional environments. The commenters largely agree with the importance of empathy, understanding, and creating safe spaces for open communication when delivering difficult truths.