The blog post discusses the challenges and benefits of using older software for children's learning. While newer educational software often boasts flashy features, older programs can offer a simpler, more focused learning experience without the distractions of modern interfaces and internet connectivity. The author describes their process of restoring vintage educational software onto modern hardware, highlighting the technical hurdles involved in making older operating systems and software compatible. Ultimately, the post advocates for considering older software as a viable option for providing a safe, distraction-free digital learning environment for children.
The article "TikTok Is Harming Children at an Industrial Scale" argues that TikTok's algorithm, designed for maximum engagement, exposes children to a constant stream of harmful content including highly sexualized videos, dangerous trends, and misinformation. This constant exposure, combined with the app's addictive nature, negatively impacts children's mental and physical health, contributing to anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and sleep deprivation. The author contends that while all social media poses risks, TikTok's unique design and algorithmic amplification of harmful content makes it particularly detrimental to children's well-being, calling it a public health crisis demanding urgent action. The article emphasizes that TikTok's negative impact is widespread and systematic, affecting children on an "industrial scale," hence the title.
Hacker News users discussed the potential harms of TikTok, largely agreeing with the premise of the linked article. Several commenters focused on the addictive nature of the algorithm and its potential negative impact on attention spans, particularly in children. Some highlighted the societal shift towards short-form, dopamine-driven content and the lack of critical thinking it encourages. Others pointed to the potential for exploitation and manipulation due to the vast data collection practices of TikTok. A few commenters mentioned the geopolitical implications of a Chinese-owned app having access to such a large amount of user data, while others discussed the broader issue of social media addiction and its effects on mental health. A minority expressed skepticism about the severity of the problem or suggested that TikTok is no worse than other social media platforms.
Discord is testing AI-powered age verification using a selfie and driver's license, partnering with Yoti, a digital identity company. This system aims to verify user age without storing government ID information on Discord's servers. While initially focused on ensuring compliance with age-restricted content, like servers designated 18+, this move signifies a potential broader shift in online age verification moving away from traditional methods and towards AI-powered solutions for a more streamlined and potentially privacy-preserving approach.
Hacker News users discussed the privacy implications of Discord's new age verification system using Yoti's face scanning technology. Several commenters expressed concerns about the potential for misuse and abuse of the collected biometric data, questioning Yoti's claims of data minimization and security. Some suggested alternative methods like credit card verification or government IDs, while others debated the efficacy and necessity of age verification online. The discussion also touched upon the broader trend of increased online surveillance and the potential for this technology to be adopted by other platforms. Some commenters highlighted the "slippery slope" argument, fearing this is just the beginning of widespread biometric data collection. Several users criticized Discord's lack of transparency and communication with its users regarding this change.
The Guardian article explores the concerning possibility that online pornography algorithms, designed to maximize user engagement, might be inadvertently leading users down a path towards illegal and harmful content, including child sexual abuse material. While some argue that these algorithms simply cater to pre-existing desires, the article highlights the potential for the "related videos" function and autoplay features to gradually expose users to increasingly extreme content they wouldn't have sought out otherwise. It features the story of one anonymous user who claims to have been led down this path, raising questions about whether these algorithms are merely reflecting a demand or actively shaping it, potentially creating a new generation of individuals with illegal and harmful sexual interests.
Hacker News users discuss whether porn algorithms are creating or simply feeding a pre-existing generation of pedophiles. Some argue that algorithms, by recommending increasingly extreme content, can desensitize users and lead them down a path towards illegal material. Others contend that pedophilia is a pre-existing condition and algorithms merely surface this pre-existing inclination, providing a convenient scapegoat. Several commenters point to the lack of conclusive evidence to support either side and call for more research. The discussion also touches on the broader issue of content moderation and the responsibility of platforms in curating recommendations. A few users suggest that focusing solely on algorithms ignores other contributing societal factors. Finally, some express skepticism about the Guardian article's framing and question the author's agenda.
EFF warns that age verification laws, ostensibly designed to restrict access to adult content, pose a serious threat to online privacy. While initially targeting pornography sites, these laws are expanding to encompass broader online activities, such as accessing skincare products, potentially requiring users to upload government IDs to third-party verification services. This creates a massive database of sensitive personal information vulnerable to breaches, government surveillance, and misuse by private companies, effectively turning age verification into a backdoor for widespread online monitoring. The EFF argues that these laws are overbroad, ineffective at their stated goals, and disproportionately harm marginalized communities.
HN commenters express concerns about the slippery slope of age verification laws, starting with porn and potentially expanding to other online content and even everyday purchases. They argue that these laws normalize widespread surveillance and data collection, creating honeypots for hackers and potentially enabling government abuse. Several highlight the ineffectiveness of age gates, pointing to easy bypass methods and the likelihood of children accessing restricted content through other means. The chilling effect on free speech and the potential for discriminatory enforcement are also raised, with some commenters drawing parallels to authoritarian regimes. Some suggest focusing on better education and parental controls rather than restrictive legislation. The technical feasibility and privacy implications of various verification methods are debated, with skepticism towards relying on government IDs or private companies.
The "In Memoriam" post honors Ian McDonald, a key figure in the UK's push for the Online Safety Bill. A passionate advocate for protecting children online, McDonald tirelessly campaigned for legislation to hold tech companies accountable for harmful content. He tragically passed away before seeing the bill become law, but his dedication and expertise were instrumental in shaping it. The post highlights his significant contributions, emphasizing his deep understanding of the online world and his commitment to making it a safer place, particularly for vulnerable users. His work leaves a lasting legacy, and the Online Safety Bill stands as a testament to his unwavering efforts.
HN users discuss the UK's Online Safety Bill, expressing concerns about its impact on end-to-end encryption. Many see it as a significant threat to privacy and free speech, potentially leading to backdoors in messaging services and increased surveillance. Some commenters argue that the bill's aims, while ostensibly noble, are technically infeasible and will ultimately harm online safety rather than improve it. There's skepticism about the government's ability to effectively moderate online content and a belief that the bill will disproportionately affect smaller platforms. Several users highlight the chilling effect the bill could have on innovation and the potential for abuse by authoritarian regimes. Some also question the timing of the bill's implementation, suggesting it's a power grab.
Apple has removed its iCloud Advanced Data Protection feature, which offers end-to-end encryption for almost all iCloud data, from its beta software in the UK. This follows reported concerns from the UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) that the enhanced security measures would hinder law enforcement's ability to access data for investigations. Apple maintains that the feature will be available to UK users eventually, but hasn't provided a clear timeline for its reintroduction. While the feature remains available in other countries, this move raises questions about the balance between privacy and government access to data.
HN commenters largely agree that Apple's decision to pull its child safety features, specifically the client-side scanning of photos, is a positive outcome. Some believe Apple was pressured by the UK government's proposed changes to the Investigatory Powers Act, which would compel companies to disable security features if deemed a national security risk. Others suggest Apple abandoned the plan due to widespread criticism and technical challenges. A few express disappointment, feeling the feature had potential if implemented carefully, and worry about the implications for future child safety initiatives. The prevalence of false positives and the potential for governments to abuse the system were cited as major concerns. Some skepticism towards the UK government's motivations is also evident.
Widespread loneliness, exacerbated by social media and the pandemic, creates a vulnerability exploited by malicious actors. Lonely individuals are more susceptible to romance scams, disinformation, and extremist ideologies, posing a significant security risk. These scams not only cause financial and emotional devastation for victims but also provide funding for criminal organizations, some of which engage in activities that threaten national security. The article argues that addressing loneliness through social connection initiatives is crucial not just for individual well-being, but also for collective security, as it strengthens societal resilience against manipulation and exploitation.
Hacker News commenters largely agreed with the article's premise that loneliness increases vulnerability to scams. Several pointed out the manipulative tactics used by scammers prey on the desire for connection, highlighting how seemingly harmless initial interactions can escalate into significant financial and emotional losses. Some commenters shared personal anecdotes of loved ones falling victim to such scams, emphasizing the devastating impact. Others discussed the broader societal factors contributing to loneliness, including social media's role in creating superficial connections and the decline of traditional community structures. A few suggested potential solutions, such as promoting genuine social interaction and educating vulnerable populations about common scam tactics. The role of technology in both exacerbating loneliness and potentially mitigating it through platforms that foster authentic connection was also debated.
The UK government is pushing for a new law, the Investigatory Powers Act, that would compel tech companies like Apple to remove security features, including end-to-end encryption, if deemed necessary for national security investigations. This would effectively create a backdoor, allowing government access to user data without their knowledge or consent. Apple argues that this undermines user privacy and security, making everyone more vulnerable to hackers and authoritarian regimes. The law faces strong opposition from privacy advocates and tech experts who warn of its potential for abuse and chilling effects on free speech.
HN commenters express skepticism about the UK government's claims regarding the necessity of this order for national security, with several pointing out the hypocrisy of demanding backdoors while simultaneously promoting end-to-end encryption for their own communications. Some suggest this move is a dangerous precedent that could embolden other authoritarian regimes. Technical feasibility is also questioned, with some arguing that creating such a backdoor is impossible without compromising security for everyone. Others discuss the potential legal challenges Apple might pursue and the broader implications for user privacy globally. A few commenters raise concerns about the chilling effect this could have on whistleblowers and journalists.
This guide emphasizes minimizing digital traces for protesters through practical smartphone security advice. It recommends using a secondary, "burner" phone dedicated to protests, ideally a basic model without internet connectivity. If using a primary smartphone, strong passcodes/biometrics, full-disk encryption, and up-to-date software are crucial. Minimizing data collection involves disabling location services, microphone access for unnecessary apps, and using privacy-respecting alternatives to default apps like Signal for messaging and a privacy-focused browser. During protests, enabling airplane mode or using Faraday bags is advised. The guide also covers digital threat models, stressing the importance of awareness and preparedness for potential surveillance and data breaches.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and necessity of the guide's recommendations for protesters. Some questioned the threat model, arguing that most protesters wouldn't be targeted by sophisticated adversaries. Others pointed out that basic digital hygiene practices are beneficial for everyone, regardless of protest involvement. Several commenters offered additional tips, like using a burner phone or focusing on physical security. The effectiveness of GrapheneOS was debated, with some praising its security while others questioned its usability for average users. A few comments highlighted the importance of compartmentalization and using separate devices for different activities.
A phishing attack leveraged Google's URL shortener, g.co, to mask malicious links. The attacker sent emails appearing to be from a legitimate source, containing a g.co shortened link. This short link redirected to a fake Google login page designed to steal user credentials. Because the initial link displayed g.co, it bypassed suspicion and instilled a false sense of security, making the phishing attempt more effective. The post highlights the danger of trusting shortened URLs, even those from seemingly reputable services, and emphasizes the importance of carefully inspecting links before clicking.
HN users discuss a sophisticated phishing attack using g.co shortened URLs. Several express concern about Google's seeming inaction on the issue, despite reports. Some suggest solutions like automatically blocking known malicious short URLs or requiring explicit user confirmation before redirecting. Others question the practicality of such solutions given the vast scale of Google's services. The vulnerability of URL shorteners in general is highlighted, with some suggesting they should be avoided entirely due to the inherent security risks. The discussion also touches upon the user's role in security, advocating for caution and skepticism when encountering shortened URLs. Some users mention being successfully targeted by this attack, and the frustration of banks accepting screenshots of g.co links as proof of payment. The conversation emphasizes the ongoing tension between user convenience and security, and the difficulty of completely mitigating phishing risks.
Summary of Comments ( 18 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43747283
Hacker News users discussed the benefits and challenges of using old software for children's learning. Some highlighted the appeal of simpler interfaces and the potential for focused learning without distractions like ads or internet access. Others emphasized the importance of curated experiences, acknowledging that while some older software can be valuable, much of it is simply obsolete. Several commenters mentioned the difficulty of getting old software to run on modern hardware and operating systems, with suggestions like DOSBox and virtual machines offered as solutions. The idea of a curated repository of suitable older software was also raised, but concerns about copyright and the ongoing maintenance effort were also noted. A few users pointed out the educational value in teaching children how to deal with older technology and its limitations, viewing it as a form of digital literacy.
The Hacker News post titled "Restoring Old Software for Child Learning Safety" generated a moderate amount of discussion with a variety of perspectives on using older software for children's learning environments.
Several commenters focused on the practical challenges and potential drawbacks of the approach. One user highlighted the difficulty of maintaining older software and hardware, pointing out the scarcity of replacement parts and the expertise needed to keep them running. They also mentioned the potential security risks associated with running outdated software. Another commenter questioned the educational benefits, arguing that older software might not be as engaging or effective as modern learning tools designed with contemporary pedagogical principles in mind. The limited exposure to current technology could also put children at a disadvantage later on, they suggested. One user even jokingly compared it to training a pilot on a biplane.
Others expressed more positive views, emphasizing the potential advantages of older software. One commenter appreciated the simpler, less distracting nature of older programs, suggesting that this could foster deeper focus and learning. They argued that modern software often comes with unnecessary bloat and distractions that can hinder a child's learning experience. Another user brought up the value of learning to use command-line interfaces and gaining a deeper understanding of how computers work, which older software can facilitate. The potential for fostering problem-solving skills through troubleshooting was also mentioned.
The idea of curated environments and controlled exposure to technology resonated with some commenters. They acknowledged the potential benefits of limiting access to the wider internet and the constant stream of distractions it presents. One user discussed using Raspberry Pis with custom software installations to create a safe and focused learning environment for their child.
A few commenters shared their own experiences with using older software for educational purposes. One recounted their positive experiences with older educational games and software, emphasizing the educational value and engaging nature of these programs.
While there was no single overwhelmingly compelling comment, the discussion offered a nuanced exploration of the trade-offs involved in using older software for children's learning. The comments highlighted the potential benefits of simplicity, focus, and a deeper understanding of computing principles, while also acknowledging the challenges of maintenance, security risks, and potential educational limitations. The discussion ultimately reflected the diverse perspectives on balancing technological advancement with appropriate educational practices for children.