The Polish city of Warsaw is employing a biomonitoring system using eight freshwater mussels to continuously monitor the quality of its drinking water. Sensors attached to the mussels track their shell movements. If pollutants are present in the water, the mussels close their shells, triggering an alarm system that alerts water treatment plant operators to potential contamination. This real-time monitoring system provides a rapid, cost-effective, and natural way to detect changes in water quality before they impact human health.
Self-driving buses, operating in simpler, more controlled environments than robotaxis, are emerging as a potentially faster route to widespread autonomous vehicle adoption. These buses can navigate fixed routes with fewer unpredictable variables, making them easier to deploy and potentially build public trust in autonomous technology. While challenges like complex intersections and pedestrian interactions remain, successful pilot programs suggest that autonomous buses could not only improve public transit but also pave the way for wider acceptance and eventual expansion of self-driving technology to personal vehicles.
HN commenters are generally skeptical of the claims made in the article about the potential of autonomous buses. Several point out the limitations of current self-driving technology, particularly in complex environments and unpredictable weather. Some highlight the "last mile" problem and doubt that these buses offer a significant advantage over existing public transit. Others question the economic viability, suggesting the cost and maintenance of these specialized vehicles might outweigh the benefits. A few commenters bring up safety concerns and the potential for accidents, referencing previous incidents involving autonomous vehicles. There's also discussion of the regulatory hurdles and public acceptance challenges that need to be overcome. While some express a degree of optimism, the overall sentiment appears to be cautious pessimism about the near-term impact of autonomous buses.
Summary of Comments ( 57 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42915113
HN commenters were generally impressed with the mussel-based water quality monitoring system, calling it "clever" and "elegant." Some expressed concern about the mussels' welfare, questioning whether the system was cruel or if it stressed the animals. Others discussed the potential for false positives/negatives due to factors beyond pollutants, like temperature changes. A few pointed out that similar biomonitoring systems already exist, using organisms like clams and fish, and that this wasn't a novel concept. Several users highlighted the importance of quick detection and response to contamination events, suggesting this system could be valuable in that regard. Finally, some questioned the scalability and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional methods.
The Hacker News post titled "Polish city is using mussels to monitor water quality (2020)" has a moderate number of comments, sparking a discussion around the practicality, effectiveness, and history of using bivalves for biomonitoring.
Several commenters point out that this practice isn't novel. One commenter mentions a similar system used in Warsaw for decades, highlighting the long-standing understanding of mussels' sensitivity to pollutants. This historical context is further emphasized by another commenter who notes the use of mussels for monitoring water quality in London's water supply as far back as the early 20th century. They even provide a link to a research paper detailing the historical usage and sensitivity of mussels in detecting heavy metals and other contaminants.
The discussion also delves into the technicalities of such biomonitoring systems. One commenter questions the specific mechanism triggering the closure of the mussels' shells, wondering if it's a reaction to pollutants or simply the presence of particulate matter in the water. Another user responds, explaining that while the article doesn't provide explicit details, similar systems often rely on the cumulative behavior of multiple mussels. A significant deviation from the baseline behavior, like a simultaneous closure of a large percentage of mussels, triggers an alarm, suggesting a potential contamination event.
Some comments express skepticism about the efficacy of the system, particularly its susceptibility to false positives. One commenter points out the potential for natural events, like changes in water flow or temperature, to trigger the mussels' closing mechanism, leading to unnecessary alerts. Another commenter highlights the challenge of pinpointing the exact source of contamination based solely on the mussels' response. They suggest the system might be better suited as an early warning signal that then necessitates further investigation through traditional water quality testing methods.
Finally, the conversation touches on broader environmental themes. One commenter raises concerns about the ethical implications of using animals for such purposes, prompting a discussion about the potential stress experienced by the mussels. Another user counters this argument by suggesting that the mussels likely experience minimal discomfort and contribute significantly to safeguarding the water supply for both human and ecosystem health.