Waymo, Alphabet's self-driving unit, plans to expand its autonomous vehicle testing to over ten new US cities. Focusing on trucking and delivery services, Waymo will leverage its existing experience in Phoenix and San Francisco to gather data and refine its technology in diverse environments. This expansion aims to bolster the development and eventual commercial deployment of their autonomous driving systems for both passenger and freight transport.
Self-driving buses, operating in simpler, more controlled environments than robotaxis, are emerging as a potentially faster route to widespread autonomous vehicle adoption. These buses can navigate fixed routes with fewer unpredictable variables, making them easier to deploy and potentially build public trust in autonomous technology. While challenges like complex intersections and pedestrian interactions remain, successful pilot programs suggest that autonomous buses could not only improve public transit but also pave the way for wider acceptance and eventual expansion of self-driving technology to personal vehicles.
HN commenters are generally skeptical of the claims made in the article about the potential of autonomous buses. Several point out the limitations of current self-driving technology, particularly in complex environments and unpredictable weather. Some highlight the "last mile" problem and doubt that these buses offer a significant advantage over existing public transit. Others question the economic viability, suggesting the cost and maintenance of these specialized vehicles might outweigh the benefits. A few commenters bring up safety concerns and the potential for accidents, referencing previous incidents involving autonomous vehicles. There's also discussion of the regulatory hurdles and public acceptance challenges that need to be overcome. While some express a degree of optimism, the overall sentiment appears to be cautious pessimism about the near-term impact of autonomous buses.
Summary of Comments ( 26 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870056
HN commenters are generally skeptical of Waymo's expansion plans. Several point out that Waymo's current operational areas are geographically limited and relatively simple to navigate compared to more complex urban environments. Some question the viability of truly driverless technology in the near future, citing the ongoing need for human intervention and the difficulty of handling unpredictable situations. Others express concern about the safety implications of widespread autonomous vehicle deployment, particularly in densely populated areas. There's also discussion of the regulatory hurdles and public acceptance challenges that Waymo and other autonomous vehicle companies face. Finally, some commenters suggest Waymo's announcement is primarily a PR move designed to attract investment and maintain public interest.
The Hacker News post "Waymo to test its autonomous driving technology in over 10 new cities" has generated several comments discussing various aspects of Waymo's expansion and the broader autonomous vehicle landscape.
A significant thread discusses the challenges of scaling autonomous driving technology. One commenter points out the difficulty of handling "long tail" scenarios – unusual events that are difficult to predict and program for. They argue that true autonomy requires solving this problem, which may be further away than some believe. This sparks a discussion about the difference between Level 4 autonomy (requiring human intervention in some cases) and Level 5 (fully autonomous), with skepticism expressed about the feasibility of achieving Level 5 in the near future.
Another commenter questions the economic viability of robotaxis, suggesting that the cost of the technology and maintenance might outweigh the potential savings from eliminating human drivers. They also raise the issue of liability in accident scenarios. This concern is echoed by another user who wonders about the insurance implications of widespread autonomous vehicle deployment.
Several commenters express excitement about the potential benefits of autonomous vehicles, including increased safety, reduced traffic congestion, and improved accessibility for people who cannot drive. They also discuss the potential impact on urban planning and the transportation industry.
There's a brief discussion comparing Waymo's approach to Tesla's. One commenter suggests that Waymo's more cautious and geographically focused approach may be more successful in the long run than Tesla's more aggressive rollout of its Autopilot system.
A few commenters share anecdotal experiences with Waymo's vehicles in Phoenix, generally expressing positive impressions of the technology's performance.
Finally, some comments touch upon the regulatory and legal hurdles facing autonomous vehicle deployment, emphasizing the need for clear regulations and safety standards. One commenter notes the complexity of navigating different regulations across various jurisdictions, which could slow down the expansion of autonomous driving technology.