This paper presents a real-time algorithm for powered descent guidance, focusing on scenarios with non-convex constraints like obstacles or keep-out zones. It utilizes a novel Sequential Convex Programming (SCP) approach that reformulates the non-convex problem into a sequence of convex subproblems. These subproblems are solved efficiently using a custom interior-point method, enabling rapid trajectory generation suitable for online implementation. The algorithm's performance is validated through simulations of lunar landing scenarios demonstrating its ability to generate feasible and fuel-efficient trajectories while respecting complex constraints, even in the presence of disturbances. Furthermore, its computational speed is shown to be significantly faster than existing methods, making it a promising candidate for real-world powered descent applications.
The blog post "The Missing Mentoring Pillar" argues that mentorship focuses too heavily on career advancement and technical skills, neglecting the crucial aspect of personal development. It proposes a third pillar of mentorship, alongside career and technical guidance, focused on helping mentees navigate the emotional and psychological challenges of their field. This includes addressing issues like imposter syndrome, handling criticism, building resilience, and managing stress. By incorporating this "personal" pillar, mentorship becomes more holistic, supporting individuals in developing not just their skills, but also their capacity to thrive in a demanding and often stressful environment. This ultimately leads to more well-rounded, resilient, and successful professionals.
HN commenters generally agree with the article's premise about the importance of explicit mentoring in open source, highlighting how difficult it can be to break into contributing. Some shared personal anecdotes of positive and negative mentoring experiences, emphasizing the impact a good mentor can have. Several suggested concrete ways to improve mentorship, such as structured programs, better documentation, and more welcoming communities. A few questioned the scalability of one-on-one mentoring and proposed alternatives like improved documentation and clearer contribution guidelines. One commenter pointed out the potential for abuse in mentor-mentee relationships, emphasizing the need for clear codes of conduct.
Summary of Comments ( 3 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43735960
HN users discuss the practical applications and limitations of the proposed powered descent guidance algorithm. Some express skepticism about its real-time performance on resource-constrained flight computers, particularly given the computational complexity introduced by the non-convex optimization. Others question the novelty of the approach, comparing it to existing methods and highlighting the challenges of verifying its robustness in unpredictable real-world scenarios like sudden wind gusts. The discussion also touches on the importance of accurate terrain data and the potential benefits for pinpoint landing accuracy, particularly in challenging environments like the lunar south pole. Several commenters ask for clarification on specific aspects of the algorithm and its implementation.
The Hacker News post titled "A Real-Time Algorithm for Non-Convex Powered Descent Guidance [pdf]" has a modest number of comments, focusing primarily on the practical applications and limitations of the proposed algorithm. There isn't a large, sprawling discussion, but the existing comments offer some interesting perspectives.
One commenter highlights the difficulty of real-time trajectory optimization, particularly in the context of unpredictable events like engine failures. They suggest this algorithm could be valuable for handling such contingencies, enabling rapid recalculation of a safe landing trajectory. This comment focuses on the robustness and adaptability of the approach in challenging scenarios.
Another comment chain discusses the algorithm's potential relevance to SpaceX landings. One participant questions whether SpaceX uses convex optimization for their landings, implying that a non-convex approach like the one proposed in the paper might offer advantages in terms of handling more complex constraints or optimizing for different parameters. Another user responds, suggesting that SpaceX likely utilizes some form of convex optimization, given its computational efficiency and the relatively predictable nature of their landing scenarios (barring unforeseen events). This exchange highlights the trade-offs between computational complexity and the ability to handle more general scenarios.
A further comment specifically mentions the challenge posed by non-convexity in optimization problems, emphasizing that local optima can trap traditional algorithms. They express interest in the paper's approach to overcoming this issue, indicating that finding globally optimal or near-optimal solutions in a non-convex space is a significant contribution.
Finally, one commenter notes the paper's focus on powered descent, contrasting it with ballistic entry, and highlighting the applicability of the algorithm to situations where continuous thrust control is available. This clarifies the specific domain of the research and its relevance to powered landing scenarios.
In summary, the comments on Hacker News don't delve deeply into the technical intricacies of the algorithm, but rather discuss its potential real-world implications, limitations, and the challenges inherent in the problem it addresses. They offer a valuable perspective on the practical significance of the research, complementing the theoretical content of the paper itself.