The Guardian's US edition thrives despite its open, no-paywall model by focusing on a membership program and philanthropic support. Instead of restricting content, they cultivate reader relationships, emphasizing voluntary contributions and highlighting the public service value of their journalism. This strategy allows them to maintain a large audience, enhancing their influence and attracting advertising revenue, while donations and memberships provide a significant and growing portion of their funding. They prioritize international news and investigative reporting, differentiating themselves from other outlets and appealing to a loyal readership who value their unique perspective.
Jeff Atwood, co-founder of Stack Overflow and Discourse, discusses his philanthropic plans in a CNBC interview. Driven by a desire to address wealth inequality and contribute meaningfully, Atwood intends to give away millions of dollars over the next five years, primarily focusing on supporting effective altruism organizations like GiveWell and 80,000 Hours. He believes strongly in evidence-based philanthropy and emphasizes the importance of maximizing the impact of donations. Atwood acknowledges the complexity of giving effectively and plans to learn and adapt his approach as he explores different giving strategies. He contrasts his approach with traditional philanthropy, highlighting his desire for measurable results and a focus on organizations tackling global issues like poverty and existential risks.
Hacker News users discuss Jeff Atwood's philanthropy plans with a mix of skepticism and cautious optimism. Some question the effectiveness of his chosen approach, suggesting direct cash transfers or focusing on systemic issues would be more impactful. Others express concern about potential unintended consequences or the difficulty of measuring impact. A few commend his willingness to give back and experiment with different approaches, while others simply note Atwood's historical involvement in coding communities and the evolution of Stack Overflow. Several users also mention effective altruism and debate its merits, reflecting a general interest in maximizing the impact of charitable giving. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities and nuances of philanthropy, especially in the tech world.
Summary of Comments ( 350 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43511529
Hacker News commenters discuss The Guardian's success with a voluntary contribution model, expressing skepticism about its long-term viability and replicability. Some doubt the claimed 30% conversion rate for recurring contributions and suggest it's inflated or unsustainable. Several attribute The Guardian's success to a unique combination of factors, including its established brand, left-leaning audience, and reliance on foundation grants, arguing it's not a model easily replicated by other publications. Others point to the importance of clear communication and framing of the contribution request, contrasting The Guardian's approach with more aggressive paywall strategies. Some commenters also highlight the potential downsides of relying on reader donations, including vulnerability to shifts in public sentiment and potential bias towards donor interests. A few offer alternative models or suggestions for improvement, such as tiered memberships or focusing on specific niche content.
The Hacker News post "The Guardian flourishes without a paywall" has generated a substantial discussion with a variety of perspectives on the Guardian's business model and the broader landscape of online media.
Several commenters express skepticism about the sustainability of the Guardian's model. Some question the article's claim of "flourishing," pointing to the Guardian's history of financial losses and reliance on substantial philanthropic support from the Scott Trust. They argue that this reliance on philanthropy masks the true cost of running a large news organization and isn't a replicable model for most publications. Others raise concerns about the potential downsides of relying on donations, such as potential influence from donors and the difficulty of maintaining consistent funding in the long term. One commenter points out the unique circumstances of the Guardian's ownership structure, noting that its non-profit status and the Scott Trust's backing allow it to operate with a different financial calculus than publicly traded companies.
Another thread of discussion centers around the effectiveness of the Guardian's membership and contribution model. While some commenters applaud the voluntary contribution approach as a more democratic and accessible model for readers, others express doubts about its ability to generate substantial revenue compared to traditional subscription models. One commenter highlights the "psychology of free" and suggests that most users will simply consume the content without contributing, even if they appreciate it.
Several users discuss the broader implications of the Guardian's model for the future of journalism. Some view it as a potential path forward for high-quality journalism in a digital age, emphasizing the importance of free access to information. Others are more pessimistic, arguing that the Guardian's model is an exception, not the rule, and that most news organizations will need to find sustainable subscription or other revenue models to survive.
A few commenters delve into the specifics of the Guardian's content and audience. Some praise the quality of its journalism, particularly its international coverage, and suggest that this high-quality content is a key driver of reader support. Others critique its perceived political bias, arguing that it influences both its coverage and its audience.
Finally, several comments focus on alternative business models for news organizations. Some mention the potential of micropayments, while others discuss the possibility of government subsidies or other forms of public funding for journalism. The overall tone of the discussion is a mix of cautious optimism about the Guardian's model and concern about the broader challenges facing the news industry. The commenters generally agree on the importance of finding sustainable ways to fund quality journalism but differ on the best approach to achieve that goal.