Inherited wealth is increasingly rivaling earned income in importance, especially in advanced economies. As populations age and accumulated wealth grows, inheritances are becoming larger and more frequent, flowing disproportionately to the already wealthy. This exacerbates inequality, entrenches existing class structures, and potentially undermines the meritocratic ideal of social mobility based on hard work. The article argues that governments need to address this trend through policies like inheritance taxes, not just to raise revenue, but to promote fairness and opportunity across generations.
Paul Graham argues that the primary way people get rich now is by creating wealth, specifically through starting or joining early-stage startups. This contrasts with older models of wealth acquisition like inheritance or rent-seeking. Building a successful company, particularly in technology, allows founders and early employees to own equity that appreciates significantly as the company grows. This wealth creation is driven by building things people want, leveraging technology for scale, and operating within a relatively open market where new companies can compete with established ones. This model is distinct from merely getting a high-paying job, which provides a good income but rarely leads to substantial wealth creation in the same way equity ownership can.
Hacker News users discussed Paul Graham's essay on contemporary wealth creation, largely agreeing with his premise that starting a startup is the most likely path to significant riches. Some commenters pointed out nuances, like the importance of equity versus salary, and the role of luck and timing. Several highlighted the increasing difficulty of bootstrapping due to the prevalence of venture capital, while others debated the societal implications of wealth concentration through startups. A few challenged Graham's focus on tech, suggesting alternative routes like real estate or skilled trades, albeit with potentially lower ceilings. The thread also explored the tension between pursuing wealth and other life goals, with some arguing that focusing solely on riches can be counterproductive.
Jeff Atwood, co-founder of Stack Overflow and Discourse, discusses his philanthropic plans in a CNBC interview. Driven by a desire to address wealth inequality and contribute meaningfully, Atwood intends to give away millions of dollars over the next five years, primarily focusing on supporting effective altruism organizations like GiveWell and 80,000 Hours. He believes strongly in evidence-based philanthropy and emphasizes the importance of maximizing the impact of donations. Atwood acknowledges the complexity of giving effectively and plans to learn and adapt his approach as he explores different giving strategies. He contrasts his approach with traditional philanthropy, highlighting his desire for measurable results and a focus on organizations tackling global issues like poverty and existential risks.
Hacker News users discuss Jeff Atwood's philanthropy plans with a mix of skepticism and cautious optimism. Some question the effectiveness of his chosen approach, suggesting direct cash transfers or focusing on systemic issues would be more impactful. Others express concern about potential unintended consequences or the difficulty of measuring impact. A few commend his willingness to give back and experiment with different approaches, while others simply note Atwood's historical involvement in coding communities and the evolution of Stack Overflow. Several users also mention effective altruism and debate its merits, reflecting a general interest in maximizing the impact of charitable giving. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities and nuances of philanthropy, especially in the tech world.
Summary of Comments ( 546 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43213143
HN commenters largely agree with the premise that inherited wealth is increasingly important for financial success. Several highlight the difficulty of accumulating wealth through work alone, especially given rising housing costs and stagnant wages. Some discuss the societal implications, expressing concern over decreased social mobility and the potential for inherited wealth to exacerbate inequality. Others offer personal anecdotes illustrating the impact of inheritance, both positive and negative. The role of luck and privilege is a recurring theme, with some arguing that meritocracy is a myth and that inherited advantages play a larger role than often acknowledged. A few commenters point out potential flaws in the Economist's analysis, questioning the data or suggesting alternative interpretations.
The Hacker News post "Inheriting is becoming nearly as important as working" sparked a lively discussion with a variety of perspectives on the increasing role of inheritance in wealth accumulation. Several commenters agreed with the premise, pointing to the rising cost of living, particularly housing, and stagnant wages making it nearly impossible for younger generations to amass wealth at the same rate as their predecessors. They argued that inheritance is becoming a necessary leg up, not just a bonus, for many to achieve financial stability, let alone prosperity. The concept of "unearned wealth" and its societal implications were also debated.
Some users challenged the article's assertions, questioning the methodology and data presented. They argued that the article oversimplified a complex issue and didn't adequately account for factors like differing savings rates, investment strategies, and entrepreneurial endeavors. One commenter suggested that the article focused too much on Western economies and overlooked the global picture.
A significant portion of the discussion revolved around the fairness and ethical implications of inherited wealth. Some commenters advocated for policy changes, such as higher inheritance taxes, to address wealth inequality and promote social mobility. They argued that inherited wealth perpetuates a system where opportunities and outcomes are heavily influenced by family background rather than merit. Others defended inheritance as a legitimate form of intergenerational wealth transfer, emphasizing the importance of family support and the right to bequeath assets to loved ones.
The discussion also touched upon the broader economic and social consequences of rising wealth inequality, including its potential impact on social cohesion, political stability, and economic growth. Several commenters expressed concerns about the long-term effects of a society where inherited wealth plays such a significant role in determining life outcomes.
Finally, a few commenters shared personal anecdotes about their own experiences with inheritance, offering nuanced perspectives on the emotional and financial complexities involved. Some described the relief and opportunities afforded by inheritance, while others reflected on the challenges and responsibilities that come with it.