Revolt is a free and open-source alternative to Discord, offering a similar feature set with a focus on user privacy and community control. It features text and voice channels, direct messaging, file sharing, rich text editing, and voice chat, all hosted on its own servers. Revolt aims to provide a transparent and extensible platform, allowing users to self-host or contribute to its development. Its client is available on desktop and web, with mobile apps planned for the future. The project prioritizes community involvement and customization, giving users more control over their communication experience.
DM is a lightweight, unofficial Discord client designed to run on older Windows operating systems like Windows 95, 98, ME, and newer versions. Built using the Delphi programming language, it leverages Discord's web API to provide basic chat functionality, including sending and receiving messages, joining and leaving servers, and displaying user lists. While not offering the full feature set of the official Discord client, DM prioritizes minimal resource usage and compatibility with older hardware.
Hacker News users discuss the Discord client for older Windows systems, primarily focusing on its novelty and technical ingenuity. Several express admiration for the developer's skill in making Discord, a complex modern application, function on such outdated operating systems. Some question the practical use cases, while others highlight the potential value for preserving access to communities on older hardware or for specific niche applications like retro gaming setups. There's also discussion around the technical challenges involved, including handling dependencies and the limitations of older APIs. Some users express concern about security implications, given the lack of updates for these older OSes. Finally, the unconventional choice of Pascal/Delphi for the project sparks some interest and debate about the suitability of the language.
A security vulnerability, dubbed "0-click," allowed remote attackers to deanonymize users of various communication platforms, including Signal, Discord, and others, by simply sending them a message. Exploiting flaws in how these applications handled media files, specifically embedded video previews, the attacker could execute arbitrary code on the target's device without any interaction from the user. This code could then access sensitive information like the user's IP address, potentially revealing their identity. While the vulnerability affected the Electron framework underlying these apps, rather than the platforms themselves, the impact was significant as it bypassed typical security measures and allowed complete deanonymization with no user interaction. This vulnerability has since been patched.
Hacker News commenters discuss the practicality and impact of the described 0-click deanonymization attack. Several express skepticism about its real-world applicability, noting the attacker needs to be on the same local network, which significantly limits its usefulness compared to other attack vectors. Some highlight the importance of the disclosure despite these limitations, as it raises awareness of potential vulnerabilities. The discussion also touches on the technical details of the exploit, with some questioning the "0-click" designation given the requirement for the target to join a group call. Others point out the responsibility of Electron, the framework used by the affected apps, for not sandboxing UDP sockets effectively, and debate the trade-offs between security and performance. A few commenters discuss potential mitigations and the broader implications for user privacy in online communication platforms.
Summary of Comments ( 264 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43277918
Hacker News users discussed Revolt's potential as a Discord alternative, praising its open-source nature and commitment to user privacy. Several commenters expressed interest in self-hosting, viewing it as a significant advantage. Some questioned Revolt's long-term viability and ability to compete with Discord's network effects and feature set, while others pointed to Matrix as a more established alternative. Concerns were also raised about moderation challenges and potential abuse on a decentralized platform. A few users shared their positive experiences using Revolt, highlighting its performance and clean interface, though acknowledging it's still under development. Overall, the comments reflect cautious optimism about Revolt, with many hoping it succeeds but recognizing the hurdles it faces.
The Hacker News post titled "Revolt: Open-Source Alternative to Discord" sparked a discussion with a moderate number of comments, primarily focusing on Revolt's potential, its comparison to Discord and Matrix, and the challenges of building a successful open-source community platform.
Several commenters expressed interest in Revolt as a viable alternative to Discord, praising its open-source nature and potential for greater user control and privacy. Some voiced frustration with Discord's perceived shift towards commercialization and centralization, seeing Revolt as a promising solution. However, many also acknowledged the significant network effect enjoyed by Discord, questioning whether Revolt could realistically compete with such an established player.
A recurring theme in the discussion was the comparison between Revolt and Matrix. Some commenters argued that Matrix, with its decentralized architecture and existing user base, offered a more robust and mature alternative to Discord. They questioned the need for another similar platform, suggesting that efforts might be better spent contributing to the Matrix ecosystem. Others countered this by pointing to perceived usability issues with Matrix and its steeper learning curve, arguing that Revolt's simpler, more Discord-like interface could attract a wider audience.
The challenges of building a thriving community were also discussed, with commenters emphasizing the importance of moderation, feature development, and user experience. Some expressed concerns about potential moderation difficulties and the risk of Revolt becoming a haven for undesirable communities if not managed carefully. Others highlighted the need for consistent development and a clear roadmap to build trust and attract users.
Several technical aspects of Revolt were also touched upon, including its use of technologies like Rust and Postgres, with some commenters praising these choices while others raised questions about scalability and performance.
Overall, the comments reflected a mixture of cautious optimism and pragmatic skepticism about Revolt's prospects. While acknowledging its potential and the appeal of an open-source alternative to Discord, many commenters recognized the significant hurdles faced by any new platform attempting to compete in this space. The discussion highlighted the importance of community building, user experience, and careful consideration of existing alternatives like Matrix.