A new study suggests that daily consumption of omega-3 fatty acids may slow down the biological aging process. Researchers analyzed blood samples and DNA methylation data from over 2,600 participants and found that those with higher levels of omega-3s had slower epigenetic aging rates across three different biological clocks. This correlation persisted even after adjusting for lifestyle factors and other dietary habits. While the study demonstrates a link, not a causal relationship, it supports previous research suggesting the potential health benefits of omega-3s and highlights the possibility of using them to promote healthy aging.
Greenland sharks, inhabiting the frigid Arctic waters, are the longest-lived vertebrates known to science, potentially reaching lifespans of over 400 years. Radiocarbon dating of their eye lenses revealed this astonishing longevity. Their slow growth rate, late sexual maturity (around 150 years old), and the cold, deep-sea environment contribute to their extended lives. While their diet remains somewhat mysterious, they are known scavengers and opportunistic hunters, consuming fish, seals, and even polar bears. Their flesh contains a neurotoxin that causes "shark drunk" when consumed, historically making it useful for sled dog food after a detoxification process. The Greenland shark's exceptional longevity provides a unique window into past centuries and offers scientists opportunities to study aging and long-term environmental changes.
HN commenters discuss the Greenland shark's incredibly long lifespan, with several expressing fascination and awe. Some question the accuracy of the age determination methods, particularly radiocarbon dating, while others delve into the implications of such a long life for understanding aging and evolution. A few commenters mention other long-lived organisms, like certain trees and clams, for comparison. The potential impacts of climate change on these slow-growing, long-lived creatures are also raised as a concern. Several users share additional information about the shark's biology and behavior, including its slow movement, unusual diet, and symbiotic relationship with bioluminescent copepods. Finally, some commenters note the article's vivid descriptions and engaging storytelling.
Summary of Comments ( 9 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42992729
Hacker News users discussed the study's limitations, such as the small sample size (10 participants) and the short duration (6 months). Several commenters expressed skepticism about the reliability of such a small study, particularly given the complex relationship between diet and health. Some also pointed to the potential for publication bias and the financial incentives behind promoting omega-3 supplements. The lack of a control group and the subjective nature of some measurements (like "biological age") were also criticized. A few users mentioned personal experiences with omega-3 supplementation, with mixed results. The overall sentiment leans cautious, emphasizing the need for larger, more rigorous studies to confirm these preliminary findings.
The Hacker News post titled "Daily omega-3 fatty acids may help human organs stay young" links to a Medical Xpress article about a study on the potential benefits of omega-3s. The discussion on Hacker News is relatively brief, containing only a handful of comments, and doesn't delve deeply into the study's findings. It doesn't offer a highly compelling or diverse range of perspectives.
One commenter expresses skepticism towards the study, pointing out the frequent contradictions in nutritional research and advising caution in interpreting the results. They highlight the financial incentives behind such studies, suggesting potential bias.
Another commenter focuses on the difficulty of determining optimal omega-3 dosage and the potential adverse effects of excessive intake. They emphasize the importance of consulting with a healthcare professional before significantly altering omega-3 intake.
A third comment shifts the focus to the potential benefits of omega-3s for cognitive function, mentioning a personal experience of improved mental clarity after increasing omega-3 consumption. They also touch on the importance of the omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.
The remaining comments are very short and less substantive, with one simply questioning the efficacy of omega-3 supplements compared to dietary sources, and another briefly mentioning potential kidney stone risks associated with high doses of certain omega-3 formulations. There is no extended discussion or debate on the topic.