Scientists at Berkeley Lab have developed an artificial leaf device that uses sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to produce valuable chemicals. This advanced artificial photosynthesis system employs a copper-based catalyst within a light absorber to convert CO2 into ethylene, acetate, and formate, feedstocks for plastics, adhesives, and pharmaceuticals. It offers a more efficient and sustainable alternative to traditional manufacturing methods, as well as CO2 removal from the atmosphere.
Researchers at the University of Stuttgart have developed a bioinspired adaptive shading system that responds to changing weather conditions without electricity. Mimicking the pine cone's humidity-driven scale movement, the system uses a bilayer material composed of wood veneer and a bacterial cellulose layer. When humidity increases, such as during rain, the cellulose swells, causing the shading elements to close. Conversely, in dry conditions, the cellulose shrinks, opening the elements and allowing light to pass through. This passive system offers a sustainable and energy-free solution for climate control in buildings, reducing the need for energy-intensive air conditioning and heating.
Hacker News users discussed the practicality and scalability of the bioinspired shading system. Several commenters questioned the cost-effectiveness compared to existing solutions like motorized shades or electrochromic glass, expressing skepticism about its real-world application. Others pointed out potential maintenance issues with the delicate pine cone-inspired design, especially concerning dust accumulation and insect infestations. The longevity and durability in various weather conditions were also questioned. Some appreciated the elegance of the biomimicry, but the overall sentiment leaned towards cautious interest with significant concerns about practical implementation. A few suggested exploring alternative materials beyond wood for improved durability and scalability.
Summary of Comments ( 79 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43788053
HN commenters express cautious optimism about the "artificial leaf" technology. Some highlight the importance of scaling production and reducing costs to make it commercially viable, comparing it to other promising lab demonstrations that haven't translated into real-world impact. Others question the specific "valuable chemicals" produced and their potential applications, emphasizing the need for more detail. A few point out the intermittent nature of solar power as a potential hurdle and suggest exploring integration with other renewable energy sources for continuous production. Several users also raise concerns about the environmental impact of the process, particularly regarding the sourcing and disposal of materials used in the artificial leaf. Overall, the sentiment is one of interest but with a healthy dose of pragmatism about the challenges ahead.
The Hacker News post discussing the Berkeley Lab's artificial leaf development has generated a moderate number of comments, mostly focusing on the practical applications and potential impact of this technology. Several commenters express cautious optimism, acknowledging the exciting possibilities while also highlighting the hurdles that need to be overcome before widespread adoption.
A recurring theme is the comparison to previous announcements of similar technologies, with some users pointing out that "artificial photosynthesis" has been a research area for a long time, and wondering what makes this particular breakthrough different or more promising. They question whether this version addresses the scalability and cost-effectiveness issues that have plagued past attempts. Some express skepticism about the claimed efficiency and the economic viability of scaling up production.
Some commenters delve into the specifics of the chemical processes involved, discussing the challenges of separating and purifying the produced chemicals, as well as the energy requirements for these processes. They raise concerns about the potential environmental impact, particularly regarding the source of the CO2 used in the process and the overall lifecycle assessment of the technology.
Others focus on the potential applications, mentioning the possibility of decentralized chemical production, reduced reliance on fossil fuels, and the creation of more sustainable supply chains. They see the potential for this technology to contribute to addressing climate change by providing a carbon-neutral way to produce valuable chemicals. There is also discussion about the specific chemicals mentioned in the article (ethylene, propylene, and 1-butanol) and their industrial uses.
A few commenters offer more speculative thoughts, imagining the future implications of this technology, such as its potential use in space exploration or in creating self-sustaining closed-loop systems.
While excitement about the potential of the technology is palpable, the overall tone remains grounded in pragmatism, with many users emphasizing the need for further research and development before declaring this a true breakthrough. Several call for more detailed information about the efficiency, cost, and scalability of the process before drawing definitive conclusions.