Ron Garrett reflects on six failed startup attempts, rejecting the label of "failure" and instead focusing on the valuable lessons learned. He emphasizes the importance of choosing the right co-founder, validating ideas early and often, building a minimum viable product (MVP) quickly, and iterating based on user feedback. Marketing and distribution proved crucial, and while passion is essential, it must be coupled with a realistic market and sustainable business model. Ultimately, he learned that "failing fast" and adapting are key to entrepreneurial growth, viewing each setback as a stepping stone toward future success.
Ron Garrett, in a reflective and deeply personal blog post titled "I am (not) a failure: Lessons learned from six failed startup attempts," chronicles his entrepreneurial journey, marked by not one, not two, but six unsuccessful startup ventures. He meticulously dissects each experience, not to dwell on the sting of failure, but rather to extract valuable insights and wisdom gained through the crucible of repeated entrepreneurial endeavors.
Garrett commences his narrative by establishing a crucial distinction: the separation of the individual from the outcome of their ventures. He argues vehemently against conflating the failure of a business with the failure of the entrepreneur behind it. This crucial separation forms the philosophical bedrock of his post, allowing him to objectively analyze his experiences without succumbing to self-defeating negativity.
He then proceeds to systematically examine each of his six failed startups, providing a concise yet detailed overview of each venture’s unique circumstances. This includes the nature of the business, the problems it aimed to solve, the strategies employed, and ultimately, the contributing factors leading to its demise. From a venture involving a SaaS product for managing construction projects, to a platform connecting local businesses with consumers, the diversity of his attempts underscores a persistent drive to innovate and create.
Throughout this examination, recurring themes emerge. Garrett identifies critical lessons learned across these varied experiences, highlighting crucial aspects of startup success, such as the paramount importance of validating ideas rigorously before substantial investment, the necessity of assembling a highly competent and dedicated team, and the often-underestimated power of effective marketing and sales strategies. He specifically emphasizes the need for a "product-market fit," arguing that a brilliant idea without a receptive market is destined for failure. Furthermore, he reflects on the significant impact of external factors, such as market timing and competition, demonstrating an understanding of the complex interplay of forces that influence a startup’s trajectory.
Beyond these practical business lessons, Garrett also delves into the emotional and psychological toll of repeated setbacks. He candidly discusses the feelings of disappointment, self-doubt, and the temptation to give up that inevitably accompany entrepreneurial failure. However, he emphasizes the importance of resilience, perseverance, and the ability to learn from mistakes. This emphasis on the growth mindset, on viewing failures as learning opportunities rather than definitive pronouncements of one’s abilities, is central to his narrative.
Ultimately, Garrett concludes his post not with a tale of defeat, but with a message of hope and renewed determination. He frames his experiences not as failures, but as valuable learning experiences that have shaped him into a more seasoned and resilient entrepreneur. He emphasizes the ongoing nature of his entrepreneurial journey, suggesting that these six ventures, while unsuccessful individually, have collectively contributed to a richer understanding of the startup landscape, ultimately preparing him for future endeavors. He conveys a sense of optimism, looking forward to applying the accumulated wisdom gleaned from his past experiences to achieve future success.
Summary of Comments ( 210 )
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42771676
HN commenters largely praised the author's vulnerability and honesty in sharing their startup failures. Several highlighted the importance of recognizing sunk cost fallacy and knowing when to pivot or quit. Some questioned the framing of the experiences as "failures," arguing that valuable lessons and growth emerged from them. A few commenters shared their own similar experiences, emphasizing the emotional toll of startup struggles. Others offered practical advice, such as validating ideas early and prioritizing distribution. The prevailing sentiment was one of empathy and encouragement, acknowledging the difficulty of entrepreneurship and the courage it takes to try repeatedly.
The Hacker News post titled "I am (not) a failure: Lessons learned from six failed startup attempts" generated a fair amount of discussion, with several commenters sharing their own experiences and perspectives on startup failure.
A compelling thread emerged around the definition of "failure." Several commenters challenged the author's framing of his experiences as "failures," arguing that valuable learning and growth came from each attempt. One commenter pointed out that the author gained significant experience, including learning to code, building and launching products, and navigating the complexities of running a business. These were framed not as evidence of failure, but as significant accomplishments that contribute to future success. This sparked further discussion on the importance of reframing "failure" as "learning" and focusing on the iterative nature of entrepreneurship. Another commenter echoed this sentiment, highlighting the value of the journey itself, regardless of the outcome. They emphasized that the skills and knowledge acquired through these experiences are assets, not liabilities.
Another recurring theme in the comments was the importance of validating ideas early and often. Commenters discussed the tendency of founders to become emotionally attached to their ideas, which can make it difficult to objectively assess their viability. One commenter shared a personal anecdote about clinging to a failing project for too long, emphasizing the need to be willing to pivot or abandon an idea when the data suggests it's not working. Others suggested strategies for early validation, such as conducting thorough market research and seeking feedback from potential customers.
Several commenters also offered practical advice for aspiring entrepreneurs. One emphasized the importance of building a strong network of mentors and advisors who can provide guidance and support. Another suggested focusing on solving a real problem for a specific target audience, rather than getting caught up in the hype of a particular technology or trend.
While some commenters praised the author's vulnerability and honesty in sharing his experiences, others expressed skepticism about the value of learning from repeated failures. One commenter argued that while some lessons can be learned from failure, consistently failing to launch a successful startup might indicate a deeper issue with the founder's approach or decision-making process. This prompted a counter-argument that the number of attempts is less important than the quality of the learning and the founder's ability to adapt and improve with each iteration.
Finally, there was some discussion about the role of luck and timing in startup success. One commenter acknowledged the hard work and dedication involved in building a startup, but also pointed out that external factors, such as market conditions and competitor activity, can significantly impact the outcome. They suggested that entrepreneurs should be prepared for the unpredictable nature of the startup journey and focus on controlling what they can, while adapting to the inevitable challenges and uncertainties.